Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES Materials Process Design and Control.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Computing An Adaptive Numerical Method for Multi- Scale Problems Arising in Phase-field Modelling Peter.

Advertisements

Hongjie Zhang Purge gas flow impact on tritium permeation Integrated simulation on tritium permeation in the solid breeder unit FNST, August 18-20, 2009.

Heat Transfer with Change of Phase in Continuous Casting Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford ANSYS Users Group Meeting September 28, 2010.

Combined thermal, solutal and momentum transport. Assume a rigid mold. Imperfect contact and air gap formation at metal/mold interface Design of mold surface.

Advanced CFD Analysis of Aerodynamics Using CFX

Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.

Katsuyo Thornton*, R. Edwin García✝, Larry Aagesen*

Solidification and Grain Size Strengthening

~0.5 m Computational grid size Process ~5 mm REV Modeling Microsegregation In Metal Alloys – Vaughan Voller, University of Minnesota 1 of 14 Can we build.

Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.

Two Approaches to Multiphysics Modeling Sun, Yongqi FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Laser Treatment Modeling Capabilities at Rensselaer-Hartford Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford

Modeling of Micro segregation in Metal Alloys Vaughan R. Voller University of Minnesota.

Voller, University of Minnesota Application of an Enthalpy Method for Dendritic Solidification Vaughan R. Voller and N. Murfield.

Computational grid size ~0.5 m Process ~5 mm REV Maco-Micro Modeling— Simple methods for incorporating small scale effects into large scale solidification.

Session III: Computational Modelling of Solidification Processing Analytical Models of Solidification Phenomena V. Voller QUESTION: As models of solidification.

Solidification of Pb-Sn Alloys Teri Mosher University of Illinois Advisor: Professor Krane.

An Enthalpy Based Scheme for Simulating Dendritic Growth V.R. Voller 4d o (blue) 3.25d o (black) 2.5d o (red) Dendrite shape with 3 grid sizes shows reasonable.

Reduced-order modeling of stochastic transport processes Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Swagato Acharjee and Nicholas Zabaras Materials.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,

Solidification Nov

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES LIJIAN TAN Presentation for Admission to candidacy.

Sino-German Workshop on Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, – Shanghai, PR China Use of magnetic fields during solidification under.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory THE STEFAN PROBLEM: A STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS USING THE EXTENDED FINITE ELEMENT METHOD Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF WEIGHTED MANY- BODY EXPANSIONS USING AB-INITIO CALCULATIONS FOR PREDICTING STABLE.

NTNU Short Course on solidification at IISc October – November 2012 Lars Arnberg, NTNU 1.Introduction – basic concepts 29/10 1.Nucleation - grain refinement.

NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF AN APPLIED ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL ON THE SOLIDIIFCATION OF A BINARY METAL ALLOY P.A. Nikrityuk, K. Eckert, R. Grundmann.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MOLECULAR DYNAMICS APPROACH FOR INVESTIGATION OF GRAIN BOUNDARY RESPONSE WITH APPLICATIONS TO CONTINUUM.

Solidification / Melting Moving Boundary Problems: A finite difference method Final Project MANE 6640 – Fall 2009 Wilson Braz.

Growing Numerical Crystals Vaughan Voller, SAFL Feb

Introduction to Materials Science, Chapter 9, Phase Diagrams University of Virginia, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering 1 Growth of Solid Equilibrium.

NTNU 1 Solidification, Lecture 4 Three phase solidification Eutectic growth Types of eutectics Peritectic growth Segregation Macro / microsegregation Lever.

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Multigrid accelerated numerical methods based on implicit scheme for moving.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Design and control of properties in polycrystalline materials using texture- property-process maps Materials.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 101 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,

A MULTI-SCALE/MULTI-PHYSICS MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR SOLIDIFICATION SYSTEMS Vaughan R Voller Saint Anthony Falls Lab University of Minnesota Acknowledgments.

Bin Wen and Nicholas Zabaras

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Finite Element Modeling of the Deformation of 3D Polycrystals Including the Effect of Grain Size Wei Li.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,

Uncertainty quantification in multiscale deformation processes Babak Kouchmeshky Nicholas Zabaras Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION LIJIAN TAN NICHOLAS ZABARAS Date: 24 July 2007 Sibley School.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sethuraman Sankaran and Nicholas Zabaras Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory CONTROL OF CONVECTION IN THE SOLIDIFICATION OF ALLOYS USING TAILORED MAGNETIC FIELDS B. Ganapathysubramanian,

Predictions for Multi-Scale Shock Heating Of a Granular Energetic Material By Venugopal Jogi ( M.S Candidate ) Advisor: Dr. Keith A. Gonthier Support Air.

