Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soybean Iron Chlorosis Project 2001 Summary Report AGVISE Laboratories Benson, MN & Northwood, ND.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county of the sample. This data.
Agronomic Value of Nutrients in Biosolids Randall Warden A & L Great Lakes Laboratories Fort Wayne, IN Quality Analyses for Informed Decisions.
PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE BY SILAGE CORN IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Amber Moore, Steve Hines, Brad Brown, Mario de Haro Marti, Christi Falen, Mireille Chahine, Tianna Fife,
Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
Sharpen for Sunflower Desiccation
Mark Petersen, Jen Muscha & Travis Mulliniks USDA-ARS Fort Keogh Livestock & Range Research Laboratory.
Crop Residue Yield Variability in North Central Region Rajesh Chintala.
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
Sorghum Fertility Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences.
What is the purpose of this presentation? n Provide a better understanding of site specific yield information and the value that it can bring to your.
Amber Moore, Ph.D. University of Idaho. Collected to represent Conservation Management Unit Time allowed between sampling and planting (Code 590) Within.
Nutrients and Nutrient Requirements Topic 3041 Anna Blight.
Alfalfa Fertility Brian Arnall Soil Ferity Extension OSU.
Soil Testing Procedures for Biologically Based Systems Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, Nebraska
 Errors or differences in Soil samples ◦ Collection method > laboratory ◦ Environment > laboratory  Field Variability ◦ Composite sample no matter area.
Micronutrient Deficiencies in Wheat
Crops and Crop Production in North Dakota Joel Ransom.
Precision Farming Profitability Reference C: Soil Sampling and Analysis By Sylvie Brouder, Mark Morgan.
Importance of Soil Testing
Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations Soil Education Short Course.
Secondary and Micronutrient Management
Micronutrient Management Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory % Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To Total Number of Samples Tested.
Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets, wheat, diversified Dairy,
Correlations of Soil and Hay Micronutrients Purpose: Is there a correlation between soil micronutrients and those in the hay crop?
Potential for Sensor Based Systems in Corn-Sugar Beet Rotations John A. Lamb Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota – St. Paul.
Acids… Learning objectives: Know that salts are formed from reactions with acids. Know how to write correct word equations. Know what salts are formed.
THE SUPPLY OF CORN STOVER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Richard G. Nelson 1, Marie E. Walsh 2, and John Sheehan 3 1 Kansas State University 2 University.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county of the sample. This data.
Crop Compare Dwight Aakre, Farm Management Specialist Andy Swenson, Farm & Family Resource Management Specialist.
Chapter 3: Soil Sampling And Soil Sensing
Minnesota Fertility Research & Funding Sources. Sugarbeet Research & Education Board Average Funding Research Type Fertility$189,000 Weed$84,667.
West Hills College Farm of the Future The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturalists Chapter Four Soil Sampling and Analysis.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Managing Micronutrients with Soil (Plant) Testing and Fertilizer.
AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county of the sample. This data.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Understanding Soil Test Results and Fertilizer Recommendations
Micronutrients Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin Zhang Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin.
Soil Fertility Impacting Soil Health Ray Ward Ward Laboratories Inc. Kearney, NE “Guiding Producers.
SOIL SAMPLING Dr. Dave Franzen Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Soil Fertility in Muskogee County
Dilution and Reactions of Acids
Thank you for choosing AGVISE Laboratories
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
Soil Fertility for Wine Grapes
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2017
Precision Nutrient Management: Grid-Sampling Basis
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Thank you for choosing AGVISE Laboratories
Annual SCN Summary for 2015 AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county.
Annual SCN Summary for 2018 AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2014
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Grid Sampling: Point vs. Random
%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016
Annual SCN Summary for 2016 AGVISE Laboratories summarized Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) levels on a regional basis, based upon the zip code region or county.
Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences
Nutritional Issues in Caneberries
Presentation transcript:

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples

AGVISE Laboratories % Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2013

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory % Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples Tested

Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2013 Fall 2013 Samples (lb/a 0-24” samples) MB ND SD MN

Average Change in Soil Nitrate From 2012 (lb/a 0-24” samples) MB ND SD MN (Wheat fields tested in the fall)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “WHEAT” in 2013

Average Soil Nitrate Following “WHEAT” Years of history! Nitrate-N (0-24”)

Average Soil Nitrate Following Wheat For Region ( ) Deep “N” (24-48” lb/a) Nitrate-N (24-48” lb/a)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Barley” in 2013

Average Soil Nitrate Following “BARLEY Nitrate-N (0-24” lb/a)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Sunflower” in 2013

Average Soil Nitrate Following “SUNFLOWER” Nitrate-N (0-24” lb/a)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Edible Beans” in 2013

Average Soil Nitrate Following “DRY BEANS” Nitrate-N (0-24” lb/a)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Sugarbeet” in 2013

Average Soil Nitrate Following “SUGARBEET” Nitrate-N (0-24” lb/a)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Fallow” in 2013

Average Soil Nitrate Following “FALLOW” Nitrate-N (0-24” lb/a)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Soybeans” in 2013

Average Soil Nitrate Following “Soybeans” Nitrate-N (0-24” lb/a)

Average Soil Nitrate following Corn in 2013 Fall 2013 samples (lb/a 0-24” samples) MB ND SD MN

Average Change in Soil Nitrate From 2012 (lb/a 0-24” samples) MB ND SD MN (Corn fields fields tested in the fall) +12

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following “Corn” in 2013

53% 71% 49% 66% 60% 77% 76% 55% 71% 37% 20% 21% 66% 47% 30% 71% % Soil Samples with Phosphorus less than 10 ppm Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 40% (Olsen P test) 40% 63% 34% 32% 37% 31% 36% 47% 51%41% 55% 22%

18% 13% 3% 4% 5% 7% 5% 2% 42% 33% 16% 25% 32% 34% 16% 12% % Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 33% 11% 45% 16% 5% 29% 38% 28% 21% 4%1% 39% 73% 31%

64% 50% 75% 57% 70% 85% 83% 57% 69% 34% 32% 35% 31% 63% 39% 48% 74% % Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 32% 36% 28% 58% 16% 34% 47% 45% 66% 83% 29% 46% 74% 85%

14% 20% 41% 61% 43% 59% 28% 37% 22% 16% 15% 10% 12% 8% 14% 11% 32% 23% % Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 20% 72% 64% 88% 79% 52% 44% 51% 49% 33% 30% 63% 66%

23% 20% 29% 23% 33% 58% 60% 39% 24% 19% 25% 14% 36% 6% 18% 34% 24% % Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0% Fall 2013 Samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 9% 4% 11% 28% 36% 19% 15% 29% 26% 25% 48% 12% 29% 16%

61% 45% 59% 72% 90% 85% 92% 75% 88% 58% 26% 86% 75% 66% 53% 32% 36% 26% 69% 44% 47% 76% % Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a Fall 2013 Samples (0-24” samples) MB ND SD MN 44% 73% 82% 52% 84% 66%

14% 17% 8% 20% 11% 5% 3% 1% 3 20% 37% 25% 6% 0% 1% 6% 19% 16% 35% 29% 15% 30% % Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 16% 7% 10% 5% 21% 38% 42% 19%

4% 10% 8% 4% 20% 24% 4% 28% 5% 1% 13% 4% 1% 8% 2% % Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 1% 17% 50% 81% 36% 11%18% 14% 10% 9% 15% 29% 9% 0% 22%

68% 78% 73% 37% 34% 52% 63% 55% 28% 55% 82% 97% 41% 38% 27% 24% 75% 81% 75% 81% 51% 71% % Soil Samples with Soil pH greater than 7.3 Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 68% 23% 17% 24% 14% 52% 61% 94% 93%

3% 1% 11% 9% 3% 5% 36% 17% 3% 1% 41% 11% 20% 14% 2% 1% 6% 1% 33% 1% % Soil Samples with Soil pH less than 6.0 Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 4% 10% 31% 13% 27% 17% 8% 94% 1% 25%

10% 23% 9% 6% 17% 7% 11% 27% 24% 30% 11% 8% 1% 10% 44% 45% 31% 13% 8% % Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0% Fall 2013 samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 27% 1% 10% 24% 51% 5% 3% 1% 4% 3% 9%

19% 30% 13% 8% 1% 3% 1% 5% 1% 3% 10% 15% 2% 8% 2% 17% 11% 8% 15% 4% 5% % Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0 Fall 2013 Samples (0-6” samples) MB ND SD MN 9% 11% 0% 6% 2% 11% 5% 10% 16%

North Dakota & NW Minnesota % Samples Testing with Salts greater than 1.0 1:1 salt method – expressed as mmhos/cm 582 Grand Forks 567 TRF 587 Minot

South Dakota - % Samples Testing with Salts greater than 1.0 1:1 salt method – expressed as mmhos/cm

Zip Code Areas For Soil Test Summaries