IMPLEMENTING PROXIMITY DETECTION – HOW GOOD DO OUR PEOPLE HAVE TO BE? A PRESENTATION BY PETER STANDISH, SP SOLUTIONS
BY WAY OF INTRODUCTION Begin with the end in mind – Sharing information from SP Solutions works Reflecting on major losses investigated What are we going to cover? How big the problem can be Fitting the approach into a system – visualising your risks Quantification – indicative – but NOT Gospel
HOW BIG IS THE ISSUE? Surface Coal – Traffic Related Incidents Inputs: NSW Coal Production Data DI&I Fatality Database – and available source reports (e.g. US Fatalgrams) Earlier SP Solutions analyses Data values: 120 MTPA surface coal production 78 Surface coal traffic fatalities – 15 NSW surface coal traffic fatalities = 1 every 3 years
HOW THE DATA LOOKS
THE DATA - CONTROL
MAKING SENSE OF IT Based on work done with our clients – analysing their catastrophic level risks Presenting the issues by considering the interaction of controls to causes, incidents and outcomes.
UNDERSTANDING – RISK AND CONTROL CHARTING Human Error (Frequency) Vehicle out of control Equipment Failure (Frequency) Road Conditions (Frequency) Error Tolerant Controls Contractor Mgt Systems On-Board Diagnostics Design Standards Equipment Selection Standard Pre-start inspections Road Maintenance Signage / Communication Cause Preventative Control Bunds, separation, braking Speed limiting and proximity detection devices Training Mgt Systems Near Miss / Minor Collision Serious Injuries / Damage in Collision All controls fail, fatal traffic accident. Emergency Response, Seat Belts and Cabin integrity Incident Reactive Control Outcome
QUANTIFYING THE ISSUE Current: 1 fatality every 3 years Predicted: 1 fatality every 10 years
SO - HOW GOOD DO OUR PEOPLE HAVE TO BE? Without detection and proximity devices – we’re asking our people to: Make 1,208,690 trips incident free Decide what to do when vehicles converge 24,300 times, and React to 8,280 maintenance issues This requires them to perform: Better than brain surgeons Better than elite Cambridge graduates, and Equivalent to air line pilots (i.e. 1 operator = 2 pilots)
SOME CAUTIONARY POINTS New technology can cause clashing effects Remote controls a case in point (10/3 – 3/10) Proximity / speed detection are not preventative! Avoid “sense of comfort” with machines that “don’t bite” Include the new devices in a broader system approach – understand your issues well
WHAT TO TAKE AWAY FROM THIS? We need to help our people if we’re going to achieve incident free sites (Zero harm) We should understand what type of gear we’re going to introduce and why If we’re going to make a change we should think about it – and make sure we’re not going to cause a new (and possibly worse) unwanted outcome Doing nothing will mean we’ll be hearing of a surface coal mine transport death before the end of 2012
THANKS For your attention – and to the organisers of the seminar! Shameless self promotion Visit or me