1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Are You (Click).
PORTFOLIO.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
ESEA: Developing the Paraprofessional Portfolio Prepared by Carolyn Ellis Logan, Consultant Professional Development/Human Rights Department Michigan Education.
What it means for New Teachers
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
Differentiated Supervision
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
1 ADEPT for Speech-Language Therapists. 2 ADEPT Web Site
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
for School Library Media Specialists
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
For Faculty, Supervisors and Cooperating Teachers
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
ADEPT Framework
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Revised Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE-R)
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
1 EPT Adding the A and D back into AD.
ADEPT A D E P T Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
START Supporting Teachers and Rewarding Them. Is mentoring enough?
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
SAFE-T NET Introduction
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
ADEPT Updated November SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 Your SAFE-T Guide Who is becoming your your new best friend?
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
What it means for New Teachers
Dissemination Training
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
MODULE 3 Objectives Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System
ADEPT Performance Standards
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty

Note to Participants This ADEPT seminar is intended to provide cooperating teachers and supervising faculty with the knowledge and skills to assist and assess teacher candidates relative to the Expanded ADEPT System requirements This seminar will NOT qualify participants to serve as ADEPT evaluators of practicing teachers.

Purpose of the Expanded ADEPT System To continuously develop educators at all performance levels through an evaluation system that: –is valid, reliable, and fair and –produces actionable and constructive feedback that supports professional growth To re-focus our attention on intended student outcomes, allowing educators to align and strengthen professional practice to support those intended student outcomes

The Expanded ADEPT System Requirements Apply to all districts in the state Apply to all SC teacher preparation programs, and Apply throughout every stage of a teacher’s career Note: School counselors, speech and language therapists, and library media specialists will continue to be evaluated under the existing 2006 ADEPT guidelines for the 2015–2016 school year

The Expanded ADEPT System Requirements apply to the following educators: Traditionally Prepared Teachers Alternatively Prepared Teachers (PACE, ABCTE, Teach for America) International Teachers National Board Certified Teachers Career and Technology (CATE) Teachers Teachers employed from out-of-state Working Retired Teachers

Expanded ADEPT for Teacher Candidates Student teaching is the capstone Expanded ADEPT experience for teacher candidates Teacher candidates must be assisted and evaluated relative to all Expanded ADEPT Performance Standards Teacher Candidates must receive formative assistance and summative evaluations from both IHE and P-12 faculty

Dual Roles for Supervising Faculty During Student Teaching Facilitator (Coach) Evaluator (Gate Keeper) Demonstrate/Co- teach Explain and Guide Provide Formative Feedback Provide Coaching and Support Document and Evidence Analyze and Critique Performance Make Judgments Formative Summative

System Functions The Expanded ADEPT System has three functions: A ssisting D eveloping E valuating

Expanded ADEPT Processes The system has five processes: Preservice Induction Formal (Summative) Evaluation Diagnostic Assistance Informal (Formative) Evaluation: Goals- Based Evaluation (GBE)

Connecting Functions and Processes Each Expanded ADEPT process has a primary function Assisting Induction and Mentoring Diagnostic Assistance Developing Preservice Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE) Evaluating Formal (Summative) Evaluation

Expanded ADEPT Processes are: Informal (Formative) Results are used to assist teachers and to develop and enhance teaching performance Preservice Induction Diagnostic Assistance Goals-Based Evaluation Formal (Summative) Results are highly consequential and are used to make decisions about contracts and certificate advancement or sanctions Formal (Summative) Evaluation

ASSISTINGASSISTING DEVELOPINGDEVELOPING EVALUATINGEVALUATING Formative Evaluation Assessment FOR Learning Goal = Improvement Low-Stakes, Ongoing Summative Evaluation Assessment OF Learning Goal = Judgment High Stakes, Less Frequent

Expanded ADEPT Formal (Summative) Evaluation results are used: at the state level for certificate advancement purposes at the district level to make contract and employment decisions at the state level to determine when sanctions should be taken against a teacher’s certificate at the higher education level to make decisions regarding a teacher candidate’s recommendation for initial certification at the higher education level as a part of each institution’s report card

Teacher Candidate Evaluation during Student Teaching During the student teaching semester, each teacher candidate is provided with feedback in order to enhance his or her professional knowledge and skills. Formative Following student teaching, each teacher candidate receives a judgment regarding his or her overall performance relative to the ADEPT Performance Standards. Summative

Expanded ADEPT and Career Development What you and your teacher candidates need to know.

