Presentation of District Data Overview and Scrutiny Committee Wednesday 16 th July 2014 Nathan Rowland Community Projects Officer Community Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Households Below Average Income 2008/09
Advertisements

Cambridgeshire Health Trainers Bidding Event June 4th 2009 Holiday Inn, Impington Cambridge.
U.S. Hispanic Population: 1998 Helping You Make Informed Decisions.
Page 1 Boscombe Strategic Assessment 21 st July 2011.
2011 Census Information Summary | May 2013 – Health of Carers & Unpaid Care Profile HEADLINES PRODUCED BY POLICY, IMPACT AND INTELLIGENCE |
The North East Economy: A great place to invest. Overview of North East LEP Area.
University of Oxford Centre for the Analysis of South African Social Policy What can Social Science Contribute to Neighbourhood renewal? Indices of Multiple.
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
 Why the survey was devised – Interlink in partnership with TLI project and Salford City Council  Information collected from January till April’13 
Skills & Work November 2014 Locality Information.
2011 Census Joint Intelligence Group 3 April 2013.
July 2010 Luton Family Poverty Needs Assessment. Child Poverty Act 2010 Local authorities must prepare and publish a Child Poverty Needs Assessment The.
Poverty in America The Economics of Poverty. Statistics Poverty in America Over half the world lives on under $2.00 per day. In 2003, over 12% of all.
Causes of Poverty in the UK. What is Poverty?  “Individuals, families and groups in the population can be said to be in poverty when they lack the resources.
Education Pays Education Pays.
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 2009 East Ayrshire Andrew White Office of the Chief Statistician 16 th February.
Welfare Reforms Ursula Barrington. Welfare reforms On 16 February 2011 the Welfare Reform Bill was introduced to Parliament. The Bill legislates for the.
What’s new in the Child Poverty Unit – Research and Measurement Team Research and Measurement Team Child Poverty Unit.
Public Attitudes to Housing Results from Ipsos MORI On-Line Panel Poll 31 st May 2010.
May 2014 Wolverhampton: An Overview May
Brent Diversity Profile Labour Market Work patterns in Brent May 2015.
Partnership Board Progress Reports 2010/11 Alison Copeland Gyles Glover Supported by the Department of Health.
Incapacity Benefit (IB)/ Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) Coventry Claimants by protected characteristics Data source: Work and Pensions Longitudinal.
ENGLAND'S SMALLER SEASIDE TOWNS A ‘benchmarking' study Prof Steve Fothergill Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University.
Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) Coventry Claimants by protected characteristics Data source: Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study Department for Work and Pensions.
Employment, unemployment and economic activity Coventry working age population by disability status Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National.
Relative poverty in Scotland decreased in 2013/14 Communities Analysis Division– September 2015 In Scotland, relative poverty, before housing costs, fell.
Welfare Reform and Tenant Management Organisations Karen Williams and Ursula Barrington August 2012.
POVERTY How do we define poverty? How is poverty measured?
Dr Diana Grice East Sussex Downs & Weald Primary Care Trust and Hastings & Rother Primary Care Trust An overview of East Sussex - Facts and figures.
Employment, unemployment and economic activity Coventry working age population by gender Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics.
Out of Work Benefits Coventry Claimants by protected characteristics Data source: Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study Department for Work and Pensions.
2001 CENSUS/NeSS OUTPUT ROADSHOW KEY STATISTICS HIGHLIGHTS Ian White/Sarah Crofts ONS, Census Division.