An Enthalpy Model for Dendrite Growth Vaughan Voller University of Minnesota.

Introduction 1. Similarity 1.1. Mechanism and mathematical description 1.2. Generalized variables 1.3. Qualitative analysis 1.4. Generalized individual.

A gradient optimization method for efficient design of three-dimensional deformation processes Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Swagato.

DESIGN OF MICROSTRUCTURE-SENSITIVE PROPERTIES IN ELASTO-VISCOPLASTIC POLYCRYSTALS USING MULTISCALE HOMOGENIZATION TECHNIQUES V. Sundararaghavan, S. Sankaran.

Microsegregation Models and their Role In Macroscale Calculations Vaughan R. Voller University of Minnesota.

Cornell University- Zabaras, FA An information-theoretic multiscale framework with applications to polycrystal materials Materials Process.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,

Numerical Simulation of Dendritic Solidification

Governing Equations Conservation of Mass Conservation of Momentum Velocity Stress tensor Force Pressure Surface normal Computation Flowsheet Grid values.

Multiscale Modeling Using Homogenization PI: Prof. Nicholas ZabarasParticipating students: Veera Sundararaghavan, Megan Thompson Material Process Design.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MODELING THE EFFECTS OF MOLD TOPOGRAPHY ON ALUMINUM CAST SURFACES Lijian Tan and Nicholas Zabaras Materials.

Presented by Adaptive Hybrid Mesh Refinement for Multiphysics Applications Ahmed Khamayseh and Valmor de Almeida Computer Science and Mathematics Division.

Key Issues in Solidification Modeling—

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF WEIGHTED MANY- BODY EXPANSIONS USING AB-INITIO CALCULATIONS FOR PREDICTING STABLE.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory An information-learning approach for multiscale modeling of materials Sethuraman Sankaran and Nicholas.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory TAILORED MAGNETIC FIELDS FOR CONTROLLED SEMICONDUCTOR GROWTH Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Nicholas Zabaras.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING OF SOLIDIFICATION OF MULTICOMPONENT ALLOYS LIJIAN TAN Presentation for Thesis Defense.

Convection Heat Transfer in Manufacturing Processes P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Mode of Heat Transfer due to.

Mathematical modeling of cryogenic processes in biotissues and optimization of the cryosurgery operations N. A. Kudryashov, K. E. Shilnikov National Research.

Fluid Flow Regularization of Navier-Stokes Equations

The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.

Numerical Simulation of Dendritic Solidification

Modeling Phase Changes in Finite Element Analysis

Anthony D. Fick & Dr. Ali Borhan Governing Equations

Presentation transcript:

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca, NY URL: Lijian Tan and Prof. Nicholas Zabaras

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION  Brief review of alloy solidification process  Brief review of macro-scale model Review of meso-scale model  Multi-scale modeling  Adaptive meshing  Database approach

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory solid Mushy zone liquid ~ m (b) Meso/micro scale ~ – m solid liquid (a) Macro scale (mushy zone is represented by volume fraction) q g MULTISCALE NATURE OF SOLIDIFICATION

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory  Governing equations  Volume fraction is related with microstructure.  Lever rule or Scheil rule is used to obtain volume fraction.  Meso scale modeling is required to obtain volume fraction more accurately. MACRO SCALE MODELING

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MESO SCALE MODELING  A moving solid-liquid interface  Presence of fluid flow  Heat transfer  Solute transport Although equations are even simpler than macro-scale model, numerically it is very hard to handle due to the moving solid-liquid interface.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory ISSUES RELATED WITH MOVING INTERFACE  Jump in temperature gradient governs interface motion  No slip condition for flow  Gibbs-Thomson relation  Solute rejection flux Requires curvature computation at the moving interface!

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory  Cellular automata  Phase field method  Front tracking  Level set method Techniques for handling moving interface Interface motion (level set equation) Ref. S. Osher 1997, Devised by Sethian&Osher Signed distance Level set method MESO SCALE MODELS

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory OUR WORK WITH LEVEL SET METHOD  L. Tan and N. Zabaras, "A level set simulation of dendritic solidification of multi-component alloys", Journal of Computational Physics, in press  N. Zabaras, B. Ganapathysubramanian and L. Tan, "Modeling dendritic solidification with melt convection using the extended finite element method (XFEM) and level set methods", Journal of Computational Physics, in press.  L. Tan and N. Zabaras, "A level set simulation of dendritic solidification with combined features of front tracking and fixed domain methods", Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 211, pp , 2006 Comparing with the other method in literature, our method has better convergence, less computational requirement. Our method can also be easily extended to 3D.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory COVERGENCE BEHAVIOR Our method Osher (1997) Different results obtained by researchers suggest that this problem is nontrivial. All the referred results are using sharp interface model. Triggavason (1996) Benchmark problem: Crystal growth with initial perturbation.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory COMPUTATIONAL REQUIREMENT Our diffused interface model with tracking of interface Phase field model without tracking of interface

