Hypothetical Examples of How Residential Photovoltaic (PV) ESI IDs Could be Settled ERCOT Load Profiling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling Tres-Amigas Update Modeling Work Group Meeting February 10, 2011 WECC Staff.
Advertisements

PV Market Trends and Technical Details. All of US has Suitable Solar Resource for Large Scale PV Deployment.
1 Distributed Generation Task Force November 5, 2007.
A Solar Generation Forecasting System for ERCOT Where Would the Data Come From? Jay Zarnikau | President Steve Wiese | Senior Consultant, Energy Efficiency.
October 8, 2013 Eric Fox and Mike Russo. AGENDA »Recent Sales and Customer Trends »Preliminary State Sales and Demand Forecast »Building a No DSM Forecast.
1 Annual Validation and Settlement Load Allocation By Ernie Podraza Reliant Energy August 10, 2005 RMS Meeting Material.
Timber Research Centre Michael Anderson– Mohamed Farid Pablo Prallong – Lewis Macleod Ross Turbet & Group A 26/04/20054 th Presentation.
ERCOT Analysis of 2005 Residential Annual Validation Using the Customer Survey Results ERCOT Load Profiling Presented to PWG - October 26, 2005.
Oil & Gas Preliminary Sample Analysis March 30, 2006.
ERCOT Load Research Sampling Round 2 Model Coefficient Updates Additional Evaluations Presented to the PWG on July 28, 2010.
ERCOT Staff Comments Regarding the Proposed Suspension of Residential 2005 Annual Validation RMS Presentation August 10, 2005.
Presented to the PWG Meeting of May 26, 2010
Valuing The Time- Varying Production of Solar PV Cells Severin Borenstein Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley University of California Energy Institute.
Final Application Portfolio Community Level Solar Energy System Daniel Marticello ESD.71 Fall
1 Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Site Selection Analysis 5/14/2008.
Profiling Working Group January 11, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting January 11, 2006.
ERCOT 2003 UFE ANALYSIS By William Boswell & Carl Raish AEIC Load Research Conference July 13, 2005.
Warren Lasher Director, System Planning October 4, 2014 Our Energy Future.
ERCOT PUBLIC 7/14/ Long-Term Load Forecasting Calvin Opheim ERCOT Manager, Forecasting & Analysis LTSA Scenario Development Workshop July 14, 2015.
Sai Moorty ERCOT Integration Options into ERCOT systems.
Three Decimals for Profile Resolution. 2 Pro Case for Three Decimals for Profile Resolution  Generation 15 minute pattern rarely has 2 adjacent equal.
1 AMS Data Workshop ERCOT Overview of AMS Data Processes June 27, 2014 ERCOT June 27, 2014.
LPGRR044 Distributed Generation (DG) Profile Segment Implementation Plan.
RMSUpdate January 6, 2005 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
Current DG Framework for Competitive Areas of ERCOT DREAM TF September 28, 2015.
RMSUpdate November 4, 2004 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
1 AEIC Annual Load Research Conference September 12, Reno, NV ERCOT Residential Profile ID Assignments – Dealing with Assignment Accuracy and Migration.
Distributed Energy Resources Concept Document Discussion ERCOT Staff DREAM Task Force Aug. 25,
UFE 2003 Analysis June 1, UFE 2003 ANALYSIS Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation June 1, 2005.
Distributed Generation Task Force November 29, 2007 TAC Report.
New Jersey Community RE / Solar Programs* New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering & Interconnection Rules Stakeholder Meeting July 23, 2008 *FOR.
1 ERCOT LRS Precision Analysis PWG Presentation February 27, 2007.
Market Operations Presentation ERCOT Board of Directors October 21, 2008 Updated as of 10/21/08 Betty Day.
UFE 2005 Analysis 1 UFE 2005 ANALYSIS Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation.
May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.
Demand Response Status Report Calvin Opheim October 9, 2007.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
1 UFE Workshop Sponsored by COPS October 19, 2004.
ERCOT UFE Analysis UFE Task Force February 21, 2005.
Comparison of New Load Profile Models 14-Month Models vs 21-Month Models ERCOT Load Profiling Staff.
1 History of UFE (shortened version of presentation provided at UFE Taskforce Workshop on 9/14/2004) UFE Taskforce Meeting February 21, 2006.
1 Arguments for Continuing Residential Validation Improves Settlement Accuracy Improves UFE Profile Assignment is more correct Arguments to Stop Residential.
MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.
1 ERCOT Load Profile Transition Option 1 – 4 Analysis August 21, 2006.
ERCOT PUBLIC 10/7/ Load Forecasting Process Review Calvin Opheim Generation Adequacy Task Force October 7, 2013.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
RENEWABLE ENERGY STRATEGIES FOR MANUFACTURERS BEN D.S. COLLINS RENEWABLE ENERGY DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR
RMS Update to TAC October 5, RMS Activity Summary 2008 Test Flight Schedule Update on TAC directive relating to identifying issues with net metering.
DRG Slides for PWG Update to COPS. 2 Highlights from the DGTF Recommendation - 3 Small DRG applies to generation less than 50 kW –Profiling is applicable.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
An Introduction to Solar Energy. World solar photovoltaic (PV) installations increased 19% in one year, reaching a record high of 1,744 megawatts (MW)
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
Solar Profiling Interstate Renewable Energy Council presentation to the ERCOT Profiling Working Group Jan. 22, 2008.
October 13, 2009 NOIE DRG Settlements TF update to COPS Settlement Discussion for ALL DG < or = 1 MW Don Tucker on behalf of the NOIE DRG Settlements Task.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
DSWG - June 25, Four-CP Response for Transmission- and Distribution- Connected ESIIDs in ERCOT Competitive Area Carl L Raish.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting March 11, 2008.
1 A Review of Impacts to UFE and Load Ratio Share Based on AV Profile ID Changes Presented by ERCOT Staff to the Profiling Working Group 10/26/2005.
Demand Response Options Review Carl Raish November 27, 2007.
IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Tables and Figures IEA-PVPS Self-Consumption Policies 2016 The Red Oak Park a neighborhood.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profiling Methodology ERCOT Load Profiling March 4, 2008.
1 RMS Update to RMWG June 6, Market Process for Solar & Wind Devices Retail customers are purchasing and installing wind and solar equipment on.
Distributed Generation Task Force
Market Continuity Update to TAC Joel Mickey
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
2017 Annual Validation Update PWG
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Session 26
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Session 22
Presentation transcript:

Hypothetical Examples of How Residential Photovoltaic (PV) ESI IDs Could be Settled ERCOT Load Profiling

2 Introduction There are two options that can be used to settle the outflow for residential photovoltaic (PV) arrays as measured at the point of interconnection for the ESI-id : 1.Wholesale settlement of the outflow only 1.Wholesale settlement of all solar generation settlement of the outflow and adjustment of the load profile (in order to account for solar generation during all time periods of generation)

3 Settlement of Outflow Only Some possibilities for allocating the PV-generated outflows: 1. Spread the energy evenly over daylight hours 2. Spread the energy evenly over the peak PV generating hours 3. Spread the energy using a PV model 4. Spread the energy using both a PV model and the existing settlement load profile How can the outflow for residential photovoltaic (PV) arrays as measured at the point of interconnection be settled?

4 Settlement of Outflow Only These approaches allocate the solar generation (or outflow) as measured point of interconnection. None of these options adjust the settlement profile of load for solar output (i.e., load is settled using the existing load profile).

5 Examples Following are examples of the Settlement of Outflow Only option for a very low usage residential high winter ratio (RESHIWR) ESI ID in the North Central weather zone.

6 Spread energy evenly over daylight hours

7 Spread the energy over peak PV hours

8 PV generation models If PV generation models were created, PV generation measured at the point of interconnect could be used to estimate the shape of the PV output to the grid. To estimate the shape of the PV output to the grid scale the ‘kWh out’ value using the PV generation model.

9 PV generation models

10 PV generation models used with existing load profiles If PV generation models were created, PV generation measured at the point of interconnect could be used with the existing load profiles to estimate the shape of the PV output to the grid.

11 PV generation models used with existing load profiles

12 PV generation models used with existing load profiles

13 PV generation models used with existing load profiles

14 Settlement of Outflow Only - Analysis Initial estimates for ERCOT effort of these options: 1.Spread the energy evenly over daylight hours small effort (<100k) 2. Spread the energy evenly over the peak PV generating hours small effort (<100k) 3. Spread the energy using a PV model small effort (<100k) 4. Spread the energy using both a PV model and the existing settlement load profile medium effort (<500k)

15 Assumptions The settlement options included in this presentation assume: That NIDR generation data as measured at the point of interconnect will be provided to ERCOT for each applicable ESI-id. This will require modifications to the 867 business process at ERCOT. These changes are not accounted for in the ERCOT estimates provided in this presentation. A registration process is created for ESI-ids that have solar installations. This will include how solar ESI-ids are identified in the ERCOT settlement process.

16 Summary These approaches allocate the solar generation (or outflow) as measured point of interconnection. None of these options adjust the settlement profile of load for solar output (i.e., load is settled using the existing load profile). Questions?

17 Settlement of ‘kWh in’ and ‘kWh out’ How can settlement reflecting solar generation not measured as outflow be accomplished? This includes: settlement of the outflow and adjustment of the load profile (in order to account for solar generation during all time periods of generation)

18 Example Following is an example of the Settlement of Solar Generation option for a very low usage residential high winter ratio (RESHIWR) ESI ID in the North Central weather zone.

19 Settlement of ‘kWh in’ and ‘kWh out’

20 Settlement of ‘kWh in’ and ‘kWh out’ This approach involves the most significant changes for ERCOT. The exact requirements would need to be defined through the stakeholder process. At a high level, ERCOT estimates that this would be a large effort (<750k). This estimate should be considered a ballpark estimate only due to unidentified requirements at this time.

21 Assumptions The settlement options included in this presentation assume: That NIDR generation data as measured at the point of interconnect will be provided to ERCOT for each applicable ESI-id. This will require modifications to the 867 business process at ERCOT. These changes are not accounted for in the ERCOT estimates provided in this presentation. A registration process is created for ESI-ids that have solar installations. This will include how solar ESI-ids are identified in the ERCOT settlement process. A new load profile would need to be created.

22 Other Applications The settlement options included in this presentation can be applicable to other renewable technologies. This would require the use of a technology specific model.

23 Questions Questions?