Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers Francis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Statistical adaptation of COSMO predictions with the Kalman.
Advertisements

Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Overview of Swiss activities R. Stübi, D. Ruffieux, B.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss The Latent Heat Nudging Scheme of COSMO EWGLAM/SRNWP Meeting,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of COSMO in.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecasts in the Alps – first.
Verification of DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger.
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Limbering up VERSUS for operational use COSMO-GM, September.
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Advances in the use of observations in the ALADIN/HU 3D-Var system Roger RANDRIAMAMPIANINA, Regina SZOTÁK and Gabriella Csima Hungarian Meteorological.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Parametrization of Subgrid-Scale Orographic Drag in the.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Data mining in the joint D- PHASE and COPS archive Mathias.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Task 1 of PP Interpretation 1.1Further applications of.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Final PP QPF meeting COSMO General Meeting, 18 September.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss PP VERSUS2 Status Report VERSUS Meeting 04/03/2010, Langen.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss PP QPF Workshop 8 March 2007, Langen.
1 Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss NWP Eumetcal course November 2007 Langen – Germany.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Accounting for Change: Local wind forecasts from the high-
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Postprocessing of temperature and wind for COSMO-7 and.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Verification results of COSMO at MeteoSwiss in the year.
26 th EWGLAM & 11 th SRNWP meetings, Oslo, Norway, 4 th - 7 th October 2004 Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan RC LACE Data Manager Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Local Probabilistic Weather Predictions for Switzerland.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss TECO-2006, WMO, Geneva, Global Criteria for.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 4 activities.
Verification Verification with SYNOP, TEMP, and GPS data P. Kaufmann, M. Arpagaus, MeteoSwiss P. Emiliani., E. Veccia., A. Galliani., UGM U. Pflüger, DWD.
GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of MeteoSwiss 18 September 2008 COSMO GM 2008.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Sensitivity studies for the Swiss test cases LM User Seminar,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 3: Overview status report COSMO General Meeting, 19.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss A more reliable COSMO-LEPS F. Fundel, A. Walser, M. A.
Status of AMDAR Implementation in Japan, Forecast Department, Japan Meteorological Agency Prepared for APSDEU-6 Seoul, Korea, 1 June 2005.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistics of COSMO Forecast Departures in View of.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss TKE as a measure of turbulence COSMO General Meeting,
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Ozone and PM 2.5 verification in NAM-CMAQ modeling system at NCEP in relation to WRF/NMM meteorology evaluation Marina Tsidulko, Jeff McQueen, Pius Lee.
Verification A first attempt to WP Preliminary results of one test case Matteo Buzzi, Pirmin Kaufmann, Dominique Ruffieux, Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Probabilities from COSMO-2 derived with the neighborhood.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss The new algorithm for gridpoint - station correspondence.
Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs) with LM Verification against Temps Ulrich Pflüger, Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Numerical Weather Prediction at MeteoSwiss 8th of October.
COSMO WG3-WG5 workshop 9 March 2005, Langen. WG3-WG5 workshop, , Langen 1 Agenda for joint WG3-WG5 workshop (1) WP.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Analyzing the TKE budget of the COSMO model for the LITFASS-2003.
Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files for Verification at DWD Ulrich Pflüger Deutscher.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Experiments at MeteoSwiss : TERRA / aerosols Flake Jean-Marie.
OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.
Verification Priority Project ‘Quantitative Precipitation Forecast’ Progress report Task 1.1 and 1.2 Silke Dierer and Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Station lists and bias corrections Jemma Davie, Colin Parrett, Richard Renshaw, Peter Jermey © Crown Copyright 2012 Source: Met Office© Crown copyright.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistics of COSMO Forecast Departures in View of.
Use of radar data in the HIRLAM modelling consortium
Impact of AMDAR/RS Modelling at the SAWS
1941 Welcome to the SGRFC meeting
Upper Air Data The Atmosphere is 3D and can not be understood or forecast by using surface data alone.
aLMo from GME and IFS boundary conditions: A comparison
Verification of COSMO-2 with a mobile wind profiler
WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of aLMo in the year 2005
Preliminary comparisons of GOMOS and MIPAS ozone products with Odin
Stéphane Laroche Judy St-James Iriola Mati Réal Sarrazin
Workshop Results WG5 COSMO General Meeting
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
A Futile Comparison of the Refractive Conditions in the Monterey Bay
Ulrich Pflüger & Ulrich Damrath
Presentation transcript:

Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers Francis Schubiger & Christophe Hug MeteoSwiss VERSUS meeting Langen (D), 4 March 2010

2 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) Requirements for TEMPs verification (1) Verification: for all 12h (wind alone also for all 6h) starting at +0h at surface and on the following p-levels: from 1000 to 850 hPa: for each 25 hPa from 850 to 100 hPa for each 50 hPa 70, 50 and 30 hPa wind direction only for wind speed > 3m/s MeteoSwiss can provide fortran-code for vertical interpolation onto p-levels and onto z-levels (subroutines inside fieldextra)

3 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) TEMPS verification Payerne: Summer 2009 wind speed: forecasts + 24h COSMO-7 COSMO-2 biasStandard deviation

4 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) Requirements for TEMPs verification (2) Strategy at MeteoSwiss: Verification with OBS and MOD in „l2b-format“ OBS: BUFR -> l2b MOD: GRIB -> l2e Suggested strategy for VERSUS: OBS: read BUFR directly in VERSUS and vertical interpolation for all verification p-levels MOD: read GRIB (all model levels of U,V,QV,QC,T,P needed) with fieldextra and produce an output („l2b- format or eventually pseudo-BUFR) with profiles at all TEMP-gridpoints for all verification p-levels

5 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) L2e-format

6 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) l2e-format H model gp v-profile M * E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E H model gp v-profile

7 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) Requirements for windprofiler verification (1) windprofilers (WP) run in two modes, in Switzerland: high mode: data from ~200m to ~8000 m above ground, for all 144m low mode: data from ~100m to ~2500 m above ground, for all 72m verification for all 30‘ (full hours and half hours) with the WP-data (temporal means of 30‘) at full hours +15‘ and +45‘ (WP at full hour +15‘ contains the data of the last 30‘) Verification on the following z-levels: high mode: on WP-levels or model-levels low mode: on WP-levels or model-levels

8 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) CN-MET upper air network assimilated in COSMO-2 Kleindöttingen (KDT) Aug.-Okt. ‘08 Mühleberg (ZES) May-June ‘09 Windprofiler locations in Switerland Project CN-MET

9 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) Requirements for windprofiler verification (2) Strategy at MeteoSwiss: Verification with MATLAB (experimental mode) OBS: BUFR -> conversion to z-levels (within MATLAB) MOD: GRIB -> l2b profiles for all model-levels -> interpolation to z-levels (within MATLAB) Suggested strategy for VERSUS: OBS: read BUFR directly in VERSUS and conversion/vertical interpolation for all verification z-levels, subtract 15‘ to the sounding time for comparison with MOD MOD: read GRIB (all model levels of U,V,W needed) with fieldextra and produce an output („l2b-format or eventually pseudo-BUFR) with profiles at all WP-gridpoints for all verification z-levels

10 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) KDT – High-mode wind direction High-mode Wind direction ff ≥ 3 m/s High-mode Wind direction ff ≥ 3 m/s

11 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) ZES – High-mode wind speed

12 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) KDT – Low-mode wind speed

13 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) Bias Wind direction ff ≥ 3 m/s Comparison radio sonde Payerne: Bias Radiosonde PayerneProfiler Payerne Profiler Kleindöttingen 0-5°

14 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) Comparison radio sonde Payerne: Standard deviation 10-15° 20-30° Radiosonde PayerneProfiler Payerne Profiler Kleindöttingen Bias Wind direction ff ≥ 3 m/s

15 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) PAY – High mode wind direction High-mode Wind speed ff ≥ 3 m/s High-mode Wind speed ff ≥ 3 m/s

16 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) PAY – High-mode wind speed

17 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) PAY – Validation with Radiosounding Wind direction ff ≥ 3 m/s Wind direction ff ≥ 3 m/s

18 VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers VERSUS meeting, , Langen (D) PAY – Validation with radiosounding