Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 12, 2016JGW-T1605101.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Advertisements

Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
Joshua Smith December 2003 Detector Characterization of Dual-Recycled GEO600 Joshua Smith for the GEO600 team.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
Summary of Suspension Configurations Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo March 18, 2015.
GEO600 Detector Status Harald Lück Max-Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Uni Hannover.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
New iKAGRA Configuration Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 11th KAGRA F2F (University of Tokyo) Feb 6, 2015.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
1 Virgo Commissioning Status WG1 meeting Potsdam, 21 st July 2006.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research Univ. of Tokyo Development of an RSE Interferometer Using the Third Harmonic Demodulation LIGO-G Z Osamu Miyakawa,
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
IKAGRA 初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo July 5, 2016JGW-T
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo May 9, 2016JGW-T
bKAGRA PSL Design Study
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Main Interferometer Subsystem
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Main Interferometer Meeting
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Presentation transcript:

Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 12, 2016JGW-T

3 km Michelson, mid-fringe lock input power to BS ~ 220 mW power at detection port (REFL) ~ 8 mW duration: Mar 25 9:00 JST - Mar 31 17:00 JST (from to in GPS time) duty cycle (lock): 85.2 % (IMC was 94.4 %) total locked time: hours longest lock: 3.6 hours (but typically ~ 30 minutes) strain sensitivity: ~3e Hz (~0.77pc for 1.4Msun-1.4Msun NS-NS inspiral range) Thanks to inputs from Y. Saito, T. Uchiyama, Y. Aso, O. Miyakawa, K. Kokeyama, K. Hayama, Y. Sasaki, M. Nakano, Y. Enomoto, T. Shimoda, etc …… Quick Facts 2

3 km Michelson, mid-fringe lock, UGF ~8 Hz suspended mirrors DC alignment controlled with oplevs Interferometer Configuration 3 Laser IFI IMC round-trip length: (5) m (klog #616)klog #616 finesse: 540(70) (klog #618)klog #618 mode matching ratio: 86.2 % (JGW-G )JGW-G (see klog # 991 for servo topology)klog # 991 PMC round-trip length: 0.4 m (IOO blog )IOO blog finesse: 197 (IOO blog )IOO blog mode matching ratio: 75 % (IOO blog )IOO blog PR2 PR3 BS ETMY ETMX temp loop ~300 mHz PZT loop ~3 kHz ETM loop ~8 Hz MCe loop ~30 Hz (cross over) PZT loop ~30 kHz Michelson BS-ETMX length: m (designed) BS-ETMY length: m (designed) contrast: ~70 % at best (klog # 1169)klog # 1169 beam radii at PR3 wx = 35.3(2) mm wy = 37.5(3) mm (klog # 907)klog # mW 2 W NPRO IFI transmissivity: 94 % (JGW-G )JGW-G MCe MCiMCo RFM network

fused silica, room temperature Suspensions and Mirrors 4 Laser IFI PR2 PR3 BS ETMX ETMX, ETMY (TAMA PRM) Type-C (double pendulum without stacks) + config magnets wire dia 100 um for X, 50 um for Y 100 mm dia, 60 mm thick RoC = 9 km reflectivity: 50 % for X, 90 % for Y (probably) BS (CLIO BS) Type-C (double pendulum without stacks) x config magnets 150 mm dia, 40 mm thick (no wedge) RoC = flat PR2 fixed 2-inch mirror RoC = /- 0.2 m PR3 Type-Bp’ (double pendulum) 250 mm dia, 100 mm thick RoC = m TM stage was fixed IM stage has 6 OSEMs MCi, MCo, MCe Type-C (double pendulum with stacks) x config magnets mm dia, 29.5 mm thick RoC = 37.33(9) m (klog #711)klog #711 ETMY MCe MCiMCo

central part and both ends were at air (PR2-BS was not connected, but covered; klog #1078)klog #1078 Vacuum 5 Laser IFI PR2 PR3 BS ETMX ETMY MCe MCiMCo Xarm 1.6 Pa one year sealed off Yarm 68 Pa Oct 28: last fastening EYA air pressure EXA air pressure IYC+IYA 1.5 Pa Mar 19: pumping IXC+IXA 4.0 Pa Mar 19: pumping IFI to BS area air pressure IMC 200 Pa (klog #1020)klog #1020 GVs close to IXA/IYA were closed slide based on _Alignment.ppt by Y. Saito

calibration of error signal (optical gain) 2.3e10 counts/m (klog #1169)klog #1169 calibration of feedback signal (actuator efficiency) 1.8e Hz (klog #1169)klog #1169 calibration lines at 80 Hz and 135 Hz to monitor loop gain Calibration 6 Michelson optical gain 2.3e10 counts/m Filter zero at 0.2,7 Hz pole at 0.02,200,200 Hz DC gain 100 (notch at 15.3 Hz) Actuator (klog #1340)klog #1340 ETMX: 2.6e-10 m/counts at DC, f0=0.92 Hz, Q= 5.1 ETMY: 0.94e-10 m/counts at DC, f0=0.94 Hz, Q = 4.6 combined: 1.7e-10 m/counts at DC (sign was wrong) Michelson differential displacement [m] error signal K1:LSC-REFL_PDA1_DC_OUT_DQ feedback signal K1:LSC-MICH_OUT_DQ rough calib roughly calibrated in L*h(t) [m] K1:LSC-MICH_ERR_CAL_OUT_DQ calibration lines (80 Hz, 135 Hz) demodulated signal K1:LSC-LKIN_CAL1/2_A_REAL/IMAG_OUT_DQ (1 for 80 Hz, 2 for 135 Hz) demodulated signal K1:LSC-LKIN_CAL1/2_B_REAL/IMAG_OUT_DQ (1 for 80 Hz, 2 for 135 Hz)

