Relative positioning with Galileo E5 AltBOC code measurements DEPREZ Cécile Dissertation submitted to the University of Liège in partial requirements for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Near real time assessment of the Space Weather effect on navigation based on the DGPS technique S.Lejeune, R.Warnant, A. Barré, M. Bavier Royal Observatory.
Advertisements

 Global  Positioning  System  Department of Defense developed for navigation  Standard positioning service (public uses)  Precise positioning service.
GPS Theory and applications
2013 Western Australia Surveying Conference
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 Improving the GPS L1 Signal GPS III Offers the Opportunity.
June 12-14, 2013, Ottawa, Canada From dual- to triple-frequency PPP: method, problems and application in California Jianghui Geng, Yehuda Bock Scripps.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Global Navigation Satellite Systems
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Workshop, October 27 – 28, 2006, Quebec city, Quebec Sükeová, Liliána 1 L2C.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Basic Principles of GPS Mathias Lemmens EU GIS/Mapping Advisor Abuja 4 th August 2005.
Per R. Bodin Global Posision System GPS. Per R. Bodin Litt historie 1960: nasA & DoD are Interested in developing a satellite based position system with.
Ground-Based Altimetry Using a Single- Receiver Single-Frequency GNSS Phase Ambiguity Resolution Technique G. Stienne* S. Reboul J.-B. Choquel M. Benjelloun.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Introduction to Global Navigation Satellite Systems Ondrej Kútik.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
DISCUSSION SESSION 3: FUTURE PPP USER SOLUTIONS GNSS PPP W ORKSHOP : R EACHING F ULL P OTENTIAL J UNE 2013, O TTAWA What will near-term PPP user.
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION The Global Positioning System Bart Krol / Jeroen Verplanke.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Global Positioning System GPS Fully functional for Military use in 1995 Frequencies of operation L1 = MHz and L2 = MHz. SPS (Civil) uses.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
Monitoring the ionospheric activity using GNSS
1 LAVAL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF GEOMATICS Mohammed Boukhecha (Laval University) Marc Cocard (Laval University) René Landry (École technique supérieure.
Tripp Corbin, CFM, GISP CEO eGIS Associates, Inc. Relationships Matter.
VRS Network The Magic Behind the Scene
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
GPS How it Works For a full tutorial on GPS and its applications visit the Trimble WebsiteTrimble Website.
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Global Positioning System
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future GLONASS Russia’s global satellite navigation system 24 satellites in three.
By Andrew Y.T. Kudowor, Ph.D. Lecture Presented at San Jacinto College.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.
Surveying with the Global Positioning System Phase Observable.
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
SVY 207: Lecture 7 Differential GPS By now you should understand: –How GPS point positioning works from first principles Aim of this lecture: –To understand.
M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.
What Makes a GNSS Signal the IGS Analysis Center Workshop 2-6 June 2008, Miami Beach Larry Young (not an expert, just a user) Jet Propulsion Lab.
Global Positioning System Overview
The Global Positioning System. Early Satellite Systems Satellite Surveying started more than 30 years ago. Now, High accuracy could be achieved in real.
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future Precision Agriculture – Lesson 2 What is GPS? Global Positioning System Operated.
Chapter 2 GPS Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 6 Point Positioning –By now you should understand: F How receiver knows GPS satellite coordinates F How receiver produces pseudoranges.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
SVY207: Lecture 10 Computation of Relative Position from Carrier Phase u Observation Equation u Linear dependence of observations u Baseline solution –Weighted.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant, G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, H. Brenot, J. Spits, S. Stankov.
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
The Global Positioning System
Least Squares Measurement model Weighted LSQ  Optimal estimates  Linear  Unbiased  Minimum variance.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
GNSS: Principle, limitations and perspectives.
GNSS: Principle, applications and opportunities.
Global Positioning System Supplemental from JD Text
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*,
Presentation transcript:

Relative positioning with Galileo E5 AltBOC code measurements DEPREZ Cécile Dissertation submitted to the University of Liège in partial requirements for the degree of Master of Geomatics and Geometrology Dissertation advisor : R. Warnant Examiners : R. Billen and A. Demoulin 1

1. Positioning Satellite-based positioning principle 2 Time difference between reception and emission time of a signal sent by a satellite to a receiver:

1. Positioning Unknowns: The 3 components of the receiver position: X r,Y r,Z r The receiver clock error Requirements: At least 4 visible satellites The satellite clock error Time difference= synchronisation of the clocks 3 Never reached in practice!

