U.S. Environmental Projection Agency, Office of Research and Development Formation and Control of Cyanobacterial Toxins Thomas Speth, Nicholas Dugan, Joel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP Lab #12 Dissolved Oxygen & Aquatic Primary Productivity part I
Advertisements

Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
Understanding the Environmental Requirements for Fish.
Environmental Resources Unit C Animal Wildlife Management.
Molecular Basis for Detection and Cytotoxicity Caused by
Preliminary Assessment of Cyanotoxin Occurrence in Lakes and Reservoirs in the United States Keith A. Loftin, Jennifer L. Graham, Michael T. Meyer, Andrew.
Freshwater Algae Blooms: Contributing Factors and Health Concerns Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental Health What are algae.
How Human Activities Can Affect Sustainability Section 7.3
Cyanobacteria and Drinking Water Supplies. Cyanobacteria – An Emerging Issue 2.7 billion years Microscopic Organisms Blue-green Algae Many Different Types.
Harmful Algal Blooms and Microcystin in the Tidal Fresh James River, Joe Wood, Ph.D. - Chesapeake Bay Foundation *Research performed while at VCU.
Examination of Cyanobacteria (Blue-Green Algae) Microcystin- LR Toxin in Callander Bay Presented by: Jamie Lavigne Supervised by: Dr. Reehan Mirza Department.
Cyanotoxin Reduction Performance
Waste water treatment - Phycoremediation
Lecture 4: Free chlorine and hypochlorite Prepared by Husam Al-Najar The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Eutrophication Menkov, Peter Stamatova, Zhanet Tantcheva, Christina.
Potential of Using Precision Agricultural Practices for P Fertilizer Management.
Outcome: ES20-AE1 – Analyze the relationship between biotic and abiotic factors that provide criteria to determine the condition of aquatic systems. ES20.
Ecology’s Freshwater Algae Program Lake Steilacoom.
Water Treatment, Water Infrastructure, Water Testing, Detection and Monitoring Isabel C. Escobar, Chemical & Environmental Engineering April Ames, Public.
Water Quality.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Rapid and Accurate Analysis of Microcystins Using UPLC/MS/MS Yongtao (Bruce) Li, Ph.D. Joshua S. Whitaker Eurofins Eaton Analytical,
Barriers Against Cyanotoxins in Drinking Water DVGW-Technology Center Water (TZW) Karlsruhe, Dresden branch TOXIC - EVK TOXIC.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
©MathScience Innovation Center Our Backyard Waterways : Eutrophication Presented by: Rachel Martin Day 2.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Update on Lake Erie Nutrient and Algal Issues Gail Hesse Ohio Lake Erie Commission March 30, 2012.
Blue Green Algae in Indiana: The Role of the State Bruno Pigott Assistant Commissioner Office of Water Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Partner for progress Christian Moldaenke, Corina de Hoogh, Arco Wagenvoort, David R. Alexander and Detlev Lohse Water Monitoring Systems: the Daphnia and.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
OHIO RIVER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT Program Overview.
Bloomin’ Toxins: What Public Officials Need to Know About Cyanotoxins US Council of Mayors Washington, DC April 30, 2015
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Lesson 1.5 Pg
SCREENING FOR ALGAL TOXINS IN VOLUNTEER-MONITORED LAKES
Blue-green Algae -the basics & -Washington’s monitoring program
Co-Occurrence of Toxins and Taste-and-Odor Compounds in Cyanobacterial Blooms from the Midwestern United States USGS Kansas Water Science Center Algal.
Variability of molecular assays Quality-control samples were collected and analyzed for cyanobacterial genes. Fourteen field concurrent replicates were.
Tackling Algae March 2015 update. Agenda Background Our algae working group Raw water management –Catchment –Algae management plans –Reservoir mixing.
Harmful Algal Blooms 1 Agenda Items 7a: Revision of HABs Response and Communications Plan 7b: HABs Stressor Response Data Assessment Strategy.
Research and Other Activities Related To Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)
Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) in California and SWAMP's Statewide Strategy California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Freshwater.
Wastewater Treatment Principles and Regulation. What is Wastewater? Sewage released by residences, businesses and industry Contains liquid and solid components.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
User Resources for the: One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS) and National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) Updated: 06/15/2016.
October 19, 2006 Oklahoma Water Resources Board City of Tulsa
Water Testing APES.
Water Testing APES.
Pb Solids Precipitated Under Laboratory Conditions
Presented by, Chris Overcash, PE, BCEE, ENV SP For
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Warm Up p65 Which part of the water cycle is MOST responsible for polluting surface water? Municipalities (towns) get drinking water from which two sources?
Algae Farms and Lake Erie Algal Blooms
US Environmental Protection Agency
Update on Lake Erie Nutrient and Algal Issues
Warm Up p65 Which part of the water cycle is MOST responsible for polluting surface water? Municipalities (towns) get drinking water from which two sources?
Plant Nutrients Diego and lorenzo.
Wetlands.
Section 7.3 How Human Activities Can Affect Sustainability
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
Abiotic Factors Affecting Aquatic Systems
Algae, Algal Toxins, and Treatment: A Cure for Bad HABits!
Preliminary Assessment of Cyanotoxin Occurrence in Lakes and Reservoirs in the United States Keith A. Loftin, Jennifer L. Graham, Michael T. Meyer, Andrew.
Awareness of the Season
Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association March 22, 2017
Understanding the Environmental Requirements for Fish
The future is now: How climate change has altered coastal ecosystem function and what can be done to make these systems more resilient Christopher J.
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Environmental Projection Agency, Office of Research and Development Formation and Control of Cyanobacterial Toxins Thomas Speth, Nicholas Dugan, Joel Allen, Darren Lytle, Heath Mash, Toby Sanan, Jody Shoemaker, Jay Garland, and Michelle Latham

