WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Example of hydrological modelling Slobodan Nickovic World Weather Research Programme.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Earth Modeling System (IEMS) at RHMSS/SEEVCCC - Numerical models in use -
Advertisements

Infiltration and unsaturated flow Learning objective Be able to calculate infiltration, infiltration capacity and runoff rates using the methods described.
12.3 Mass Movements and Erosion
Hillslope morphology Ch 8. Hillslope Types Soil-mantled Soil-mantled –Transport-limited –Shape: smooth, rounded Bare bedrock or thin soils Bare bedrock.
Global Hydrology Modelling and Uncertainty: Climate Change and Hydrological Extremes Katie Anne Smith.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Runoff Processes Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.6 to 5.8 and Chapter 6 for Tuesday of next week.
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Kinematic Routing Model and its Parameters Definition.
4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence, 6 th – 8 th May 2008, Toronto, Canada Efficiency of distributed flood mitigation measures at watershed scale.
Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.
Use of satellite altimeter data for validating large scale hydraulic models Matt Wilson, University of Exeter Doug Alsdorf, Ohio State University Paul.
1 Numerical Hydraulics Open channel flow 1 Wolfgang Kinzelbach with Marc Wolf and Cornel Beffa.
Modeling Fluid Phenomena -Vinay Bondhugula (25 th & 27 th April 2006)
Evaluating river cross section for SPRINT: Guadalupe and San Antonio River Basins Alfredo Hijar Flood Forecasting.
A Macroscale Glacier Model to Evaluate Climate Change Impacts in the Columbia River Basin Joseph Hamman, Bart Nijssen, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Bibi Naz,
Hydrology and Water Resources Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept. Physically-based Distributed Hydrologic Modeling.
Non-hydrostatic algorithm and dynamics in ROMS Yuliya Kanarska, Alexander Shchepetkin, Alexander Shchepetkin, James C. McWilliams, IGPP, UCLA.
Kristie J. Franz Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University
Implementation of the fully-distributed and physically-based FEST-WB model A. Amengual Grup de Meteorologia, Departament de Física, Universitat de les.
Workshop on Effective Implementation of IWMP
Applying Methods for Assessing the Costs and Benefits of CCA 2 nd Regional Training Agenda, 30 September – 4 October 2013 Priyanka Dissanayake- Regional.
Toby’s & Jake’s notes combined
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Discussion and Future Work With an explicit representation of river network, CHARMS is capable of capturing the seasonal variability of streamflow, although.
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
Hydraulics for Hydrographers Basic Hydrodynamics
LL-III physics-based distributed hydrologic model in Blue River Basin and Baron Fork Basin Li Lan (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower.
Modelling 1: Basic Introduction. What constitutes a “model”? Why do we use models? Calibration and validation. The basic concept of numerical integration.
A cell-integrated semi-Lagrangian dynamical scheme based on a step-function representation Eigil Kaas, Bennert Machenhauer and Peter Hjort Lauritzen Danish.
Assessing the impacts of climate change on Atbara flows using bias-corrected GCM scenarios SIGMED and MEDFRIEND International Scientific Workshop Relations.
Sources of streamflow from hillslopes Baseflow streamflow maintained by groundwater contributions Stormflow Augmented by direct precipitation on saturated.
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed
Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method
Distributed Flow Routing Surface Water Hydrology, Spring 2005 Reading: 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.2 Venkatesh Merwade, Center for Research in Water Resources.
Channel Flow Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.4, , 9.7.
Lab 13 - Predicting Discharge and Soil Erosion Estimating Runoff Depth using the Curve Number method –Land use or cover type –Hydrologic condition –Soil.
Surface hydrology The primary purpose of the WEPP surface hydrology component is to provide the erosion component with the duration of rainfall excess,
Mathematical Background
Deforestation and the Stream Flow of the Amazon River -- Land Surface Processes and Atmospheric Feedbacks Michael T. Coe1, Marcos Heil Costa2, and Britaldo.
An example of vertical profiles of temperature, salinity and density.
1 HYDROSPHERE1 INTRODUCTION This unit has three components, The Hydrological cycle and its features. Working with hydrographs and Studying rivers.
Watershed Modeling Approaches Distributed: CASC-2D (CSU, U Conn, WMS) overland flow: 2-D diffusion wave with explicit FD channel flow: 1-D diffusion wave.
Erosion! Once a rock is weathered, it usually moves from one place to another. This process is called erosion.
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Geopotential and isobaric surfaces
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Runoff Overview Tom Hopson.
VFR Research - R. Hudson VFR Research Section Introduction to Hydrology Dr. Rob Hudson, P.Geo.
Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw
Surface Water Virtual Mission Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Kostas Andreadis, and Doug Alsdorf Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Wednesday 09/10/2014 Quiz! (Short?) Weather Discussion Continue Review Material Geostrophic Wind Continuity Vorticity.
Modelling of Marine Systems. Shallow waters Equations.
Week 1.
Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw
Distributed modelling
Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
1Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington
Hydrologic fundamentals
CEVE 412/512 Dr. Phil Bedient Jan 2016
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
INTRODUCTION TO HYDROLOGY
DHSVM Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model
Surface Water Virtual Mission
Hydrology CIVL341.
OBJECTIVES Evaluation of;
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
GHOST (Generic Hydrologic Overland-Subsurface Toolkit)
Presentation transcript:

