Profound Implications of the Higgs Boson Christopher T. Hill Fermilab ATLAS Collaboration meeting Argonne Nat’l. Lab July 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Higgs boson What it is: 1) barroom explanation 2) more, with some pictures 3) yet more, with some formulas Plus pictures related to the discovery John.
Advertisements

Kiwoon Choi PQ-invariant multi-singlet NMSSM
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 4 TASI, 2006.
The search for the God Particle
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
J. Hošek, in “Strong Coupling Gauge Theories in LHC Era”, World Scientific 2011 (arXiv: ) P. Beneš, J. Hošek, A. Smetana, arXiv: A.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Tony Liss Saturday Physics for Everyone November 9, 2013 (With debts to Chris Quigg, Leonard Susskind, Hitoshi Murayama)
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
Looking for SUSY Dark Matter with ATLAS The Story of a Lonely Lepton Nadia Davidson Supervisor: Elisabetta Barberio.
4 th Generation Leptons in Minimal Walking Technicolor Theory Matti Heikinheimo University of Jyväskylä.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
The Ideas of Unified Theories of Physics Tareq Ahmed Mokhiemer PHYS441 Student.
The Cosmological Constant and Technical Naturalness Sunny Itzhaki hep-th/ work to appear.
Physics with ATLAS and CMS Are there new symmetries or extra-dimensions? What is dark matter? Where does mass come from? The two big multi-purpose experiments.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
.. Particle Physics at a Crossroads Meenakshi Narain Brown University.
The Higgs boson and its mass. LHC : Higgs particle observation CMS 2011/12 ATLAS 2011/12.
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
What is mSUGRA? Physics in Progress, seminar talk, 11 th Feb 2010 Helmut Eberl.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
A.F.Kord Sabzevar Tarbiat Moallem University (Iran) September 2011.
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
P Spring 2003 L12Richard Kass The properties of the Z 0 For about ten years the Z 0 was studied in great detail at two accelerator complexes: LEP.
Low scale gravity mediation in warped extra dimensions and collider phenomenology on sector hidden sector LCWS 06, March 10, Bangalore Nobuchika.
The Standard Model of Electroweak Physics Christopher T. Hill Head of Theoretical Physics Fermilab.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
ILC Physics a theorist’s perspective Koji TSUMURA (Kyoto from Dec 1 st ) Toku-sui annual workshop 2013 KEK, Dec , 2013.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Low scale supergravity mediation in brane world scenario and hidden sector phenomenology Phys.Rev.D74:055005,2006 ( arXiv: hep-ph/ ) ACFA07 in Beijing:
Twin Higgs Theories Z. Chacko, University of Arizona H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez.
The mass of the Higgs boson and the great desert to the Planck scale.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
1 ILC の物理 岡田安弘 (KEK) ILC 測定器学術創成会議 2006年6月28日 KEK.
Scale invariance and the electroweak symmetry breaking Archil Kobakhidze with R. Foot, K.L. McDonald and R. R. Volkas: Phys. Lett. B655 (2007) Phys.
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
X ± -Gauge Boson Production in Simplest Higgs Matthew Bishara University of Rochester Meeting of Division of Particles and Fields August 11, 2011  Simplest.
The Higgs Boson Observation (probably) Not just another fundamental particle… July 27, 2012Purdue QuarkNet Summer Workshop1 Matthew Jones Purdue University.
Dynamical EWSB and Fourth Generation Michio Hashimoto (KEK) Mt. Tsukuba M.H., Miransky, M.H., Miransky, in preparation.
STANDARD MODEL class of “High Energy Physics Phenomenology” Mikhail Yurov Kyungpook National University November 15 th.
1 Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) “Discoveries of Higgs and Supersymmetry to Pioneer Particle Physics in the 21 st Century”
H. Quarks – “the building blocks of the Universe” The number of quarks increased with discoveries of new particles and have reached 6 For unknown reasons.
1 Higgs Physics Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) November 26, 2004, at KEK.
Compelling Scientific Questions The International Linear Collider will answer key questions about matter, energy, space and time We now sample some of.
Nobuchika Okada The University of Alabama Miami 2015, Fort Lauderdale, Dec , GeV Higgs Boson mass from 5D gauge-Higgs unification In collaboration.
The Search For Supersymmetry Liam Malone and Matthew French.
Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model with Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter Nobuchika Okada Miami Fort Lauderdale, Dec , 2010 University.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
The Importance of the TeV Scale Sally Dawson Lecture 3 FNAL LHC Workshop, 2006.
DIS2003 A.Tilquin Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at LEP What is the Standard Model Why to go beyond and how Supersymmetry Higgs sector.
Some remarks on Higgs physics The Higgs mechanism Triviality and vacuum stability: Higgs bounds The no-Higgs option: strong WW scattering These are just.
Weyl Symmetry, Planck Scale, & Inflation.
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
Physics Overview Yasuhiro Okada (KEK)
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #19 Wrapping up the Higgs Mechanism
Grand Unified Theories and Higgs Physics
The symmetry of interactions
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Physics Overview Yasuhiro Okada (KEK)
Physics Overview Yasuhiro Okada (KEK)
What do we hope to understand?
Quantum gravity predictions for particle physics and cosmology
Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY
Presentation transcript:

