BeAST Detector (Brookhaven eA Solenoidal Tracker) Alexander Kiselev for the BNL EIC taskforce Berkeley EIC User Group Meeting Jan’2016
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev RHIC -> eRHIC upgrade proposal 2/18 by 2025 convert RHIC to an electron-ion collider by replacing one of the proton rings by up to ~21 GeV electrons (arXiv ) Yesterday talk by Thomas Roser
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Two viable eRHIC detector options 3/18 Upgrade PHENIX to ePHENIX Build a new detector
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev A “perfect” DIS detector requirements 4/18 The more close to 4 acceptance the better Reach in kinematic variables Reliable electron identification Good hadron PID High spatial resolution of primary vertex Low material budget Luminosity and polarization measurement Close-to-beam-line acceptance add-on detectors in order to register: recoil protons low Q 2 electrons neutrons in hadron going direction See yesterday talk by Elke Aschenauer for a complete list of requirements
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev5/18 hadronic calorimeters electrons 9.0m TPC e/m calorimetersRICH detectors silicon trackersGEM trackers3T solenoid coils BeAST detector layout ALICE EIC R&D (UCLA, BNL) CBM SBS EIC R&D (UCLA, BNL) hadrons -4< <4: Tracking & e/m Calorimetry (hermetic coverage)
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Tracker elements 2x7 disks with mm radius; same building blocks as in vertex forward/backward silicon trackers: TPC: GEMs: ~2m long; gas volume radius [ ] mm 1.2% X 0 IFC, 4.0% X 0 OFC; 15.0% X 0 end-caps assume 5 mm long GEM pads and m s.p. {r } resolution 3 disks behind the TPC end-caps; SBS design assume 50 m resolution 6/18 silicon vertex tracker: 2x2 barrel layers; ALICE ITS design (MAPS-based) assume discrete 20x20 m 2 pixels and ~0.3% X 0 per layer
A.Kiselev7/18 High resolution up to (at least) | |~3 High redundancy Low material budget Variations: MuMegas barrels, smaller TPC radius, … Jan, Tracker performance & properties EIC R&D (Saclay) Momentum resolutionRadiation length scan 2.0m
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Smearing in DIS kinematic variables 8/18 {PYTHIA 20x250 GeV, NO bremsstrahlung} -> {GEANT} -> {Kalman filter track fit} same procedure; simulation WITH bremsstrahlung -> looks good despite poor resolution at low Y and long bremsstrahlung tails
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev “Purity” in (x,Q 2 ) kinematic bins 9/18 Describes migration between kinematic bins Important to keep it close to 1.0 for successful unfolding bremsstrahlung OFFbremsstrahlung ON Bremsstrahlung matters even for detector with ~5% X/X 0 “Straightforward” lepton tracking can hardly help at Y<0.1 Use scattered lepton tracking information only
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev “Purity” in (x,Q 2 ) kinematic bins, cont’d 10/18 Assume e/m calorimeter with energy resolution ~5%/ √ E is used in addition to tracking Consider “bremstrahlung off ” case for simplicity tracking onlytracking + EmCal -> a good EmCal clearly helps to extend useful Y-range
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev “Purity” in (x,Q 2 ) kinematic bins, cont’d 11/18 Electron-only methodDouble-angle method Make use of hadronic final state information Consider “bremstrahlung on” case here -> hadronic final state accounting also helps to extend useful Y-range (and also other methods were employed at HERA)
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev e/m calorimeter modeling -> good agreement with original MC studies and measured data Tungsten powder scintillating fiber technology; straight (endcap) and tapered (barrel) geometry 12/18
-energy resolution comparable to ZEUS 1987 paper HCal EmCal 12 GeV pions: Hcal vs EmCal Slope ~1.20 perfectly matches measured data - GEANT4, FTFP_BERT physics list - Birk’s correction accounted Hadronic calorimeter modeling Jan, /18 A.Kiselev Lead absorber scintillating plate sandwich technology
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev14/18 -> field maps, magnet aperture locations and sizes available -> Roman Pots, Low Q 2 tagger & Lumi Monitor implemented FFAG bypass Roman Pots location Low Q 2 tagger location Main detector Electron beam line Hadron beam line Interaction Region implementation See talk by Richard Petti tomorrow
