10-Dec-2012-cesg-1 Presentation to ESTEC Nordwijk, Netherlands 8 April 2014 CCSDS Space Link Services (SLS) Area Area Director: Gian Paolo Calzolari (ESA/ESOC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer Networks20-1 Chapter 20. Network Layer: Internet Protocol 20.1 Internetworking 20.2 IPv IPv6.
Advertisements

Why to learn OSI reference Model? The answer is too simple that It tells us that how communication takes place between computers on internet but how??
BASIC CRYPTOGRAPHY CONCEPT. Secure Socket Layer (SSL)  SSL was first used by Netscape.  To ensure security of data sent through HTTP, LDAP or POP3.
A General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/
Common Coding and Synchronization Layer: Next Steps NASA Optical Communications Working Group 17 April /9/20151.
TCP/IP Protocol Suite 1 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 7 Internet Protocol Version4.
1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.
EE 4272Spring, 2003 Chapter 11. ATM and Frame Relay Overview of ATM Protocol Architecture ATM Logical Connections ATM Cells ATM Service Categories ATM.
Gursharan Singh Tatla Transport Layer 16-May
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 1 The Trade Between CCSDS and HDLC Framing on Global Precipitation Measurement David Everett and Jonathan.
What is a Protocol A set of definitions and rules defining the method by which data is transferred between two or more entities or systems. The key elements.
Mukesh N. Tekwani Elphinstone College Mumbai
1 Network Layer Security: Run over non-IP Protocol? Howie Weiss (NASA/JPL/Parsons) San Antonio, TX October 2013.
CCSDS Next Generation Space Link Protocol (NGSLP) Greg Kazz Peter Shames NASA-JPL
Unified Frame Format Next Generation Data SpaceLink Protocol (NGSLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 2/20/
June 2004 SIW-4 - IP in Space Implementation Guide 1 Handbook for Using IP Protocols for Space Missions James Rash - NASA/GSFC Keith Hogie, Ed Criscuolo,
CHAPTER #6  Introducti on to ATM. Contents  Introduction  ATM Cells  ATM Architecture  ATM Connections  Addressing and Signaling  IP over ATM.
Cesg-1 SLS REPORT 7 May 2010 Jean-Luc Gerner (AD) Gilles Moury (DAD) SPACE LINK SERVICES (SLS) AREA SLP and NGU sections Only.
How would optics fit in CCSDS Stack? G.P. Calzolari (SLS Area Director) CCSDS Spring 2012 Meetings 16 April Which Cross Support Services should be picked.
Next Generation Space Link Protocol – Raison d’etre Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg SLS-SLP WG Fall 2013 CCSDS Meeting - San Antonio, TX, USA.
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Electrical Engineering Department EE400 PROJECT Personal Area Networks Instructed by Dr.AlGhadbanPresenters.
Security Association / Security Context Bruno Saba DCT/TV/IN 03/05/2010.
CCSDS P1A/B Meeting - Frascati - Nov 8, Gilles Moury, Guy Lesthievent - 1 Proposal to P1A & P1B Increasing allowed frame lengths and interleaving.
CCSDS Security WG meeting October 2008, hosted by DLR at DIN premises (Berlin) 1 Data Link Security BOF An ESA contribution on Lessons Learned and Issues/Questions.
CCSDS Unified Space Data Link (USLP)
Karlstad University IP security Ge Zhang
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Network Layer Security - Food for Thought D. Fischer, I Aguilar-Sanchez CCSDS Fall Meetings.
Requirements Topics and Proposals as discussed at Session #4 of IEEE /16r1.
March 7, 2008Security Proposal 1 CCSDS Link Security Proposal Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz Howard Weiss March 7, 2008.
RF&Mod services from CIS-Lunar WG Single access? Multiple access? –To/from several s/c simultaneously from one station? (many to one) This might be useful.
IPsec Introduction 18.2 Security associations 18.3 Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP) 18.4 Internet Key Exchange.