4 1. Positioning Errors affecting the signal Receiver clock bias Satellite clock bias Atmospheric errors Tropospheric errors Ionospheric errors Multipath Observation noise Satellite hardware delays Receiver hardware delays 1-2 metres decimetres centimetres – 50 meters 1-2 metres metres decimetres - metres Position equation:

5 2. Observables Codes pseudoranges Expected precision: from decametres to metres Basic observable Most common for public applications Position equation:

6 2. Observables Expected precision: from centimetres to millimetres Initial ambiguity High precision applications Expensive receivers Carrier phases pseudoranges Position equation:

7 3. Global Navigation Satellite Systems Global Positioning System (GPS) American GNSS Constellation of 24 satellites 12 hours of revolution Altitude of kilometres Operational since 1995 Modernization: 2 -> 3 carrier frequencies 2 -> 5 codes

8 3. Global Navigation Satellite Systems Galileo European GNSS Project initialized in 1999 Altitude of kilometres Satellites: Prototypes GIOVE-A and GIOVE-B decommissioned in 2012 IOV 1 generation: 3 satellites available FOC 2 generation: 4 satellites under commissioning 4 carrier frequencies (E1, E5a, E5b, E6) and 10 codes E5a+b obtained with the AltBOC modulation of E5a an E5b 1 : In orbit Validation phase 2 : Full Operational Capability phase

9 4. Hypothesis Galileo E5a+b outperforms other GPS and Galileo signals [Caelen, 2014]: lower observation noise better multipath mitigation Assumption: Precision on positioning should be better with Galileo E5a+b than with other signals Hypothesis: Constraints: First constraint: solution based on the code-only observable (non ambiguous) to reach decimetre precision on position estimation. Second constraint: single-frequency solution, the most common for public applications Could Galileo E5 AltBOC single-frequency code-only measurements be used to reach decimetre-level accuracy on satellite-based position estimations? Research question:

10 5. Methods Single-frequency code-only methods: Single point positioning: Single point positioning results with Galileo E5a+b on DOY 192 of 2015 obtained with a Trimble receiver

11 5. Methods Single-frequency code-only methods: Single point positioning: Single point positioning results with Galileo E5a+b on DOY 192 of 2015 obtained with a Trimble receiver

12 5. Methods Single-frequency code-only methods: Relative positioning: Principle: Two receivers simultaneously observe the same satellites. Single difference: Difference between two receiver observations of the same satellite Double difference: Difference between two receiver observations of the two same satellites.

13 5. Methods Single-frequency code-only methods: Single difference: Single difference results with Galileo E5a+b on DOY 345 of 2014 obtained with two Trimble receivers

14 5. Methods Single-frequency code-only methods: Single difference: Single difference results with Galileo E5a+b on DOY 345 of 2014 obtained with two Trimble receivers

15 5. Methods Single-frequency code-only methods: Double difference : configurations Zero baseline Short baseline Receiver clock bias Satellite clock bias Atmospheric errors Tropospheric errors Ionospheric errors Multipath Part of the observation noise Satellite hardware delays Receiver hardware delays Position equation: Receiver clock bias Satellite clock bias Atmospheric errors Tropospheric errors Ionospheric errors Multipath Observation noise Satellite hardware delays Receiver hardware delays Medium baseline Receiver clock bias Satellite clock bias Atmospheric errors Tropospheric errors Ionospheric errors Multipath Observation noise Satellite hardware delays Receiver hardware delays Position equation:

16 6. Results Least Square Adjustment Fixed precise coordinates Configuration details: MATLAB program Real Time

17 6. Results Very different results obtained with the two types of receivers: Trimble

18 6. Results Very different results obtained with the two types of receivers: Septentrio

19 6. Results Trimble receivers: less precise than the Septentrio’s receivers (higher observation noise) Septentrio receivers: non simultaneity of the observations Observation precision as computed by our software might be altered Values of position precision are lower Three main parameters affect the position precision: PDOP: Position Dilution Of Precision The elevations of the satellites observed The number of visible satellites GPS results are compared to Galileo results: Galileo is more affected by PDOP and low elevation satellites Galileo E5 shows the best observation precision Comparison with GPS constellation reduced to 4 satellites: Galileo E5 shows the best position precision

20 7. Conclusion Trimble in zero baseline mode: Decimetres precision obtained on observations with Galileo E1, E5a and E5b signals (correspond to results obtained by [Springer et al., 2013]) A few centimetres precision on observations with Galileo E5 (correspond to expected values with Galileo full constellation [Colomina et al., 2012], [Silva et al., 2012], [Lopes et al., 2012]) Metres precision on position with all Galileo signals and decimetres precision when PDOP is low (also reached by [ESA, 2014], [Langley et al., 2012], [Steigneberger & Hauschild, 2015] with real data ) Septentrio in zero, short and medium baselines: A few centimetres precision on observations with all the Galileo signals ([Colomina et al., 2012], [Silva et al., 2012], [Lopes et al., 2012]) A few decimetres precision on position with all the Galileo signals When Brussels medium baseline is considered (80 kilometres), the decimetres precision can only be reached when PDOP values are low

21 8. Prospects As high PDOP values were encountered with Galileo signals (due to their reduced constellation), the same study should be undertaken when more satellites will be available Issues due to the non simultaneity of the Septentrio receivers should be solved Statistics based on more observation days Similar study on carrier phase observable Combine GPS and Galileo observations

22 I thank you for your attention