T2K: ND280 status, progress, and plans Steven Dytman, (Vittorio Paolone) University of Pittsburgh (Representing the T2K collaboration) NUFACT10 XII International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Advertisements

First Neutrino Oscillation Results from T2K Costas Andreopoulos STFC, Rutherford Appleton Lab.
Near Detector Working Group for ISS Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 24 January 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
T2K – Canada Accelerator & Detector Status D. Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF ACOT meeting, May 12, 2007.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
1 Tokai 2 Kamioka Status and Prospects Antonin Vacheret for the T2K Collaboration Tuesday 7th September NOW 2010, Otranto, Lecce, Italy.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Measurements of neutrino charged current scattering in K2K Fine-Grained Detector Introduction Introduction K2K Near Detector K2K Near Detector CC interactions.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
Recent Results from T2K Jonathan Perkin on behalf of the T2K collaboration.
Measuring Neutrino Oscillations with the T2K Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL Dec-2011.
The Latest MINOS Results Xinjie Qiu Stanford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond Sept
XLVth Rencontres de Moriond Status of the T2K experiment K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for the T2K collaboration Contents Physics motivations (neutrino oscillation)
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
Caio Licciardi Toronto, June 7 th 2010 On behalf of the T2K FGD group UBC, Kyoto University, University of Regina, TRIUMF, University of Victoria.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
T2K neutrino oscillation results Kei Ieki for the T2K collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute 2014/2/22 1 ν T okai K amioka.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Near Detector Tasks EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Paul Soler.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Current Status of the T2K Experiment Ryan Terri (for the T2K Collaboration) 31 May – 4 June 2010 Planck 2010, CERN.
Status of Super-Kamiokande, K2K and JHF ACFA LC Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K2K collaboration and JHF collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Recent Results from the T2K ND280 detector Jonathan Perkin on behalf of the T2K collaboration KAMIOKA TOKAI 295 km.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
T2K : New physics results
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

T2K: ND280 status, progress, and plans Steven Dytman, (Vittorio Paolone) University of Pittsburgh (Representing the T2K collaboration) NUFACT10 XII International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super beams and Beta beams October 2010 TIFR, Mumbai, India

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh2 Outline Motivation: Oscillations Motivation: Oscillations T2K Experimental Overview ND280 Measurement Requirements T2K/ND280 Detector Elements T2K first physics run (Jan-June 2010): ND280 Performance Plans and Schedule

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010 S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh3 What is the Goal? 3-flavor mixing describes (almost) all neutrino oscillation phenomena (3 mixing angles, 2 independent mass splittings, 1 CPV phase) Interference: θ 13 and δ CP unknown θ 13 < 10 o (CHOOZ/MINOS) Atmospheric & accelerator: θ 23 ~ 45 o (Δm 23 ) 2 ~ 2.3x10 -3 eV 2 Solar & reactor: Θ 12 ~ 34 o (Δm 12 ) 2 ~ 8x10 -5 eV 2 Next generation experiments need to: Measure θ 13 and δ CP (if θ 13 ≠ 0) Mass hierarchy (Δm 2 23 > 0?) θ 23 maximal (45 o )?

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh4 T2K Overview Main objectives: Measure/improve limit on θ 13 (ν μ →ν e appearance) θ 13 ≠ 0 would allow to explore CPV in leptonic sector Improve measurement of Δm 2 23 and θ 23 ( ν μ →ν μ disappearance) Experiment Parameters : Long baseline (295 km) Very intense beam Massive far detector (SuperK) Near detector: ND280 (ν flux/ composition near source and measure background processes off of water) Off-axis design Enhance sensitivity at oscillation maximum Reduce intrinsic background SuperK – Water Cherenkov ND280 Location

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010V. Paolone, University of Pittsburgh5 T2K Beam T2K is the first LBL ν experiment using an off-axis beam This configuration produces a narrow beam with peak energy (~600 MeV) tuned to first oscillation maximum (Δm 2 13 (=2.3 x eV 2 ) L/4E ν ≈π/2 ) Reduces high energy tail: Reduces background (but does not eliminate) from non-QE interactions and NC feed down from high energy ν μ Beam direction is tunable, aimed 2.5 o off axis in the direction of Super-Kamiokande

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh6 JPARC Facility

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010V. Paolone, University of Pittsburgh7 Neutrino Beam-line

