Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Advertisements

The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
Bunch length modulation in storage rings C. Biscari LNF – INFN - Frascati Workshop on “Frontiers of short bunches in storage rings” – Frascati – 7-8 Nov.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Lecture 3: Laser Wake Field Acceleration (LWFA)
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Accelerator Physics  Basic Formalism  Linear Accelerators  Circular Accelerators  Magnets  Beam Optics  Our Accelerator Greg LeBlanc Lead Accelerator.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Travelling Wave Tube For Broadband amplifier helix TWTs (proposed by Pierce and others in 1946 ) are widely used For High average power purposes the.
and Accelerator Physics
V.Balbekov, 12/09/08 HCC simulation with wedge absorbers V. Balbekov, Fermilab Muon Collider Design Workshop December 8-12, 2008 JeffersonLab, Newport.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
Design of Microwave Undulator Cavity
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
TWO-CHANNEL RECTANGULAR DIELECTRIC WAKE FIELD ACCELERATOR STRUCTURE EXPERIMENT* G. Sotnikov, 1,2 T.C. Marshall, 1,3 S. V. Shchelkunov, 4 A. Didenko, 1,5.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
TWO-BEAM, MULTI-MODE, DETUNED ACCSELERATING STRUCTURE S.Kazakov 1,2, S.Kuzikov 3, V.Yakovlev 4 J.L. Hirshfield 1,5, 1 Omega-p,Inc., 199 Whitney Ave., New.
RMS Dynamic Simulation for Electron Cooling Using BETACOOL He Zhang Journal Club Talk, 04/01/2013.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
The Design and Effects on the Electron Beam of the International Linear Collider Positron Source Helical Undulator Duncan Scott Magnetics and Radiation.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
examples of dual-mode (3 GHz + 6 GHz) cavities
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration in hollow plasma
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Coupler RF kick simulations.
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
The 2nd European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
NC Accelerator Structures
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Wakefield Accelerator
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Needle Cathodes for RF Guns
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
A Design Study of a Compressor ring for
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia 2 Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA 3 Omega-P, Inc., New Haven, CT, USA Outline: 1.A problem of beam cooling in accelerators 2.Damping rings 3.Helical accelerating structure with asynchronous transverse fields (HSFC) 4. Calculation methods: perturbation theory and HFSS simulations 5.Parameter optimization in comparison with classical structure 6.Beam dynamics simulation by CST Microwave Studio 7.Conclusion

0.3 ТeV ILC collider Movement of particles in a focusing channel with dry friction Transverse emittances: Particles, moving in DC-magnet undulator, produce synchrotron radiation which leads to cooling According to Liouville’s theorem the phase volume can be reduced, if only there are friction forces in a system. Wakefields cause growth of transverse emittances in accelerator behind damping rings.

Low energy beams might be cooled in a damping ring: Parameters: W=5 GeV, I=400 mA, P=6700 m – total length of circumference, T=25 ms – transverse damping time. ILC damping ring In case of high energy particles the damping ring becomes too long.

Such accelerating structure is impractical, because DC magnet system conflicts with feeding, focusing, and diagnostic systems. Inevitably large period does not allow to reach small emittance, because the smallest achievable emittance is proportional to squared wiggler period L. The accelerator with alternating accelerating sections and wigglers reduces effective gradient. - cooling rate in a periodic DC-magnet field. H.H. Braun et al. Potential of Non-standard Emittance Damping Schemes for Linear Colliders, 2004., where W – particle energy.

Helical Self Focusing and Cooling (HSFC) Accelerating Structure Appealing features: 1. Non-synchronous transverse field components might provide: 1) emittance control (beam cooling due to synchrotron radiation of particles); 2) near axis beam focusing 2. A new structure has smooth shape of constant circular cross-section (no expansions or narrowings) and big aperture (no small irises) 3. A new technology of the mass production seems possible which allows avoiding junctions inside long accelerating section E – accelerating field (synchronous with particles) transverse field components (far from Cherenkov synchronism) Copper mandrel HSFC = Accelerating structure + RF undulator + lens

Dispersion curves: R=6.09 mm, P=8 mm, a=1.25 mm Partial waves: 1) travelling TM 01 mode + 2) near to cut off rotating TM 11 mode TM 01 : E z  0 at axis, TM 11 : E z =0 at axis, E  and H   0 at axis, Normal waves Partial waves Slow normal wave 2 (v gr  v ph >0) consists of partial TM 01 and TM 11 waves. The wave 2 is the operating wave (might be in synchronism, it has low group velocity). V ph  c V ph  0

Electric field in HSFC accelerating structure. Calculation by HFSS.

Complex amplitude of the electric field Beam line

Accelerating field component vs longitudinal coordinate for different phases (with step 5  ) Accelerating component is uniform at beam line.

Transverse electric field components at beam line vs length for different phases Transverse components are also uniform and have much longer spatial period in comparison with period of the accelerating component.

Phases of electric field components at beam line Phase of accelerating component Phases of transverse components Accelerating E-field and transverse E-fields have opposite phase velocities! Phase velocity of the accelerating component actually equals the light velocity.

Transverse components of magnetic field at beam line In HSFC structure both transverse electric and magnetic fields cause particle’s wiggling like in RF undulator.

Phases of magnetic field components Transverse magnetic fields together with transverse electric fields go toward electrons.

Simulation of electric field evolution at beam line vs length (phase step is 20  ) accelerating field transverse fields

Surface electric fieldSurface magnetic field Optimization requires maximum of accelerating field normalized on maximum of surface field: Also maximum of shunt impedance is necessary: Here holes and/or absorbers could be inserted to improve mode selection

R=6.09 mm a=1.25 mm P=8 mm hP=4.727 f=28.2 GHz Q=10800 E acc /E surf =0.307 R sh /L=18.9 MOhm/m Results of HFSS optimization Example: f= 30 GHz structure, G=E acc =100 MV/m, then B=0.75 T, Beam energy W=25 GeV (  =49000), then necessary decay distance  2800 m. Dispersion curve

taper Transverse particle momentums Simulation of particle motion in 100 MV/m HSFC accelerating structure by CST Microwave Studio Total length =10 periods regular part taper TM 01 Normal wave taper regular part

Parameters of cooling in 100 MV/m HSFC structure

In HSFC structure there is gradient of the asynchronous fields which leads to appearance of the ponderomotive (Miller’s) force: Complex amplitude of electric field at different cross-sections The pondermotive force (due to longitudinal TM 11 fields) in each cross-section is directed to the axis and provides beam focusing. - frequency which electrons see.

Bunch population during acceleration. The blue color (at input) corresponds to low particle energy. The red color (at output of structure) means the higher energy of the accelerated particles. Simulation of ponderomotive force focusing in HSFC accelerating structure by CST Microwave Studio bunch Parameters: initial energy 10 GeV, bunch length 1 ps, bunch diameter 3 mm, charge 100 nC, gradient 100 MV/m.

Conclusion 1.TM 01 – TM 11 HSFC accelerating structure has non-synchronous electric and magnetic field components to be used in order to preserve low beam emittance and small energy spread. 2.Smooth beam focusing due to the pondermotive (Miller’s) force might also be used. 3.The structure allows high enough accelerating gradient normalized on maximum surface field (>0.3). 4.Shunt impedance is slightly less than in conventional accelerating structures. In order to increase shunt impedance, one might either to go to higher frequencies (R sh /L~  3/2 ) or to go to lower frequencies and to apply superconductivity.