2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions Working document for the workshop on condensables & Semi-Volatiles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
Advertisements

Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
Gas/Particle Partitioning. Why is gas/particle partitioning important? Dispersion of Pollutants Introduced into the Atmosphere as Determined by Residence.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
Finnish BC emission inventory, and national characteristics and user practice influence on domestic wood combustion emissions Kaarle J. Kupiainen 1,2,
Direct PM 2.5 Emissions Data, Testing, and Monitoring Issues Ron Myers Measurement Policy Group SPPD, OAQPS.
U. Dusek 1, R. Holzinger 1, T. Röckmann 1 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht (IMAU), Utrecht University, The Netherlands Combined measurements.
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF UK ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham and National Centre for Atmospheric Science.
2010 Diesel Emission Reduction Consortium Experimental Studies of Exhaust Chemistry and Aftertreatment Professor Thatcher Root Department of Chemical and.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
The Framework of Modeling SOA Formation from Toluene Oxidation Di Hu and Richard Kamens Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University.
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
WHAT IS MISSING IN THE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM? Dick Derwent rdscientific, Newbury APRIL Workshop, Imperial College London April 23 rd 2010 This work.
Improving regional air quality model results at the city scale : results from the EC4MACS project INERIS : Bertrand Bessagnet, Etienne Terrenoire, Augustin.
SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London.
Air Quality Management in Mumbai V.K.Phatak MMRDA.
BC, EC and OC Metrics, emissions and trends Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Bas Henzing, Antoon Visschedijk EC emissions from diesel-fuelled vehicles,
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories Lesson 1 Introduction to Fine Particles (PM 2.5 )
Title Progress in the development and results of the UNIFIED EMEP model Presented by Leonor Tarrason EMEP/MSC-W 29 th TFIAM meeting, Amiens, France,
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
Chapter 17.1 Atmospheric Characteristics
IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) An Integrated Assessment Model for Fine Particulate Matter in Europe Markus Amann, M.
1 EGTEI – 22 November 2011 Nadine ALLEMAND – EGTEI secretariat Update of the Guidance Document of the Gothenburg Protocol with information on Black Carbon.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contribution from MSC-W to the review of the Gothenburg protocol – Reports 2006 TFIAM, Rome, 16-18th May, 2006.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
Charmex workshop Trieste 1/Total Working sesssion « chemical processes » overview Relevant questions : -VOC reactivity, oxidized.
Diesel Emissions Regulation and Control Impact of ARB Regulation.
Karl Ceulemans– Steven Compernolle – Jean-François Müller
1.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Secondary Organic Aerosols
UNECE-CLRTAP and EMEP Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling 26th session, Brussels, May 2001 Integrating the environmental effects of Particulate.
Prakash V. Bhave, Ph.D. Physical Scientist PM Model Performance Workshop February 10, 2004 Postprocessing Model Output for Comparison to Ambient Data.
Quality of current PM emission inventories Kristin Rypdal, Chair of Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections With input from Zbigniew Klimont.
Joint TFEIP/TFMM workshop October 22, Dublin Understanding discrepancies between atmospheric model results and measurements given uncertainties in emission.
Yunseok Im and Myoseon Jang
POMI kick-off meeting 7 March, 2008 Collaborative research project in support to the reduction of atmospheric pollution in REGIONE LOMBARDIA ( )
Fine particles: the views of the WG on Strategies and Review Richard Ballaman Chairman of WGSR Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape.
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
2. Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA
Ambient air sampling and monitoring Topic 5 Ms. Sherina Kamal.
Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by linear unmixing of aerosol mass spectra V. A. Lanz 1, M. R. Alfarra 2, U. Baltensperger.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections Emissions of condensable and semi-volatile organic particulate matter Summary of TFEIP background paper.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions
Review of Important PM2.5 Source Categories
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
vkm in transport modelling
On-going developments of SinG: particles
Major Air Pollutants.
Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Time-Integrated Sampling
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Air Quality Management in Mumbai
Presentation transcript:

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions Working document for the workshop on condensables & Semi-Volatiles