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory EXTEND TO 3D

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING WITH ADAPTIVE MESH Solution changes rapidly only near solid-liquid interface. Still solve the meso-scale model, but with refined element only near interface. When combine adaptive meshing with parallel computing, we may be able to solve some macro-scale problems using the meso-scale model.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Le=10 (boundary layer differ by 10 times) Micro-segregation can be observed in the crystal; maximum liquid concentration about (compares well with Ref Heinrich 2003) SIMPLE BINARY ALLOY GROWTH EXAMPLE

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Domain decomposition Colored by process id COMBINE WITH PARALLEL COMPUTING

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory APPLY TO MACROSCALE PROBLEM

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory APPLY TO MACROSCALE PROBLEM

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory IDEA OF DATA BASE APPROACH Even with adaptive meshing and parallel computation, solving very large problem with a meso scale model is not realistic. Runs in meso- scale Data base Build data Solve the interested problem Run in macroscale Results with statistical properties. Model verification (the same problem) Results with details in mesoscale Run in meso- scale Results with statistical properties. Statistics Compare

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory DETAILS OF THE DATA BASE APPROACH  Macro scale: Model the evolution of T (temperature), fl (liquid volume fraction), and two state variables s1 (grain size), s2 (grain type).  Model the unknowns (fl, s1 and s2) with the following form. R,G are the cooling rate and temperature gradient, defined at each point with value equal to the temperature rate and gradient when fl reaches 0.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory WHY LINK THE TWO SCALES IN THIS WAY  Volume fraction is mainly related with temperature and microstructure type.  Studies (experimental and numerical) have shown that microstructure type is determined by cooling rate and temperature gradient for a given alloy.  All variables (T, fl, R, G, s1, s2) have direct physical meaning, so data can be easily obtained from meso scale simulation results. No optimization is required to fit parameters.  In our numerical example, the following simplification is used.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory LINK BETWEEN TWO SCALES Linking hypothesis: Relations between macroscopic variables follow the same relations between the averaged microscopic variables in meso scale e.g. Macro scale Meso scale func(.)  Macro scale and meso scale are decoupled.  Accuracy of this approach relies on the accuracy of data obtained from meso scale simulation and the way for modeling and analyzing the data.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory PROBLEM CONSIDERED Domain: 10cm by 10cm Alloy: Al - 0.3%Cu Superheat: 30K Nucli density: 10^6/m^3 Cooling rate: 0.5K/s Want to know the solidification time, and the final microstructure. Use symmetry, around 2 million elements are required to solve microstructure evolution using the meso scale, which takes 24 hours.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory DATA GENERATION Adiabatic Cooling rate 0.4K/s, 0.6K/s Heyn’s interception measure mean of interception length is a function of angle s1 (grain size): mean of interception length for all angles s2 (structure type): ratio of smallest mean interception length to largest mean interception length For each point, extract information of (R, s1, s2) For each point every 100 time step, extract information of (T, fl). Remember from which run case and which position the data is generated. It will be useful to give an idea what (s1, s2) means. 2 hours for each case

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory OBTAINED MICROSTRUCTURE INFORMATION Microstructure type (s2) Volume fraction Grain size (s1) Solid Liquid Fine Coarse Columnar Equiaxed

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory COMPARE WITH MESO SCALE SIMULATION Volume fraction Predicted structure at P Q

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory COMPARE WITH STATISTICAL RESULT Microstructure type (s2) Grain size (s1) Fine Coarse Columnar Equiaxed Meso scale modelData base approach

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Lever Rule Scheil Rule COMPARE WITH MACRO SCALE MODEL Solidification time ~420s Data base approach: ~423s Both macro modeling (with Lever rule or Scheil rule) and the data base approach gives approximate total solidification time. The “true” solution (meso-scale simulation result) is about 428s. Liquid fraction Lever Rule Database Volume fraction

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory COMPUTATION REQUIREMENT StrategyComputational workAccuracy Meso scale model (Adaptive meshing 24 hours Supposed to be the most accurate Data base approach Data: 4 hours Macro scale simulation : 5min Close to the meso scale model Macro scale model 5 min Total solidification time correct. No information about microstructure can be given.

Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION