Identifying dementia in Deaf Sign Language users T Denmark, J Atkinson, B Woll, J Marshall, A Young, E Ferguson-Coleman, K Rogers, R Geall, J Keady and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mini-Mental State Examination - 2nd Edition
Advertisements

THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF AN OLDER PERSON Dr Hannah Seymour Consultant Geriatrician.
General Information --- What is the purpose of the test? For what population is the designed? Is this population relevant to the people who will take your.
Sharing the diagnosis of dementia Alistair Burns Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust University of Manchester Manchester Academic Health Science.
DRAFT Promotional Copy for NNSDO 1 Cognitive / Mental Status Assessment of Older Adults.
Equity Issues in Assessments for Individuals who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Ann Moxley, Ph.D. California School for the Deaf - Fremont.
DAWN STEWART BSC, MPA, PHD BRS 214 Introduction to Psychology Rehabilitation interventions and clinical psychology.
Funded by Alzheimer’s Society Emma Ferguson-Coleman 1, Tanya Denmark 2, Alys Young 1, Bencie Woll 2, Jo Atkinson 2, Jane Marshall 3, Katherine Rogers 1,
Mary Ganguli’s Slides March 13 th Meeting. Mild Cognitive Impairment A View from the Trenches.
Screening By building screening for symptoms of VCI into regular workflows or practice, health care providers are participating in Taking Action to address.
Mild Cognitive Impairment as a Target for Drug Development Steven H. Ferris, Ph.D. Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center New York University School.
ACT on Alzheimer’s Disease Curriculum Module VI: Screening.
ACT on Alzheimer’s Disease Curriculum Module VII: Disease Diagnosis.
Author: Sabrina Hinton. Year and Publisher: American Guidance Service.
Linguistic Demands of Preschool Cognitive Assessments Glenna Bieno, Megan Eparvier, Anne Kulinski Faculty Mentor: Mary Beth Tusing Method We employed three.
Dementia in People with a Learning Disability A Care Pathway Using a Collaborative Approach ANDREW GRIFFITHS.
Barbara A. Wilson, Eve Greenfield, Linda Clare, Alan Baddeley, Janet Cockburn, Peter Watson, Robyn Tate, Sara Sopena, Rory Nannery & John Crawford (2008)
Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire (CAIDS-Q) McKenzie & Paxton Dr Karen McKenzie.
Educational level relative to gender (Ν=28)
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Administering the Kindergarten.
Emotion Perception and Social Functioning in Serious Mental Illness: Differential Relationships Among Inpatients and Outpatients Melissa Tarasenko, Petra.
Standardization and Test Development Nisrin Alqatarneh MSc. Occupational therapy.
ACT on Alzheimer’s Disease Curriculum Module V: Cognitive Assessment and the Value of Early Identification.
MEMORY ASSESSMENT in the LAB vs. the CLINIC
2012 Role Delineation Study: What is it, and why do it?
BY DR ZAINAB ABDULZAEEZ UMAR DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE AMINU KANO TEACHING HOSPITAL.
Reliability & Validity
Competency in Older Adults: Clinical and Legal Perspectives The Role of Cognitive and Neuropsychological Evaluations John Crumlin, PhD Assistant Director,
Arbitre Consulting, Inc.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 6 and 8.
MINI MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION (MMSE) PREPARED BY DR. IRENE ROCO ASST. PROFESSOR.
Do Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Predict Dementia at 1- and 2- Year Follow-Up? Findings from the Development of Screening Guidelines and Diagnostic.
Insight and Locus of Control as Related to Aggression in Individuals with Severe Mental Illness (SMI) Bethany L. Ridling Faculty Mentor: Dr. William Spaulding.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
An Innovative Approach to Fair Evaluations for People with Cognitive Disabilities.
Psychological Testing
T10 OUTCOME ASSESSMENT Why, what and how? Dr. Frederike van Wijck & John Dennis.
Background The Island of Jersey is part of the British Isles but has a Healthcare System independent from the UK. The Neurology Service offers a patient.
T10 OUTCOME ASSESSMENT Why, what and how? Dr. Frederike van Wijck & John Dennis.
Assessing Responsiveness of Health Measurements Ian McDowell, INTA, Santiago, March 20, 2001.
Reliability and Validity of the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist in Turkish Gulsah Kose, Abdullah Bolu, Leyla Ozdemir, Cengizhan Acikel, Sevgi.
T10 OUTCOME ASSESSMENT Why, what and how? Dr. Frederike van Wijck & John Dennis.
Additional Assessments. Clinicians are encouraged to communicate with the interprofessional team about other resources and next steps in terms of additional.
Gifted Learners: Identification 1. Identify students with advanced potential Provide appropriately differentiated curriculum and instruction Collect data.
Principles of Assessment and Outcome Measurement for Physical Therapists ksu. edu. sa Dr. taher _ yahoo. com Mohammed TA, Omar,
Ensuring Deaf people with dementia are supported Professor Alys Young & Emma Ferguson-Coleman University of Manchester.
UNIT Standardization and Technical Properties n Standardization Sample n Reliability Studies Internal Consistency Reliabilities at Decision-Making Points.
Decision-Making Capacity - under the medical model Dr. Michael A. Valente.
Educational Research Chapter 8. Tools of Research Scales and instruments – measure complex characteristics such as intelligence and achievement Scales.