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Solenoid field modeling OPERA 2D/3D software used Multi-Ring Solenoid configuration(s) Presently used design: MRS-B1 15/18
Neutron flux estimation Import STAR experiment geometry (including experimental hall) Run ep- and pp-PYTHIA simulations for STAR and BeAST setups Use direct STAR neutron flux measurements from 2013 as a reference STAR geometry imported in EicRoot BeAST detector placed in STAR hall Strategy: At most ~10 10 n/cm 2 per year of running at L=10 33 cm -2 s -1 n/cm 2 / 1MHz PYTHIA 20x250 GeV ep-events Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev 16/18
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Track finder/fitter for forward angles 17/18 Recently written in EicRoot for STAR forward upgrade project (6 silicon strip disks) Successfully handles few hundred tracks per event in pseudo-rapidity range [ ] -> no doubts should work fine on a handful of tracks per DIS event in a more favorable BeAST pixelated MAPS- based forward/backward silicon tracker geometry
Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Summary slide 18/18 A flexible eRHIC detector simulation framework developed Ongoing work: Physics process simulations Realistic RICH detector implementation(s) PID algorithm development Track finder implementation for central rapidities Further optimization of various detector technologies to meet the detector requirements imposed by physics
Backup Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev 19/16
Lepton PID requirements E.C. Aschenauer EIC User Meeting, Berkley, Lepton-PID: suppression: the same coverage for tracking & Ecal h - suppression through E/p <-4: 1:1 -4< <-1: 10:1 to 10 3 :1 <1: 10 4 :1
SIDIS: Pion Kinematics Jan, Cuts: Q 2 >1 GeV 2, Increasing hadron beam energy influences max. hadron energy at fixed (and , K ±, p ± look the same) A.Kiselev Increasing lepton beam energy boosts hadrons more to negative rapidity -3< <3 covers entire p t & z region important for physics
Lepton Kinematics and (x,Q 2 ) coverage Jan, Q 2 > 1.0 GeV 2 : rapidity coverage -4 < < 1 is sufficient Q 2 < 0.1 GeV 2 : a dedicated low-Q 2 tagger is required A.Kiselev Increasing lepton beam energy: scattered lepton is boosted to negative high y-coverage limited by radiative corrections -> can be suppressed by requiring hadronic activity low y-coverage limited by E’ e resolution -> use hadron or double angle method to reconstruct event kinematics
Kinematic Coverage of Pions E.C. Aschenauer EIC User Meeting, Berkley, Cuts: Q 2 >1 GeV 2, GeV -3< <3 covers entire kinematic region in p t & z important for physics no difference between , K ±, p ±
Exclusive Reactions 24 proton/neutron tag method o Measurement of t o Free of p-dissociation background o High acceptance for Roman Pots / ZDC challenging IR design Diffractive peak Large Rapidity Gap method o X system and e’ measured o Proton dissociation background o High acceptance in for detector MYMY Q2Q2 How can we select events: two methods Need Roman Pot spectrometer and ZDC Need HCal in the forward region Jan,7 2016A.Kiselev Cuts: Q 2 >1 GeV, 0.01<y<0.85 DVCS – photon kinematics increasing Hadron Beam Energy: influences max. photon energy at fixed – photons are boosted to negative rapidities (lepton direction)
Requirements from Physics Jan, Hadron-going direction: 1.detection of neutrons from nuclear break up location/acceptance of ZDC (<4 mrad) 2. detection of scattered protons from exclusive and diffractive reactions; location/acceptance of RP (<5 mrad); A.Kiselev 3.beam element free region around the IR 4.minimize impact of detector magnetic field on lepton beam synchrotron radiation Lepton-going direction: 1.space for low Q 2 scattered lepton detection 2.space for the luminosity monitor in the outgoing lepton beam direction 3. space for lepton polarimeter detector acceptance: >4.5 DVCS protons
Low Q 2 -tagger – Task: detect low Q 2 scattered electrons quasi-real photoproduction physics Jan, e’-detector A.Kiselev need a separate device designed similar to the JLab Hall D tagger (finely spaced scintillator array): scattered lepton energy -> at nominal energy can not register scattered electrons with Q 2 <0.1 in main spectrometer! DIS electron kinematics