BeAST Detector (Brookhaven eA Solenoidal Tracker) Alexander Kiselev for the BNL EIC taskforce Berkeley EIC User Group Meeting Jan’2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.C. Aschenauer1. Requirements from Physics on IR E.C. Aschenauer 2 Summarized at: Hadron Beam:
Advertisements

Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.
E.C. Aschenauer for the group.  Optimize the IR design to be able to integrate  the luminosity monitor  the lepton polarimeter  the low Q 2 -tagger.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Monte-Carlo simulations and reconstruction for 12-degree ep-elastic Luminosity Monitor A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
Detector simulations for EIC at BNL Alexander Kiselev POETIC Workshop Sep,
 Improve lepton-photon-hadron separation in the FMS to do  Some examples  J/Ψ physics in pAu and pp at forward rapidities  current status from chris.
The Design of a Detector for the Electron Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Anders Ingo Kirleis 1, William Foreman 1, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer 2, and Matthew.
1 News from eRHIC Matt Lamont, Thomas Ullrich, William Foreman, Anders Kirleis, Michael Savastio, Elke Aschenauer and the CAD-eRHIC Team E.C. AschenauerEIC-Convener.
Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC Vasiliy Morozov for MEIC Study Group Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting, Stony Brook University June 27,
A. Kiselev BNL, 06/20/2013 EicRoot status report and calorimeter code development.
E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: arXiv:
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
The GlueX Detector 5/29/091CIPANP The GlueX Detector -- David Lawrence (JLab) David Lawrence (JLab) Electron beam accelerator continuous-wave (1497MHz,
E.C. AschenauerEIC Detector R&D Committee Meeting, October
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
Possibility for Double DVCS measurement in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne SBS Meeting June 4 th 2013.
The Tungsten-Scintillating Fiber Accordion Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the sPHENIX Detector Craig Woody, for the PHENIX Collaboration Physics Department,
1  Calorimetry  W-Scintillator & W-Si  compact and high resolution  Crystal calorimeters PbW & BGO BNL, Indiana University, Penn State Univ., UCLA,
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)
Jin Huang Brookhaven National Lab ● Motivation ● PHENIX ● STAR ● eRHIC Detectors ● ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PHENIX Collaboration STAR Collaboration BNL EIC Task.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
Some thoughts about the IR-Design and Si-tracking E.C. AschenauerEIC Tracking R&D Meeting, March
1 EIC EW Meeting, W&M, VA, May 2010 E.C. Aschenauer.
Jin Huang BNL.  GEANT4 customary code  PHENIX simulation/analysis  EICROOT by EIC taskforce at BNL (learning) RICH Discussions J. Huang 2.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Lattice /Detector Integration for Target Fragmentation, Diffraction, and other Low-t Processes Charles Hyde-Wright Old Dominion University
E.C. AschenauerFebruary Inclusive Structure functions in eA or why momentum resolutions are important E.C. Aschenauer February How to extract.
Detector & Interaction Region Concepts for DES and SIDIS Pawel Nadel-Turonski Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA EICC meeting, January 10–12, 2010, Stony.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
ESTAR Upgrade Ming Shao USTC. eRHIC – the future of RHIC STAR Regional Meeting, Weihai, /24/2012.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Jin Huang (BNL) for the PHENIX collaboration Based on the ePHENIX Letter of Intent, arXiv: [nucl-ex] ● Physics goals ● detector design ● performance.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 51.
Current eRHIC IR Design  Important features  10 mrad crossing angle Needs to be integrated into the current STAR and upgrades Important for luminosity.
E.C. Aschenauer1. Requirements from Physics on IR E.C. Aschenauer 2 Summarized at: Hadron Beam:
Calorimeters Design Issues and Simulation Needs C.Woody Physics Department Brookhaven National Lab EIC Simulation Workshop Oct 9, 2012.
Know How at LLR Ultra-granular calorimetry AFTER vs CHIC 1F. Fleuret - LLR11/05/ LPSC.
Detector Here, we will only discuss a multi-purpose high-luminosity ep detector, not a dedicated lower-luminosity ep/eA detector as.
IR-Design 0.44 m Q5 D5 Q4 90 m 10 mrad m 3.67 mrad 60 m m 18.8 m 16.8 m 6.33 mrad 4 m Dipole © D.Trbojevic 30 GeV e GeV p.
EPHENIX for eRHIC 1 Mostly from Sasha’s Presentation from DIS.
Jin Huang BNL/LANL. ePHENIX Review J. Huang 2 RICH GEM Station4 EMCal HCal GEM Station2 R (cm) HCal p/A EMCal GEMs EMCal & Preshower TPC DIRC η=+1 η=
Abstract Deep inelastic scattering (DIS) and diffractive scattering are used to probe the internal structure of hadrons in accelerator physics. During.
Jin Huang Brookhaven National Lab. eRD14 meeting Jin Huang 2 ~ →2020~2025Time Current PHENIX sPHENIX (+fsPHENIX) An EIC detector  14y+ operation.
Some thoughts to stimulate Discussion E.C. Stony Brook, January
AB c CEBAF Hall D ASIC Needs in Nuclear Science T. Ludlam Brookhaven National Lab 1 RHIC.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Extending the PHENIX physics reach Physics beyond the baseline accessible at RHIC II Capabilities needed to address the new physics Detector upgrades to.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: EIC User Meeting, Berkley, E.C. Aschenauer Does this saturation produce matter of universal properties in the.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle New Design: for eRHIC with CEC: 20 x 325 with b* of 5cm: 1.4x10 34 cm -2 s -1 as the the luminosity does.
E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: E.C. Aschenauer Rad. Cor. for Next Generations Exp., JLab Internal and External Radiative Corrections don’t factorize.
E.C. AschenauerEIC Detector Simulation Workshop, October
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
IR- and Detector Design Considerations
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Radiative Corrections for Heavy Nuclei
ePHENIX Letter of Intent
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
JLEIC Detector Simulation Forward Ion Detection
PheniX, STAr AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer
Special Considerations for SIDIS
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Update on JLEIC Interaction Region Design
EIC SOFTWARE TOOLS AND NEEDS
Presentation transcript:

BeAST Detector (Brookhaven eA Solenoidal Tracker) Alexander Kiselev for the BNL EIC taskforce Berkeley EIC User Group Meeting Jan’2016

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev RHIC -> eRHIC upgrade proposal 2/18 by 2025 convert RHIC to an electron-ion collider by replacing one of the proton rings by up to ~21 GeV electrons (arXiv ) Yesterday talk by Thomas Roser

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Two viable eRHIC detector options 3/18  Upgrade PHENIX to ePHENIX  Build a new detector

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev A “perfect” DIS detector requirements 4/18  The more close to 4  acceptance the better  Reach in kinematic variables  Reliable electron identification  Good hadron PID  High spatial resolution of primary vertex  Low material budget  Luminosity and polarization measurement  Close-to-beam-line acceptance add-on detectors in order to register:  recoil protons  low Q 2 electrons  neutrons in hadron going direction See yesterday talk by Elke Aschenauer for a complete list of requirements

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev5/18 hadronic calorimeters electrons 9.0m TPC e/m calorimetersRICH detectors silicon trackersGEM trackers3T solenoid coils BeAST detector layout ALICE EIC R&D (UCLA, BNL) CBM SBS EIC R&D (UCLA, BNL) hadrons -4<  <4: Tracking & e/m Calorimetry (hermetic coverage)

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Tracker elements 2x7 disks with mm radius; same building blocks as in vertex forward/backward silicon trackers: TPC: GEMs: ~2m long; gas volume radius [ ] mm 1.2% X 0 IFC, 4.0% X 0 OFC; 15.0% X 0 end-caps assume 5 mm long GEM pads and  m s.p. {r  } resolution 3 disks behind the TPC end-caps; SBS design assume 50  m resolution 6/18 silicon vertex tracker: 2x2 barrel layers; ALICE ITS design (MAPS-based) assume discrete 20x20  m 2 pixels and ~0.3% X 0 per layer

A.Kiselev7/18  High resolution up to (at least) |  |~3  High redundancy  Low material budget Variations: MuMegas barrels, smaller TPC radius, … Jan, Tracker performance & properties  EIC R&D (Saclay) Momentum resolutionRadiation length scan 2.0m

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Smearing in DIS kinematic variables 8/18  {PYTHIA 20x250 GeV, NO bremsstrahlung} -> {GEANT} -> {Kalman filter track fit}  same procedure; simulation WITH bremsstrahlung -> looks good despite poor resolution at low Y and long bremsstrahlung tails

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev “Purity” in (x,Q 2 ) kinematic bins 9/18  Describes migration between kinematic bins  Important to keep it close to 1.0 for successful unfolding bremsstrahlung OFFbremsstrahlung ON  Bremsstrahlung matters even for detector with ~5% X/X 0  “Straightforward” lepton tracking can hardly help at Y<0.1  Use scattered lepton tracking information only

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev “Purity” in (x,Q 2 ) kinematic bins, cont’d 10/18  Assume e/m calorimeter with energy resolution ~5%/ √ E is used in addition to tracking  Consider “bremstrahlung off ” case for simplicity tracking onlytracking + EmCal -> a good EmCal clearly helps to extend useful Y-range

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev “Purity” in (x,Q 2 ) kinematic bins, cont’d 11/18 Electron-only methodDouble-angle method  Make use of hadronic final state information  Consider “bremstrahlung on” case here -> hadronic final state accounting also helps to extend useful Y-range (and also other methods were employed at HERA)

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev e/m calorimeter modeling -> good agreement with original MC studies and measured data Tungsten powder scintillating fiber technology; straight (endcap) and tapered (barrel) geometry 12/18

