Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT Structure Project Management Seminar Bridge Preliminary Design Report.
Advertisements

Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive CDM 2007 Training Package Session 2 - Clients Version: September 07.
Railway Grade Separations Issues. Railway Grade Separations 1.Introduction Qualifications/experience to undertake bridge planning for railway grade separations:
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
EvalS Application User Guide version September 17, 2011.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
Transmission Corridor Zone Designation Process Terrence O'Brien, CEC December 11, 2007 Energy Action Plan.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
Personal Budgets – Regs and the Code of Practice
Andersonlloyd.co.nz Auckland, Christchurch, Dunedin, Queenstown 18 May 2015 Reform of Resource Consent Application Process Presenter Rachel Brooking.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
School of Psychology Online Ethics Guide No. 1 Submitting an application for ethical review. JRC/13/10/2014.
Responding to Inspection Findings
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
ETD Submission Process Fall 2011 Valerie Emerson ETD Administrator, Gelman Library / (202)
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Utility & Rail Coordination in Project Development Jennifer McCleve Utilities & Rail Branch Manager.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
Mobile Audio/Video Recording Equipment Policy and Procedure Number PP
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
CANAR Consortia of Administrators for Native American Rehabilitation FISCAL MANAGEMENT FOR PROJECT SUCCESS CANAR 2012.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
The new VicSmart process and provisions. What is VicSmart? VicSmart is a fast planning permit process A decision is expected to be made in 10 days All.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Interim Alternate Route Adjustment Process Joint Training INTERIM ALTERNATE ROUTE ADJUSTMENT PROCESS Joint Training October 31, 2008 INTERIM ALTERNATE.
IM NETWORK MEETING 20 TH JULY, 2010 CONSULTATION WITH 3 RD PARTIES.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction DCA Application to Amend Cell Tower Regulations – Temporary Towers and Height Restrictions.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
The Procurement Channel and the Procurement Working Group of the Joint Commission February 2016RELEX, Brussels1.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
The Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI, WT Docket No
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
To the ETS – Agreement Management Online Training Course
Experienced Inspectors' Workshop: Archaeology
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Engineering Waiver Management
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
[insert Module title here]
[insert Module title here]
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
To the ETS – Agreement Management Online Training Course
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Environmental Commitments
Presentation transcript:

Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY

POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL  Implementation deadline extended to 2018 (further extensions possible)  Railroads report that they still aim to complete environmental clearances in 2016 so they can proceed with deployment and testing ASAP  As written, the Program Comment is in effect until May 16, 2021 so no extension was required  Program Comment efficiencies:  Certain exclusions from Section 106 review  APE limited to ¼ mile  Concurrent SHPO/Tribal 30-day review  No response= referred to FCC for resolution (10 days)  Adverse Effect Agreements can require monitoring, other provisions

POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL REVIEWS

POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL - EFFECTS  Vast majority have been cleared with no effects (or no adverse effects)  If an Adverse Effect is identified  Explore alternative sites  If not possible, advise FCC ( to  Work with SHPO and/or Tribe to determine avoidance, mitigation, or monitoring requirements  Adverse Effect Agreement  ACHP notification  Environmental Assessment may be required

POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL - REMINDERS  If the project was approved more than a year ago, railroads should:  Check State (SHPO) guidelines on approval expiration  Confirm that the project to be constructed is the same as that approved  If the project changes prior to construction, advise FCC  New review may be required  Withdrawn or Revised Projects  E-106 and TCNS  No construction until all environmental reviews (106 and EA, if required) for actual proposed project are completed

NON-PTC POLES = REGULAR NPA REVIEWS  Non-PTC poles, or PTC poles more than 75’ tall, require Section 106 review under the regular process established in the NPA.  These include, but are not limited to:  Advanced Train Control System Poles (ATCS): fixed digital radio link between multiple base stations along railroad tracks to communicate, monitor and control trackside or wayside equipment  PTC Base Station Poles  WiFi Poles  Other (RR Police Radio, etc.)

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS  Most other (non-FCC regulated) construction in railroad rights of way (e.g. double tracking, expansion, etc.) is exempted from environmental, historic preservation, and sometimes even local, reviews  The direct APE for FCC undertakings includes all (but only) work associated with the tower or pole:  Trenching  Staging  Associated infrastructure (cabinets, power source, etc.)  If any recent non-FCC related construction is evident (double-tracking, signals, etc.) in photographs in the report, explain!

LESSONS LEARNED  Railroads may know about cultural resources in their right of way from past experience; PTC (or other infrastructure) requires special care  Turn of century RR construction clipped a mound site  APE not sufficiently defined in PTC consultation  Artifacts identified during utility trenching  Work stopped, mitigation required (MOA)

LESSONS LEARNED  When projects are delayed or modified, special care is required to ensure all parties receive notification and full information  Project submitted as excluded PTC, then withdrawn  New E-106 notification, but same TCNS number (no updates to TCNS)  SHPO identified concerns and required monitoring, Tribes not adequately notified of project revisions or SHPO concerns  Once monitoring was agreed, project should not be considered excluded  Monitor contacted FCC to ask status of Tribal consultation  Work stopped, adequate Tribal notification required before project proceeded

RESUBMITTING OR REVISING PROJECTS  Updating an E-106 filing (using the same number) automatically generates an notification to the Tribes who have expressed interest in the project.  If a NEW E-106 filing (new number) is instead made, one of the following is necessary:  Submit a NEW TCNS notification with a statement in the Project Details box that references the original TCNS number; or  Submit an eSupport request ( asking the FCC to reinstate the original TCNS Number to a Proposed status and list the project changes.  The FCC will then update the notification with the project changes and reset the notification to go back out to the Tribes.  In either case, the contractor is required to then update the related E-106 filing to remove the initial TCNS number and recopy the new or updated TCNS notification number into the E-106 filing.

LESSONS LEARNED  Expedited, streamlined PTC process still requires flexibility to protect resources  RR proposed 65’ PTC pole in highly sensitive (and scenic) area associated with the creation story of several Tribes, considered a traditional cultural property  Tribe requested viewshed analysis as necessary to determine effect  Consultant referred request as not sufficiently justified  Commission agreed with Tribe, requested railroad to review proposal  Railroad reviewed and redesigned, moved pole out of TCP

“View towards proposed pole.”

WIRELESS RAILROAD INFRASTRUCTURE QUESTIONS?