1 Responsiveness-To-Intervention The Context for Reforming General and Special Education Responsiveness-To-Intervention The Context for Reforming General.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

Knox County Schools Transition to RTI2
Big Ideas About Frequent Formative Evaluation Using General Outcome Measures and the Progress Monitoring Program One of the most powerful interventions.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
DIBELS – Part II SED 368 Fall Review DIBELS Benchmarks – 3 times/year – At grade-level learners may need only benchmarks – Can be used as a screener.
John M. Hintze, Ph.D. University of Massachusetts
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
A NEW APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING LEARNING DISABILITIES RTI: Academics.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
0 1 Response to Intervention is NOT: Just a Special Education initiative Only for students with disabilities Only for beginning reading A new way to.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
Curriculum-Based Measurement, Common Assessments, and the Common Core Mathematics Assessment and Intervention.
2008 Student Progress Monitoring & Data-Based Instruction in Special Education Data-Based Instruction.
1 CBM Teachers assess students’ academic performance, using brief measures, on a frequent basis. Teachers assess students’ academic performance, using.
Decision Making with Progress Monitoring Data: Considerations in Determining Instructional Effectiveness John M. Hintze, Ph.D. University of Massachusetts.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
Introduction to Using Curriculum- Based Measurement for Progress Monitoring in Math.
Graphing and Interpreting CBM Scores An overview (Sample presentation to present to students) 2008 Student Progress Monitoring & Data-Based Instruction.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Theresa M. Janczak, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Exceptional Education Buffalo State College Theresa M. Janczak.
1 Progress Monitoring in a Response to Intervention World: Helping Classrooms to Implement Best Practices Jacki Bootel Rebecca Holland-Coviello Silvia.
1 Using Progress Monitoring to Develop Strong IEPs Nancy Safer Whitney Donaldson National Center on Student Progress Monitoring Ingrid Oxaal OSEP OSEP.
RTI Implementer Series Module 2: Progress Monitoring
Using Curriculum-Based Measurement to Determine Response to Intervention 2008 Student Progress Monitoring & Data-Based Instruction in Special Education.
National Center on Response to Intervention Using CBM in a Response to Intervention Framework Introduction to Using CBM for Progress Monitoring in Reading.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
National Center on Response to Intervention Using CBM in a Response to Intervention Framework Using CBM to Determine Response to Intervention.
1 Improving Student Outcomes through Progress Monitoring Nancy Safer Jacki Bootel Rebecca Holland Coviello Virginia Department of Education September 28,
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Evaluating Student Response to Instruction Using a 3-Tier RtI Progress Monitoring System John M. Hintze, Ph.D. University of Massachusetts National Center.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Students At-Risk for Reading Difficulties: High and Low Responders Sharon Vaughn and Greg Roberts Center on Instruction, University of Texas Sylvia Linan-Thompson,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Progress Monitoring Strategies for Writing Individual Goals in General Curriculum and More Frequent Formative Evaluation Mark Shinn, Ph.D. Lisa A. Langell,
2006 OSEP Project Directors Meeting 1 Screening and Progress Monitoring for Identification of Reading Disabilities within an RTI Model Screening and Progress.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.
1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Series Module 2: Progress Monitoring.
Severe Discrepancy vs. Response to Intervention. Severe Discrepancy Model of Eligibility Determination (1974 – present) This method is used for students.
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
1 Responsiveness to Intervention (RTI): Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) for State Educational Agencies National Research Center on Learning.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
Progress Monitoring Elementary Intervention Coaches November 22, 2011.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
Responsiveness to Instruction Vermont Principals Association Strand August, 2011 Julie Benay, M.Ed.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
Douglas Fuchs, Lynn Fuchs, Donald Compton and Joan Bryant
Identifying and Serving Students with Behavior Problems
Identifying and Serving Students with Behavior Problems
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
Overview of Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)
Sarah’s Progress in Secondary Prevention
Response to Intervention Overview
Mathematics Progress Monitoring and Determining Response
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

1 Responsiveness-To-Intervention The Context for Reforming General and Special Education Responsiveness-To-Intervention The Context for Reforming General and Special Education Douglas Fuchs Vanderbilt University

2 Typical RTI Procedure Primary Prevention All children receive the universal, core instructional program. All children are tested once in the fall. At-risk students are identified as potentially at-risk for academic failure. The progress of potentially at-risk students is monitored for 6-8 weeks to (dis)confirm risk and identify students for secondary prevention.

3 Typical RTI Procedure Secondary Prevention − − For at-risk students, a second level of prevention is implemented using standard research-validated tutoring protocols. − − Student progress is monitored throughout intervention, and students are re-tested following intervention. − − Growth/performance is dichotomized as responsive or unresponsive. − − Students who respond well return to primary prevention, with ongoing progress monitoring.

