Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 1 ENHANCING STUDENT LEARNING TEACHING QUALITY INDICATORS PROJECT Sponsored by the Carrick Institute for Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Advertisements

Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.
Bronwyn Kosman, Office of the DVC (Provost) No 1 TEACHING MATTERS DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF TEACHING QUALITY Researching (e)Learning and Teaching Presentation.
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
HM Inspectorate of Education 1 The Quality Framework for Scottish FE Colleges Angus Allan, HMIE.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Professor Judyth SachsTeaching Quality Indicators ProjectNo 1 ENHANCING STUDENT LEARNING TEACHING QUALITY INDICATORS PROJECT Sponsored by the Carrick Institute.
Offices of the Provost & Deputy Vice-Chancellor (S&E) Introduction New policies, procedures and guidelines Key drivers OADRI Cycle Quality Management.
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
Professor Ian Anderson & Ms Debra Knoche Centre for Health & Society – Onemda VicHealth Koori Health Unit University of Melbourne National Workforce Strategy.
SEM Planning Model.
How can we recognize and reward quality teaching and learning? Denise Chalmers Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning National TQI project.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
The ethnicity and attainment gap in the UK HE sector Chris Brill Senior Policy Adviser Equality Challenge Unit The Open University ‘Access and Success.
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Implementing the new Australian Medical Council standards: The focus on Indigenous health Professor Michael Field Chair, Medical School Accreditation Committee,
Country Case: Sri Lanka Ensuring Quality in Higher Education Prof. Colin N. Peiris Quality Assurance Specialist QAA Council of the UGC Sri Lanka.
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
2011 UKPSF 2011 The UK Professional Standards Framework for for teaching and supporting learning in higher education 1.
Excellence in Vocational Teaching Symposium 23 & 24 September 2013 Qingdao, P.R. China.
Applying standards Assessment in Music (Associate Professor Don Lebler, Griffith University’s Conservatorium of Music) Hunters and Gatherers (Dr Romy Lawson,
Barriers to comparability Sustainable Offshore Delivery Hilary Winchester 25 July 2012
1 AUQA Performance Portfolio Chapter 3 International Activities.
Teaching and Supporting Students with Vision Impairments An Australian Universities Teaching Committee Funded Project WAANU Conference March 2005.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Aligning Institutional Strategic and SEM Plans: Indiana State University November 12, 2012 Tom Green, Ph.D. Senior Consultant.
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Program Directors and the Quality Agenda Lucy Schulz, Director: Student and Academic Services June 2002 Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Quality Assurance Project Makerere University Report on Activities of the No Cost Extension Dr Ddembe Williams Project Manager Dr Lillian Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza.
Directorate of Academic Affairs and Registrar Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) Annual Institutional Report (AIR) Reporting Period: 1 January –
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Teaching Matters: Developing indicators of teaching quality, a comparative study The Teaching Quality Indicators Project
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Introduction to IQAC Khawza I Ahmed, Director IQAC.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
The Potential of UKPSF at NU
Professional Recognition and Development (PRD) Scheme
Applying for HEA Fellowship
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Chair, Quality Assurance Committee
Teaching Quality Indicators Project
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Presentation transcript:

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 1 ENHANCING STUDENT LEARNING TEACHING QUALITY INDICATORS PROJECT Sponsored by the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 2 AIM To reward and recognise quality teaching in higher education through systematic implementation of indicators and metrics on teaching and teacher effectiveness

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 3 FOCUS Student Learning The Student Experience Performance-based Quality Assurance Culture Quality Teaching AUQA 2009

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 4 FOUR STAGES 1.Investigation and Development of Framework COMPLETE 2.Pilot Implementation of Framework IN PROGRESS 3.Sector Wide Up-scaling 3.Sector Wide Up-scaling TO COMMENCE IN Benchmarking TO COMMENCE IN 2009

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 5 STAGE 2 Eight universities involved in pilot phase: Deakin UniversityDeakin University Griffith UniversityGriffith University Macquarie UniversityMacquarie University RMITRMIT University of QueenslandUniversity of Queensland University of South AustraliaUniversity of South Australia University of TasmaniaUniversity of Tasmania University of Western AustraliaUniversity of Western Australia

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 6 KEY DIMENSIONS Four key dimensions critical for quality in learning and teaching: 1.Institutional climate and systems - Macquarie priority 2.Diversity and inclusivity 3.Assessment 4.Student community and engagement

