Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February. 2006 Comparison of the EDI and FGM Measurements of the Magnetic Field Magnitude Plot shown.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-ray spectra from magnetar candidates – Monte Carlo simulations Nicola Parkins, Silvia Zane, Roberto Turolla and Daniele Viganò University of Liverpool,
Advertisements

My Penguin Math Book By:. I see How many penguins do you see? Count them & type the number in the box penguins.
STAFF-SC / FGM Comparison I. Spectrograms comparison II. Average spectra comparison III. Wave Forms comparison IV. Noise Level Conclusions Cross_Calibration.
Column rejection in the MOS  The core of soft sources is removed by the standard emchain.  Due to very large fluctuations in count rate from one column.
Ondřej Rozinek Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Biomedical Engineering 3D Hand Movement Analysis in Parkinson’s Disease
IB Internal Assessment
IB Internal Assessment (Lab) Scoring. DCP- Aspect 1 Recording raw data Complete/2 Records appropriate quantitative and associated qualitative raw data,
CLUSTER Electric Field Measurements in the Magnetotail O. Marghitu (1, 3), M. Hamrin (2), B.Klecker (3), M. André (4), L. Kistler (5), H. Vaith (3), H.
FGM report 9 th Cross calibration workshop Elizabeth Lucek, Patrick Brown, Paul French, Chris Carr, Tim Oddy, André Balogh I mperial College London March.
11 14th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting, York, 5-7 Oct 2011 STAFF CAA products & Cross-Calibration activities Patrick ROBERT & STAFF Team 5) STAFF-SC CWF.
1 10th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting, Paris, 2-4 November 2009 STAFF/SC cross-calibration activities Patrick ROBERT, C. Burlaud & STAFF Team 2) The Calibrated.
Graph Some basic instructions
1 Physics 8.02T For now, please sit anywhere, 9 to a table.
STAFF Report Patrick Robert, Rodrigue Piberne & STAFF team.
1 12th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting, Toulouse, Oct 2010 STAFF/SC Calibration & Cross-Calibration activities Patrick ROBERT & STAFF Team, LPP 2)
A high-resolution Aquarius OI SSS L4 analysis: 3-year, near-global, weekly, 0.5 degree grid Oleg Melnichenko, Peter Hacker, Nikolai Maximenko, and James.
Finding the Component Form a Vector Use the velocity vector and angle measure to find the component form of the vector as shown: V = IvIcos”i” + IvIsin”j”
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
1 14th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting, York, 5-7 Oct 2011 STAFF CAA products & Cross-Calibration activities Patrick ROBERT & STAFF Team 5) STAFF-SC CWF.
Introduction: The on-board measurements available for control are a dual-slit sensor to find the elevation of the sun and a magnetometer to measure the.
Electric field, electric potential, and ‘density’ measurements at quasi-perpendicular collisionless shocks: Cluster/EFW measurements Stuart D. Bale, Ryan.
1 CAA 2009 Peer Review, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March CAA Peer Review: Selected Recommendations.
Status_Penetrating_Radiation Flag Branislav Mihaljčić, A Fazakerley 1.
Cluster Active Archive 1 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Jonathan Kissi-Ameyaw Cluster Active Archive ESTEC.
9 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March /17 CAA Graphics: Pre-generated/On-demand Panels and Cross-Calibration.
16 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop IRAP, Toulouse, 6-9 November20121 Removing strong solar array disturbances and telemetry errors from DC magnetic field.
CAA 8th Cross-Cal meeting Kinsale (Ireland), 28 Oct 2008 Edita Georgescu EDI Status of Calibration and Archiving Activities.
 Line Graphs: are used to show something changing over time.  Bar Graphs: are used to show a comparison between two or more variables.  Pie Chart:
15 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 17th – 19th April 2012, UCL, London PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate.
Light, color, and frequency pg. 71. Objectives Describe a light wave. Understand qualitatively the relationship between color, frequency, and wavelength.
MSSL * I. Rozum, A.N. Fazakerley, A.D. Lahiff, H. Bacai and C. Anekallu PEACE Calibration Status 8 th Cross Calibration Workshop, Kinsale, Ireland, 28.
Cluster Active Archive Science User Working Group (CAASUWG) - update Matt Taylor on behalf of CAASUWG.
Investigation of a discrepancy between magnetic field magnitudes determined by the FGM and EDI instruments Jonny Gloag, Edita Georgescu, Elizabeth Lucek,
DAA Status/Progress B. Mihaljčić, A. Fazakerley, N. Doss, G. Watson UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science Laboratory 18 th.
16 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop IRAP, Toulouse, 6-9 November20121 Data gaps and spikes in FGM data.
CODIF CORSS-CALIBRATIONS C. Mouikis, L. Kistler, K. Genestreti UNH 10th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting L'Observatoire de Paris, Paris, 2-4 November 2009.
FGM report 9 th Cross Calibration Workshop Paul French, Elizabeth Lucek, Chris Carr, Patrick Brown, Tim Oddy, Andre Balogh Imperial College London March.
CODIF Calibration Status Lynn Kistler Space Science Center UNH Mar 25-27, 2009 Cambridge, UK.
Vectors and Scalars.  A scalar is a number which expresses quantity. Scalars  may or may not have units associated with them.  Examples: mass, volume,
WHISPER Cross-caibration activities
Inferring the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Back to the Maunder Minimum
Status Report of EDI on the CAA
PAD SELECTION QUALITY FLAG STATUS
Magnetic Splinter Meeting
Cluster Active Archive – Wideband data BM2 mode
Larmor Orbits The general solution of the harmonic oscillator equation
EDI – CAA STATUS REPORT EDI CAA Status
RAPID/IES Calibration Status Rutherford Appleton Lab
Photon Calibrator Investigations During S6
Status Report of EDI on the CAA
From: Accuracy of Wearable Sensors for Estimating Joint Reactions
10th CAA Operations Review Annual Report of the FGM Experiment
Observations of Electrons Accelerated Upwards
Uniform Acceleration Lab: Car and Ramp
Looping Probabilities in Model Interphase Chromosomes
A velocity selector consists of magnetic and electric fields
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
How to Start This PowerPoint® Tutorial
Go over homework – Practice Sheet 3-2 & 3-3 evens only
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Yong Wang, Paul Penkul, Joshua N. Milstein  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center
Elena A. Allen, Erik B. Erhardt, Vince D. Calhoun  Neuron 
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Sumit K. Chaturvedi, Huaying Zhao, Peter Schuck  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Digital Mapping Welcome to a short presentation on how to create a very basic event route using digital mapping. In this example, we will be using Quo.
Presentation transcript:

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February Comparison of the EDI and FGM Measurements of the Magnetic Field Magnitude Plot shown by Harri Laakso in the Cross-Calibration Kickoff Meeting Big discrepancy between the 2 measurements visible for C2

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February EDI 3-hourly Survey Plots are VERY useful Color convention is to use: - cyan for WW instrument mode and data - dark blue or violet for AG(=AE) instr. mode and data - black for FGM B, via onboard link. Panel 1 +2 from top show 24 h overview. Red box in panel 1 is used to highlight the 3 hours expanded in the 5 panels below. (panel 1) - raw data counts from EDI (panel 2)- instrument mode WW and AG - magnetic field magnitude from FGM, via onboard link (panel 3) - ambient electron counts (labels on right) - electron drift velocity in B_perp plane (labels on left) (panel 4) ( labels on right ) : -0 or 180 to 90 degrees anisotropy normalized -to statistical uncertainty - GSE latitude of the drift velocity (labels on left) (panel 5) - 0 to 180 degrees anisotropy (labels on right) and/or - GSE azymuth of the drift velocity (labels on left) (panel 6) FGM B magnitude (panel 7) FGM B angle to S/C spin axis (aprox Z_GSE)

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February In EGD processed for CAA: ERROR FOUND! Fig 1. Data produced by Hans Vaith on his computerFig 2. Overplot of HAV‘s (red) and CAA-data (green) => S/W error in „wwconv.c“, affecting data between 1-24/02/2001, when the onboard sw changed SOLUTION: Expression: var = (short)( (var & 0x07ff) << 5 ) / 32; working well on other 3 computers had to be replaced by: var &= 0x07ff; var <<= 5; var /= 32; for gcc compiler EGD (for 1-24/02/2001) REPROCESSED (V02) and REPLACED in CAA

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February EGD Statistics for 23/02/2001 „bad“ data C2_CP_EDI_EGD__ _V01/2.cef„good“ data FGM: 1 second averages using FGM-daily calibration were interpolated to the EDI times EDI:time-of-flight in microseconds converted to B in nT using fe = 2π m/e, where the electron mass m was corrected for relativistic effect m = m 0 + T/c 2 T = 0.5 keV

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February EGD Statistics for Cluster-3 „2001“- Orbits

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February EGD Statistics for Cluster-2 „2002“-Orbits

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February Conclusion Cross-calibration activities are very useful ! Thanks to Harri for calling our attention to the error ! (please don‘t forget to put the date on the plot next time)

Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February EDI Basics (2): Measurement Techniques in WW Mode EDI uses 2 techniques in the WW mode to measure the electron drift : 1.Triangulation 2.Time-of-flight Both techniques are attempted for every analysis interval. The two results are compared to one another, and based on estimated error measurements, one will be assigned the “winner” and the other the “loser”. Both drift step results are assigned a quality flag (good/caution/bad) based on some criteria. Through triangulation, one directly determines the ‘drift-step’ vector d, which is the displacement of the electrons after one gyration. The Time-of-Flight measurement provides as a by-product the gyro-time T g that is related to the magnetic field magnitude through universal constants