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Organic matter in the atmosphere  Organic matter (OM) represents 20 to 30% of the particulate matter in Europe, this fraction is dominated by the secondary organic fraction produced by chemical reactions of organic precursors (Freutel et al., 2013, Crippa et al., 2013)  For primary species, in 2013, 50.5% of the primary PM2.5 emissions were attributed to the residential sector in the EEA-33 regions, road transport represents the second emitting macro sector with 16.1%.  Wood burning combustion represents the main source of the residential sector  Road traffic emissions is an important contributor of organic matter in urban areas  Actually, all activity sectors with combustion processes emit particulate matter

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Why this working group?  Official primary PM emissions decrease (e. g. use of filtering techniques for the case of diesel vehicles, improvement of efficiency of wood stoves, etc…)  Air quality models usually underestimate PM, and the lack of some emissions is considered as one of the explanations (particularly in winter due to wood burning)  The secondary fraction and/or the organic fraction are underestimated by models  In smog chambers, the aging of diesel vs gasoline exhausts show the importance of SOA formation. In some experiments, gasoline vehicles produce more aerosols than diesel vehicles after several hours in the chambers → role of VOC and SVOC  Semi volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC) are partly included in emission inventories  How to complement these emissions inventories?

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 SVOC in emission inventories  So far, only VOC is reported in emission inventories, a fraction of SVOC is certainly included in the PM emissions: Modellers do their own emission to feed their model with SVOC with very poor data  A bit of history: NOx was reported because of its role on acidification and Ozone formation (Sofia Protocol & Gothenburg Protocol) then SVOCs should be known/reported, isolated in the future as they are PM precursors

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Models for what? Reminder…  Models are used in the frame of the Convention to: provide an integrated view of the pollution in 2 dimension, complement the monitoring strategy based on measurements evaluate the impact of an emission reduction (source matrix receptor) that is a fundamental basis for the integrated assessment (IA) Emissions EMEP & Other sources CTMs SR matrix EMEP IA GAINS

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Concept of SVOC - I  All organic species are more or less volatile and can be considered as semi-volatile, their vapour pressure is the key parameter to define the volatility.  The temperature and the organic aerosol loading (the total mass of organic species into which semi-volatile species can condense) influence the partitioning between the gas and particle phases.  VOCs represent the most volatile fraction of organic species.  The heaviest organic molecules (in term of molecular weight) can be considered to be entirely in the particulate phase, they constitute what is commonly called organic matter.  In between, there is a large spectrum of molecules that are partitioned between the gas and particle phases, they are called in a broad sense SVOC (semi-volatile organic compounds).

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Concept of SVOC - II  Organic species can be split in: ELVOC (Extremely low Volatile Organic Compounds) LVOC (Low Volatile Organic Compounds) SVOC (Semi Volatile Organic Compounds) IVOC (Intermediate Volatility Organic Compounds) VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds)  These categories can be delimited by vapour pressure thresholds  This delimitation is arbitrary, the Gas/Particle partitioning can change with the temperature and the level of concentrations  Chemistry transport models host secondary organic aerosol modules able to produce secondary organic aerosol from gas phase organic species SVOC in a broad sense POA (Primary Organic Aerosol) in gas and particle phases

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Evolution of SVOCs  Air quality models have chemistry modules to account for the VOC and SVOC chemistry  Some simple considerations: Dilution of SVOC leads to evaporation Decrease of T° leads to condensation/absorption of SVOC Oxidation reactions lead to the formation of bigger molecules

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Evolution of SVOCs Particle Gas In the dilution sampler Fast dilution and cooling in the atmosphere Atmospheric reactions –SOA formation In the atmosphere INERIS dilution system for Wood stove / Fireplaces

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Until now, how do modellers manage SVOC emissions?  So far, emission inventories are targeted on VOC, NOx, SOx, NH3, CO and PM broken down into PM2.5 and PM10  A speciation is often proposed to identify the organic matter in each PM fraction EC / OM / Other OM is organic matter supposed as particulate matter at the emission “other” means non carbonaceous species (dust, inorganics, etc…)  Modellers do their own calculation of total primary organic aerosol (gas + particles) emitted by a given sector with coefficients based on dilution curves reported in the literature. TPOA= 2 * OM (as an example) IVOC can be considered as not included in TPOA then IVOC is estimated from TPOA or VOC emission factors Not consistent !! Certainly different operating conditions

