Roles/Responsibilities/Effectiveness.  Be able to explain the curriculum writing process  Identify ad explain the roles and responsibilities of Special.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Understanding based curriculum CREATING UNITS FOR UNDERSTANDING NOVEMBER 7, 2014.
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Stage 1: Identify desired results. Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence. Stage 3: Plan learning experiences and instruction. Wiggins, G & McTighe. J,
Curriculum Writing Candace Wallace, Director of Curriculum & Testing June, 2009.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
BACKWARD MAPPING: Beginning with the end in mind
Effective Instructional Strategies From Theory to Practice Chapter 2 Planning and Organizing for Teaching.
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
SEPT 20 8:00-11:00 WHAT ARE WE MEASURING? HOW DO WE MEASURE? DHS English Department Professional Development.
Essential Questions How do we create units maps aligned to the Common Core Standards? How do we assure maps are quality?
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
“Developing Quality Maps: Nuts, Bolts, and Staff Development” Dr. Ann Johnson
Understanding by Design
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Practicum in PE Dr. Cummiskey
Work Session: Mapping Template for Higher Education ICIU facilitated by Dr. Heidi Hayes Jacobs - March 5, 2015.
Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
What does this mean?. Teaching Beyond the Facts Trying to teach in the 21 st century without conceptual schema for knowledge is like trying to build a.
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Project Based Learning: adding RIGOR into your lesson
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Alignment to ICC Technology and Information Literacy.
Using Understanding by Design
Presentation of Learning- CONNECT-ED Summer 2011 AKA… “Nerdy” Reflections.
 Dramatic technological revolution  Increasingly diverse, globalized and complex media- saturated society.  Greater impact on society than from oral.
North Carolina Essential Standards PCk12 Fine Arts Learn to Love the Change!
The Backward Design Process
Integrator Session 1 Summer 2009 Unit Design. Integrator Enduring Understandings Integrating technology into higher order curriculum improves student.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Backwards Design: Aligning Objectives, Assignments, Assessments Marc Boots-Ebenfield, Coordinator of Instructional Design & Distance Learning Center for.
FINDING THE PATH AND STAYING ON IT Sue Howell August 12 & 13, 2010.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SRPASCD 2011 Dr. Patricia Ahrens & Dr. Michelle Saylor.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Curriculum Overview Curriculum Team Work Year 1.
Curriculum Overview Curriculum Team Work. KTD – Curriculum Development K = What I KNOW I Know T = What I THINK I Know D = What I know I DON’T Know.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Office of Service Quality
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Questioning Strategies EDG 4410 Teaching Strategies and Classroom Management University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL Dr. Verkler Fall 2014.
Implementing the Common Core Marcia Torgrude Welcome.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
BENCHMARK #3 “ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE RIGHT WORK” PLC YEAR 2 DAY 2 INQUIRY CYCLE.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
OHIO LEARNING STANDARDS K-12 MATHEMATICS GRADE 3 BY: AMY FURMAN.
COMMON CORE FOR THE NOT-SO-COMMON LEARNER
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Designing Programs for Learners: Curriculum and Instruction
Presentation transcript:

Roles/Responsibilities/Effectiveness

 Be able to explain the curriculum writing process  Identify ad explain the roles and responsibilities of Special Education and Regular Education in the areas of curriculum, instruction, assessment and grading practices  Identify the goal of Special Education in the OCSD  Identify the necessary data to collect to determine effectiveness of the Special Education program in the OCSD.

 Philosophical basis for work  Process used by Regular Education and Special Education teachers when writing curriculum  How does the Special Education teacher “fit” into the curriculum process?

 As I present, think about YOUR ROLE as a Special Education Teacher. Jot down ideas about: ◦ 1. Your perceived role in each area (CIA) ◦ 2. Your ideal role ◦ 3. Barriers/Issues related to ideal role

Curriculum Teaching And Learning Instruction Assessment Year 1 – alignment to ICC Write Grade Level Benchmarks and Components for each grade/course Alignment in Curriculum Maps Year 3 – Aligning assessments with our curriculum. Writing common summative assessments Training on Assessment OF and FOR Learning Alignment in Curriculum Maps Embedded in Year 2 and Year 3 Professional Development planned around student and staff needs Curriculum Mapping

 Second biggest impact on learning is from what is taught. (Shanahan)  Explicit curriculum is important in ensuring that teaching occurs.  Explicit curriculum prevents excessive overlaps across grade levels.  Curriculum needs to be organized.  An explicit curriculum makes differentiated instruction possible.

