Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IRB Issues in Medical Education Research – OHRP Perspective American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine 2 nd Annual Meeting – June 24-26,
Advertisements

Human Investigation Committee  Is It Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research that requires IRB review?
QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
Request For Exemption RFE. A Review of Penn’s Commitment to Research Research is a substantial and esteemed enterprise at Penn. The research community.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Tasha Osafo, CIP Assistant Director IRB Office Exempt Review.
Quick Facts about Exempt Research No continuing review required IRB Reviewer makes Exempt determination 6 OHRP & 4 FDA categories(1 category overlaps)
Conducting Exempt Research An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Institutional.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
Research Ethics The Protection of Human Subjects.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Stanley Estime, MSCI, CIP Senior QA/QI Specialist Lisa Gabel, CIP QA/QI Specialist IRB Determinations: What type of Review will your study receive?
Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU.
SLCL Human Subjects Review Committee. Who we are Four faculty from SLCL: – Melissa Bowles, Chair (SIP) – José Ignacio Hualde (Linguistics/SIP) – Jennifer.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Institutional Review Board
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Submitting human subjects research
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Changes to Exempt Categories
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
Lana Gevorkyan Corporate Director Human Research Protection Program
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Submitting human subjects research
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Institutional Review Board
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
Common Rule Changes Effective date is January 21, 2019
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Current IRB at DMACC September 2018.
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited Review Full Board Review Approval Letter Sent Research May Begin Exemption Letter Sent Research May Begin Review by Member Review by Member + Chair Approval Review by Chair Review at IRB Meeting Revisions / Contingencies Addressed by Investigator Yes No Approval Yes No

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited Review Full Board Review Approval Letter Sent Research May Begin Exemption Letter Sent Research May Begin Review by Member Review by Member + Chair Approval Review by Chair Review at IRB Meeting Revisions / Contingencies Addressed by Investigator Yes No Approval Yes No The Mississippi College Institutional Review Board (IRB) was established to protect the rights and welfare of research subjects. It is modeled following standards established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Specifically, the regulations 45 CFR 46, also known as the Common Rule, are employed. IRB members use the ethical principals of the Belmont Report, issued in 1978 by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The principals are:  Respect for persons  Treat individuals as autonomous agents  Protect persons with diminished authority  Beneficence  Do unto others as you would have them do unto you  Justice  Distribute the risks and potential benefits of research equally among those who may benefit from the research The MC IRB patterns decisions for approval of IRB application submissions after the HHS’ Decision Charts. HHS’ Decision Charts

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited Review Full Board Review Approval Letter Sent Research May Begin Exemption Letter Sent Research May Begin Review by Member Review by Member + Chair Approval Review by Chair Review at IRB Meeting Revisions / Contingencies Addressed by Investigator Yes No Approval Yes No Please make certain your Request for External Review application is complete using the Submission Checklist on page 2. Especially important is your proof of certification for the required HHS Human Subject Research Training. If your IRB application is not complete, it will be returned to you and no further action will be taken until it is resubmitted. You must make certain you have completed the online HHS Human Subject Research TrainingHHS Human Subject Research Training.

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited Review Full Board Review Approval Letter Sent Research May Begin Exemption Letter Sent Research May Begin Review by Member Review by Member + Chair Approval Review by Chair Review at IRB Meeting Revisions / Contingencies Addressed by Investigator Yes No Approval Yes No If your IRB application is complete, the Board Chair will determine in which category your submission belongs. The length of time required for review and decision is as follows: Exempt: 1-2 weeks Expedited: 2-4 weeks Full Board Review: 4-8 weeks

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited Review Full Board Review Approval Letter Sent Research May Begin Exemption Letter Sent Research May Begin Review by Member Review by Member + Chair Approval Review by Chair Review at IRB Meeting Revisions / Contingencies Addressed by Investigator Yes No Approval Yes No Your IRB submission will be deemed Exempt if your research represents no more than minimal risks to participants and does not involve special populations (such as the mentally retarded, some types of studies with children, prisoners, etc.). The purpose of this review is to determine if research is in keeping with the exempt categories as defined by regulation and thus exempt from Expedited or Full Review. Research that falls into one of the categories below may deemed Exempt: Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods. Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), or observation of public behavior, unless: (i) information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and (ii) any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation. Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects. Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of department or agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: (i) Public benefit or service programs; (ii) procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs; (iii) possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (iv) possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs. Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies, (i) if wholesome foods without additives are consumed or (ii) if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It should be noted that only members of the IRB may determine that a study is exempt from Expedited or Full Review. If the category is determined to be Exempt, no further review is needed and you will receive an Exemption Letter in the form of an . You may begin your research upon receiving the Exemption Letter, but you must notify us of any changes in your study.

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited Review Full Board Review Approval Letter Sent Research May Begin Exemption Letter Sent Research May Begin Review by Member Review by Member + Chair Approval Review by Chair Review at IRB Meeting Revisions / Contingencies Addressed by Investigator Yes No Approval Yes No (7) research on individual or group characteristics or behavior, (8) continuing review of research previously approved by the convened IRB, and (9) continuing review of research not conducted under an investigational new drug application or investigational device exemption where categories two (2) through eight (8) do not apply, but the IRB has determined and documented at a convened meeting that the research involves no greater than minimal risk and no additional risks have been identified. When approved, you will receive an Approval Letter. At this point, you may begin your research! If the Board recommends revisions to your IRB submission and/or imposes contingencies, you will need to make the necessary changes and resubmit your application. An expedited review procedure consists of a review of research involving human subjects by the IRB chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the IRB in accordance with the requirements set forth in 45 CFR CFR Your IRB submission will be deemed appropriate for Expedited Review if your activities present no more than minimal risk to human subjects, and involve only procedures listed in one or more of the following categories fully described at the HHS website. The categories involve (1) clinical studies of drugs and medical devices, (2) collection of blood samples, (3) collection of biological specimens by noninvasive means, (4) collection of data through noninvasive procedures, (5) research involving materials that have been collected, or will be collected solely for nonresearch purposes, (6) collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings,HHS website

Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determin e Review Category Expedited Review Full Board Review Approval Letter Sent Research May Begin Exemption Letter Sent Research May Begin Review by Member Review by Member + Chair Approval Review by Chair Review at IRB Meeting Revisions / Contingencies Addressed by Investigator Yes No Approval Yes No Your IRB submission will be deemed appropriate for Full Board Review if your research has potential risk to human subjects. This may include but is not limited to: Research that involves the administration of drugs or other substances to subjects where an IND/IDE are required, Research that materially affects the pregnancy of a woman or the health/well-being of fetuses in utero. Research involving subjects with life-threatening physical conditions. Research involving physically intrusive procedures. Research which previous experience (by the particular investigator or other investigators) has been shown to create a potential of risk to subjects. Research that may result in a significant level of psychological or physical stress. Research which potentially could put the subject at risk for legal or civil liability or invade a subject's privacy in regard to sensitive aspects of his/her behavior (e.g., illegal conduct, drug use, sexual behavior, alcohol use) when there is a possibility that the subject could be identified. Research involving prisoners. Research that places protected populations (such as children, mentally retarded individuals, mentally ill individuals, patients with medical disorders) at more than minimal risk. Research involving waivers of any HIPAA regulations. When approved, you will receive an Approval Letter. At this point, you may begin your research! If the Board recommends revisions to your IRB submission and/or imposes contingencies, you will need to make the necessary changes and resubmit your application.