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh8 ND280 Detector Suite Off-Axis Detector: In SK Direction, measure: flux Rates/Cross sections for water and plastic to reduce systematic errors on oscillation parameters

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh9 Expected Sensitivity Δm 2 23 =2.4x10 -3 eV 2, δ CP = 0 (δ CP can enhance or reduce the signal) e appearance: (sin 2 2θ 13 < (90% C.L.)) With 5 x 0.75 MW x 10 7 s (8.3 x PoT) μ disappearance: (δ(sin 2 2θ 23 )≈0.01 & δ(Δm 2 23 )<1x10 -4 eV 2 ) At full exposure, sensitivity depends on level of systematic errors

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010V. Paolone, University of Pittsburgh10 T2K analysis strategy Measure ν μ flux at near detector Extrapolate flux from near to far detector using beam simulation; tuned/constrained by beam and hadron production data (NA61/Shine) Estimate ν μ rate (without oscillation) at far detector: N null Compare to measured ν e (ν μ ) rate (spectrum) to observe oscillation and extract oscillation parameters P(ν μ →ν μ ) ≈ 1− sin 2 2θ 23 sin 2 (Δm 2 23 L/4E ν ) Φ ND =N ND /(σ ND ε ND ) Φ FD =R(FD/ND)Φ ND N null =Φ FD σ FD ε FD P(osc)=N FD /N null Reconstructed v energy (GeV) MC ν e appearance sin 2 2θ 13 = 0.1 signal/BG ~ 7 (750kWx5x10 7 s) P(ν μ →ν e ) ≈ sin 2 2θ 13 sin 2 θ 23 sin 2 (Δm 2 13 L/4E ν ) ν μ disappearance N FD /N null

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh11 Background Processes ν μ background to CCQE ν μ measurements at Super-K is CCπ + ν μ/e + N → μ - /e - + N +  + Comparable size to CCQE ν μ background to ν e search at Super-K NC  0 : ν μ/e + N → ν μ/e + N +  0 Only π 0 →γγ detected in final state γ and e - are indistinguishable Intrinsic ν e in beam T2K Beam Critical to measure these processes at the near detector especially at full exposure using water targets

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh12 ND280: INGRID The INGRID is the On-axis detector and... : Consists of 16 modules of scintillator/iron sandwich planes Measures neutrino beam profile in X and Y Large mass allows quick feedback on beam shape.

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh13 ND280: Off-Axis … Is in UA1 Magnet: 0.2T B field Contained volume ~ 3.5m x 3.6m x 7m. SMRD (Side Muon Range Detector): Scintillator planes inserted into magnet yoke gaps. Detects large angle muons from inner detector. Provides cosmic ray trigger. ECAL: Scintillator planes with radiator. Measure EM showers from inner detector. Lines the inside of UA1 magnet and encloses inner detector. TRACKER: 2 FGDs (Fine Grained Detectors): scintillator planes: active target mass. 3 TPCs (Time Projection Chambers): Tracking, ID and momentum measurements of charged particles from FGD and P0D. P0D (  0 Detector): Scintillators planes interleaved with lead/brass/water; optimized for gamma detection. SMRD ECAL

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh14 ND280: P0D P0D consists of : 40 x-y scintillator planes (~10k scint. Bars) Middle: scint(8t)+H 2 O bags(3t) Front/back: calorimeter (veto and γ catcher) Pb+Scintillator (6.4t) Important background to Super-K e appearance (i.e. if SK misses one  from  0 ) is from Neutral-Current  0 :  + N   + N +  0 P0D optimized for measurement of gammas from  0  0 (Pi0) detector=P0D

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh15 ND280: SMRD ~2k scint. counters (87x17x0.7 cm3) Side Muon Range Detector: Sand muon veto, Cosmic trigger Large angle muon range Efficiency for MIP > 99%

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh16 ND280: ECAL Layers of scintillator bars (~21K) brass radiators: σ E /E~7.5%/√E Uses: Sand muon rejection Detect gammas for  0 analysis Detect bremsstrahlung in e measurement Schedule: Downstream ECAL in place for 1 st run Barrel ECAL installed during present shutdown

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh17 ND280: TPC Time Projection Chambers (TPC): Mechanical construction: double box design made from composite panels. Inner box with copper clad G10 skins, outer box with aluminum skins. Wireless readout with MicroMegas (7x10mm 2 pads) ~124k channels Excellent tracking and particle ID: 5σ e/μ separation, σ p /p < 10% at 1 GeV/c TPC inner box

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh18 ND280: FGD Fine Grained Detectors (FGD): X-Y scintillator planes (~8.4k scint. Bars) + H 2 O (in FGD2) FGD planes consist of long, thin scintillator bars Bars in planes alternate directions allowing for 3D tracking.

