INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
World’s Best Workforce  Board Level Curriculum and Instruction  December 18, 2013.
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
BOLD’S WORLD’S BEST WORK FORCE, MISSION TO SUCCESS.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Fulton City School District CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education October 27, 2015.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Northwest ISD January 11, 2016 The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
MARCH 2, 2016 ACCOUNTABILITY WEBINAR Kim Gilson, Doni CashRegion 10 ESC 1.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING JUNE 7, 2016.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
Campus Improvement Planning JULY 27, 2016 C I P.
Montgomery Township Board of Education
West Haven Next-Generation Accountability Report
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Campus Improvement Planning
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016

TODAY’S OUTCOME Work with peers to begin development of campus improvement plans and prepare for leading campus teams in completing the work

NEED FOR ALIGNMENT District Improvement Plan CIP Dept Plan District Plan Department Plan Campus Plan Four Big Goals Objectives? Strategies? Actions?

IMPROVEMENT APPROACH Improve alignment between district, campus, and department plans Reduce plan length by focusing on fewer, broader-based strategies Deliver the DIP in a timely manner as to allow campuses ample time to begin or complete CIPs with campus staff prior to school opening Provide opportunities for principals to collaborate on CIP development to improve end products and minimize redundant design efforts

IMPROVEMENT PLAN ORGANIZATION Goal Performance Objective Strategy Strategy Strategy Strategy Strategy Goal Action Action Action Strategy Action Action Strategy Timeframe

DIP GOALS Goal 1: All students will achieve their full potential by taking ownership of their learning and setting high academic goals. Goal 2: All students and staff will demonstrate personal responsibility and integrity reflective of noble character by using their unique gifts and talents as productive members of the global community. Goal 3: All students and staff will learn and work in a safe and responsive environment. Goal 4: All levels of the organization will systematically improve performance by increasing efficiency and effectiveness of operations. Today’s focus

STANDARDS SCHMANDARDS Approximately 2 items Level II Final Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 1

GOAL 1 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Index 1 Achievement Index 2 Progress Index 3 Closing Gaps Index 4 Postsecondary Percentage of tests in which students met the Level II standard Percentage of tests in which students met or exceeded progress in reading and math Percentage of tests in which students from economically disadvantaged and lowest performing race/ethnicity subgroups met Level II or Level III standard Percentage of students meeting Level II final standard on two or more tests Graduation rate, diploma plan rate, percentage meeting college/career readiness component (met TSI, advanced/dual completion, CTE sequence) Distinction Designations

DISTINCTION DESIGNATIONS ELA IndicatorsMathematics Indicators

GOAL 1 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 1.1. Increase performance on Index 1 (Student Achievement) of the state accountability system by 5 points over (District in 2015 = 81) 1.2. Increase performance on Index 2 (Student Progress) of the state accountability system by 5 points over (2015 = 36) 1.3. Increase performance on Index 3 (Closing Performance Gaps) of the state accountability system by 5 points over (2015 = 43) 1.4. Increase performance on Index 4 (Postsecondary Readiness) of the state accountability system by 5 points over (2015 = 72) 1.5. Increase the total number of campus distinction designations earned by 10% as compared to (2015 = 80)

EXPECTATIONS FOR CAMPUS PLANS Perform a Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) including summary, strengths, needs (OFIs), and data sources (Data Documentation) Demographics Student and staff background (see 2015 TAPR or Fall 2015 PEIMS reports) Attendance, discipline, dropout/graduation Student Achievement State accountability, including indexes, distinctions, and safeguards State assessments (STAAR, TELPAS) Other assessments (STAR Reading/Math, CBAs, SAT/ACT/PSAT/AP) Identify key areas of focus for Title I campuses must identify areas where expenditures are planned

EXPECTATIONS FOR CAMPUS PLANS Enter plans into plan4learning CNA/Data Documentation Goals – copy from district plan Performance objectives for Goal 1 Copy from district plan for Objectives 1 – 4 (based on 4 indexes) Modify Objective 5 for your campus (e.g. Increase number of distinctions earned by 2) Use district Strategies and Actions to create aligned campus strategies and actions Start focusing on Goal 1 Use the Evidence that Demonstrates Success field in plan4learning to capture actions

EXPECTATIONS FOR CAMPUS PLANS

DIP/CIP TENTATIVE TIMELINE April 25, 2016Present draft DIP to TEE for feedback and possible approval July 28, 2016Present DIP as Information Item at Board Meeting August 25, 2016Present DIP as Discussion/Action item at Board Meeting for possible approval September 5, 2016Draft CIPs submitted to central administration for compliance review September 12, 2016Present approved DIP to TEE committee September 22, 2016First reading of CIPs as Information Item at Board Meeting October 2016Select campuses share CIPs at Board carousel October 27, 2016Board Discussion/Action Item and possible approval of CIPs