4 Typical RTI Procedure Tertiary Intervention − − Those who do not respond receive a multidisciplinary team evaluation and are identified for special education (LD, BD, MR). − − Tertiary intervention should (needs to) represent a reformed special education where   Individual student goals are set ambitiously.   Ongoing progress monitoring is used formatively and recursively way to develop individualized, effective programs.   Ongoing progress monitoring is also used to identify when students have met benchmarks and need to re-enter secondary or primary prevention

5 Health Care Analogy High blood pressure (HBP) can lead to heart attacks or strokes High blood pressure (HBP) can lead to heart attacks or strokes At the annual check-up (primary prevention), HBP screening At the annual check-up (primary prevention), HBP screening If screening suggests HBP, then monitoring over 6-8 weeks occurs to verify HBP If screening suggests HBP, then monitoring over 6-8 weeks occurs to verify HBP If HBP is verified, secondary prevention occurs with relatively inexpensive diuretics, which are effective for vast majority, and monitoring continues If HBP is verified, secondary prevention occurs with relatively inexpensive diuretics, which are effective for vast majority, and monitoring continues For patients who fail to respond to secondary prevention (diuretics), then tertiary prevention occurs—experimentation with more expensive medications (e.g., ACE inhibitors, beta blockers), with ongoing monitoring, to determine which drug or combination of drugs is effective For patients who fail to respond to secondary prevention (diuretics), then tertiary prevention occurs—experimentation with more expensive medications (e.g., ACE inhibitors, beta blockers), with ongoing monitoring, to determine which drug or combination of drugs is effective

6 Most RTI Conversations …have been about primary and secondary prevention where the purpose is to reform general education …have been about primary and secondary prevention where the purpose is to reform general education Fewer conversations about tertiary intervention.Yet it’s as important to get right: Reforming special education Fewer conversations about tertiary intervention.Yet it’s as important to get right: Reforming special education

7 RTI as General Education Reform RTI = early intervention that can: RTI = early intervention that can: (a) prevent disability (b) mitigate disability (c) eliminate “false positives” (including reducing over-representation of minorities minorities

8 RTI as General Education Reform 15% of IDEA monies to fund general ed reforms (e.g., professional development to support the tier structure and progress monitoring) to make general ed more accommodating of academic diversity (RTI as REI) 15% of IDEA monies to fund general ed reforms (e.g., professional development to support the tier structure and progress monitoring) to make general ed more accommodating of academic diversity (RTI as REI)

9 RTI as General Education Reform: The New General Ed Continuum of Placements The traditional continuum of special education services The traditional continuum of special education services Some (NASDSE, CASE) are advocating for a serious re-thinking of GE and SE; a new GE continuum of placements and services Some (NASDSE, CASE) are advocating for a serious re-thinking of GE and SE; a new GE continuum of placements and services General education reformers do not wish RTI to be understood as a more valid method of disability identification because in an ideal RTI World there will be no disability identification General education reformers do not wish RTI to be understood as a more valid method of disability identification because in an ideal RTI World there will be no disability identification

10 RTI as Special Education Reform Why special education must find its way back to its clinical roots: individualized, data-based, and recursive. Why special education must find its way back to its clinical roots: individualized, data-based, and recursive. Set ambitious goals Set ambitious goals Distinguish the intensity of secondary vs. tertiary prevention Distinguish the intensity of secondary vs. tertiary prevention − Tertiary prevention is reserved for students who fail to respond to standard forms of instruction (i.e., validated, standard tutoring protocols) and who therefore need a nonstandard (individualized) form of instruction Use flexible exit/re-entry decisions, based on student progress, to rely on tertiary prevention as needed and to maximize time in primary/secondary prevention as possible (LRE) Use flexible exit/re-entry decisions, based on student progress, to rely on tertiary prevention as needed and to maximize time in primary/secondary prevention as possible (LRE)

11 CBM in RTI at Tertiary Prevention − CBM incoming level/slope is used to set IEP goal. − CBM is administered weekly. − CBM slope is used to assess the effectiveness of varying instructional components for that student and to inductively formulate an effective, individualized program. − CBM slope is used to quantify response. On the basis of slope, decisions are formulated about when to exit tertiary prevention. Goal is to return students to primary or secondary prevention as soon as possible, but weekly CBM continues so that re-entry to tertiary prevention occurs as needed.

12 Finding Level for Reading PM Determine student reading grade level at year’s end Determine student reading grade level at year’s end Administer three passages at this level: Administer three passages at this level: − Fewer than 10 correct words, use Word Identification Fluency − Between 10 and 50 words, but less than 85–90% correct, move to next lower level of test and administer three passages at this level − More than 50 correct words, move to highest level of text where student reads 10–50 words Maintain appropriate level for entire year Maintain appropriate level for entire year

13 Tertiary Prevention: Setting IEP Goals Three options for setting IEP goals: Three options for setting IEP goals: − National norms for end-year levels − Intra-individual framework − National norms for weekly rate of improvement (slope)

14 Identify appropriate grade-level end- year level Identify appropriate grade-level end- year level Mark level on graph with an X at end- year Mark level on graph with an X at end- year Draw goal-line from first three CBM scores to X Draw goal-line from first three CBM scores to X Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With National Norms for End-Year Level