Profound Implications of the Higgs Boson Christopher T. Hill Fermilab ATLAS Collaboration meeting Argonne Nat’l. Lab July 15, 2013

A fundamental Higgs Mechanism was supposed to explain the origin of electroweak mass

A fundamental Higgs Mechanism was supposed to explain the origin of electroweak mass We now know that a fundamental Higgs Boson exists and explains the masses of quarks, leptons, W and Z

A fundamental Higgs Mechanism was supposed to explain the origin of electroweak mass But, the Higgs Boson does NOT explain the origin of the electroweak mass-scale We now know that a fundamental Higgs Boson exists and explains the masses of quarks, leptons, W and Z

A fundamental Higgs Mechanism was supposed to explain the origin of electroweak mass The Higgs Boson does NOT explain the origin of the electroweak mass-scale i.e., what is the origin of the Higgs Boson mass itself? We now know that a fundamental Higgs Boson exists and explains the masses of quarks, leptons, W and Z

A fundamental Higgs Mechanism was supposed to explain the origin of electroweak mass The Higgs Boson does NOT explain the origin of the electroweak mass-scale i.e., what is the origin of the Higgs Boson mass itself? This is either very sobering, or it presents theoretical opportunities We now know that a fundamental Higgs Boson exists and explains the masses of quarks, leptons, W and Z

Nature may be telling us something very profound:

Point-like spin-0 bosons are natural afterall ! Nature may be telling us something very profound:

Nature may be telling us something very profound: Point-like spin-0 bosons are natural afterall ! All mass in nature may be a quantum phenomenon !

“All mass is a quantum phenomenon” is almost as jolting as being told that “light comes in quanta!” Max Planck

The world of masslessness features a symmetry:

Scale Invariance

The world of masslessness features a symmetry: Scale Invariance Scale Invariance is (almost) always broken by quantum effects

The world of masslessness features a symmetry: Scale Invariance Scale Invariance is (almost) always broken by quantum effects Feynman Loops  h -

Scale Symmetry in QCD is broken by quantum loops and gives rise to the

Scale Symmetry in QCD is broken by quantum loops and gives rise to the Origin of the Nucleon Mass

Scale Symmetry in QCD is broken by quantum loops and gives rise to the Origin of the Nucleon Mass (aka, the visible mass in the universe)

Gell-Mann and Low:

Khriplovitch (1969); t’ Hooft (1972) Gross, Politzer and Wilczek (1973): Gell-Mann and Low:

Khriplovitch (1969); t’ Hooft (1972) Gross, Politzer and Wilczek (1973): Gell-Mann and Low: “running coupling constant” |

QCD running coupling constant |

Murraypalooza Santa Fe July 2005

A Puzzle: Murray Gell-Mann lecture ca 1975 Noether current of Scale symmetry

A Puzzle: Murray Gell-Mann lecture ca 1975 Noether current of Scale symmetry Current divergence

A Puzzle: Murray Gell-Mann lecture ca 1975 Noether current of Scale symmetry Current divergence Yang-Mills Stress Tensor

A Puzzle: Murray Gell-Mann lecture ca 1975 Noether current of Scale symmetry Current divergence Yang-Mills Stress Tensor Compute:

A Puzzle: Murray Gell-Mann lecture ca 1975 QCD is scale invariant!!!??? Noether current of Scale symmetry Current divergence Yang-Mills Stress Tensor Compute:

Resolution: The Scale Anomaly

See Murraypalooza talk: Conjecture on the physical implications of the scale anomaly. Christopher T. Hill (Fermilab). hep-th/ Christopher T. HillFermilab Resolution: The Scale Anomaly

Origin of Mass in QCD = Quantum Mechanics Resolution: The Scale Anomaly

‘t Hooft Naturalness: Small ratios of physical parameters are controlled by symmetries. In the limit that a ratio goes to zero, there is enhanced symmetry (“custodial symmetry”).