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 2009 COSLA Tackling Poverty Officers Group Matt Perkins Office of the Chief Statistician.
Lesson Starter. What will I learn? To Define what is meant by the term ‘Poverty’. To Describe two different ways of measuring poverty: absolute poverty.
PKSS Community Survey – Analysis and Conclusions Sep 11 th, 2009.
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 2009 Niamh Laffan Office of the Chief Statistician Scottish Government 29 th October.
Additional analysis of poverty in Scotland 2013/14 Communities Analytical Services July 2015.
EDAT 17 December 2014 Local demographic trends – An older and ageing population Andy Cornelius Corporate Research & Consultation Team.
Equality Statistics In Scotland Equality Statistics Branch Scottish Government February 2009.
U.S. Hispanic Population: 1999 Helping You Make Informed Decisions.
Analysis of 2011 Census Data Irish Community Statistics, England & Selected Urban Areas Prof. Louise Ryan, Alessio D’Angelo, Mike Puniskis, Neil Kaye Wednesday.
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 2009 ScotXed seminar - 31 October 2011 Andrew White, Office of the Chief Statistician.
Employment, unemployment and economic activity Coventry working age population by ethnicity Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics.
What is my neighbourhood like? Read this if you want to learn: 1)Why statistical data about your local area is important 2)What statistical information.
CRISIS IN UK. UK Map Financial Crisis » The most common issue is household income that is 60% or less of the average (median) British household.
Quality of Life in North Warwickshire Warwickshire Observatory Stacey Mann Warwickshire Observatory September 2015.
Indices of Deprivation 2015 For Telegraph Hill Ward.
2015 English Indices of Deprivation – Torbay Contact: Torbay Public Health.
2015 English Indices of Deprivation – South Devon and Torbay CCG Contact: Torbay Public Health.
Barnet Insight Commissioning Group Induction. Barnet is a growing, but not at a uniform rate  Barnet is London’s most populous borough home to 367,265.
EPHA Autumn Term Meetings Outcomes PhaseEssex Provisional 2015 Essex Actual 2014 % point change (2014 v 2015) Provisional national figures 2015.
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 2009 Matt Perkins Office of the Chief Statistician 30 th October 2009.
Community Foundation of Collier County Our Mission: To improve the quality of life in Collier County by connecting donors to community needs and providing.
Impacts of welfare changes in Camden May Housing Benefit Overview There has been an 24% decrease in new claims since 2011/12. Housing Benefit.
Department for Work and Pensions 1 Croydon Ward Report Benefit Data Comparison Report.
Annual Report 2013/14. The causes of the causes  The social determinants of health underpin the stark inequalities in health in Camden and Islington.
By London Borough of Havering Public Health Service Version 1.2 (March 2016) This is Havering 2016 A Demographic and Socio-economic profile A Demographic.
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Evaluation Panel Workshops 17 th June 2014.
How healthy is your community? Public Health Warwickshire Spring 2014 Warwick and localities version.
Current data on key issues for Cheltenham. A growing population The population of Cheltenham was 115,700 in 2011 up 5.2% from 110,000 in The population.
Impacts of welfare changes in Camden October 2015 (HB ref date 1 Oct-15)
Impacts of welfare changes in Camden 6 August 2014.
Poverty in Lincoln James Wilkinson Policy and Strategic Information Officer.
Localized Council Tax Reduction scheme - EIA
Health Inequalities: #PublicHealthHour
Plans for the next results
Child Poverty in Essex An update on the Essex Child Poverty Strategy
North Solihull Locality Profile 2018.
What is social mobility?
Presentation transcript:

Presentation of District Data Overview and Scrutiny Committee Wednesday 16 th July 2014 Nathan Rowland Community Projects Officer Community Services

The Braintree District at a glance Gender 51% are Female 49% are Male Religion 61.27% of residents are Christian 29.99% have no religion 0.47% are Muslim 0.3% are Hindu 0.24% are Buddhist 0.14% are Jewish 0.06% are Sikh 0.4% follow other religions 7.14% are unknown Total Population in people Age Groups 19.7% of residents are aged % of residents are aged % of residents are aged % of residents are aged 65+ Ethnicity 93.15% are White British 2.65% are classed as White Other Other ethnic groups make up 4.2% of the population

The Braintree District at a glance Long Term Illness & Disability 16.4% of residents have a long term limiting illness or disability Learning Disability 433 people have a learning Disability Ranked 3rd highest in Essex Mental Health Estimated sufferers Ranked 5th highest in Essex Dementia An estimated 1975 sufferers (8% of over 65s). Ranked 5 th highest in Essex Carers 10.1% of residents provide unpaid care to another person Housing 69% of residents are owner occupiers 17% live in Social Housing 13% live in Private rented accommodation 1 % live rent free Towns & Parishes 54% of residents live in one of the District’s three main towns Over 70% of residents live in an area with a Parish or Town Council

Population

Population by Location The majority of residents live in the three towns in the district with people or 54.13% of the population living in these areas. Braintree (& Bocking) has the largest population with people (28.8% of the population) Witham has residents (17.24% of the population) Halstead has (8.09% of the district population) The remaining people or 45.87% of residents live outside of the three main towns people, (17.32% ) live in the North/Halstead area of the district people (15.84%) live in the Mid/Braintree area of the district people (12.71%) live in the South/Witham area of the district

Projected Changes The Office of National Statistics estimates that by 2021 the population of the District will have risen to over 162,805 people. This is an overall increase of 10.37% or people. (Source ONS Population Projections at Subnational level 2011) The different age groups are expected to change as follows: 0-15 years age group will increase by 3961 people years age group will decrease by 1495 people years age group will increase by 3675 people 65years + age group will increase by 9151 people POPPI Projections estimate that 2119 people aged over 65 will suffer from dementia by 2016

Education & Skills

GCSE Attainment According to the Department of Education, the Braintree District has the lowest GCSE attainment figures in Essex compared to the other district and boroughs. In % of students achieved 5 or more GCSEs at grade A*-C (including English and Maths). This is 8.5% lower than the average for England, 0.1% lower than the next lowest district (Harlow), and 17.5% lower than the highest performing area in Essex (Castle Point). (Source Department of Education 2014) % of Students achieving 5+ A*-C grades inc. English and mathematics GCSEs in 2013 Braintree52.3 Harlow52.4 Maldon54.5 Basildon56.0 Castle Point59.3 Thurrock UA59.5 Tendring59.9 Rochford60.6 Chelmsford61.4 Southend-on-Sea UA61.9 Uttlesford64.3 Colchester65.0 Epping Forest68.5 Brentwood69.8 England 60.8

GCSE Attainment In 2013, two of the eight secondary schools in the District achieved above the national average (59.20%) for the percentage of students achieving 5+ A*-C GCSEs (or equivalent). These were: Honywood (69%), Hedingham School (61%) The schools with the lowest attainment levels were: Alec Hunter Humanities College (40%), The Ramsey College (41%) Tabor Academy (46%). (Source Department of Education 2013) School name % achieving 5+ A*-C GCSEs (or equivalent) including English and maths GCSEs in 2013 % Increase - Decrease District Ranking England - all schools53.50%59.00%59.40%59.20%-0.20%N/A England - state funded schools only55.10%58.20%58.80%60.60%1.80%N/A The Honywood Community Science School 65%68%72%69%-3.00%1 Hedingham School and Sixth Form 45%68%67%61%-6.00%2 Notley High School and Braintree Sixth Form 55%66%64%58%-6.00%3 Maltings Academy 50%42%51%56%5.00%4 New Rickstones Academy 40% 43%49%6.00%5 Tabor Science College 48%47%54%46%-8.00%6 The Ramsey College 34%44%42%41%-1.00%7 Alec Hunter Humanities College 51%45%36%40%4.00%8 N.B. Result are calculated by place of residence rather than the school attended, and therefore include results of resident students who attend schools outside of the Braintree District