15 GradeReadingComputation Concepts and Applications Applications Kindergarten 40 sounds/minute (LSF) —— Grade 1 60 words/minute (WIF) 20 digits 20 points Grade 2 75 words/minute (PRF) 20 digits 20 points Grade words/minute (PRF) 30 digits 30 points Grade 4 20 replacements/2.5 minutes (Maze) 40 digits 30 points Grade 5 25 replacements/2.5 minutes (Maze) 30 digits 15 points Grade 6 30 replacements/2.5 minutes (Maze) 35 digits 15 points Note: These figures may change pending additional RTI research. Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With National Norms for End-Year Level

16 Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With National Norms for End-Year Level X goal-line end-of-year benchmark

17 Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With Intra-Individual Framework Identify incoming weekly rate of improvement (slope) using at least 8 data points Multiply slope by 1.5 Multiply by number of weeks until end of year Add to student’s baseline score This is the end-of-year goal.

18 1.Identify incoming weekly rate of improvement (slope) using at least 8 data points slope = Multiply slope by 1.5 to find more ambitious slope 1.0 × 1.5 = Multiply ambitious slope by number of weeks until end of year to find year’s increase 1.5 × 12 = Add year’s increase to incoming score to find goal = Mark goal (32.65 ) on graph with X 6. Draw goal-line from incoming to X Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With Intra-Individual Framework

19 Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With Intra-Individual Framework X

20 Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With National Norms for Weekly Improvement 1.Average the student’s first 3 scores (baseline) Baseline = ( ) ÷ 3 = Find appropriate norm (weekly rate of increase) Multiply norm by number of weeks left in year to find year’s increase 0.30 × 17 = Add to baseline to find goal = Mark goal (16.43) on graph with X 6. Draw goal-line from baseline

21 Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With National Norms for Weekly Improvement Grade Reading — Slope Computation — Digits Correct Slope Concepts and Applications — Points Correct Slope K No data available —— (WIF) 0.35 No data available (PRF) (PRF) (Maze) Note: These figures may change pending additional RTI research.

22 Tertiary Prevention: Setting Goals With National Norms for Weekly Improvement X

23 PM in Tertiary Prevention: Designing Individualized Programs Monitor adequacy of student progress and inductively design effective, individualized instructional programs Monitor adequacy of student progress and inductively design effective, individualized instructional programs Start with secondary prevention validated tutoring protocol Start with secondary prevention validated tutoring protocol Increase intensity Increase intensity Monitor progress Monitor progress − When adequate, maintain program (with increasing goals, as warranted) − When inadequate, experiment with new instructional component (maintain effective components; eliminate ineffective components) Apply decision rules for graphs: Apply decision rules for graphs: − Based on 4 most recent consecutive scores − Based on trend-line

24 PM in Tertiary Prevention: 4-Point Method X most recent 4 points goal-line

25 PM in Tertiary Prevention: Four-Point Method X goal-line most recent 4 points

26 PM in Tertiary Prevention: Based on Trend X X X goal-line trend-line

27 PM in Tertiary Prevention: Based on Trend X X X goal-line trend-line

28 Exiting Tertiary Prevention (with ongoing PM to return to tertiary prevention as needed) On the basis of level and slope, decisions are formulated about when to exit tertiary prevention. Goal is to return students to primary or secondary prevention as soon as possible, but weekly CBM continues so that students return to tertiary prevention as frequently and for as long as needed to ensure strong outcomes. On the basis of level and slope, decisions are formulated about when to exit tertiary prevention. Goal is to return students to primary or secondary prevention as soon as possible, but weekly CBM continues so that students return to tertiary prevention as frequently and for as long as needed to ensure strong outcomes.

29 Tertiary Prevention: Determining Response in Reading Grade CBM Probe > Slope >End Level Kindergarten Letter Sound Fluency > 1 > 40 Grade 1 Word Identification Fluency > 1.8 > 50 Grade 2 Passage Reading Fluency > 1 > 60 Grade 3 Passage Reading Fluency > 0.75 > 70 Grade 4 Maze Fluency > 0.25 > 25 Grade 5 Maze Fluency > 0.25 > 25 Grade 6 Maze Fluency > 0.25 > 25 Note: These figures may change pending additional RTI research.

30 Tertiary Prevention: Determining Response in Math Grade Computation Concepts and Applications > Slope > End level > Slope > End level Grade 1 > 0.50 > 20 digits > 0.40 > 20 points Grade 2 > 0.40 > 20 digits > 0.40 > 20 points Grade 3 > 0.40 > 20 digits > 0.70 > 20 points Grade 4 > 0.70 > 20 digits > 0.70 > 20 points Grade 5 > 0.70 > 20 digits > 0.70 > 20 points Grade 6 > 0.70 > 20 digits > 0.70 > 20 points Note: These figures may change pending additional RTI research.

31 PM in Tertiary Prevention: Review IEP goals are set. Individualized programs are designed and implemented. Student progress is monitored: − Students with adequate slopes and projected end levels return to primary or secondary prevention, with ongoing PM. − Students with inadequate slopes and projected end levels remain in tertiary prevention, with ongoing PM.

32 For Additional Information Contact: Flora Murray Vanderbilt University 328 Peabody College Department of Special Education Nashville, TN (615)