District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US101: SE 16 th – SE 36 th Street (Lincoln City) )Project Community Advisory Committee July 11, 2007 Meeting.
Advertisements

Who we are these people? Gabriela Vega – Transportation Planner, DDOT/PPSA George Branyan – Pedestrian Program Coordinator, DDOT/PPSA Trey Dickerson –
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
City of High Springs - Traffic Study City of High Springs Traffic Study Sept. 16th, 2003 Public Meeting #2.
Tower Road Enhancement Project Prepared for Alachua County By Causseaux & Ellington, Inc. Alachua County Roadway Network Improvements.
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
Ed Cox City of Sacramento, Department of Public Works Bicycle Solutions in Sacramento.
May 14, st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Redwood Road & 35th Avenue Traffic Study. Problems Observed: High collision rate along the corridor was found at McArthur Boulevard intersection, with.
INDONESIA INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVE A Safe System Supporting Vulnerable Road Users Dr Dale Andrea VicRoads International.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD CA MUTCD 2012 Revisions to Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals.
Mecca Roundabout Project Mecca, CA September 28, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
Some important pedestrian considerations 4-1. Skew increases crosswalk length, decreases visibility 4-2.
Welcome to the Open House Mount Seymour Road Area Traffic and Access Review The purpose of this Open House is for us to: Provide an overview of the study.
EX-1 Intersections & Interchanges Improved Traffic Signal Control Ramp metering Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Automated Enforcement.
80 th and Foster Intersection Analysis Kevin Hace Chris Hass Matt Palmer CE 410/510: Bicycle and Pedestrian Engineering Design.
Hawthorne & 16th Brian Marcum Chloe Ritter Collin Roughton.
Module 5 Displaced Left Turn (DLT) Intersections
Third & Fourth Streets Traffic Calming Study Presentation to Transportation Commission May 14, 2015.
Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Kamm’s Corners Development Corporation.
Interstate 435 and Front Street Interchange Improvements This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
INTERSECTION SAFETY PERFORMANCE AND AUDIT Andy Loonan Basak Aldemir-Bektas Intersection: Welch Avenue & Lincoln Way.
Lexington Town Center Streetscape Project Page 1 Battle Green Improvements Project Intersection of Bedford Hancock Street / Harrington Road Board.
Intersection Design Spring 2015.
INTRODUCTION An intersection is the general area where two or more highways join or cross, including the roadway and roadside facilities for traffic movements.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
Interacting With Other Users. Most collisions occur when two or more objects try to occupy the same space at the same time. Drivers must identify movement.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
The Main Street Bike Lane Project LADOT Bike Program.
Problem 1: Determination of Facility Types for Analysis.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Pedestrian Design at Intersections Lesson 11 Publication No.
Roundabout Feasibility: Analysis Framework and Design Considerations Presented By: Jason D. Pack, P.E. Fred Choa, P.E.
Problem 4: Clifton Country Rd/Route 146 Intersection Base Case Phasing and Volumes Analysis Plans Description of Analyses Overarching Issues 4a: AM peak.
Northside Transportation Network Community Meeting November 17 th, 2010 UROC.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
September 15, 2011 Presented by: Clay Harris, PMP - City of Austin Federico Mendoza, PE, PTOE – Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc. Todd Lane Alternative Geometric.
 Rice Street Traffic Study Proposal Presentation to the Saint Paul CIB Committee March 31, 2015.
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
156 th Street Design in Bennington Public Open House Meeting October 28, 2009 City of Bennington, NE.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
Chapter 191 Chapter 19: Elements of Intersection Design and Layout Make an initial sizing of the intersection Make an initial sizing of the intersection.
Fehr & Peers | March 13 th, 2012 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
SEPARATED BIKE LANE PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDE. Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide Context Conforms to federal and state standards and guidelines:
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation BARRIER DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR CRASH MITIGATION SE 2 nd Avenue and Biscayne Blvd Way (SE 4 th Street)
Intersection Design Spring 2017.
MD 30 (Hanover Pike) at Mt. Gilead Road
Saving the King Street Bicycle Boulevard
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
JUAN DE FUCA PEDESTRIAN CROSSING Transportation and Public Infrastructure Committee Colwood, BC 1 October 2012.
Project Management Team Meeting #3
US 92 Pedestrian Connectivity & Safety Assessment Study
Traffic System Management for “Tulkarem”
BELLE TERRE BLVD/PKWY CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Pilot Project Evaluation
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
After the NACTO Guide Now I’m going to discuss the options available within the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide.
US 92 Pedestrian Connectivity & Safety Assessment Study
2a. Fully actuated signal - Improved T intersection
Protected Bicycle Lanes Finally Pedal Their Way to KC…
ODOT Region 1 Lents Neighborhood
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
Project Location: 35th Ave HSIP8
Presentation transcript:

District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting

2 Presentation Overview Pre-Barrier Conditions Four Proposed Geometric Alternatives on 2 nd Avenue – Benefits and drawbacks for ALL road users – Operational Analysis Three Proposed Barrier Length Options on 4 th Street for the selected Alternative – Weaving Analysis to Select Preferred Option – Operational Analysis

3 Pre-Barrier Installation Conditions

4

5 High number of run-off the-road crashes – Total of 10 crashes over a 3 year period Downhill grade after crossing the drawbridge combined with high speeds heading into a 90 degree curve Visibility limitations due to the vertical curve Mitigation beyond signing and pavement marking was explored