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Example of hydrological modelling Slobodan Nickovic World Weather Research Programme World Meteorological Organization, Geneva with contributions in [B]: G. Pejanovic, M. Vujadinovic, V. Djurdjevic, B. Rajkovic (Belgrade University)

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, HYDRO1k USGS topography HYDROSHED-500m FAO soil texture data USGS land use data DATASETS: HYdrology PROgnostic Model integrated system Example of hydrological modelling Nickovic, et al (2010), HYPROM hydrology surface runoff prognostic model, Water Resour. Res.

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, HYPROM - Full dynamic (FD) equation concept Kinematic approximation neglects inertia forces !!

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Full dynamics (FD) vs. kinematics (KN)  FD model more accurate  FD: friction slope term requires special treatment (Froude number >2)  KN: simplifications avoid problem (Froude number <2)  Most watershed models adapt KN approach  KN cannot accurately represent large-scale, more inert processes

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Kinematic approx Not appropriate for basins with slow slow flows Acceptable for flesh floods (where friction and gradient forces are in approx. balance)  Full dynamic system to be used

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Friction slope Potential source of model instability when FD requires completely different numerical approach to resolve the Instability due to vanishing water heights!

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Friction slope numerics Water depth is in the dominator of friction slope terms Generates numerical instability when depth vanishes Usual approach - water depths to be above a threshold (not a physically-based approach)

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Friction slope numerics – new approach Implicit time scheme applied unconditionally stable method convergent for when then physically based method

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Nickovic, et al (2010) Friction slope numerics – new approach

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Horizontal semi-staggered E grid used the same as the NMM grid problem with gravity wave short wave noise new method to resolve the problem – modification of the continuity equation

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Synthetic sink experiment with HYPROM Without modificationWith modification

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Advection numerics (Janjic, 1997) conserves mass no new extremes no negative values

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, River routing River path: A-B-C-D-E-F Mass conserving River –collector from surrounding points Same numerics as for non-river points

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Savinja case – Oct/Nov 2000 Torrential rain Landslides 7 deaths, quite a damage Complex topography Kobold and Suselj, 2005 Savinja basin

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Savinja case – Oct/Nov 2000 NMM T and V at 850 hPa, 1 Nov 2000 NMM acc. rainfall, 26 Oct – 6 Nov 2000 Savinja basin

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Savinja case – Oct/Nov 2000 River discharge over period 26/10 – 6/

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, Moraca river experiment (Nov 2002 – May 2003) Snow melting case Seasonal-scale run Problem with soil types

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, parameter Clay Loam (09) Bedrock (15) sat. diffusivity0.113 x x sat. conductivity2.45 x x porosity CH constant Sensitivity to soil type

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, model vs. observations discharge 2008 case 2008 water budget components 2008 accumulations

WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, climate studies Bojana river: Buna Bridge discharge