The Reliability of CBM Reading Growth Estimates for Different Student Groups Joseph F. T. Nese B. Jasmine Park Aki Kamata Julie Alonzo Gerald Tindal Behavioral.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
Advertisements

Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
Assessment, Screening and Progress Monitoring made Easy! a tool for every tier Darrell L. Lee, easyCBM Senior Account Manager.
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of My Breakfast Reading Program in reducing the number of children at-risk for reading difficulty. 1st grade.
DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
STAR Assessments: Using data to drive your instruction 2012.
Margaret D. Anderson SUNY Cortland, April, Federal legislation provides the guidelines that schools must follow when identifying children for special.
Reading Comprehension and Math Computation Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments for Secondary Students Carrie Urshel, Ph.D., School Psychologist.
INTRODUCTION TO THE FAST SYSTEM The FAST Team University of Minnesota Theodore J. Christ, PhD
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Response to Intervention Finding RTI-Ready Measures to Assess and Track Student Academic Skills Jim Wright
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
Using Hierarchical Growth Models to Monitor School Performance: The effects of the model, metric and time on the validity of inferences THE 34TH ANNUAL.
Assessments and Academic Growth 2014 –15 Required Actions for the LAP Student Growth Collection.
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System.
Joint Predictive Probabilities of Oral Reading Fluency for Reading Comprehension Young-Suk Kim & Yaacov Petscher Florida State University & Florida Center.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Curriculum-Based Measurements The What. Curriculum-Based Measurements  Curriculum-Based Measurements (CBM) Assessment tools derived from the curriculum,
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Assessment: Universal Screening Cadre 7 Initial Training September 29, 2011.
Assessment Methodologies Used to Personalize Instruction Gerald Tindal Castle-McIntosh-Knight Professor Behavioral Research and Teaching – UO.
Abstract In a response to intervention (RTI) model, educators in both general and special education use curriculum-based measurement (CBM) oral reading.
ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.
Assessment, Screening and Progress Monitoring made Easy! a tool for every tier.
SST Updates Nash-Rocky Mount Public School System.
Response to Intervention Reliable Methods to Measure Student Progress in Basic Literacy Skills Jim Wright
Setting Ambitious & Attainable Student Goals OrRTI Spring Training May 3 rd, 2011.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Center for Reading Research 175 Peik Hall 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN Contacts: Kathrin Maki:
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Level 2 at Middle School Curriculum Based Assessment.
1 Reading First Grant Writing Workshop: Instructional Reading Assessments Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Portland, Oregon.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Data Based Decision Making
Response to Intervention RTI: Decision Rules.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Instruction, Teacher Evaluation and Value-Added Student Learning Minneapolis Public Schools November,
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Progress Monitoring and RtI: Questions from the Field Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem,
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
ELLA Module 3 Assessments and Interventions. Goals for Today: Participants will be able to: Identify the four purposes for assessment. Align DIBELS assessments.
1 The Course of Reading Disability in First Grade: Latent Class Trajectories and Early Predictors Don Compton, Lynn Fuchs, and Doug Fuchs.
Response to Intervention Hofstra University October 21, 2014 Deborah Y. Smith, Ed.D. Principal, Connetquot Elementary School East Islip School District.
Easy Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM). What is Easy CBM? EasyCBM® was designed by researchers at the University of Oregon as an integral part of an.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Literacy Assessments Literacy Workgroup Marcia Atwood Michelle Boutwell Sue Locke-Scott Rae Lynn McCarthy.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Balancing on Three Legs: The Tension Between Aligning to Standards, Predicting High-Stakes Outcomes, and Being Sensitive to Growth Julie Alonzo, Joe Nese,
The Invariance of the easyCBM® Mathematics Measures Across Educational Setting, Language, and Ethnic Groups Joseph F. Nese, Daniel Anderson, and Gerald.
Providing Teachers Information on Student Performance and Progress.
Responsiveness of Students With Language Difficulties to Early Intervention in Reading O’Conner, R.E., Bocian, K., Beebe-Frankenberger, M., Linklater,
Department of Curriculum and Instruction Considerations for Choosing Mathematics Progress Monitoring Measures from K-12 Anne Foegen, Ph.D. Pursuing the.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Linking Progress Monitoring with High-Stakes Assessments: Setting Standards-Based Goals in Reading John Hosp & Kristen Missall The University of Iowa Pursuing.
Data-Driven Decision Making
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System: RTI Assessment Julie Alonzo, Ph.D. & Gerald Tindal, Ph.D. July 2011.
easyCBM: Online Progress Monitoring System
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Presentation transcript:

The Reliability of CBM Reading Growth Estimates for Different Student Groups Joseph F. T. Nese B. Jasmine Park Aki Kamata Julie Alonzo Gerald Tindal Behavioral Research and Teaching College of Education University of Oregon

easyCBM® Online benchmark and progress monitoring tool Designed for use within a response to intervention (RTI) framework Available in Reading and Math – 3 benchmark (screening) measures; fall, winter, spring – 17 progress monitoring forms in Reading – 10 progress monitoring forms in Math All forms constructed to be of equivalent difficulty using a Rasch model

easyCBM® Adoption Total number of users – Over 160,000 registered users nationwide – Over 1.6 million students – Over 6.2 million tests taken New registrations for free site – 70 in a day (weekdays typically 200+) – 1,415 in last 7 days – 6,011 in last 30 days

easyCBM® Reading AreaKindergartenGrade 1Grade 2Grades 3Grades 4-8 Phonological Awareness Phoneme Segmenting --- Alphabetic Knowledge Letter Names --- Letter Sounds Fluency: WordsWord Reading Fluency Fluency: Passages - Passage Reading Fluency Vocabulary --- Reading Comprehension -- Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension

easyCBM® Reading AreaKindergartenGrade 1Grade 2Grades 3Grades 4-8 Phonological Awareness Phoneme Segmenting --- Alphabetic Knowledge Letter Names --- Letter Sounds Fluency: WordsWord Reading Fluency Fluency: Passages - Passage Reading Fluency Vocabulary --- Reading Comprehension -- Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension AreaGrades 3-5 Fluency: PassagesOral Reading Fluency (ORF) Reading Comprehension Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension (MCRC)

NCRTI The National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI) has created a clearinghouse for CBM systems by developing a review process of these systems which has centralized and formalized the documentation of CBM technical adequacy.

NCRTI The National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI) has created a clearinghouse for CBM systems by developing a review process of these systems which has centralized and formalized the documentation of CBM technical adequacy. “Reliability of the slope is an indicator of how well individual differences in growth trajectories can be detected using a particular measure.”

Purpose To determine the reliability of growth rates produced by easyCBM measures for different student groups – By grade-level – Educational setting (general or special education) – English Language Learner (ELL) status – Initial performance status

Sample Five school districts in the Pacific Northwest Data from the school year. Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 n ORF 2175 MCRC 2216 ORF 2232 MCRC 2221 ORF 2380 MCRC 2367 Female 48% 49% Ethnic Minority (non-White 29%31% SPED 16%18% ELL 4% FRL 48% (9% missing)46% (13% missing)44% (14% missing)

Analysis A two-level hierarchical linear growth model represented student reading growth within one academic year, – ORF and MCRC, collected in the fall, winter, spring Level 1 (time) Level 2 (student)

Reliability The proportion of the variance of the true scores to the variance of the observed scores. Thus, the ratio between the level-2 variance component and the sum of the level-2 and level-1 components, with the latter divided by the number of observations (in this case 3). (Raudenbush, & Bryk, 2002)

Results: Grade 3 ORF

Results: Grade 3 MCRC

Results: Grade 3 ORF

Results: Grade 3 MCRC

Results: Grade 4

Results: Grade 5

Reliability As the random effect variance estimate of the intercept increases, reliability will approach 1.0.

Reliability

Similarly, as the random effect variance estimate of the slope increases, reliability will approach 1.0.

Reliability

Conclusions In the discussion of reliability of the growth estimates, groupings matter. – Not the groupings that we tend to think about (e.g., SPED and ELL). – Rather groupings based on initial status, or proficiency. Equivalent to multiple group growth modeling. – Next step: latent class growth modeling.

Reliability Reliability increases as the number of level-1 units nested within a level-2 unit increases, so as observations increase, so reliability will approach 1.0 (Raudenbush, & Bryk, 2002)

Reliability

Limitations/Questions How do we best measure sensitivity to growth? Reliability growth estimates depend on the equivalence of forms. Within-year growth is not linear (Christ, et al., 2010; Nese et al., in press) More research is needed on the technical properties of the slope estimates produced by CBM reading measures (Wayman et al., 2007)

For More Information

Measures of Growth Reliability Compared change in scores on CBM measures (ORF, word ID) to changes in scores for other reading measures (standardized achievement tests) (Marston & Deno, 1982; Marston, Deno, &Tindal, 1983) Mean increase in number of words read per week (Skiba, Deno, Marston, & Wesson, 1986) The ratio of the slope value to the standard error of estimate (Fuchs & Fuchs, 1992) Evaluation, and reduction, of the standard error of the slope (SEb) (Hintze & Christ, 2004; Christ, 2006) Split-half reliability (From Wayman et al., 2007)