PLANS FOR TODAY Model development of campus Goal 1 strategies and actions based on district strategies/actions Collaborate with peers to develop shared or unique strategies/actions Review all district Goal 1 strategies to improve understanding of how they may be applied at the campus level

1.1.1 MODEL, THINK, COLLABORATE Support implementation of Tier 1 Priorities within each content area A. Refine and implement a process for providing campuses with actionable feedback relative to Tier I priority implementation. B. Develop and implement a plan to increase leadership density throughout the system around Tier I priority implementation. C. Provide necessary resources to implement Tier I priorities. D. Evaluate the efficacy of the implementation of Tier I priorities. E. Support campuses in use of screener data to provide differentiated Tier I instruction.

COLLABORATION TIME Study and Circle Study DIP strategy and actions Circle key words Decide and Write Decide: Keep district strategy Change wording in district strategy Make action into strategy Write campus strategy Specify and Refine Write campus actions Look at district actions and make a decision: revise, add, delete Refer to Tier 1 Priority Implementation Plans for actions that can transfer Refer to Learning Expectations Rubric for actions that can transfer

1.1.2 MODEL, THINK, COLLABORATE Develop a district-wide approach to embed literacy instruction in all content areas. A. Research and define literacy and its relationship to the new generation of assessments. B. Identify grade level and content-appropriate strategies to address literacy. C. Clarify the role of literacy in the Tier I priorities in each content area.

COLLABORATION TIME Study and Circle Study DIP strategy and actions Circle key words Decide and Write Decide: Keep district strategy Change wording in district strategy Make action into strategy Write campus strategy Specify and Refine Write campus actions Look at district actions and make a decision: revise, add, delete Refer to Tier 1 Priority Implementation Plans for actions that can transfer Refer to Learning Expectations Rubric for actions that can transfer

1.1.3 MODEL, THINK, COLLABORATE Align specialized services to general education Tier I instruction to enhance student performance as appropriate to individual student needs. A. Define and standardize processes for making decisions regarding programming, assessment, supports, and accommodations for all students receiving specialized services. B. Provide necessary resources to implement Tier I priorities for students receiving services in specialized settings as appropriate to individual student needs. C. Provide training to general education teachers to support the learning of students receiving specialized services. D. Provide information to staff, parents, and community about specialized programs. E. Ensure that all teachers providing specialized services receive training in Tier I priorities and strategies aligned to program requirements. F. Evaluate the current RtI model. G. Utilize recommendations from the RtI evaluation to make program adjustments.

1.1.4 MODEL, THINK, COLLABORATE Align and revise the comprehensive professional learning plan to address the needs of adult learners. A. Perform a needs assessment to identify gaps in meeting the needs of adult learners. B. Develop a framework that facilitates personalized learning for staff. C. Allocate resources to support the professional learning plan. D. Develop processes to manage evidence of learning.

COLLABORATION TIME Study and Circle Study DIP strategy and actions Circle key words Decide and Write Decide: Keep district strategy Change wording in district strategy Make action into strategy Write campus strategy Specify and Refine Write campus actions Look at district actions and make a decision: revise, add, delete Refer to Tier 1 Priority Implementation Plans for actions that can transfer Refer to Learning Expectations Rubric for actions that can transfer

REMAINING GOAL 1 STRATEGIES Perf ObjStrategies 1.2. Increase performance on Index 2 (Student Progress) of the state accountability system by 5 points over (District in 2015 = 36) Design and implement a system of classroom continuous improvement Increase performance on Index 3 (Closing Performance Gaps) of the state accountability system by 5 points over (District in 2015 = 43) Develop a district framework that builds strong, equitable, and responsive learning environments to close learning gaps and create learning opportunities Increase performance on Index 4 (Postsecondary Readiness) of the state accountability system by 5 points over (District in 2015 = 72) Develop and implement a plan to design student tasks and assessments aligned with the rigor of the standards Develop and implement a plan to increase the number of students earning postsecondary credit or certifications while in high school Develop and implement an articulated plan to ensure that students at-risk of not graduating remain in school and receive an appropriate diploma to meet or exceed their postsecondary needs Increase the number of campus distinction designations earned by 10% as compared to (All campuses in 2015 = 80) Develop and implement a district-wide program to increase student and staff attendance.

COLLABORATION TIME Study and Circle Study DIP strategy and actions Circle key words Decide and Write Decide: Keep district strategy Change wording in district strategy Make action into strategy Write campus strategy Specify and Refine Write campus actions Look at district actions and make a decision: revise, add, delete Refer to Tier 1 Priority Implementation Plans for actions that can transfer Refer to Learning Expectations Rubric for actions that can transfer