Housing

Housing Tenure According to the 2011 Census there are 61,043 separate households in the Braintree District. 69% of households were Owner/Occupier, 17% social rented 13% private rented 1% living rent free The proportion of owner occupiers is approximately 5% higher than the average for England, whilst social rented and private rented were 1% and 4% lower respectively. Tenure of householdsBraintree DistrictEngland Owner/occupied % % Social rented % % Private rented808313% % Living rent free6711% % TOTAL % % (Source ONS Census 2011, Braintree District Housing StatNav 2013 )

Housing Tenure by Ward Great Notley and Braintree West has the highest rate of Owner Occupier households with 83% Bocking South had the highest proportion of social rented properties with 35%. Braintree Central has the highest proportion of Private rented properties with 29% (Source ONS Census 2011, Braintree District Housing StatNav 2013 )

Household Composition The majority of households in the District are made up of couples with dependent children making up 22%, followed by couples with no children representing 20%. 10% of households had non-dependent children (i.e. adult/economically active) 15% of households were single people were aged under 65 years, whilst 12% were aged over 65 years. Lone parents with dependant children makes up approximately 7% of the district or 4038 households. Household ProfileBraintree District Single person of pension age722412% Single person931315% Couple households (1 or both persons at pension age)53269% Couple households with no children % Couple households with dependent children % Lone parent households with dependent children40387% Households with all children non- dependent600910% Other households30315% (Source ONS Census 2011, Braintree District Housing StatNav 2013 )

Economy

Economic Activity 79.3% of residents of people aged in the Braintree District were classed as economically active (either in employment or are unemployed and have sought work in the last four weeks). Male residents are more likely to be classed as economically active than female residents with 87.5% of male residents (41,400 people) were classed as economically active compared to 32,500 people or 71% of female residents or 20.7% of people aged were classed as Economically Inactive. The percentage of people looking after home or family is 11.8% higher than the average for England with 6900 people or 37% 3400 people or 18.2% are long term sick and unable to work and 3100 people or 16.6% retired before 75 years. Source: ONS annual population survey 2012 Definitions Economically active: People who are either in employment or unemployed. Economically inactive: People who are neither in employment nor unemployed. This group includes, for example, all those who were looking after a home or retired.

Income In 2013 the (median) average gross weekly pay for full time workers living in the district was £ Male full time workers earned £ per week (£ more than the combined national average, and £82.50 more than the national average for male workers). Female full time workers earned £ per week (£ less than the combined national average, and £27.90 more than the national average for female workers). Male workers earned of average £ per week more than the average wage for female fulltime workers in the district. From Male F/T worker’s wages increased by an average of £40 per week, whilst Female F/T worker’s wages increased by £2 per week. Braintree District (pounds) Great Britain (pounds) Gross weekly pay Full-time workers Male full-time workers Female full-time workers Hourly pay Full-time workers Male full-time workers Female full-time workers (Source Nomis 2014, Department of Work and Pensions )

Job Seekers Allowance May 2014 Braintree District (numbers) Braintree District (%) East (%) Great Britain (%) All people1, Males Females The Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) is payable to people under pensionable age who are available for, and actively seeking, work of at least 40 hours a week. In the Braintree District in May 2014, there were 1638 people claiming JSA. This is equivalent to 1.8% of the working age population and is 0.2% lower than the average for the East of England and 0.8% lower than the average for Great Britain. Broken down by age, it is estimated that; 27% of claimants (approx. 445 people) were aged years old (NEET classification) 52% (approx. 845 people) were aged % (approx. 350 people) were aged % is a proportion of resident population of area aged and gender split (Source Nomis 2014, Department of Work and Pensions )

Job Seekers Allowance In the last 12 months JSA claims have fallen from 2.6% to 1.8% with 825 fewer people claiming compared to same time last year. The highest level of JSA claims since 2006 occurred in January 2010 when 3.4% (3135) people were claiming JSA. The Lowest level of JSA claims occurred in March 2008 when 1.3% (1206 people) were claiming. (Source Nomis 2014, Department of Work and Pensions )