Certificate The teaching certificate is an educator’s “license” to teach. Certificates are issued by the South Carolina Department of Education, and they are valid in all school districts in South Carolina. Two certificate levels: –Initial –Professional

Contract A contract is an employment agreement with the local school district. Three contract levels –Induction –Annual –Continuing

Teaching Certificate (Teaching “license” from the state) Contract Level (Employment agreement from the school district) ADEPT Process Beginning: Year 1 Length: 1 year to 3 years InitialInduction ● Induction and Mentoring (Goal: To provide beginning teachers with support and assistance to facilitate their successful transition into the profession.) Beginning: Year 2 Length: 1 to 4 years InitialAnnual ● Formal Evaluation (Goal: To provide teacher quality assurance to our stakeholders—the students, their parents, and our taxpayers.) or ● Diagnostic Assistance (Goal: To provide additional support and assistance to teachers in their second or third year of employment.) or ● Goals-based Evaluation (Goal: To support teachers’ ongoing professional development.) Beginning: Upon successful completion of the formal evaluation and obtaining a professional certificate Length: Duration of career ProfessionalContinuing ● Goals-Based Evaluation (Goal: To support teachers’ ongoing professional development.) or ● Formal Evaluation (Goal: To provide teacher quality assurance to our stakeholders—the students, their parents, and our taxpayers.)

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Expanded ADEPT Training

The Importance of Professional Standards Articulated standards or expectations for competent practice are the defining attributes of any profession.

Overall Structure of Expanded ADEPT Five major concepts Domains ADEPT Performance Standards (APSs) Key Elements Data Formative and Summative Assessments

What are domains? Domains are broad categories of professional knowledge. They function as organizers for the ADEPT Performance Standards and for the data collected during the evaluation process. The domains facilitate informed decision making. Four Domains I. Planning II. Instruction III. Environment IV. Professionalism

What are performance standards? Statements of what teachers and assume responsibility for be able to do, should know, on an ongoing basis – throughout all phases of their careers.

Performance Domains and Standards Domain I: Planning –APS 1: Long-Range Planning –APS 2: Short-Range Planning –APS 3: Planning Assessments and Using Data Domain II: Instruction –APS 4: Establishing & Maintaining High Expectations for Learners –APS 5: Using Instructional Strategies to Facilitate Learning –APS 6: Providing Content for Learners –APS 7: Monitoring, Assessing, and Enhancing Learning

Performance Domains and Standards Domain III: Environment –APS 8: Maintaining an Environment That Promotes Learning –APS 9: Managing the Classroom –APS 10: Fulfilling Professional Responsibilities Domain IV: Professionalism

What are Key Elements? In simplest terms, the key elements give meaning to the performance standards by identifying their most important components.

What is the relationship between performance standards and key elements? Within each performance standard, each key element statement is followed by a key paragraph that defines and describes the key element. The definitions and descriptions are intended to explain the key elements. They are not intended to be all-inclusive or to be used as presence/absence checklists.

How many key elements? Domain I: Planning11 key elements –APS 1: Long-Range Planning5 key elements –APS 2: Short-Range Planning3 key elements –APS 3: Planning Assessments and 3 key elements Using Data Domain II: Instruction12 key elements –APS 4: Establishing & Maintaining High 3 key elements Expectation for Learners –APS 5: Using Instructional Strategies to 3 key elements Facilitate Learning –APS 6: Providing Content for Learners3 key elements –APS 7: Monitoring, Assessing, and 3 key elements Enhancing Learning

How many key elements? Domain III: Environment 6 key elements –APS 8: Maintaining an Environment 3 key elements That Promotes Learning –APS 9: Managing the Classroom3 key elements –APS 10: Fulfilling Professional 5 key elements Responsibilities Domain IV: Professionalism 5 key elements

How many key elements? Domain 1: Planning11 key elements Domain 2: Instruction12 key elements Domain 3: Environment 6 key elements Domain 4: Professionalism 5 key elements TOTAL34 key elements

What is meant by data? Data refer to information that is collected during the ADEPT process that is relatively free from a judgment of value or worth of the teacher based on the information.