‘t Hooft Naturalness:  0  Small ratios of physical parameters are controlled by symmetries. In the limit that a ratio goes to zero, there is enhanced symmetry (“custodial symmetry”).

‘t Hooft Naturalness: Small ratios of physical parameters are controlled by symmetries. In the limit that a ratio goes to zero, there is enhanced symmetry (“custodial symmetry”). 0 h - 0  0 

‘t Hooft Naturalness: Small ratios of physical parameters are controlled by symmetries. In the limit that a ratio goes to zero, there is enhanced symmetry (custodial symmetry). Classical Scale Invariance is the “Custodial Symmetry” of  QCD 0 h - 0  0 

Many theories were proposed to imitate QCD for the electroweak scale.

Many theories were proposed to imitate QCD for the electroweak scale. All of these featured “strong dynamics” and classical scale invariance as the custodial symmetry of v Weak << M Gut, Planck

Many theories were proposed to imitate QCD for the electroweak scale. (1)Technicolor (2)Supersymmetric Technicolor (3)Extended Technicolor (4)Multiscale Technicolor (5)Walking Extended Technicolor (6)Topcolor Assisted Technicolor (7)Top Seesaw (8)Supersymmetric Walking Extended Technicolor (9)Strong dynamics from extra-dimensions (10)…. All of these featured “strong dynamics” and classical scale invariance as the custodial symmetry of v Weak << M Gut, Planck

Many theories were proposed to imitate QCD for the electroweak scale. (1)Technicolor (2)Supersymmetric Technicolor (3)Extended Technicolor (4)Multiscale Technicolor (5)Walking Extended Technicolor (6)Topcolor Assisted Technicolor (7)Top Seesaw (8)Supersymmetric Walking Extended Technicolor (9)Strong dynamics from extra-dimensions (10)…. All of these featured “strong dynamics” and classical scale invariance as the custodial symmetry of v Weak << M Gut, Planck

Many theories were proposed to imitate QCD for the electroweak scale. (1)Technicolor (2)Supersymmetric Technicolor (3)Extended Technicolor (4)Multiscale Technicolor (5)Walking Extended Technicolor (6)Topcolor Assisted Technicolor (7)Top Seesaw (8)Supersymmetric Walking Extended Technicolor (9)Strong dynamics from extra-dimensions (10)…. All of these featured “strong dynamics” and classical scale invariance as the custodial symmetry of v Weak << M Gut, Planck Mass extinction of theories on July 4 th 2012

Susy is different

Supersymmetry is the custodial symmetry of v Weak  M Gut, Planck in SUSY models

Susy is different Supersymmetry is the custodial symmetry of v Weak  M Gut, Planck in SUSY models This generally requires that SUSY partners should be close together in mass with ordinary particles

Susy is still alive?

In my opinion the MSSM is dead

Susy is still alive? But, SUSY may be relevant at higher energy scales In my opinion the MSSM is dead

     F   e m e 22 _ d e = 22 (m e / MeV ) (  / GeV ) 2 = 0.2 x (e-cm) x _______ Current limit: d e < e-cm  > 1.4 x 10 5 GeV EDM’s are a powerful constraint:

    F   e m e  _ M selectron > 10 TeV ( sin  ) 1/2 e e selectron wino   =  sin  sin 2  1/M selectron   Future limit: d e < e-cm e-cm ? This is why I love Project-X ! EDM’s are a powerful constraint:

It is possible that we need only the strongest coupled SUSY partners to the Higgs Boson to be nearby in mass

It is possible that we need only the strongest coupled SUSY partners to the Higgs Boson to be nearby in mass The More minimal supersymmetric standard model A, G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan, A.E. Nelson Phys.Lett. B388 (1996) “Natural SUSY” : A Light Stop

But what has then become of scale symmetry, which is already established as custodial symmetry of QCD?