2 Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)  Overgrowth of autotrophs close to the shore of a water body  Wide variety of taxa can produce blooms  Typically detrimental to the aquatic system and can be harmful to humans and land animals (contact and consumption)  Blooms are dependent on numerous factors, including nutrient loading, temperature, and weather patterns Cyanobacterial HAB (CyanoHab) Bacteria that produce a wide variety of toxins and are considered HABs because they exhibit some similar characteristics with algae (e.g., photosynthesis). Often referred to as blue-green algae

20 states have recreational water guidelines for harmful algae blooms Three states (MN, OH, and OR) have implemented standards or guidelines that apply to cyanotoxins in drinking water EPA’s Office of Water is currently drafting Health Advisories for microcystin-LR and cylindrospermopsin 3 Current Regulations/Guidance EPA’s informational webpage cyanohabs

4 Source Water Impacts on Drinking Water Crop Land 65% Urban 10% Septic 7% Pasture 14% Nitrogen Load Source Distribution to Harsha Lake in Ohio  Excessive nitrogen and phosphorous levels can cause harmful algal blooms  Agriculture is often the largest contributor of nitrogen load into waterways  Algal blooms put pressure on drinking water facilities, requiring operational changes that can be costly and not well understood  Algal/cyanobacteria strains bloom under different conditions, at different times  Different strains produce different toxins at varying amounts Problem:

Monitoring for HABs 5 (cyanobacteria)  Different algal/ cyanobacterial strains bloom under different conditions, at different times  Chlorophyll peak may be detected without cyanobacteria peak Chlorophyll peak but absence of BGA peak RFU

Cyanobacteria Strains & Associated Toxins 6 Cyanobacteria Taxa  Strains produce different toxins at different amounts  Toxins can have multiple variants Example: Over 80 known microcystin variants Toxins analyzed by USEPA

7 Extracellular Toxins

Dissolved (toxin released from cell)  Solids removal processes ineffective  Typical disinfectants may not be effective enough (e.g., permanganate, chlorine)  More effective treatments are expensive and plants typically do not have them in place (e.g., GAC) Treatment for Cyanobacteria Toxins 8 Particulates (toxin in cell)  Solids removal processes effective  Do not want to lyse cell or toxin will be released Microcystin ToxinMicrocystis (cells) Toxin within the cell and those that are dissolved require different treatment processes

Analytical Methods 9 LC-MS/MS  EPA uses three LC-MS/MS methods (2 triple quad and 1 high resolution MS)  EPA has tested for 7 microcystin congeners/variants (over 80 known)  Currently evaluating 13 congeners/variants  Lysis techniques can give total toxin concentration (internal and external to cell)  Requires significant expertise and analytical equipment ELISA  Broad-based method (measures 80+ toxin congeners/variants)  Example: Ohio’s ELISA-based guidance is 1 ug/L  EPA has tested ELISA under different sample handling procedures  Lysis techniques can give total toxin concentration (internal and external to cell)  Easy and relatively inexpensive

10 Development of Analytical Methods Drinking water: Multi-Lab Verification Complete Method 544: Microcystins and nodularin Ambient water: Method Development Method 544: Microcystins and nodularin Method 545: Cylindrospermopsin and anatoxin-a Comparison of ELISA and LC/MS/MS: Compare results of ELISA measurements and LC/MS/MS concentrations of microcystin variants Detection of cyanobacterial toxins

Harmful Algal Blooms in Ohio  Celina (population 10,400) Summer 2013: > 100 µg/L total microcystins and nodularin in treatment plant influent  Carroll Township (population 2,000) September 2013: > 3 µg/L total microcystins and nodularin in finished water Ohio EPA “Do not drink” advisory  Toledo (population ~500,000) September 2013: Detectable, but < 1 µg/L toxin in finished water August 2014: > 1 µg/L total microcystins and nodularin in finished water, Ohio EPA “Do not drink” advisory 10