Within Expanded ADEPT, six types of evidence (data) are collected: 1.The long-range plan (APS 1) 2.The unit work sample (APSs 2 and 3) 3.The classroom observation records (APSs 4-9) 4.The teacher’s reflections on instruction and learning (APSs 4-9) 5.The professional review (APS 10) 6.The professional self-assessment and professional growth and development plan (APS 10)

Dossier During the ADEPT formal evaluation process, all data are placed in a dossier that is maintained by the chair of the evaluation team. All evaluators have access to the teacher candidate’s dossier. The evaluators analyze the data in the dossier to arrive at their evaluation judgments

IHE PROCEDURES Expanded ADEPT

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APS 1 [Present and discuss APS 1, including the key elements.] [Insert the IHE’s expectations regarding the types of instructional support, assistance, and/or evaluation that supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the teacher candidates in terms of APS 1.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APS 1 [Insert types of assistance that cooperating teachers and supervising faculty might provide to the candidates in terms of APS 1.] [Insert the frequency and timeframe for cooperating teachers and supervising faculty to provide assistance and conduct assessments of teacher candidates in terms of APS 1.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APS 1 [Insert the types of documentation that the supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the IHE and to the teacher candidates in terms of APS 1.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APS 1 [Insert the IHE’s system for judging/rating the teacher candidates performance relative to APS 1.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APSs 2 and 3 [Present and discuss APSs 2 and 3, including the key elements.] [Insert IHE’s expectations regarding the types of instructional support, assistance, and/or evaluation that supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the teacher candidates in terms of APSs 2 and 3.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APSs 2 and 3 [Insert types of assistance that cooperating teachers and supervising faculty might provide to the candidates in terms of APSs 2 and 3.] [Insert the frequency and timeframe for cooperating teachers and supervising faculty to provide assistance and conduct assessments of teacher candidates in terms of APSs 2 and 3.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APSs 2 and 3 [Insert the types of documentation that the supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the IHE and to the teacher candidates in terms of APSs 2 and 3.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 1: Planning APSs 2 and 3 [Insert the IHE’s system for judging/rating the teacher candidates performance relative to APSs 2 and 3.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 2: Instruction APSs 4-7 [Present and discuss APSs 4-7, including the key elements.] [Insert IHE’s expectations regarding the types of instructional support, assistance, and/or evaluation that supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the teacher candidates in terms of APSs 4-7.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 2: Instruction APSs 4-7 [Insert types of assistance that cooperating teachers and supervising faculty might provide to the candidates in terms of APSs 4-7.] [Insert the frequency and timeframe for cooperating teachers and supervising faculty to provide assistance and conduct assessments of teacher candidates in terms of APSs 4-7.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 2: Instruction APSs 4-7 [Insert the types of documentation that the supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the IHE and to the teacher candidates in terms of APSs 4-7.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 2: Instruction APSs 4-7 [Insert the IHE’s system for judging/rating the teacher candidates performance relative to APSs 4-7.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 3: Environment APSs 8 and 9 [Present and discuss APSs 8 and 9, including the key elements.] [Insert IHE’s expectations regarding the types of instructional support, assistance, and/or evaluation that supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the teacher candidates in terms of APSs 8 and 9.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 3: Environment APSs 8 and 9 [Insert types of assistance that cooperating teachers and supervising faculty might provide to the candidates in terms of APSs 8 and 9.] [Insert the frequency and timeframe for cooperating teachers and supervising faculty to provide assistance and conduct assessments of teacher candidates in terms of APSs 8 and 9.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 3: Environment APSs 8 and 9 [Insert the types of documentation that the supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the IHE and to the teacher candidates in terms of APSs 8 and 9.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 3: Environment APSs 8 and 9 [Insert the IHE’s system for judging/rating the teacher candidates performance relative to APSs 8 and 9.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 4: Professionalism APS 10 [Present and discuss APS 10, including the key elements.] [Insert the IHE’s expectations regarding the types of instructional support, assistance, and/or evaluation that supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the teacher candidates in terms of APS 10.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 4: Professionalism APS 10 [Insert types of assistance that cooperating teachers and supervising faculty might provide to the candidates in terms of APS 10.] [Insert the frequency and timeframe for cooperating teachers and supervising faculty to provide assistance and conduct assessments of teacher candidates in terms of APS 10.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 4: Professionalism APS 10 [Insert the types of documentation that the supervising faculty and cooperating teachers are expected to provide to the IHE and to the teacher candidates in terms of APS 10.]

Expanded ADEPT Procedures Domain 4: Professionalism APS 10 [Insert the IHE’s system for judging/rating the teacher candidates performance relative to APS 10.]

IHE Expanded ADEPT Procedures [Insert a description of the respective roles of the supervising faculty and cooperating teachers in the consensus process relative to each APS.]

IHE Expanded ADEPT Procedures [Insert the unit’s criteria for teacher candidates to successfully complete each APS and the clinical experience.]