Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 1 Simulation Scenarios and Comparison Criteria for Coexistence.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2

Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.

Doc.: IEEE /0049r0 Submission January 2007 Matthew Fischer, BroadcomSlide 1 Signaling of intolerance for 40 MHz transmissions Notice: This document.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1426r1 November 2014 Gustav Wikström et al., EricssonSlide 1 DSC and legacy coexistence Date: Authors:

Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA

Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color

Doc.: IEEE /0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes.

Further Considerations on Enhanced CCA for 11ax

Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0064r1 January 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Consideration on UL-MU overheads Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .

Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .

Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold

Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax

Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /219r0 Submission Mar 2004 Masahiro TAKAGI, ToshibaSlide 1 Requirements for MAC / PHY Simulation Interface Masahiro TAKAGI

Doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 Slot Time Synchronization for Coexistence of 5 MHz, 10 MHz and 20 MHz Systems Date:

Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.

Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.

Doc.: IEEE / r1 Submission November 2006 Bill McFarland, Atheros Communications, Inc.Slide 1 Energy Detect CCA Threshold Notice: This document.

Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)

Doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 CCA – CID 537 discussion Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1052r2 Response considerations in Active Scanning September 2012 HTC Corp.1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.

Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0779r2 Submission June 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Practical Usage Date: 2014-July Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov

Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0866r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Traffic modeling and system capacity performance measure Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0294r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:

Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments

Doc.: IEEE /0569r0 Submission April 2006 Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba CorporationSlide 1 Performance evaluation of 40MHz transmission - regarding CCA.

Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1468r1 Submission Jan 09 Ashish Shukla, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 ERP Protection in IEEE s Mesh Network Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1633r0 Submission January 2005 Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba CorporationSlide 1 Comparison of 20/40 MHz coexistence methods Notice: This.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:

Doc.: IEEE /034r0 Submission January 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg ChairpersonSlide 1 TGg Report to the IEEE Working Group Matthew B. Shoemake.

Doc.: IEEE /1366r3 Submission November 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition Date: 2013-xx-11Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /227 Submission May 2001 S. Gray, NokiaSlide 1 Throughput and Loss Packet Performance of DCF with Variable Transmit Power Steven D.

Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA

Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax

CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017

VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)

Proposed basis for PAR discussion

Simulation-based evaluation of DSC in enterprise scenario

TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC

Proposed response to 3GPP ED request

doc.: IEEE /0190r0 March 2005 March 2005

Remaining incoherence in Comparison Criteria

The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator

TGh Monitored Signal Strength Indication (MSSI)

Response to Reasons and Cures related to ICB/DCB frames

Simulation of 20/40 MHz CCA Unfairness

CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017

Simulation of 20/40 MHz CCA Unfairness

CCA- and slot-time relations

NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation

Proposed basis for PAR discussion

Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 1 Simulation Scenarios and Comparison Criteria for Coexistence Masahiro Takagi Tomoko Adachi TOSHIBA CORPORATION

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 2 What PAR says about Coexistence Additional Explanatory Notes in PAR –Table 1 “ Evaluation Metrics ” includes “ coexistence ” as an evaluation parameter. PAR ( r7) itself does not have the definition of “ coexistence ”, but draft PAR ( r6) has the following definition –The ability of one system to perform a task in a given shared environment in which other systems have an ability to perform their tasks and may or may not be using the same set of rules. It is impractical to evaluate the coexistence of HT system with all other systems. But coexistence of HT system with Legacy a/g system should be evaluated. –This should be regarded as a responsibility of WG.

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 3 Review of Simulation Scenarios and Comparison Criteria w.r.t. Coexistence (1/2) Legacy coexistence are supposed to be evaluated by SS9 and SS11 (clause 8.1 of r18 “ Usage Models ” ) –Scenario 9 (Mixed-Mode BSS) 3 Legacy STAs and 3 HT STAs associate with the mixed-mode AP. –Scenario 11(Co-channel legacy BSS) Legacy BSS and HT BSS shares the same wireless medium (location and channel). Table.6 of r18 has the following note: –Note, the BSSs are overlapping, without any STA/AP being exactly on top of another STA/AP. –This note implies HT BSS shall not dictate legacy STA/AP ’ s media access. No comparison criterion in r25 refers to SS9 and SS11. –This inconsistency has been introduced during FRCC comment resolution process, since the references to SS9 and SS11 were removed from CC18, 19 and 20.

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 4 Review of Simulation Scenarios and Comparison Criteria w.r.t. Coexistence (2/2) CC15 “ Sharing of medium with legacy devices ” –Scenario 17 (Point-to-Point HT Goodput Test for CC 15) HT STA associates with AP. –Scenario 18 (Point-to-Point Legacy Throughput Test for CC 15) Legacy STA associates with AP. –Scenario 19 (Point-to-Point Legacy Sharing Throughput Test for CC 15) HT STA and Legacy STA associates with AP. SS19 can be regarded as a simplified version of SS9, But one aspect of coexistence which are supposed to be evaluated by SS11 cannot be covered by these simulation scenarios. –HT AP cannot control the media access of Legacy STA in the other Legacy BSS.

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 5 Simplified simulation scenario corresponding to SS11 for CC15 HT BSS part is same as SS17. Legacy BSS part is same as SS18. The distance between HT STA and 11a STA are determined so that the RSSI at 11a STA (-64.47dBm) is below the CCA threshold power (-62dBm). –(HT STA TxPower = 17dBm, Channel B) –This configuration is appropriate to evaluate protection mechanisms of HT systems. CC15 reports the goodputs of HT STA and 11a STA in this scenario respectively in addition to T1, T2, T3 and T4. HT AP 20m 10m HT STA11a STA 10m m 11a AP 20m 10m Legacy BSSHT BSS

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 6 Conclusion Coexistence of HT system with legacy a/g system should be evaluated. Current comparison criteria cannot evaluate HT BSS and Legacy BSS coexistence at all. Simple simulation scenario and modification of CC15 for HT BSS and Legacy BSS coexistence evaluation is proposed. Evaluation of the coexistence should use SS11 or the proposed simulation scenario.

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 7 Backup Slides

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 8 IEEE802.11a CCA sensitivity CCA sensitivity The start of a valid OFDM transmission at a receive level equal to or greater than the minimum 6 Mbit/s sensitivity (- 82 dBm) shall cause CCA to indicate busy with a probability >90% within 4 µs. If the preamble portion was missed, the receiver shall hold the carrier sense (CS) signal busy for any signal 20 dB above the minimum 6 Mbit/s sensitivity (-62 dBm).

doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 9 Path Loss Model Dth = 5m (Channel A,B and C) 10m (Channel D) 20m (Channel E) 30m (Channel F)