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 7 INDICATIVE L & T INDICATORS Institutional Climate & Systems Diversity & Inclusivity AssessmentStudent Community & Engagement Adoption of a student- centred learning perspective Possession of desirable teacher characteristics Relevant and appropriate teaching experience, qualifications and development Use of current research findings in informing teaching and curriculum / course content Community engagement / partnership Funding model in support of L & T Valuing and accommodating student and staff diversity Provision of adequate support services Active recruitment and admissions Provision of transition and academic support Active staff recruitment Multiple pathways for reward and recognition of staff Assessment policies address issues of pedagogy Adopting an evidence- based approach to assessment policies Alignment between institutional policy for best practice and faculty / departmental activities Commitment to formative assessment Provision of specific, continuous and timely feedback Explicit learning outcomes Value of graduates Student engagement Fostering and facilitating (academic) learning communities Staff engagement

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 8 DIMENSIONS OF QUALITY TEACHING

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 9 PROCESS examine and revise the relevant policies and practices that impact on the quality of teaching and learningexamine and revise the relevant policies and practices that impact on the quality of teaching and learning establish the necessary infrastructure and systems to gather and interpret the dataestablish the necessary infrastructure and systems to gather and interpret the data implement strategies to build a culture that values, recognises and rewards quality teaching and learningimplement strategies to build a culture that values, recognises and rewards quality teaching and learning

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 10 PROGRESS TO DATE University-level Teaching Policy Audit completedUniversity-level Teaching Policy Audit completed Division/Department Teaching Policy Audit commencedDivision/Department Teaching Policy Audit commenced Policy, Procedure and Guideline Templates approvedPolicy, Procedure and Guideline Templates approved Teaching Quality Indicators Steering Group formed (first meeting held 26 September 2007)Teaching Quality Indicators Steering Group formed (first meeting held 26 September 2007) Two Working Parties establishedTwo Working Parties established -Assessment -Student Feedback

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 11 TQI STEERING GROUP Terms of Reference 1.Engage the wider Macquarie University community in enhancing the quality of student learning and the student and staff experience 2.Provide feedback on the Teaching Quality Indicators framework 3.Guide the implementation of the Teaching Quality Indicators framework 4.Work with existing committees, or establish new sub-committees or working parties as required, to determine, develop, implement and effectively utilise teaching quality indicators 5.Incorporate the findings of internal and external reviews, providing input as appropriate, where there is potential for an impact on the performance culture of learning and teaching 6.Establish working links with other institutions, particularly those involved in the TQI pilot, to embrace a quality culture in learning and teaching 7.Meet Carrick Institute deadlines and reporting requirements

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 12 TQI STEERING GROUP Members Deputy VC (Provost) - ChairProfessor Judyth Sachs Senate MemberA/Prof Nick Mansfield Academic Program Committee MemberDr Jan Tent Coursework Studies Committee MemberMr Julian De Meyrick Learning & Teaching Committee MemberA/Prof Pamela Coutts Dean, Higher Degree ResearchProfessor John Hooper Dean of StudentsRepresented by Acting DoS, Mr Julian De Meyrick Academic RegistrarMr Colin Hawkins CPD / CFL RepresentativeDr Sharon Fraser Director, Human ResourcesMr Tim Sprague LibrarianMs Maxine Brodie Academic Staff MemberDr Steve Cassidy Academic Staff MemberA/Prof Julie Fitness Administrative Staff MemberMr Gary Grocott SecretaryMs Bronwyn Kosman

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 13 TQI STEERING GROUP Timelines 2007 SeptForm Steering Group Assess priorities by mapping key dimensions against OctUse policy audit to inform process and data audits Identify and meet with key stakeholders NovContinue audits Commence mapping results against Framework DecReport on initial phase

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 14 TQI STEERING GROUP Timelines 2008 JanConfirm priorities for Macquarie and revise Framework as necessary FebStrategy planning for implementation of Framework Mar – AprConsultation with stakeholders regarding implementation May – AugPolicy development and implementation Sept – NovPolicy development, implementation and approvals DecReport on pilot implementation Completion of Stage 2

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 15 TQI PROJECT TIMELINES 2009 Stage 3Sector wide up-scaling (~ 10 institutions) to implement the model and process established in Stage 2 Stage 4Sharing agreed benchmarking data across the sector – nationally and internationally

Teaching Quality Indicators Project No 16 FURTHER DETAILS Project Manager: Bronwyn Kosman ext 4791 Website: /teachingquality.html /teachingquality.html