An American Sign Language HIV Video Survey for Deaf Adolescents Marjorie F. Goldstein, PhD Patrice Joyner, MSW Elizabeth Eckhardt, PhD Roberta Berry, MFA.
Identifying cognitive disorder and dementia in users of sign languages - moving away from spoken language tests T Denmark, J Atkinson, B Woll, J Marshall,
The diagnosis of dementia - 2
Development of an Online Suite of Career, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Assessments for Individuals who are Deaf Deb Guthmann Ed.D and Josephine Wilson.
Understanding Populations & Samples
Harjinder Kaur Community psychiatric nurse manager – Asian link
Friday Harbor Laboratory University of Washington August 22-26, 2005
C.Calia 1, L. Destino2, A. Semeraro 2, M. Pennelli 2, M. F. De Caro 2
Instruments being translated and validated into ASL include:
Intelligence Andrea Mejia Spring 2017.
Cognitive screening tests: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Test Validity.
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Brief Visuospatial Memory Test- Revised™ (BVMT-R™) Ralph H
Designed for individuals ages 16 and older.
What is the MoCA? Screening for VCI should be conducted using a validated screening tool, such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test. Additional screening.
Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales - Guiding Principles and Evolution Friday Harbor Psychometrics Workshop 2005.
Decision-Making Capacity - under the medical model
Mini-Mental State Examination - 2nd Edition
Assessment Chapter 3.
Presentation transcript:

Identifying dementia in Deaf Sign Language users T Denmark, J Atkinson, B Woll, J Marshall, A Young, E Ferguson-Coleman, K Rogers, R Geall, J Keady and A Burns DCAL, University College London, 49 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD, UK SORD, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK This work is funded by the Alzheimer’s Society Background Tests used to identify dementia in users of spoken languages are unsuitable for Deaf people who use sign languages. British Sign Language (BSL) is unrelated to spoken English. Linguistic, cultural and educational differences mean that using interpreters or written English formats is unreliable and error prone, particularly as communication itself is part of the assessment. Diagnosis of deaf patients is typically late with adverse consequences for access to medication, rehabilitation and care planning. Establishing the norms of healthy ageing in the Deaf sign language community in respect of cognitive and linguistic functioning is a necessary precursor to the development of assessment tools that might be used to detect unusual changes associated with dementia. Here we present the first BSL cognitive screening test, akin to the widely used cognitive screens in the UK such as the Mini Mental State Examination and Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination (ACE-r, Mioshi, Dawson et al. 2006). We have begun using this test as part of routine clinical practice with Deaf patients at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in England. Test development Developed by Deaf led team of neuropsychologists, BSL consultants and linguistics experts. All natively or highly bilingual in BSL/ English. BSL Video instructions ensure standardised administration Presented by an older Deaf native signer Well understood across UK: sign used in instructions and test have low regional variability and historic change No English language requirement Domains tested include: orientation, memory, attention, executive function, language and visuospatial cognition Format partially adapted from the ACE-r, suitable items adapted from ACE-r and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa). A strict back translation procedure was used to ensure conceptual equivalence. Additional items were developed from scratch to ensure cultural and linguistic relevance. Examples of novel items Sign fluency tasks using handshapes rather than asking for words starting with an English letter. Culturally appropriate memory screen using biographical information about a Deaf man, rather than a written name and address. Retrograde memory questions about historical figures and events which are universally known and relevant to the Deaf community – e.g. death of Princess Diana (Patron of British Deaf Association). Sign language tasks BSL tasks include: picture description, sentence repetition, comprehension and picture naming. Normative data Data was collected from 226 cognitively healthy deaf adults aged years attending a Darby and Joan holiday and social clubs for older deaf people. Inclusion criteria specified no history of neurological disease or injury, mental illness, substance abuse or additional disability. Matrix Reasoning (WASI) was used as a control task for ensuring normal distribution of intellectual ability. Preliminary results Test scores ranged from from a possible total of 110. There were no ceiling or floor effects. Scores significantly correlate with age (r(224)=.43, p<.001) and matrix reasoning (r(226)=.42 p<.001) showing that the BSLCS is sensitive to both cognitive ageing and intellectual ability. The test shows robust psychometric properties with excellent interrater reliability (0.99), good internal consistency (0.81) and high test re-test reliability (0.73) and no detectable practice effects. Good convergent validity was indicated by correlations with performance on other tests sensitive to dementia such as digit span (r(215)=0.47, p<.001) and a BSL verbal learning and memory test (r(222)=-0.15, p<.05). Future Research Creation of Z scores and cut-offs which can be used to detect greater levels of change associated with neurodegeneration and dementia. Collection of research data from deaf patients with suspected and confirmed dementia to establish diagnostic validity and to develop severity rating scales for cognitive impairment. Conclusions This is the first cognitive screening test of its type, designed for signers by signers, avoiding common cultural pitfalls inherent in translation of English tests. It shows promise as a clinical instrument for the identification of cognitive impairment and we hope that its use will enable earlier diagnosis of dementia in the previously underserved deaf population. We conclude that it is optimal to test for cognitive function in Deaf BSL signers without using assessments that are based heavily on spoken language. Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR (2006), The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21(11): Vinson DP, Cormier K, Denmark T, Schembri A, Vigliocco G, (2008), BSL Norms for Age of Acquisition, Familiarity and Iconicity, Behavior Research Methods, 40(4),