Office of Baseline Change Proposal (BCP) Approval or Brief Presented by: Draft version Jun 16, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Kin Chao, Chairperson DOE/SC Review Committee Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Review Committee.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Review of Critical Decision 2 for the Large Liquid Argon Detector for Neutron Physics (MicroBooNE) at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
WCI LEA UPDATE MAY 2, 2014 RI Department Of Education Wireless Classroom Initiative Cynthia Brown, Director Office of Statewide Efficiencies Craig Hockenbrough,
CHAPTER 4 The strategic Planning function รศ. ดร. เสรี วงษ์มณฑา.
U.S. Department of Energy Project Management: Communicating Progress – Celebrating Success Paul Bosco, PE, PMP, CFM, LEED-AP Director, Office of Procurement.
1 9/21/2015For Official Use Only Negotiation Sensitive Business Clearance for XX Program XX Jan XX.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck Deputy Director (Project Management)
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CFAC Review Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities CD-2 Planning May 8, 2007.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck NLSL II Deputy Director (Project Management)
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
1 What’s Next for Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB)? AGA/GWSCPA 6 th Annual Conference Dianne Copeland, Director, FSIO May 8, 2007.
7/26/2006 Wyatt Merritt 1 DECam Preparations for Critical Decision 2/3a Preparations for CD2 Preparations for CD3a DECam MOUs.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Continuous Improvement Story Cover Page The cover page is the title page Rapid Process Improvement Story Template O Graphics are optional This CI Story.
Technology planning* … is the process of identifying the ideal role of technology in an organization and mapping the evolution of that role into the future.
Project Plan. Project Plan Components Project Overview – Description and Strategy Business Case Summary Key Deliverables and Scope Critical Success Factors.
12 GeV Upgrade Project Status Allison Lung Hall C Users Meeting Jefferson Lab January 18, 2008.
LBNE Working Group Meeting December 20, :00– 5:00 PM Snake Pit.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the LBNE Project September 25, 2012 Jim Yeck.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Update Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Light Sources NSLS-II Project Director Conventional Facilities.
Project Management Processes for a Project
7/26/2006 Wyatt Merritt 1 DECam CD1 Documentation DOE Critical Decision Process Documentation Requirements.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office May 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the NSTX.
Managing Risk CHAPTER SEVEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
DOE Stanford Site Office Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Office of Science Review of the LCLS.
LHC CMS Upgrade Project CD-1 Alternative Selection and Cost Range Steve Webster Federal Project Director August 26, 2013 CD-1 Executive Session.
October 15, 2007 Smart Card. Smart Travel. TransLink ® Card Procurement Study Update Presentation to the TransLink Operating Group.
Project X Working Group Meeting January 15, :00 PM Snake Pit.
Power Upgrade Project SNS September 21-22, TBM Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Schedule Approach Tom Mann October 27, 2005.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office February 2014 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
Project Management Processes for a Project Chapter 3 PMBOK® Fourth Edition.
Sharing My Story David Arakawa, Federal Project Director SNS Instruments Next-Generation (SING) Project DOE Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office 1.
1 Ventilation Systems Capital Asset Projects Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System (15-D-411) Exhaust Shaft (15-D-412) Ronald.
DOE Review of LARP – Feb 17-18, 2014 DOE Critical Decision Process Ruben Carcagno February 17,
1 For Official Use Only 6/12/2016 Business Clearance for XX Program XX Jan XX.
Office of Critical Decision-1 Approve Alternative Selection & Cost Range or Brief Presented by:
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office December 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
TITLE OF AUDIT Author Date of presentation. Background Why did you do the audit? e.g. high risk / high cost / frequent procedure? Concern that best practice.
Cost and Schedule Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE DOE/SC CD-2/3b Review of the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory February 4,
OFFICE OF SCIENCE DOE/SC CD-3c Review of the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory June 14-16, 2016.
Office of Project Management Oversight and Assessments Office of Critical Decision-3 Approve Start of Construction or Brief Presented by:
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Using Games to Effect Organizational Change
Project Management W. J. Foyt
Project Major Activities Over Next Days (as of xx/xx/xx)
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Contract Clearance for
Preparations for a Lehman Review
ctclink Steering Committee
CIS12-3 IT Project Management
Legislative Budget Office (LBO) 2-Year Workplan
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
PULSE Building Renovation
Details supporting the increase
Ctclink executive leadership committee May 31, 2018
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Office of Baseline Change Proposal (BCP) Approval or Brief Presented by: Draft version Jun 16, 2015