TRIO-CINEMA Meeting at KHU 1 October 19-23, 2009 CINEMA Operations Manfred Bester.
FSH/security SLS-SLP fall2009 (version 4) Page 1 Security Headers + Homogeneous approach to FSH and Insert Zone in TM/AOS/TC frames: some problems and.
Proposal for a TC-2 Protocol Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz Oct /27/20151.
BITTT and CCSDS in China October About BITTT BITTT is the abbreviation for Beijing Institute of Tracking and Telecommunications Technology.
IRIG-106 CHAPTER 7 TELEMETRY DOWNLINK ETTC JUNE 2015 Balázs Bagó Zodiac Data Systems.
1 19 September 2005 Space Link Services Area report to CMC Reston, Virginia, USA, 26 September 2005.
CCSDS Fall Meeting at ESTEC
CCSDS march 2008 meeting – Crystal City 1 TC/TM space links security SEA / SLS cross area meeting.
Routing Fundamentals and Subnets Introduction to IT and Communications Technology CE
1 Space Link Services Area report to CESG/CMC Darmstadt, Germany, 9 October 2007 J.L. Gerner / G. Moury.
IP security Ge Zhang Packet-switched network is not Secure! The protocols were designed in the late 70s to early 80s –Very small network.
The CCSDS Cislunar Communications Architecture Keith Scott The MITRE Corporation CCSDS Meeting January 2007.
Apr SLS-SLP WG Goal: Progress TM, AOS Space Data Link Protocol Pink Sheets to Blue (OID frame)* Hold due to FSH/Insert Zone/Security discussion.
Cesg-1 28 April 2009 Jean-Luc Gerner (AD) Gilles Moury (DAD) SPACE LINK SERVICES (SLS) AREA.
Key Management V 0.4 Discussion of document revision SeaSec Intermediary Meeting, Heppenheim, October 07 Daniel Fischer Uni Lux SECAN-Lab / ESA OPS-GDA.
Seeking a General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 5/1/2012 5/1/12 Proposed Universal.
Impulse Radio April 8, 2004 ISDWG April 8, 2004 Data Service Multiplex.
BITTT—Beijing Institute of Tracking and Telecommunications Technology
Space Data Link Secure Protocol Interoperability Testing Interfaces Definition Proposal Bruno Saba DCT/TV/IN 26/04/2010.
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems 1 JAXA CCSDS Status April 12 – 13, 2005 Kaneaki Narita Consolidated Space Tracking and Data Acquisition.
Figure 2-6: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) Figure 4-14: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) MAP Packet Service.
1 Systems Architecture WG: Charter and Work Plan October 23, 2003 Takahiro Yamada, JAXA/ISAS.
1 19 September 2005 Space Link Services Area report to CESG Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 19 September 2005.
Why we need USLP Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg November 9-10, 2014 CCSDS Fall London Question: Why the change of name from NGSLP to USLP? Answer: 1) In time the.
National Aeronautics & Space Administration European Space Agency & 1 Modulation and Coding: Draft IOAG Resolutions to CCSDS September 9, 2008 Les Deutsch.
CCSDS Telecommand Sync and Channel Coding Specification using advanced Block Codes Ed Greenberg NASA/JPL Oct. 15,
20.1 Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Chapter 10 Telemetry Downlink
Joint Meeting of the CCSDS and the OMG-SDTF
How Updated CCSDS Protocols can Simplify Data Formatting for the Constellation Project Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz.
SLS-CS_16-12 Terminology Used with Sliced Transfer Frames
BITTT and CCSDS in China
Seeking a General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 5/1/2012 5/1/12 Proposed Universal.
SLS AREA REPORT Goal: Next Generation Uplink WG
CCSDS Link Security Proposal
A Wireless LAN technologies IEEE
Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 16 September 2005
Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/2012
NET 323D: Networks Protocols
Presentation transcript:

10-Dec-2012-cesg-1 Presentation to ESTEC Nordwijk, Netherlands 8 April 2014 CCSDS Space Link Services (SLS) Area Area Director: Gian Paolo Calzolari (ESA/ESOC) Deputy Area Director: Gilles Moury (CNES)

10-Dec-2012-cesg-2 SLS – We are the Space Link Services

10-Dec-2012-cesg-3 Communications Scenario

10-Dec-2012-cesg-4 Layering (1) CCSDS started from this layered approach. The CCSDS Data Link Layer and the Physical Layer are hosting the typical Tracking, Telemetry and Command functions; i.e. they are the historical and basic layers for CCSDS Communications.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-5 Layering (2) A more detailed view of the layered approach is shown below together with the related standards. The CCSDS Data Link Layer and the is actually split between Protocol (sub)Layer and a Synchronization and Coding (sub)Layer. NOTE: The Proximity-1 Protocol Suite is totally dedicated to Orbiter- Lander links (e.g. Mars vicinity). During the years, those basic layers revealed to be very strong, and demonstrated they could also sustain more elements built on top of them.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-6 DELTA DOR PN RANGING Prox-1TM, TC LTP DTN-BP/BSP Channel Coding and Sync IP over CCSDS CFDP AOS RANGING Encapsulation Packet SECURITY RF & Modulation SLS AREA DATA COMPRESSION SLS AREA Multispectral Hyperspectral Data Compression WG Space Data Link Security WG (SDLS Protocol Function for Authentication and Confidentiality) Space Link Protocols WG Coding & Synchronization WG RF & Modulation WG Optical Communications WG O.CC&S O.Mod&W Space Packet Protocol AOS Services Encapsulation Service SLS Area in the CCSDS Layered approach (simplified view)

10-Dec-2012-cesg-7 The Basic Communications Standards: Physical Layer The Radio Frequency and Modulation Systems standard collects most of the standards for the physical layer. It focuses upon the standardization of RF and modulation systems for Earth stations and spacecraft. Technical Recommendations are subdivided into groups representing the various subsystems. These are: Earth-to-Space Radio Frequency, Telecommand, Space-to-Earth Radio Frequency, Telemetry, Radio Metric, and Spacecraft. Policy Recommendations include: Frequency Utilization, Power Limitations, Modulation Methods, Operational Procedures, Testing Recommendations, and Spacecraft Systems. Other standards for the physical layer include Pseudo- Noise (PN) Ranging Systems and Data Transmission and PN Ranging for 2 GHz CDMA Link via Data Relay Satellite and Proximity-1.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-8 The Basic Communications Standards Synchronization and Coding (sub)layer The standards for the Synchronization and Coding (sub)layer do differentiate between Telemetry and Telecommand as they offer different types of services for those two unbalanced channels. The TM Synchronization and Channel Coding standard provides unidirectional (one way) transfer of a sequence of fixed-length TM or AOS Transfer Frames at a constant frame rate over a Physical Channel across a space link, with optional error detection/correction. The TC Synchronization and Channel Coding standard provides unidirectional (one way) transfer of a sequence of variable-length TC Transfer Frames over a Physical Channel across a space link, with optional error detection/correction. While the TC coding scheme is stable since years, many different options with different Frame/Bit Error Rate (FER/BER) performances are available for telemetry; i.e. convolutional, Reed-Solomon, concatenated RS+convolutional, Turbo Codes, Low- density Parity-check (LDPC) codes, Serially Concatenated Convolutional Codes and DVB-S2. There is also a coding standard for Proximity-1.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-9 Coding Gain Here a comparison of the Bit Error Rate curves for different coding schemes allowed by CCSDS. A given coding scheme can be good for a given scenario but cumbersome for another one (like driving to supermarket with a Rolls-Royce ) Better