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Dilution curves - a tool to estimate total POA  At C oa =10 µg/m 3 and 25°C, about 55% is in the particle phase If you measure solid POA, you have to multiply 1/0.55~2 to get the total organic fraction (Gas+Particles)  If we could measure higher C oa we could take into account missing SVOC (the so called IVOC) Dilution curve from 51 light-duty American gasoline vehicles (from May et al. 2013a) at 47°C and 25°C. 55%

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Dilution curves – application with french data for vehicles  What are the level of PM concentrations and temperatures in the CVS sampling system: - Diesel vehicle (without Particulate filter) : µg/m 3 - Petrol or Diesel vehicle (with Particulate filter) : µg/m 3 - Temperature : 36°C  Determination of Xp: - Diesel vehicle (without Particulate filter) : 70-95% - Petrol or Diesel vehicle (with Particulate filter) : 50-90% May et al, 2013

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 PM measurements – focus on the organic fraction Elemental Carbon Metals-dust Inorganics IVOC Not adsorbed on filters POA in dilution samplers + Total SVOC without IVOC ++ Adsorbed vapors on filters Emission Factor in mg km -1 Ambient POA Carbon number VOC Adapted from Robinson et al. (2010) IVOC SVOC LVOC ELVOC

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Uncertainties of this methodology based on coefficient  Modellers need to identify  The coefficients used for this estimation are based on very few publications often old  We don’t have any clues about the operating conditions (T° and PM load) of the EF measurements  The two previous informations are certainly not consistent! Elemental Carbon Dust Inorganics SVOC PM ? In the dilution sampler

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Two options for the future (10 years) OPTION I  PM including SVOC will be reported with (by activity sector): A split by components : OM, EC, other (minimum requirement) A split by volatility for OM (including SVOC), for each of volatility classes a split by species will be provided  VOC Improvement of the VOC split including IVOC Disavantage : Automatically, increase your total emissions by country

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Two options for the future (10 years) OPTION II  PM without OM could be reported  OM including SVOC will be reported separately A split by volatility for OM (including SVOC), for each of volatility class a split by species will be provided  VOC Improvement of the VOC split  IVOC will be reported separately with a split by species

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Short term actions (2 years)  A “a minima” method would consist in reconstructing the total organic matter emissions in the gas and particle phases. This can be done in several steps: 1.Speciation of PM emissions by SNAPs (level 1 to 3) to separate POA emissions from other compounds, POA being the extremely low volatile compounds (ELVOC) called PCOA here and primary semi volatile organic compounds in the particle phase (primary SVOCp). 2.Estimate the total (gas+particles) primary semi volatile organic compounds emissions from POA emissions and IVOC from VOC 3.Split of total primary semi volatile organic compounds in the gas and aerosol phases on volatility bins by SNAPs (from literature or new experiments) to provide information on how SVOC partition as a function of Temperature and Organic mass load. This split would allow determining ELVOC, LVOC, SVOC according to the convention define by Donahue et al. (2012). 4.Information on how organic compound emissions can evolve with the evolution of the vehicle fleet to manage future emission inventories in order to address emission projections

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016  The modeling community needs a common “OM/EC/Other” split for emitted PM by activity sector and subsector and by country. we need to know what represent OM in this split, what were the experimental conditions: Temperature and PM load in the sampler.  For the two main PM emitters (traffic and wood burning) we need to know at least by country the method used to estimate the PM emission factors and :  temperature in the device (dilution tunnel)  PM load (in µg/m3 ) in the device  These two parameters have to be determined by sub SNAP and fuel (diesel, gasoline, Euro1-6 for vehicles)  We have to know the composition of the car fleet by country (diesel, gasoline, Euro1-6) Short term actions (2 years) - specifically

2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Long term actions (10 years)  The “idealistic” method would consist in an inventory providing directly OM emissions including SVOC by volatility bins at a reference temperature (with recommended values of enthalpies of vaporization by SNAP to take into account the dependency to temperature) from non-volatile compounds to compounds with a volatility close to dodecane. These emissions by volatility bins could come from an analytic system providing directly emissions for each volatility bins or an analytic system providing total OM emissions and the corresponding dilution curves.  All activity sectors should be addressed  Certainly research actions are required to define new experimental protocols