CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Advertisements

Section 106 A Strategic Approach Peter Wilkinson Parks Service Manager Bristol Parks.
Strategic Spending of Developers Contributions Bournemouth and Poole Borough Councils Poole  L17 Policy and context  The Green Card system  Scoring.
Sharing Knowledge on Local GI delivery Ely, 13 th July 2010 Funding for Green Infrastructure – Maximising GI Funding Opportunities Rob Shipway.
KHG Future Funding Workshop Community Infrastructure Levy – 14 June 2013 James Renwick Ashford Borough council.
Laura Wood Team Leader –Strategic Planning 16 th February 2015 Little Gaddesden Parish Council Meeting.
Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Gwyn Jones City Growth and Development Manager Sustainable Development Panel Briefing 27 July 2011.
The Croydon Monitoring Report Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy December 2014.
Growth and Delivery Event Workshop 5 – Future Proofing Affordable Housing.
The Community Infrastructure Levy – A planning gain? 1 Janet Askew, Adam Sheppard University of the West of England, Bristol Lorraine O’Connor Foot Anstey.
Personal Budgets – Regs and the Code of Practice
Thriving communities, affordable homes Housing provision: The new development framework Nick Taylor Head of Area, North West London Homes & Communities.
Affordable Housing: Policies into Practice Louise Dwelly Housing Strategy & Enabling Manager October 2004.
Planning Act 2008 Strategic Planning and Housing Scrutiny Sub-Group Wednesday 8 April 2009.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council A Neighbourhood Plan for Broomhaugh and Riding Peter Rutherford, Northumberland.
Current Planning Issues in Hertfordshire James Doe Assistant Director – Planning, Development and Regeneration Chair of Hertfordshire Planning Group Hertfordshire.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
Financing Growth in Local Authorities Alison Scott Assistant Director, Policy and Technical CIPFA.
David Brock Cambridge Futures 2 Funding and Delivery Section 106, PFI, and powers.
Community Infrastructure Levy Preliminary Draft Consultation.
59 ½ Southwark Street London SE1 0AL (UK) ++44 (0) / Land Use Planning and Mobility Management Securing travel.
Community Infrastructure Levy Planning Advisory Service Gilian Macinnes October
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS Environmental, Housing and Planning Scrutiny Committee 23 rd September 2005.
Infrastructure Planning in the South East: The Impact of CIL Laura McCulloch.
Planning Obligations & Section 106
Christine James
Section 106 Overview Tony Melia – Section 106 Officer.
Neighbourhood Planning. Frequently Asked Questions What is Neighbourhood Planning? What can a Neighbourhood Plan do – and what can it not do? What are.
Neighbourhood Planning. What is neighbourhood planning? Neighbourhood planning gives communities direct power to develop a shared vision for their neighbourhood.
Neighbourhood Planning Miles Thompson Shared Planning Policy Manager South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse District Councils
The power of neighbourhood planning Tony Burton Free range Neighbourhood planner Founder, Civic Voice ex Design Council, National Trust, CPRE Author neighbourhood.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson MAV Rate Capping Forum 26 November 2015.
The Croydon Monitoring Report Community Infrastructure Levy December 2015.
Budget Presentation 2010/2011 – 2013/2014 All Communities 28 January 2010.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
S106, Developer Contributions & Delivering Infrastructure Mike Kiely Director of Planning LB Croydon Chair Planning Officers Society.
CIL : The Spending. Background and Context The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just.
CIL – a local authority perspective Jeni Jackson, Woking BC.
PLANNING ADVISORY SERVICE SEMINAR January 2015 SECTION 106 – ISSUES, APPROACHES AND CLAUSES Presented by Shabana Anwar.
Community Infrastructure Levy Implementation July 2014.
INTRODUCING CIL AND DEALING WITH SCHEME SPECIFIC VIABILITY ISSUES – BRISTOL’S APPROACH Jim Cliffe Planning Obligations Manager Bristol City Council.
TO CIL OR NOT TO CIL? Alison Fairhurst DCLG January 2016.
S106, Developer Contributions & Delivering Infrastructure Steve Dennington Plan Making Team Leader (Deputy Service Head – Spatial Planning) LB Croydon.
Councillor briefing Developer contributions: Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 obligations, viability Date: April 2015www.pas.gov.uk.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 and S278 vs CIL July 2014.
Community Infrastructure Levy – Charging Schedule.
Savills.com CIL Latest Research & Findings Emily Harvey, Associate.
Guest speaker: Lizzie Cullum (Savills). savills.com Viability Testing of CIL and Local Plans Effective Practice Lizzie Cullum BA (Hons) MRICS Surveyor,
Savills.com CIL Latest Research & Findings Lizzie Cullum, UK Development.
S106 Agreements Development Control User Panel. s106 agreements What are s106 agreements? How are they managed? The future:Community Infrastructure Levy.
Savills.com CIL Latest Research & Findings Ian Stevens, Planning.
1 Section 106: What they are and where we are DARREN WILDING DCLG.
SECTION 106 UPDATE DARREN WILDING DCLG. S106 - LEGISLATION Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 restricts the development or use of the.
Community Infrastructure Levy The fundamentals. Response to questions.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 vs CIL July 2014.
Councillor briefing Developer contributions: Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 obligations, viability Date: July 2013www.pas.gov.uk.
1 Community Infrastructure Levy Mark Lee. 2 Community Infrastructure Levy Introduced in April 2010 as fairer, faster more certain and more transparent.
Demystifying viability The local authority experience Dominick Mennie, Deputy Team Leader (Plan Making)
Community Infrastructure Levy Project Planning and Infrastructure Evidence July 2014.
No.1 for Service and Value CIL – the experience Martin Howell, Group Planner – Policy & Information, Wandsworth Council
Development contributions – S106 & CIL - update Gilian Macinnes March
Laura McCulloch Strategic Manager – Planning Hampshire County Council The Community Infrastructure Levy: The Hampshire Experience.
S106 – Where we are- current context Gilian Macinnes Date: March 2015www.pas.gov.uk.
SECTION 106 INFORMATION PRESENTATION. WELCOME This presentation provides an overview of the way Wellingborough Council negotiates and processes developer.
CIL Evidence. The Evidence Primary Evidence 1.Justification of infrastructure requirements 2.Justification of an infrastructure funding gap 3.Technical.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Neighbourhood Planning
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
CIL In London CIL IN LONDON February 2019.
AUTHORS: JUAN GARCIA RYAN CHERRINGTON LEE McMELLON.
Presentation transcript:

CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list

The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part of a more complex blend of funding The Funding Pie

Planning Obligations (Site specific negotiations) Community Infrastructure Levy (Charging Schedule) Scope What Type of Infrastructure can it support? Only items justifiable within the 3 legal tests: a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms b) directly related to the development c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development All infrastructure necessary to support development of the area Can it be used to secure Affordable Housing? Yes - use to prescribe a proportion of affordable housing contributions No Geographic ApplicationSite specific impacts that may or may not reach beyond the ‘red line’ Must cover whole Planning Authority Area with no exceptions (room for differential rates) What types of development are eligible to pay CIL? All development (but the time consuming nature of the process means only the largest are charged) Any development over 100m 2 Building that people would normally go into. (some further exemptions existing for charities and social housing) Eligibility of Capital & RevenueCapital & Revenue both eligible (Revenue for maintenance & agreed revenue items) Capital & Revenue for ongoing maintenance Can the money be pooled?Not for long. After April 2014 you will not be able to collect s106 contributions from 5 or more developments CIL is effectively a pooling mechanism with complete flexibility over spending priorities Once the money is collected how easy is to change what it is spent on? Items agreed within the s106 Agreement (this is often inflexible). It cannot be spend on items identified for CIL investment CIL can be spent on any infrastructure. Authorities need to set out the items they intend to fund using CIL in a Reg 123 list. Setting Charging Levels Is there a need to establish a list of Infrastructure requirements The authority needs to justify s106 is necessary based on the 3 legal tests (as above) Yes. Need costed infrastructure list to prove local need (there is no emphasis on prioritisation at the evidence gathering stage and explicit recognition that the list will change over time) Setting differential ratesNegotiated proposal taking each development on its merits Differences in rates should only relate to viability in different zones or of different uses (not infrastructure costs or the impact of a proposed development) Charging UnitsFlexiblePer m 2 of additional floor space only (all uses) Testing ViabilityCase by case basis (leaving room for negotiation during pre-application discussion) Viability is tested at a borough-wide level at the evidence gather stage, then CIL payments are mandatory A comparison of CIL vs S106

Implication of the New Guidance

“double dipping” is a concern for Developers Regulation 123 is the requirement for a published list of infrastructure projects or types of infrastructure that the Charging Authority intends will be, or may be, wholly or partly funded by CIL, those infrastructure projects or types of infrastructure. …put another way you cannot collect s106 to spend on items within your Reg 123 list Purpose of the Reg 123 list

Devising it: A draft Reg 123 list will now be part of the examination Post Examination: should be based on the draft list examined with the charging schedule Need to explain the reason for change Appropriate local consultation Where a change to the regulation 123 list would have a significant impact on viability evidence requires a review of the charging schedule 123 Golden Thread Relevant Plan Infrastructure Evidence CIL Infrastructure Evidence Regulation 123 List Funding GapProject List

When a charging authority introduces the Community Infrastructure Levy, section 106 requirements should be scaled back to those matters that are directly related to a specific site, and are not set out in a regulation 123 list 3 legal tests: a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms b) directly related to the development c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development Planning Obligations can be secured through: – In-kind and financial contributions e.g. through the provision of land and facilities, or funds – On-off payments and phased payments, and maintenance payments – Pool contributions – Unilateral undertakings by developers – the applicant undertaking to the Authority to deal with specific planning issues before planning permission is granted s106 Obligations

Planning Obligations may be: Unconditional or subject to conditions Positive, requiring the developer to do something Negative, restricting the developer from doing something Relate to specific financial payments based on formula and often referred to as commuted Timing is important : If a planning obligation specifies a timescale within which the developer is required to undertake certain actions If the planning permission refers to the phasing of development, the planning obligation may be linked to this phasing arrangement If the planning obligation is a commuted sum are the money must be spent within a specified period. s106 Obligations

1.Infrastructure Evidence: – What, Where, How it will be funded 2.Viability evidence – CIL & s106 as a development cost – The extent to which s106 targets have been met (performance on Affordable Housing & the performance of tariffs) 3.Regulation 123 List – intentions for your CIL receipts 4.How s106 policies will be varied – A draft Supplementary Planning Document? the Examination

Planning Obligations Strategy Local context Strategic Sites vs Small Sites CIL Technical Viability Developme nt market Affordabl e Housing Objective s When to use s106? When to use CIL? (not to forget alternative funding sources) Recognition of delivery mechanisms Planning Obligations Approach

The greater demand on and for Council resources to deliver Implications on Council Resources Education Transport Education Transport Community Facilities Green space Health The more comprehensive the Reg 123 List

Discuss in small groups the particular challenges in your Councils that you will face in producing a draft regulations 123 list and position on s106. Specifically, consider – What will your Reg 123 list cover? – What will your s106 position ‘statement’ be? – What is the internal process you need to go through to agree this before Examination? Exercise 2