-energy resolution comparable to ZEUS 1987 paper HCal EmCal 12 GeV pions: Hcal vs EmCal Slope ~1.20 perfectly matches measured data - GEANT4, FTFP_BERT physics list - Birk’s correction accounted Hadronic calorimeter modeling Jan, /18 A.Kiselev Lead absorber scintillating plate sandwich technology

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev14/18 -> field maps, magnet aperture locations and sizes available -> Roman Pots, Low Q 2 tagger & Lumi Monitor implemented FFAG bypass Roman Pots location Low Q 2 tagger location Main detector Electron beam line Hadron beam line Interaction Region implementation See talk by Richard Petti tomorrow

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Solenoid field modeling OPERA 2D/3D software used Multi-Ring Solenoid configuration(s) Presently used design: MRS-B1 15/18

Neutron flux estimation  Import STAR experiment geometry (including experimental hall)  Run ep- and pp-PYTHIA simulations for STAR and BeAST setups  Use direct STAR neutron flux measurements from 2013 as a reference STAR geometry imported in EicRoot BeAST detector placed in STAR hall Strategy: At most ~10 10 n/cm 2 per year of running at L=10 33 cm -2 s -1 n/cm 2 / 1MHz PYTHIA 20x250 GeV ep-events Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev 16/18

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Track finder/fitter for forward angles 17/18  Recently written in EicRoot for STAR forward upgrade project (6 silicon strip disks)  Successfully handles few hundred tracks per event in pseudo-rapidity range [ ] -> no doubts should work fine on a handful of tracks per DIS event in a more favorable BeAST pixelated MAPS- based forward/backward silicon tracker geometry

Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Summary slide 18/18  A flexible eRHIC detector simulation framework developed  Ongoing work:  Physics process simulations  Realistic RICH detector implementation(s)  PID algorithm development  Track finder implementation for central rapidities  Further optimization of various detector technologies to meet the detector requirements imposed by physics

Backup Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev 19/16

Lepton PID requirements E.C. Aschenauer EIC User Meeting, Berkley, Lepton-PID:  suppression: the same  coverage for tracking & Ecal h - suppression through E/p  <-4: 1:1 -4<  <-1: 10:1 to 10 3 :1  <1: 10 4 :1

SIDIS: Pion Kinematics Jan, Cuts: Q 2 >1 GeV 2, Increasing hadron beam energy influences max. hadron energy at fixed  (and  , K ±, p ± look the same) A.Kiselev Increasing lepton beam energy boosts hadrons more to negative rapidity -3<  <3 covers entire p t & z region important for physics

Lepton Kinematics and (x,Q 2 ) coverage Jan,  Q 2 > 1.0 GeV 2 : rapidity coverage -4 <  < 1 is sufficient  Q 2 < 0.1 GeV 2 : a dedicated low-Q 2 tagger is required A.Kiselev Increasing lepton beam energy: scattered lepton is boosted to negative  high y-coverage limited by radiative corrections -> can be suppressed by requiring hadronic activity low y-coverage limited by E’ e resolution -> use hadron or double angle method to reconstruct event kinematics

Kinematic Coverage of Pions E.C. Aschenauer EIC User Meeting, Berkley, Cuts: Q 2 >1 GeV 2, GeV -3<  <3 covers entire kinematic region in p t & z important for physics no difference between  , K ±, p ±

Exclusive Reactions 24 proton/neutron tag method o Measurement of t o Free of p-dissociation background o High acceptance for Roman Pots / ZDC challenging  IR design Diffractive peak Large Rapidity Gap method o X system and e’ measured o Proton dissociation background o High acceptance in  for detector MYMY Q2Q2 How can we select events: two methods Need Roman Pot spectrometer and ZDC Need HCal in the forward region Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Cuts: Q 2 >1 GeV, 0.01<y<0.85 DVCS – photon kinematics increasing Hadron Beam Energy: influences max. photon energy at fixed  – photons are boosted to negative rapidities (lepton direction)

Requirements from Physics Jan, Hadron-going direction: 1.detection of neutrons from nuclear break up  location/acceptance of ZDC (<4 mrad) 2. detection of scattered protons from exclusive and diffractive reactions;  location/acceptance of RP (<5 mrad); A.Kiselev 3.beam element free region around the IR 4.minimize impact of detector magnetic field on lepton beam  synchrotron radiation Lepton-going direction: 1.space for low Q 2 scattered lepton detection 2.space for the luminosity monitor in the outgoing lepton beam direction 3. space for lepton polarimeter detector acceptance:  >4.5 DVCS protons

Low Q 2 -tagger – Task: detect low Q 2 scattered electrons  quasi-real photoproduction physics Jan, e’-detector A.Kiselev  need a separate device designed similar to the JLab Hall D tagger (finely spaced scintillator array):  scattered lepton energy  -> at nominal energy can not register scattered electrons with Q 2 <0.1 in main spectrometer! DIS electron kinematics