duty cycle: 85.2 % (94.4 % for IMC) longest lock: 3.6 hours (12 hours for IMC) Duty Cycle and Lock Duration 7 data processing and plot by Y. Sasaki IMC lock duration histogram MICH lock duration histogram (you can see bump at ~30 min)

X arm length and Y arm length drifts by ~60 um this caused lock loss every ~30 min because of the saturation of the feedback signal → needs more actuation range Tidal Drift 8 plot by K. Hayama et al. (klog #1418)klog #1418 measured with 3-km Michelson prediction calculated by A. Araya JGW-E used GOTIC2 (tidal effect from the Moon and the Sun)

MICH openloop gain degraded by almost 80 % (likely by alignment drift) → needs UGF servo (and online calibration) Openloop Gain Drift 9 calculation done using K1:LSC-LKIN_CAL1_A/B_REAL/IMAG_OUT_DQ by Y. Sasaki & Y. Michimura

average: 0.77 pc standard deviation: 0.39 pc for 1.4Msun-1.4Msun NS-NS rough strain sensitivity fluctuated by roughly 1 order of magnitude Inspiral Range 10 plot by K. Hayama ASD [m/rtHz] Mar 29, 2016 (includes data when unlocked)

likely to be limited by intensity noise of the IMC transmitted beam Noise Budget 11 plot generated with Simulink NoiseBudget by Y. Michimura (klog #1323)klog #1323

Michelson lock was lost every ~30 minutes Alignment was adjusted manually ~ once per day Calibration was done offline PMC was re-locked manually GVs close to IXA/IYA was closed PR2-BS duct was not connected Some unsafe issues left unaddressed Issues in March Test Run 12

Michelson lock was lost every ~30 minutes → improved to > ~5 hours (limited by IMC; tidal won’t be a problem this time klog #1446) new actuation efficiency (ETM differential): 2.6e-9 m/C at DC(klog #1340), higher UGF (klog #1344), RF lock instead of DC lock (klog #1388), x10 sensitivity (klog #1389), folded oplev for ETMs to reduce L2A (klog #1355) more stable IMC (less feedback to mirrors klog #1386, oplev DC servo turned off klog #1449)klog #1446klog #1340klog #1344klog #1388klog #1389klog #1355klog #1386klog #1449 Alignment was adjusted manually ~ once per day → dither alignment installed for IMC (working perfectly; Calibration was done offline → UGF servo (klog #1425) and online calibration (klog #1456)klog #1425klog #1456 PMC was re-locked manually remote control restored GVs close to IXA/IYA was closed opened PR2-BS duct was not connected connected Some unsafe issues left unaddressed partially addressed What’s New in April Test Run 13 (klog #1351)klog #1351 (klog #1338)klog #1338 klog #1484klog #1484, #1492)#1492

calibration of error signal (optical gain) 5.3e10 counts/m (klog #1455)klog #1455 calibration of feedback signal (actuator efficiency) 2.6(1)e-9 DC (klog #1340)klog #1340 calibration lines at 80 Hz for UGF servo (UGF controlled at 100 Hz) and at 135 Hz for loop gain monitor, other independent lines for monitoring actuator efficiency change Calibration for April Test Run 14 Michelson optical gain 5.3e10 counts/m Actuator (klog #1340)klog #1340 ETMX: 1.6e-9 m/counts at DC, f0=0.92 Hz, Q= 5.1 ETMY: 1.0e-9 m/counts at DC, f0=0.94 Hz, Q = 4.6 combined: 2.6e-9 m/counts at DC Michelson differential displacement [m] calibration lines (80 Hz, 135 Hz) error signal K1:LSC-REFL_PDA1_RF17_Q_ERR_DQ Filter zero at 0.2,70 Hz pole at 0.02,2000,2000 Hz DC gain 500 UGF servo signal K1:LSC-UGF_SERVO_OUT_DQ UGF servo online calib calibrated in L*h(t) [nm] K1:LSC-MICH_CTRL_CAL_OUT_DQ

not limited by intensity noise of the IMC transmitted beam could be BS angular noise coupling? Updated Noise Budget 15 plot generated with Simulink NoiseBudget by T. Shimoda (klog #1478)klog #1478

evacuate central part and both ends to open all GVs and see optical axis change to investigate alignment change during evacuation PR3 height check oplev stability, noise measurements with fixed mirror investigate scattering noise from vibration of ducts investigate why measured ETMX/Y actuator efficiency don’t match calculation from coil efficiency what else? What To Do After April Test Run 16