 Big Ideas/GLB: Declarative statements of enduring understandings for all students at all grade/course levels. Grade Level Benchmarks (Essential Questions)  Concepts: Describe what students should know, key knowledge, as a result of instruction, specific to grade level. Components (Concepts and Skills)  Competencies: Describe what students should be able to do, key skills, as a result of this instruction, specific to grade level. Components (Skills)

Worth Being Familiar With – these are those Nice to Know things we want student to know but they are not assessed Important to Know and Do – Part of your subject area but not essential to life-long skill attainment – might be assessed if relate to the enduring understandings Big Ideas– Reflected in the ICC and will be the Grade Level Benchmarks and Components

Content Area Standard/ICCSubject Mission StatementGrade Level/Course PurposeGrade Level BenchmarksComponents The Grade Level Benchmarks and Components drive instruction = they provide the roadmap to what the teacher needs to teach. Currently these are reflected in the Essential Question and the Content and the Skills. But…. They all do not meet the requirements of “Big Ideas” Bigger Ideas….. How do we help students “master” this content? What do we do if they don’t?

 Step 1: Define Current Reality  Step 2: Analyze the Iowa Core Curriculum  Step 3: Align current reality with ICC – eliminate any gaps and/or overlaps  Step 4: Develop a Subject Mission Statement  Step 5: Develop Grade Level/Course Purposes  Step 6 and 7: Write Grade Level Benchmarks and Components  Step 8: Develop way to validate or monitor implementation of curriculum

 Must: ◦ Be student focused “The student will…. ◦ Be measurable ◦ Begin with a verb which determines level of thinking and indicate method of summative assessment ◦ Be from Bloom’s top 4 levels of Bloom’s taxonomy ◦ Be indicative of the main skill/concept – the essential question or purpose of the unit of study

Developing big ideas/GLB helps students ◦ “Understand rather than memorize ◦ Retain ideas and facts longer because they are more meaningful ◦ Make connections between subjects and facets of a single subject ◦ Relate ideas to their own lives, and ◦ Build networks of meaning for effectively dealing with future knowledge.” (from How to Differentiate in Mixed-Ability Classrooms, 2 nd Edition; C.A. Tomlinson; ASCD; 2001)

 Reflect Higher Order Thinking - Rigorous ◦ They require “uncoverage.” or “investigation” or “evaluation” These abstract concepts stimulate higher-level thinking. They are more than just facts. They come from the top 4 levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. They have a greater potential for engaging students. The verb provides clues as to the assessment  Student Centered ◦ They reflect what the student will know or be able to do as result, not what the teacher will do  Timeless ◦ The concept transcends individual examples and/or activities. They have enduring value beyond the classroom. They will be relevant to any time teaching and do not reflect specifics – reflect skills such as problem solving  Measurable ◦ They can be measured to determine success.  Essential Concepts or Skills ◦ They are the heart of the discipline. They are worthy of the time it will take to study them at some depth ( and Understanding by Design. Wiggins & McTighe. ASCD )

 Describes the “essential” things ALL students in this grade level or course MUST KNOW or BE ABLE TO DO in a grade or course  GLB's are units of instruction that make connections between separate concepts or skills

 Topics (Apples, Winter, Shakespeare, Maps, Fractions)  Facts (2x4=8, red and yellow make orange, the capital of Illinois is Springfield)  Skills (multiplying, painting, memorizing, rhyming)  Assignments (research paper, collage, speech, book report)  Textbook Units (Unit 1, The World At War, Rational Numbers)

 Each GLB requires high level of student thinking as well as dynamic student involvement in their learning  Written with verbs from top 4 level of Bloom's Taxonomy – application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation  Each GLB written directs assessments ◦ Formative and Summative

 Criteria: ◦ A positive statement about what the students will do ◦ Verbs describing specific, measurable actions ◦ Includes an end result – what the student will be able to do ◦ High levels of achievement – Bloom's top 4 levels of thinking

 Must: ◦ Be student focused “The student will…. ◦ Begin with a verb which determines level of thinking and indicate method of formative assessment ◦ Be measurable ◦ Be from Bloom’s any levels of Bloom’s taxonomy – scaffolding of skills and concepts should take place ◦ Provide direction for instruction toward success of the Grade Level Benchmark

 Statements of concepts or skills that describe what students must know or do in order to perform the GLB.  Can be written from all levels of Bloom's Taxonomy  Content or skills scaffold as the GLB is taught  3-8 per GLB

 Simple and Complex skills  Must have students being active, not passive learners  Teachers become more facilitative instead of only providing information that students memorize

 Resources to use ◦ Matrices  Use your generated list to identify roles/responsibilities AND solutions to barriers ◦ Special Education Service Delivery Plan ◦ Grades, Diplomas, Transcripts for Students with Disabilities

 Communication ◦ What else needs to be determined before we report out?  How shall we communicate the roles/responsibilities?

 Matrices  KASAB  What is Program Evaluation?  How does Program Evaluation make our programs stronger?  What is the process for evaluating programs?

 Communication ◦ What else needs to be determined before we report out?  How shall we communicate the roles/responsibilities?