The Product Support Manager (PSM): Achieving Life Cycle Management Success Rev. Nov 09 ’05 ’06 ’07 #1 ’02 ’06 ’04 ’06 ’07 ’09 ’03 ’04 “The Secretary of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DoD Logistics Human Capital Strategy (HCS) Executive Overview 1 October 2008.
Advertisements

Bulk Petroleum Executive Agent Cynthia F. Smith PETRO May 30, 2012.
Alignment of COBIT to Botswana IT Audit Methodology
Service Provider Support of Audit Readiness Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) March 14, 2011.
Parts Management Reengineering TLCSM Executive Council Update Gregory Saunders, Director Defense Standardization Program Office 05 Oct 06.
Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) Program Update Colonel Ric Sherman, United States Army Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for.
Human Capital Strategic Planning for the DoD AT&L Workforce April 2004 Ms. Lisa Sper Federal Management Partners / (703)
1 May 2009 ver. 5.5 Materiel Development Decision (MDD) MDA: Approves AoA Study Guidance Determines acquisition phase of entry Identifies initial review.
1 PBL Panel Discussion F-22 System Program Office F-22 System Program Office F-22 System Program Director 13 January 2015.
Ms. Nancy Dolan CNO N Human Systems Integration in DoD Acquisition.
1 The Honorable Kenneth J. Krieg, Under Secretary of Defense for AT&L, signed the DoDI on Nov.2, 2006 Consistent with Goal 6: Improved Governance.
Summary of Revisions DoD Manual DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Procedures 0.
1 Achieving Total Systems Management (ATSM) Acquisition Strategies to Increase Reliability and Reduce Logistics Footprint PEO/SYSCOM Workshop November.
Contractor Assurance Discussion Forrestal Building Washington, D.C. December 14, 2011.
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
Status of Army’s Civilian Human Capital Strategic Plan (HCSP)
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Integrated Process Model - v2
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Randy Fowler | Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Materiel Readiness June 16, 2008 AIA.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
Life Cycle Logistics FIPT
OASD Logistics and Materiel Readiness
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
Joseph “Colt” Murphy Senior Financial Analyst ODASD Materiel Readiness 8 Dec 2010 OSD Product Support BCA Guidebook.
1 DoD-VA Partnership Status 22 February DoD/VA Partnership DoD/VA Mission, Vision, Authority DoD/VA Council Structure Joint Strategic Plan Current.
1 Pipeline Measurement Process Review Committee Kickoff Session Paul Blackwell Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Supply Chain Integration.
Mr. Frank J. Anderson, Jr. President, Defense Acquisition University Acquisition Education Challenges and the Human Capital Strategic Plan.
Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) in the DoD Business Management Modernization Program April 2005 John Coho I&E Business Transformation.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies R&M Engineering 08/16/11 Page 1 DTM R&M Engineering.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1 Total Ownership Cost (TOC) and Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV) Dr. Jeffrey Beach Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division; Survivability,
Logistics Workforce Categories  Ms. Vicki L. Harris  DRC Contractor  Force Management and Organization Division  (A4RF)
Performance Based Logistics 20 Nov Current Life Cycle Challenges High Weapon System Sustainment Cost Inefficient End-to-End Supply.
Life Cycle Cost-Logistics Improvement Joint Task with NDIA Logistics Div August J. Cothran B. Pieper J.S. Moorvitch.
Mr. Shawn R. Hawkins O DUSD - Acquisition Reform 27 April 99 Government/Industry Partnership Packaging Example CIVIL MILITARY INTEGRATION.
1 Twelfth PEO/SYSCOM Commanders Conference The NAVSEA Perspective On Full Service Partnering Mr. John Goodhart Assistant Deputy Commander Fleet Logistics.
Life Cycle Logistics.
DoD Logistics Human Capital Strategic Planning Overview June 26, 2007.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
UNCLASSIFIED Life Cycle Logistics Functional IPT Charter.
Strategic Vision Life Cycle Logistics Functional IPT Mrs. Sue Dryden DASD(Materiel Readiness) January 13, 2012.
1 1 Defense Acquisition Guidebook Progress Update March 27, 2012.
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) February 2006.
DoD Parts Management Reengineering Status Briefing Defense Standardization Conference 25 May 2006 Donna McMurry, DSPO.
Sustainment Solutions Envelope (SSE) Sustainment Solutions Envelope (SSE) Presented at the Defense Standardization Program Conference, 16 March 2004.
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
Innovations in Sustaining Weapons Systems DAU Acquisition Community Symposium RDML Jack Prendergast Vice Director of Logistics (J-4) Joint Staff 15 April.
BEA Orientation November 13, 2007
Parts Management Re-engineering and Warfighter Support International Society of Logistics May 17, 2005 Gregory E. Saunders Director, Defense Standardization.
Life Cycle Cost Savings by Improving Reliability Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director, Operational Test and Evaluation January 15, 2009.
| 1 Weapon System Acquisition Reform- Product Support Assessment DAU SYMPOSIUM 13 April 2010 Presented by: Basil Gray Where Innovation.
LOG235/236 Performance Based Logistics Bruce Hatlem Logistics Functional IPT September 2007.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
1 Alan Estevez | Principal Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Logistics & Materiel Readiness April 15, 2008 DAU Annual Acquisition Community Symposium.
LOG FIPT October 16, 2009 DoD Product Support Assessment Team (PSAT) Implementation.
MIL-HDBK-502A, “Product Support Analysis”
MORS Special Meeting: Risk, Trade Space, & Analytics for Acquisition
DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Life Cycle Logistics.
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Summary of Changes to the
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Performance-Based Logistics
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Alignment of COBIT to Botswana IT Audit Methodology
Defense Logistics: Integrated and Efficient
Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment (IBAS) Program Overview
Mr. Michael Petee Headquarters United State Special Operations Command
Presentation transcript:

The Product Support Manager (PSM): Achieving Life Cycle Management Success Rev. Nov 09 ’05 ’06 ’07 #1 ’02 ’06 ’04 ’06 ’07 ’09 ’03 ’04 “The Secretary of Defense shall require that each major weapon system be supported by a product support manager…” to “maximize value to the Department of Defense by providing the best possible product support outcomes at the lowest operations and support cost.” [i] [i] [i] Ibid “The Secretary of Defense shall require that each major weapon system be supported by a product support manager…” to “maximize value to the Department of Defense by providing the best possible product support outcomes at the lowest operations and support cost.” [i] [i] [i] Ibid “The Secretary of Defense shall require that each major weapon system be supported by a product support manager…” to “maximize value to the Department of Defense by providing the best possible product support outcomes at the lowest operations and support cost.” -- FY10 NDAA, Section 805

2 Background Congress passed, and President Obama signed FY10 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law (Public Law ), Oct 2009 The legislation contained a provision in Sec 805 entitled “Life Cycle Management and Product Support” requiring: –the Secretary of Defense issue comprehensive guidance on life-cycle management and development/implementation of product support strategies for major weapon systems; –each major weapon system be supported by a product support manager (PSM); and –each PSM position be performed by a properly qualified member of the armed forces or full-time employee of the Department of Defense 10pm07- 2

Life Cycle Management (LCM) “Life Cycle Management is the implementation, management, and oversight, by the designated Program Manager (PM), of all activities associated with the acquisition, development, production, fielding, sustainment, and disposal of a DOD system across its life cycle.” (JCIDS Operation Manual) “The PM shall be the single point of accountability for accomplishment of program objectives for total life cycle systems management, including sustainment ” (DoDD , Para E1.29.) PM has full accountability and responsibility for system acquisition and follow-on sustainment

4 Sec 805 PSM Responsibilities A product support manager for a major weapon system shall- –develop and implement a comprehensive product support strategy for the weapon system; –conduct appropriate cost analyses to validate the product support strategy, including cost-benefit analyses as outlined in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-94; – assure achievement of desired product support outcomes through development and implementation of appropriate product support arrangements; –adjust performance requirements and resource allocations across product support integrators and product support providers as necessary to optimize implementation of the product support strategy; –periodically review product support arrangements between the product support integrators and product support providers to ensure the arrangements are consistent with the overall product support strategy; and –prior to each change in the product support strategy or every five years, whichever occurs first, revalidate any business-case analysis performed in support of the product support strategy. 10pm07- 4

Section 805 Report Language “Product support” encompasses all critical functions related to weapon-system readiness, including materiel management, distribution, technical data management, maintenance, training, cataloging, configuration management, engineering support, repair parts management, failure reporting and analyses, and reliability growth. Included within logistics and sustainment functions are the tasks normally performed as part of the logistics support required for a major weapon system that are designed to focus on such metrics as readiness, reliability, availability, mean down time, customer wait time, footprint reduction, and reduced ownership costs. The conferees note that in implementation of this provision, the positions of product support manager, assistant program manager for logistics, deputy program manager for logistics, and system support manager shall be considered synonymous. The conferees emphasize that the product support manager is a separate position from the program manager with distinct responsibilities. Additionally, the conferees in no way intend to limit DOD from establishing product support managers and comprehensive product support strategies for other acquisition programs that are not designated major weapon systems as defined by section 2302d of title 10, United States Code

6 Sec What’s Next? OUSD (AT&L) Action Required: NLT 180 days after enactment of the FY 2010 NDAA, SecDef shall issue comprehensive guidance on LCM and the development of PS strategies (including PSM implementation guidance) Three major policy updates anticipated to fulfill this requirement: –USD AT&L Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) “Implementation of Section 805 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 “Life- Cycle Management and Product Support” –USD AT&L memo entitled “Government Performance of Critical Acquisition Functions” relating to Section 820 of the P.L. 109–364, John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, as Amended by Section 805 of P.L , National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” –Revision of DoD Instruction “Operation of the Defense Acquisition Workforce Education, Training, and Career Development Program”

Attachment 2 – Definitions Draft Policy Memo Attachment 1 - Guidance on LCM and Product Support Strategies Outcome-based (readiness-based) strategies at best-value costs Balanced use of DoD and industry resources via stable and robust partnerships Maximize competition, or the option of competition for long-term effectiveness Assist PMs in LCM responsibilities via establishment of mandatory product support manager (PSM) positions Assign properly qualified military or DoD employee to PSM positions Specifies PSM duties On Track for April 30 Guidance Issuance

Product Support Integrators Warfighter Program Manager (PM) Product Support Manager (PSM) Product Support Providers Performance Based Agreement PBA/Partnering Agreement Inherently Governmental Integrated Industrial Base: Commercial and Government DepotsICPsTier X PSI DLAOEMsDPO Responsibility/Authority Accountability Defined Performance Outcomes Responsible “Oversight & Management” Accountable “Establish Product Support Strategy” Bound Agents “Achieve documented outcomes within terms of agreements” Outcomes KPP/KSA Product Support Business Model

9 Benefits Focuses on Desired Performance Outcomes Reduces Product Support Costs Supports the Program Manager (PM) Facilitates Life Cycle Management Clearly Delineates Inherently Governmental Functions Helps Achieve Long-Term Best Value Outcomes Establishes Clear Lines of Authority Clearly Articulates Roles and Responsibilities Standardizes Terminology Encourages Development of Appropriately Rigorous, Targeted Training Further Integrates Acquisition and Sustainment

10 Recommendations DoD Policy Considerations: – Updates to DoDD , DoDI , DAG, and PBL Program Manager’s Product Support Guide to encapsulate PSM roles, responsibilities, and relationship to the PM – PSM location and reporting chain Rigorous PSM Selection Requirements Expand PSM Opportunities for Military Personnel Aggressively Implement DoD Product Support Assessment Human Capital Recommendations Align Existing Policy with New Statutory Requirements

A Few Parting Thoughts Congressional Mandate for Product Support Manager (PSM) is a Game Changer Operational Perspectives, Early Sustainment Planning & a Life Cycle Focus are Paramount While PM is Ultimately Responsible for LCM, PSM will be Key to Sustainment Planning and Execution Think (Very) Long Term, Best Value, “Life of Program” Product Support Perspective Policy & Statutes are Evolving Rapidly; Product Support Assessment & Sec 805 Implementation will drive next round Goal: genuine life cycle management which delivers sustained long-term weapon system readiness while optimizing life cycle costs By including Section 805 in the FY 2010 NDAA, Congress has made it clear where it stands on these issues, and who is responsible for addressing them.

BACKUP SLIDES

A Few Key LCM Points LCM is DoD policy –Terminology varies (TLCSM, LCM, ILCM, LCS), but principles are the same –Goal to provide more effective, affordable, operationally-ready systems –Focus on increased reliability, supportability, & maintainability –Early focus on sustainment across the system life cycle Remember: “the Program Manager (PM) is the designated individual with responsibility for and authority to accomplish program objectives for development, production, and sustainment to meet the user's operational needs.” (Ref: DoDI , Para 3.5) “Up front” sustainment planning enables acquisition & requirements communities to deliver systems with optimal availability & reliability to warfighter at best value

14 Sec 805 – What’s Different? Haven’t we always had Product Support Managers? Yes, but this legislation… –Explicitly establishes a PM “help-mate” –Strengthens PM authority (funding) –Builds a better Life Cycle Logistics human capital asset –More respect for an integral program management position (front-line) –Potential for many key roles and responsibilities to be performed better –More attentive to enterprise approaches, including FMS 10pm07- 14

15 Draft Policy Memo DoD policies implementing law will specifically require: –Assisting Program Managers (PMs) in performance of life cycle management responsibilities via establishment of mandatory Product Support Manager (PSM) positions for each major weapon system; –Assigning a properly qualified member of the armed forces or full-time employee of the DoD to PSM positions –Employing outcome-based (readiness-based) product support strategies delivered at the best value operations and support cost; –Maximizing competition, or ensure the option of competition, in implementing sustainment strategies for long-term operational effectiveness and making balanced use of DoD and industry resources via stable and robust government-industry partnerships; –PSM to perform specific duties, including development of a comprehensive product support strategy, conduct of appropriate cost analyses, and establishment and achievement of desired product support outcomes through implementation of appropriate product support arrangements

16 PSM – PSI Roles and Responsibilities

17 What does this Mean? It’s All About the Warfighter and National Security Product Support is Broader than Logistics Life Cycle Management is Enhanced Applicability beyond MDAPs Better Managed Weapon System Support PBL as a Weapon System Product Support Strategy is Enhanced Government and Industry Roles Clarified PM-PSM Relationship Better Understood Clearly Articulated Expectations “Product support, also referred to as system sustainment, is the package of support functions required to maintain the readiness and operational capability of weapon systems, subsystems, software, and support systems.” – DoD WSAR Product Support Assessment

Includes procurement to disposal of defense system material, and integration of multiple material sources and processes to meet war fighter requirements. Includes planning and executing maintenance, both scheduled and unscheduled, to defense system equipment. Includes transportation, packaging, cargo scheduling, and dispatching of materials, support services, and personnel in response to customer requirements to move and sustain the force. Includes planning, development, implementation, and management of a comprehensive, affordable, and effective systems support strategy. Four Logistics Workforce Categories SUPPLY MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPORT DEPLOYMENT/ DISTRIBUTION/ TRANSPORTATION LIFE CYCLE LOGISTICS Bottom line: Support the Warfighter!

Not to Scale DEFENSE ACQUISITIONWORKFORCE CONTRACTING LIFE CYCLE LOGISTICS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) WORKFORCE SYSTEMS … ENGINEERING PRODUCTION, QUALITY & MANUFACTURING S&T MANAGER FACILITIES ENGINEERING IT Business ( CE & FM ) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS PROPERTY PURCHASING MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SUPPLY MANAGEMENT DEPLOYMENT/ DISTRIBUTION/ TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL WORKFORCE DOD LOGISTICS WORKFORCE TEST & EVALUATION COR/COTR T&E Functional Communities within the Defense Acquisition Workforce are Part of Larger DOD Communities

Availability KPP: Mandatory for ACAT I; sponsor decision for ACAT II/III. Two components: Materiel Availability: Percentage of the total inventory of a system operationally capable of performing an assigned mission at a given time (Number of Operational End Items / Total Population) Operational Availability: Percentage of time a system or group of systems within a unit are operationally capable of performing an assigned mission (Uptime/(Uptime + Downtime)) Mandatory KSAs: Materiel Reliability KSA: Probability that system will perform without failure over a specified interval. MTBF = (Total Operating Hours / Total # of Failures) Ownership Cost KSA: Based on Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG) elements: unit operations, energy/POL, maintenance, sustaining support, continuing system improvements, regardless of funding source (O&S Costs Associated w/ Materiel Readiness) Plus a fourth Sustainment Outcome Metric: Mean Down Time A measure of average Total Downtime required to restore an asset to its full operational capabilities. MDT = (Total Down Time for All Failures/ Total Number of Failures) Mandatory Sustainment KPP & KSAs Ownership Cost Provides Balance; Sustainment Solutions Cannot be Availability and Reliability “at any Cost”