Briefing Outline Background BCP Clarification Picture(s) (if appropriate) Baseline / Proposed KPP and Scope Project Cost – Before / After Proposed Schedule Proposed Funding Profile Project Organization Major Risks EIR (IPR) / ICE Results PMRC Issues (If Applicable) Conclusions and Recommendations 2

Background Discuss the Project description and baselined scope Reason for BCP request: (Include those that apply) Project will exceed baselined TPC by $100M or 50% of the original baselined amount A change in Scope and/or Performance will affect the ability of the project to satisfy the mission need What Went Wrong: Clearly discuss what caused the project to require a BCP 3

BCP Clarification Picture Optional Picture(s) to clarify the need for a BCP Placed Here 4

Baseline / Proposed KPPs and Scope scope (and/or KPPs) when baselined consisted of the following scope: Clearly identify the project’s original scope As a result of this BCP the project scope (and/or KPPs) (has not changed) (has been decreased or increased) by the following: Indicate the specific proposed scope changes 5

Project Costs – Before / After Cost Description Original Baseline ($M) BCP ($M) Total Project Cost (TPC) Federal Controlled DOE Contingency Other Government Direct Costs Profit/Fee Opportunity In ContractPerformance Measurement Baseline (PMB) Management Reserve 6

7 FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24 Critical Decisions Design Construction & Installation Commissioning & Pre- Operations Legend CompletedPlanned CD MilestoneCD-4 Range Schedule ContingencyCritical Path CD-2CD-3CD-4 Approve Performance Baseline - Jul 15 Approve Start of Construction - Jan 17 Approve BCP – ESAAB Date Approve Project Completion Jun 24 Project Design Sep 17 Jan 17Jul 21 Jan 17Jan 23 Mar 22 Jun 24 Construction & Installation Procurement & Fabrication Commissioning & Pre-Ops Proposed Schedule Generate a complete high level schedule for your BCP with critical path and schedule contingency identified -- use this format/layout.

Proposed Funding Profile 8 Line at BCP date FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24 AY M$ Pre-Ops Construction PED R&D (Project Name) Funding Profile ($M) Fiscal Year FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24Total R&D PED Construction Pre-Ops Total

Project Organization Place an Organization Chart here that clearly indicates the lines of communication / responsibility from the Chief Executive (if a Major System Project ) to the Owner and the Project Management Executive; all the way down to the project site / team and Federal Project Director. Indicate, in bold, any changes to be made in the Organizational structure post BCP. 9

Major Risks 10

11 Results of Project Reviews Completed EIR/IPR/Red Team/etc. completed on EIR/IPR/etc. Results: “X” Major Findings, “X” Findings - Major Finding 1: State finding here Resolved: State project’s action(s) to close the finding - Major Finding 2: State finding here Resolved: State project’s action(s) to close the finding - Findings: General statement on identified findings and actions taken ICE/ICR completed on - ICE/ICR Suggested Cost and Schedule: TPC of $ M and a CD-4 date

PMRC Issues 12

Conclusions Conclusions: Sample “Conclusions” below…project develops their own. EIR and ICE supported recommended BCP Management team and management systems have been appropriately altered to ensure project success Project Team is ready to proceed Funds are available 13

Recommendations Recommendation: Approve BCP for With following attributes: KPPs: Scope: Cost/TPC: CD-4: 14

Back-Up Material as Needed 15