ChiMat user survey and feedback: highlights ChiMat Board Meeting – 29 March 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regions For All Ages Programme Presentation to Regions for Economic Change Conference – 25/26 January 2006 Workshop 3C- Working together through inter-regional.
Advertisements

Chronic Care Training Needs Assessment (CC-TNA) Initiative Presented by:
Amanda Rawlings Director of Human Resources and Organisational Development Skills Pledge.
1 Regional Partnerships and Multi Agency Information Sharing David Valls-Russell Regional Workstream Leader.
Strengthening Parent Carer Participation
South West London Collaborative Commissioning Croydon, Kingston, Merton, Richmond, Sutton and Wandsworth NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups and NHS England.
People, families and communities NHS Commissioning Board Children’s Trust Westminster’s Joint Health and Wellbeing Board Local Healthwatch Providers West.
Connections and issues in the European evaluation context Professor Murray Saunders President of the European Evaluation Society.
Teenage conceptions in Wales The challenge of intervention and evaluation.
1 Headteacher Conference Future Provision for School Improvement through the BSP 29 April 2015 Grims Dyke Hotel Kay Charles, BSP Chair and Director Farzana.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
ISABEL: The Use of a Web-Based Paediatric Clinical Support System Dr Tineke Fitch Dr Jim Briggs University of Portsmouth, UK
UKPHR Practitioner Registration East of England Public Health Practitioner Registration Scheme LAUNCH EVENT 5 th December 2014.
Clinical Lead Self Care and Prevention
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Diabetes Programme Progress Report Dr Charles Gostling, Joint Diabetes Clinical Director October 2013.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Celebrating 10 years of Practice Education Facilitation in Scotland Dr Colette Ferguson Director of Nursing,
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Political Leadership How to influence! And Current OH Issues Carol Bannister Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom.
The London Older People Service Development Program (LOPSDP) The ‘Medicines Management’ Project (January to July 2003) Lelly Oboh Project Co-ordinator.
North East Regional Meeting 13 March 2014 Chris Chart POLICY OFFICER Policy Up-date.
Implications of Part 3 of the Children and Families Act for children, young people, families and professionals The future of SEND in Hartlepool Philippa.
Council for Disabled Children May What is Independent Support? A 2-year programme to provide additional support to young people and parents during.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Assessing Capabilities for Informatics Enabled Change: The LISA Toolset Informatics Capability Development LISA – Local Health Community Informatics Strategic.
Action to cut smoking rates and reduce tobacco use needs to take place locally, nationally and regionally if we are to have the most cost effective policies.
Dawne Gurbutt, Discipline Lead, Health Related Studies 11 th July 2013 Enhancing the student learning experience through Patient & Public Involvement Practice,
A Skills and Learning Observatory for Wales Building on best practice A review of Observatory development in the UK and beyond.
Payment by Results for Specialist Alcohol Services Don Lavoie Alcohol Policy Team.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
National Support Team: Findings from the first 2 years Katrina Stephens Associate Delivery Manager, Alcohol Harm Reduction National Support Team, Department.
Promoting independent learning through technology Enhancement of Learning Support.
CHILDREN, YOUTH AND WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICE New Executive Leadership Team 15 December 2004 Ms Heather Gray Chief Executive.
Series 3: Best Practice in Joint Commissioning Implementing the SEND Reforms Produced in collaboration with: Contact a Family Council for Disabled Children.
HFEP – Regional Networks 21 January 2011 Survey Outcomes.
Influencing clinical commissioning through networks CSP English Regional Networks (ERN) – Development Event September 2012 Dawn Smith AHP Advisor NHS Clinical.
Monitoring public satisfaction through user satisfaction surveys Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities Helsinki 6-7 May 2010 Steve.
School of SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE University of BRISTOL Shall we meet for coffee? Experiments in ways of bridging the researcher commissioner gap:
London Health Libraries 27 February Drivers for Change World Class Commissioning NHS Operating Framework Healthcare for London.
Shared Decision Making in the NHS Sue Kennedy National Shared Decision Making Programme Manager.
Joint Reviews of Local Authority Social Services JOINT REVIEW OF SALFORD COUNCIL 17 th June 2003.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Commissioning High Quality Stroke Services
SEN and Disability Reform Partner Supplier briefing event December 2012.
National Dementia Declaration. uk FROM HERE…
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.
Investing in a healthy community: making the most of NICE’s ROI tools Judith Richardson Health & Social Care Directorate.
PHE Local Intelligence Contribution David Meechan, Director for Knowledge & Intelligence (East Midlands), Public Health England.
Five Year Forward View: Personal Health Budgets and Integrated Personal Commissioning Jess Harris January 2016.
London cancer workshop 9 th March Agenda TimeSession 2.00pmWelcome and objectives 2.10pmThe model of care 2.25pmProvider network development 2.45pmQuestion.
Webinar: FMLM GP Champions Network Dr Jane Povey, Deputy Medical Director, FMLM Wednesday 25 November 2015.
You’re Welcome in Medway Donna Mills Commissioning Manager.
Introduction 5 th October 2015 David Rhys Wilton Director TPAS Cymru © TPAS Cymru
Presentation to the Ad-hoc Joint Sub-Committee on Parliamentary Oversight and Accountability Wednesday 20 March 2002 PUBLIC SERVICE MONITORING AND EVALUATION.
Telecare regional support Working with local authorities to focus on delivering an enhanced telecare offering to service users and executing targeted pilots.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
Francesca Entwistle Regional Infant Feeding Co-ordinator DH London L Dyson, F McCormick, Professor MJ Renfrew.
Supporting and accelerating transformation in health and social care across Wessex March 2016.
TwfSgiliau Cymru/SkillsGrow Wales Working together to give every post-16 learner in Wales the opportunity to improve their Communication, Application.
Sharing, discussion and learning to improve safeguarding practice Evaluation of an integrated communications suite to support improved safeguarding practice.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Evaluating and improving a clinical practice guideline in the Western Cape, South Africa AIM STATEMENT: To design and use an appropriate evaluation tool.
Data in the third sector (Health Development Officer)
European Network of Environmental Authorities: Making Structural & Cohesion Funds Water Positive Working Group Dr Martin Griffiths Environment Agency for.
Early Years – early language, social mobility and the home learning environment 15 March 2018.
Macmillan Cancer Support collaborates with local providers, commissioners, voluntary sector and charity sector and we endeavour to do this across Greater.
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
NICE resources for STPs: MECC
Presentation transcript:

ChiMat user survey and feedback: highlights ChiMat Board Meeting – 29 March 2010

Background to survey This the first user survey conducted since the formation of ChiMat in February The survey was conducted on the website during March 2010 and users were invited to respond via the weekly e- bulletin. 183 users responded to the survey with 116 following through to completion. The primary purpose of the survey was to elicit feedback to enable further development of the website. General questions were also asked about the benefits of using the service, perception of tools and services and background information on users and their organisations. It is this supplementary information which has been analysed for this report.

Benefits – at individual level 183 responses at this stage

Benefits – at corporate level 183 responses at this stage

Individual comments An excellent resource - indispensible A great resource! Fantastic that all this knowledge and information is pulled together in one place. The ChiMat website offers high quality information and is a reliable resource. A good set of information, frustratingly inaccessible Extremely useful tool to support my commissioning role. A very useful resource source that is underutilised to assist in making evidence based commissioning decisions. Is on the right lines but still needs to look at ways to make accessing information easier.

The extent to which different products and/or services are used 110 responses at this stage

Positive feedback on products and services (excellent or good) 110 responses at this stage

Positive feedback versus usage of products and services CSM DMIT Age appropriate environments i-view workforce i-view NCMP European atlas Data atlas 110 responses at this stage

Regional coverage 116 responses at this stage

Organisational types covered 116 responses at this stage

Split of organisational types 116 responses at this stage

Role types covered – others split 116 responses at this stage

Role types – Using ChiMat gives me evidence to support investment decisions

Role types – I have used ChiMat to improve cost effectiveness of services

Principal observations - benefits Users are getting very good benefits from ChiMat at an individual level, in particular keeping up to date, saving time and working more effectively. 46% of users are finding evidence to support investment decisions. This is a robust proportion although lower than the other target benefits and merits further attention. Good evidence that users are applying the ChiMat outputs at a corporate level, in particular identifying opportunities for service improvement. Users are also using ChiMat for needs assessment and performance monitoring. 21% of users are managing to improve the cost effectiveness of services. This is a credible start but currently inadequate for such an important target application. Attention will be given to how users can be supported to develop in this area. Individual comments are very supportive and positive. Some comments include service improvement suggestions include improving access to information and helping with evidence based decision making.

Principal observations – use of products and services Tools most heavily commented on (proxy for use) include health profiles, data atlas, CSM, tools and data directory, needs assessments Positive feedback on all tools, but varies with tool, ranging from 68% to 100% 100% of DMIT users rate tool as good or excellent Variability across extent of use and positive perception of tools Some with very positive feedback but smaller user base, e.g. DMIT and European atlas Some with less positive feedback and small user base, e.g. age appropriate environments and i-View Some with less positive feedback but large user base, e.g. data atlas and CSM

Principal observations – user base Coverage of all English regions with most activity in North West, Yorkshire & Humber and London. Least activity in North East. Some activity at national level and beyond. 72 % of users in local organisations, PCT commissioners NHS providers and Local Authorities strongly represented. The predominant role type covers those involved in the direct delivery and development of clinical services. Other highly represented groups include clinical professionals such as nurses, midwives and health visitors, doctors and public health specialists, in turn further supported by policy developers, researchers and commissioners of services.

Principal observations – those making Value for Money decisions Those using ChiMat to provide evidence to support investment decisions have clinical backgrounds and are actively engaged in the delivery or development of services. Commissioners are also making use of ChiMat for this purpose. Those successfully using ChiMat to improve the cost effectiveness of services predominantly have clinical backgrounds and are actively engaged the delivery or development of services. This is the evidence that ChiMat is hitting the target audience and that audience are using the data and information provided for the intended purpose.

Action plans Proposed actionOwner Follow up key survey respondents with interviewVR Complete detailed analysis of website development surveyVR Review data atlas usability and adapt development plansHS/SC Evaluate more user friendly and front end reporting toolsDW/EB Review usability of CSM website and consider user specific surveyCH Conduct a specific survey for registered users of DMIT toolsHO/VR Extend DMIT to further conditions and develop intervention toolkitsHD/DW/HS Develop a case study for DMITHO/VR Develop targeted publicity for DMIT and distribution planHO/VR Further develop regional network, including a regional publicity pack, paying particular attention to North East coverage. DW/HO Develop a workshop plan and training packs focussed on evidence based decision making, business case development and improving the cost effectiveness of services for implementation via the regional network. DW/HO Use the outputs on commissioning from the Child Health Improvement Partnership to further develop commissioning workshops for implementation via the regional network. HD/DW/HO