12 Carrol Township 2013 First Do Not Drink Advisory (Ohio) Carroll Township finished water: – September 4, 2013 = 1.4 ug/L – September 5, 2013 = 3.6 ug/L Switched to emergency connection with Ottawa County Began flushing distribution system On Advisory 48 Hours

Toledo (August 2014) Do Not Drink Advisory (Ohio) Could not bring in water from another utility Had to adjust treatment ORD Technical Assistance Performed multiple analyses (ELISA and LC-MS/MS) Provided technical assistance to the city and state on sample handling and analytical procedures Results USEPA’s initial results were in agreement with the elevated toxin levels previously reported by the Ohio EPA, which they used as the basis for recommending that the City issue a ban Joint sampling, analysis, and evaluation of results allowed for agreement on sample handling and analytical procedures Later results, in concert with the Toledo utility and Ohio EPA data, showed decreasing levels of toxins, confirming the plant was reaching its drinking water goal

Lake Erie Depth 14 WestEast Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Red: Shallow Blue: Deep

Lake Erie Bloom (August 6, 2014) Sources:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cyanobacteria Index

16 Lake Erie Field Studies Monitoring cyanobacteria toxins through numerous treatment plants on Lake Erie Fate/transport of toxins through drinking water treatment systems Bench- and Pilot-Scale Studies Bench-scale permanganate, ozone, and activated carbon trials Pilot installation anticipated in time to be operational for the 2015 bloom Will support OW technical guidance to regions, states, and municipalities Lake Erie DW Treatment Plant Study

Typical Treatment Train Drinking water treatment system similar to Toledo plant 17 Flocculation Particulate (cell) removal Dissolved (toxin) removal: Not completely effective Dissolved (toxin) removal: Helpful but may not be effective enough To distribution system and consumer tap Source water with cyanoHAB Toledo plant intake 3 miles offshore Finished water water Flocculation

Western vs. Eastern Basin 18 Western basin intakes had higher nutrient loadings in early summer Western basin intakes had higher blooms levels later in summer

Through Treatment (Cells) 19 Most of the cells are taken out by the clarifier effluent

Cell Removal Treatment Facility Cyanobacteria cells removed during bloom peak sampling event 1 - plant influent to clarifier effluent (%) Toledo98 Oregon99 Ottawa94 Sandusky Cleveland99 1 Bloom peak sampling event was 9/9/13 for Toledo, Oregon, Ottawa, and Cleveland; 8/14/13 for Sandusky. 2 Sandusky operates two clarification stages. Other Lake Erie plants see similar results

Through Treatment (Toxin) 21 If toxin remains in the cell, most of it is removed before the filter

Effect of Permanganate 22 Inactivates cells Releases toxins into solution while at the same time destroying them

Through Treatment (Toxin) 23 Permangate reducing total and increasing extracellular toxin Powdered activated carbon reducing the extracellular toxin Particulate removal removes the intracellular toxin

24 Effect of Ozone Analyzed by LC-MS/MS

Expand the number of participants that have an incentive to purchase credits: WWTP to avoid expensive nitrogen removal upgrades DWTPs to protect source water Recreationists to protect beaches 25 Goal: reduce nutrient loadings at lowest cost Excessive nutrients have numerous deleterious effects such as increasing HAB potential Utilizing Lake Harsha, but program must be transferable to other watersheds East Fork Watershed and Lake Harsha as a case study Preliminary data from 2014 hyperspectral flyover: Drinking Water Intake Water Quality Trading Other impacts of nutrients Can result in increased GHG emissions GHG emissions from nutrient-stressed reservoirs can be significant Multiple reservoirs will be sampled in 2015

High Frequency Monitoring Tools 26 Physico-chemical –Temperature –pH –ORP –Specific Conductance –Turbidity –Dissolved Oxygen –Total Organic Carbon –Dissolved Organic Carbon –NO 3 -N –UV-Vis spectral profile Fluorescence BBE Algae Online Analyzer Green Algae Cyanobacteria Brown (diatoms) Cryptophyta Total Chlorophyll YSI Phycocyanin Total Chlorophyll Toxin Toxicity Online Toxicity Monitors Laboratory Assays Analytical Quantification ELISA LC-MS/MS

Conclusions Lake Erie water quality was significantly degraded in the western basin as compared to the eastern basin The bulk of toxin in treatment facility influents was intracellular Therefore, if this holds true, a facility originally designed for particulate control can serve as an effective barrier against exposure Preliminary evidence indicates that common doses of oxidants (permanganate and ozone) are sufficiently high to damage cells and release toxins, yet too low to completely degrade the released toxin Treatment facilities are currently adding oxidants and powdered activated carbon (PAC) at significant expense and uncertain effectiveness More must be known about the formation and control of cyanobacteria and their toxins to assure safe drinking water

28 Disclaimer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and Development, funded and managed, or partially funded and collaborated in, the research described herein. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for external publication. Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency, therefore, no official endorsement should be inferred. Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Questions? 12