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S.Dytman, University of Pittsburgh19 ND280: Background Measurements Summary In summary to achieve the ultimate T2K sensitivity, we require accurate/precise measurements of background processes and unoscillated beam flux. This will be provided by 2 neutrino detectors at ND280- INGRID : On-axis – beam profile monitoring ND280 : Off-axis –  energy spectrum (flux x cross section) – Intrinsic beam e – NC  0

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh20 ND280: Photosensers MPPCs Scintillator detectors read out via WLS fiber coupled to Si MPPC (667 pixel avalanche photodiode, area of 1.3x 1.3mm 2 ). Properties: Can isolate single PE's! High  eff, ~20-30% (green) gain similar to PMT’s Operating voltage ~70V. Hard to damage Insensitive to magnetic fields But.. High dark noise rates: ~0.5MHz. Cross-talk/afterpulsing. Properties (e.g. gain) depend strongly on temp and voltage. First large-scale use in HEP experiment: ~50,000 MPPCs for ND280 After First year of operation with MPPCs few- to-none have failed.

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh21 Far Detector: SuperK IV 50 kton (22.5 kton fiducial) water Cherenkov det. ID: 11k 20'' PMT (40% photo coverage); OD: 2k 8'' veto PMT (optically isolated from ID) New readout electronics and DAQ (no dead time) – improved decay-electron tagging GPS based event timing – record events within 500 μs around spill Very efficient e/μ separation (~99% at 0.6 GeV)

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh22 First Physics Run January 23 – June Beam power: ~50 kW stable running (trial shots up to 100 kW) Total data accumulated: 3.3x10 19 PoT

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh23 INGRID Performance Typical event Event times: 6 bunches/spill Event rate (per 1x10 14 PoT) vs Time

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh24 INGRID: Beam Profile Beam profile Beam center (from Gaussian fit) over run period (Required < +/- 1 mr variation over run full period)

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh25 Off-Axis: Event Displays TPC1TPC 2 TPC 3 FGD1 FGD2DSECAL Live Channel Count: Excellent!

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh26 Off-Axis: Performance P0D vertex distribution (x-y) TPC: dE/dx vs p Beam center FGD event timing FGD Neutrino Interaction Rate

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh27 Short and Long Term Plans Summer/Fall shutdown tasks: New kicker magnets and power supplies: 6 → 8 bunch New horn power supplies: 250 kA → 320kA UK Barrel ECal installation completed Install 2 INGRID diagonal modules Resume data taking in November: Goal 150 kW x 10 7 s integrated power by July 2011 (~3.2 x POT) Long term plans (2014): Reduce MR cycle: 3.5 to 2.23 s Increase LINAC energy: 181 to 400 MeV

Cross sections Near term: major need is understanding of relative rates for different topologies in water  NC  0 mimicking e -  e identification   production/absorption in target nucleus mimicking qe event  e content of beam significant work underway for tracking  0, charged particles. ND280 detectors are mixtures of water and plastic Systematic errors important after ~3 x POT. Longer term: Many PhD theses will measure variety of cross sections in plastic and water  ~ few thousand events in larger channels (qe,  +,  0 res) in existing data, ~few hundred NC  0.  ~few x 10k events with data from next 2 years (~3.1 x POT) absolute cross sections to ~20% with muon monitors, emulsion Improvements needed to get systematic error ~5%.

Cross section estimates Preliminary event rates: Events in P0D and FGD (plastic + water, no differentiation) Throw all interactions, apply simple cuts (T  >120 MeV(FGD), 160 MeV (P0D), T p >450 MeV (FGD), 550 MeV (P0D), E  >50 MeV Assume POT (~next 3 years)  e Preliminary

NuFact10: October 20-25, 2010S. Dytman, University of Pittsburgh30 Summary T2K: High intensity off-axis long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment designed to study  → e oscillations and more. ND280 needed to maximize physics reach and sensitivity New accelerator complex, beam line, and near detectors (ND280) were completed last year (week). First physics data taking concluded this year ND280 Detectors work! Running resumes after the Summer shutdown in mid-November. Stay tuned for first results...