Job Seekers Allowance In May 2014 the Braintree District has the 6 th highest JSA claimant rate in Essex (jointly with Castle Point and Epping Forest) when compared to other local authorities in Essex. Harlow has the highest claimant rate with 3.2%,whilst Uttlesford had the lowest with 0.9%. (Source Nomis 2014, Department of Work and Pensions )

Job Seekers Allowance In May 2014 the Witham West ward had the highest JSA claimant rate with 3.1% (137 claimants), this is 1.3% higher than the District Average, and 0.5% higher than the national average. The Braintree East ward has a the second highest claimant rate of 2.9% but the highest number of individual claimants with 142 people. Stour Valley South has the lowest JSA claimant rate with 0.4% (5 claimants) (Source Nomis 2014, Department of Work and Pensions )

Deprivation

Deprivation by Local Authority (Source Office of National Statistics, Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 ) Deprivation at a Local Authority level (District/Borough and Unitary) is calculated using a range of factors separate to those used by the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation. These are; Local Concentration (The ranks of a local authority district’s most deprived LSOAs that contain exactly 10% of the district’s population) Extent (Proportion of a local authority district’s population living in the most deprived LSOAs in the country) Income Scale (The number of people who are income deprived) Employment Scale (The number of people who are employment deprived)

Average Deprivation Rankings (Nationally) The Braintree District is ranked 210 th out of 326 (where 1 is most deprived) for overall deprivation compared to the other district/borough councils in England. As such the district is in the upper 50% (or upper-mid 25%) nationally. The overall score is comprised of different dimensions where the rank of the district will vary from the overall position nationally. This is comprised of: Local Concentration - Ranked 232 nationally (upper 50%) Extent - Ranked 238 th (Upper 50%) Income Scale - Ranked 150 th (Lower 50%) Employment Scale - Ranked 164 th (Upper 50%) Most Deprived Least Deprived Lower 25% Lower-Mid 25% Upper-Mid 25% Upper 25%

Deprivation at Neighbourhood Level (Source Office of National Statistics, Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 ) The English Indices of Deprivation uses Lower Layer Super Output Areas to allow for comparisons of the level of deprivation between areas. An LSOA has a minimum of 1000 and maximum of 3000 residents, compared to ward areas which have no standard population numbers. Across England there are currently LSOAs, with 84 LSOAs in the Braintree District. In the 2010 English Indices of Deprivation, deprived areas have been defined as those LSOAs that are amongst the 10 per cent most deprived in England according to the overall Index of Multiple Deprivation. Overall Deprivation is made up of 7 indicators: Income, Employment, Education Skills & Training, Health & Disability, Barriers to Housing & Services, Living Environment and Crime. For the purposes of looking at poverty, we are initially focusing on Income and Employment Deprivation

Overall Deprivation No areas in the Braintree District fall into the 10% most deprived LSOAs nationally. The map on the left shows the rankings between different 84 LSOAs within the Braintree District, separated into four groups Areas in RED are the 21 most deprived in the District Areas in Green are the 21 least deprived in the District This map does not reflect how areas are ranked nationally.

Income Deprivation No areas in the Braintree District fall into the 10% most deprived LSOAs nationally. The map on the left shows the rankings between different 84 LSOAs within the Braintree District, separated into four groups Areas in RED are the 21 most deprived in the District Areas in Green are the 21 least deprived in the District This map does not reflect how areas are ranked nationally.

Employment Deprivation No areas in the Braintree District fall into the 10% most deprived LSOAs nationally. The map on the left shows the rankings between different 84 LSOAs within the Braintree District, separated into four groups Areas in RED are the 21 most deprived in the District Areas in Green are the 21 least deprived in the District This map does not reflect how areas are ranked nationally.

Do you have any questions?

Further information For further information contact: Nathan Rowland Community Projects Officer Telephone: ext. 2348