6 Project Objectives Recommend improvements to benefit ALL road users – Pedestrians Reduce the potential risk of getting hit by a run-off the road vehicle – Bicyclists Reduce the speed of vehicles going through the intersection Provide a safer environment to travel through the intersection – Drivers Reduce run-off the road crashes and severity

7 Alternatives 1.Maintain Existing Lanes 2.Southbound Left Turn (SBLT) Lanes Modification 3.Northbound Right Turn (NBRT) Lanes Modification 4.SBLT and NBRT Lanes Modifications

8 Alternative 1: Barrier Wall in Front of Wells Fargo Center Benefits – No lane changes – Space available to fit barrier – No signal changes required Drawbacks – Pedestrian ramp would have to be closed to fully shield sidewalk – Errant vehicles travel over existing concrete island – Nearly a 90 o impact angle at high speed for drivers

9 Alternative 2: Barrier Wall Adjacent to Northbound Right-Turn Lanes (Closing one Southbound Left Turn Lane) Benefits – NBRT lanes are maintained – Barrier adjacent to critical NBRT movement – Flexibility to maintain/modify signal timing – Pedestrian crosswalks maintained – Shorter pedestrian crossing distance for southbound lanes Drawbacks – Sidewalk not fully protected – Nose of the barrier is hazardous for drivers and blocks pedestrians paths – Closing one Southbound Left Turn lane – Limited space to install barrier – SBLT spillback may extend to SE 3 rd St. if existing signal timing is maintained

10 Alternative 3-A: Barrier Wall Adjacent to Right-Turn Lanes (Closing one Northbound Right Turn Lane) Benefits – Barrier nose crash risk eliminated – Barrier adjacent to critical NBRT lanes – SBLT lanes maintained – Flexibility to maintain/modify signal timing – Shorter pedestrian crossing distance Drawbacks – Sidewalk not fully protected – Closing of one NBRT lane is required – Crosswalk relocation is required – NBRT spillback may extend to SE 5 th St. if existing signal timing is maintained

11 Alternative 3-B: Barrier Wall Combination Adjacent to Right-Turn Lanes (Closing one Northbound Right Turn Lane) Benefits – Sidewalk fully covered – Barrier nose crash risk eliminated – Barrier adjacent to critical NBRT lanes – SBLT lanes are maintained – Flexibility to maintain/modify signal timing – Shorter pedestrian crossing distance Drawbacks – Closing one NBRT lane is required – Crosswalk relocation is required – NBRT spillback may extend to SE 5 th St. if existing signal timing is maintained

12 Alternative 4: SBLT and NBRT lane closures Benefits – Barrier adjacent to critical NBRT lanes – Single barrier fully covers sidewalk – Allows for simultaneous northbound and southbound traffic flow – Shorter pedestrian crossing distances – Larger pedestrian refuge island Drawbacks – Requires closing two lanes – Vehicle weaving along Biscayne Blvd. – Pedestrian push-button activation

13 Option 4-A: Installation of barrier west of Marriott drop-off entrance (distance available for changing lanes = 255.)

14 Option 4-B: Installation of barrier just east of Marriott drop-off entrance (distance available for changing lanes = 190.)

15 Option 4-C: Installation of barrier extended to SE 3 rd Avenue (distance available for changing lanes = 0.)

16 Weaving Volumes AM (PM) 450 (266) 678 (991) 433 (284) 37 (52)

17 Weaving Volumes AM (PM) Marriott Entrance/Exit 38 (56) 43 (66) 10 (11) 3 (0)

18 What have we done since installing the barrier? Pedestrian observations – Fewer pedestrians than expected push the button – Frequent jaywalking – Many pedestrians push the button but do not wait for the “Walk” signal Bicycle observations – No behavior difference Traffic observations – Southbound left turning trucks mount the sidewalk – Red-light running for all movements – No significant spillback changes observed – No significant change in travel time before (223 sec.) and after (220 sec.) – On-going observations for lane changing activity along Biscayne Blvd.

19 Next Steps to Consider for Pedestrian and Bicycle Allow pedestrians phases to be on recall for all crosswalks Although pedestrian crossing distances have been reduced for the NBRT and SBLT lanes, the original “Walk” time is maintained Provide consistent and improved pedestrian signage for all crosswalks Confirm pedestrian facilities are up to standards Explore installing Audible Pedestrian Signals to increase pedestrians awareness

20 Next Steps to Consider for Traffic Remove the northern barriers to accommodate a greater turning radii for SBLT traffic Implement law-enforcement strategies to reduce red-light running Data shows spillbacks do not have a significant impact after analyzing the recommended improvements Separate concurrent movements to eliminate lane changing conflicts on Biscayne Blvd. – Compatible with the pedestrian recommendation to program pedestrian phases on recall – Optimize signal timings to accommodate all users

21 PM Peak Hour Analysis: 95% Queue Lengths Comparison Pre-Barrier Recommended Improvement 200’ 400’ 225’ 275’

22 Conclusions Barrier installation improved safety for all road users Lane closure resulted in negligible intersection operations changes when compared to pre-barrier conditions Further signal timing and operations modifications at SE 2 nd Avenue and Biscayne Blvd. are recommended to: – Increase pedestrian safety – Better accommodate pedestrians expectations in a downtown – Reduce lane changing conflicts along Biscayne Blvd. between SE 2 nd Ave. and SE 3 rd Ave. without rerouting traffic

23 Thank you

24 LOS Analysis Results for the Barrier Length Options * Queue lengths may exceed storage capacity SELECTED IMPROVEMENT