10-Dec-2012-cesg-10 The Basic Communications Standards Data Link Protocol (sub)layer The most important capability of the Space Data Link Protocols (sub)layer is the Master/Virtual Channel multiplexing. The (original) standards also differentiate between Down/Up-link. The TM Space Data Link Protocol standard specifies the Data Link layer protocol, services, and procedures pertaining to the Transfer Frame for the Space-to-Earth link. It replaces the old Packet Telemetry Specification. The TC Space Data Link Protocol standard specifies the Data Link layer protocol, services, and procedures pertaining to the Transfer Frame for the Earth-to-Space link. It replaces the old Packet Telecommand Specification. The Advanced Orbiting Systems, Networks and Data Links: Architectural Specification was developed in the (late) 1980’s to provide bidirectional transmission of multiple data types (including voice and video) at high data rates targeted to manned/man-tended space stations etc. Today largely used by (ESA) EO payloads: The AOS Space Data Link Protocol standard specifies the Data Link layer protocol, services, and procedures pertaining to the CCSDS Version-2 Transfer Frame. There is also a Proximity-1 Space Data Link Protocol.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-11 CCSDS Space Packet Protocol Historically, the Space Packet Protocol (SPP) has been the only method providing a flexible structure (of top of Space Data Link protocols) for transferring user/application data from Space to Earth or vice versa. Used as a common structure for TM and TC. Most innovative feature (in the early 1980s) was the APID which identified the packet contents. Previously, content was identified by data position in a repetitive frame. The APID set the data content free from the clockwork frame. Packet header also contains fields for multiplexing packets in to the link. APID subsequently (AOS and pre-Internet) proposed for reuse as networking identifier for packet routing. CCSDS packet is going to be “superseded” as network protocol with the increased networking by IP (and eventually DTN) over Encapsulation Service.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-12 Packet (CCSDS or Encapsulation) Packet Multiplexing in TM and AOS Packet End of Packet End of Packet Beginning of Packet Beginning of Packet Frame Header CCSDS Packet End of CCSDS Packet End of CCSDS Packet Frame Header Fill Packet Fill Packet Fixed Length FrameVariable Length Packet First Header Pointer in Frame Header points to First Packet header in frame Packet length in Packet Header points to next packet header in frame Packets which overrun the frame end are continued into the next frame in the VC and rejoined when demultiplexed Fill packets are used to complete a frame when a new packet is not available to complete it Frame N in Virtual ChannelFrame N+1 in Virtual Channel VC1 Frame VC3 Frame VC2 Frame VC1 Frame VC2 Frame VC3 Frame VC2 Frame VC1 Frame VC2 Frame VC3 Frame TM or AOS link consists of a stream of fixed length frames Each frame contains synchronisation, header, data (e.g. CCSDS packets) and error correction coding Any frame may be allocated to a particular Virtual Channel (VC). VCs are used share the link efficiently Link Structure Packet Multiplexing Minimum fill CCSDS packet size is 7 bytes. Incomplete minimum fill packets run into next frame End of CCSDS Packet End of CCSDS Packet Beginning of long CCSDS Packet Beginning of long CCSDS Packet Frame Header Continuation of CCSDS Packet Frame Header Fixed Length Frame First Header Pointer in Frame Header points to First Packet header in frame Packet length in Packet Header points out of frame and used to check length of reassembled packet First header pointer set to 2043d to indicate no packet header in frame Packet Segmentation End of long CCSDS Packet End of long CCSDS Packet Beginning of CCSDS Packet Beginning of CCSDS Packet Frame Header First header pointer points to end of the long packet and beginning of the next packet

10-Dec-2012-cesg-13 On top of the Data Link Layer… and below For many years, the Space Packet has been used as the main tool to carry data for whatever application including images as well as house keeping data etc. Eventually a new structure, called Encapsulation Packet, has been added to carry data in a more flexible manner as e.g. for the transfer of IP Protocol Data Units (PDUs) via CCSDS Space Data Link Layer protocols. Finally, also the basic layers for CCSDS Communications are subject to evolution and - together with new features as e.g. new powerful Uplink Codes, Variable/Adaptive Coding Modulation (VCM/ACM), enhanced space data link protocol(s). Very important is the seamless introduction of Optical Communications that aim to highly improve the Space Link Services. The related WG has just been created and will deal with Optical Coding & Modulation as well as with supporting services (e.g. weather data, etc.).

10-Dec-2012-cesg-14 Last but not least: Data Compression and Security (1 of 2) On-board data compression is needed to make full use of limited spacecraft resources like data storage and downlink capacity. The Multispectral Hyperspectral Data Compression WG takes care of this subject. They started their work with the “Lossless Data Compression” standard and eventually added standards for “Image Data Compression” and “Lossless Multispectral & Hyperspectral Image Compression” In fact multispectral & hyperspectral images can occupy enormous data volumes, and so compression algorithms specifically designed to exploit the three-dimensional structure of such images can provide tremendous benefit to space missions.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-15 Last but not least: Data Compression and Security (2 of 2) The Space Data Link Layer Security Working Group (SLS-SEA-DLS) is a joint activity between SLS and SEA Areas. The objectives of this Working Group is to develop a recommendation for a security protocol operating at the data link layer of CCSDS space links. Target missions are civilian missions (science, earth observation, telecommunications,...). This security protocol provides authentication and/or encryption both for uplink and downlink. It is compatible with CCSDS TM, TC and AOS data link protocols and independent from any specific cryptographic algorithm. This security protocol is a function within the Data Link Protocol (sub)layer.

10-Dec-2012-cesg-16 References CCSDS Web Sitehttp:// SLS Area CCSDS Publications SLS Area Publications Keep in mind the color terminology: Blue: Recommended Standards Magenta: Recommended Practices Green: Informational Reports Silver: Historical

10-Dec-2012-cesg-17 THANK YOU