Bardeen: Classical Scale Invariance could be the custodial symmetry of a fundamental, perturbatively light Higgs Boson. On naturalness in the standard model. William A. Bardeen FERMILAB-CONF T, Aug pp.

Bardeen: The only manifestations of Classical Scale Invariance breaking by quantum loops are d = 4 scale anomalies On naturalness in the standard model. William A. Bardeen FERMILAB-CONF T, Aug pp.

Bardeen: Classical Scale Invariance implies there are no additive quadratic (or quartic) divergences. A small Higgs mass (and  c  is technically natural ! On naturalness in the standard model. William A. Bardeen FERMILAB-CONF T, Aug pp. Classical scale invariance can play a similar role as SUSY

Bardeen: Perturbatively light Higgs Boson mass could come from quantum mechanics. Aspects of the Dynamical Breaking Of Scale Symmetries William A. Bardeen Myron Bander Symposium, June 8, 2013

Higgs Potential  M      2 _

Scale Invariant Higgs Potential   2 _

|H||H| 2 _   v Start with a Classically Scale Invariant Higgs Potential How can mass come perturbatively from Quantum Mechanics? Scale Invariance -> Quartic Higgs Potential -> No VEV v

2 __ Quantum loops generate a logarithmic “running” of the quartic coupling constant (v)  R log (v) ~ running coupling constant v

2 __ Quantum loops can generate a logarithmic “running” of the quartic coupling constant (v)  v  R log (v) this is the relevant behavior  passing from  0 to  0 requires R  0 ~ running coupling constant ~

Result: “Coleman-Weinberg Potential” 2 __ (v)  v v4v4 Potential Minimum arises from running of  i.e. Quantum Mechanics ~

Result: “Coleman-Weinberg Potential 2 __ (v) Higgs Mass is determined by curvature at minimum  R Require R  0 for a minimum, positive curvature v4v4 ~  v min

How do we compute R ?

Renormalization Group Equation of Gell-Mann and Low applied to in Standard Model  top H g = top Yukawa cc How do we compute R ?

R is negative in standard model No solution ! approximate physical values : Top Yukawa cc : Higgs quartic cc : We require positive R to have a minimum, stable (m h 2  0) potential

R is negative in standard model No solution ! Requires New Bosonic physics beyond the standard model approximate values : Top Yukawa cc : Higgs quartic cc :

One compelling and simple theory : H2H2 H H H H Positive R can come from a second Higgs Doublet This modifies the RG equation:

( ) Compute Higgs potential and calibrate R from Higgs Mass … 

( ) Compute Higgs potential and calibrate R from Higgs Mass  … Both R and  v  are determined

The two doublet model implies: Top Yukawa cc: Can now solve for  :   

… M 2 is determined heavy Dormant Higgs doublet

No VeV: “Dormant” Higgs Doublet The New Doublet has a positive M 2 Production, mass, and decay details are model dependent

Assume Dormant Higgs couples to SU(2) x U(1) but not to fermions Parity H 2  H 2 implies stabity: H 2   H (e   if M   M 0 Then H 2 0  is stable dark matter WIMP

Assume Dormant Higgs couples to SU(2) x U(1) Can break the parity with new interactions: H 2   h, 2h + h * Then H 2 0  is no longer stable WIMP Becomes visible !

The Dormant Doublet is pair produced above threshold near 2M H  800 GeV pp  X  Z *, W * )  X  H H *  X  6h (if allowed) Hard to see since weakly produed; If dark matter, most of final state is missing ET; Variations on the model can lead to different final states. Bardeen, Hill, Eichten, work in progress

Some Relevant References: S. Iso arXiv: [hep-ph] and refs therein. Higgs properties in the Stealth Doublet Model G. Wouda. Jun 28, 2013, arXiv: [hep-ph] | Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scale T. Hambye, A. Strumia. Jun 10, pp. arXiv: [hep-ph] | W. Bardeen, C. T. Hill, E. Eichten (work in progress)

What if all mass comes from Quantum Physics?

(a heretic) What if all mass comes from Quantum Physics?

It’s a very heretical conjecture :

We live in D=4! Cosmological constant is zero in classical limit QCD scale is generated in this way; Hierarchy is naturally generated Testable in the Weak Interactions! “Predictions” of the Conjecture:

We live in D=4! Cosmological constant is zero in classical limit QCD scale is generated in this way; Hierarchy is naturally generated Testable in the Weak Interactions! String Theory RULED OUT (classical string scale) “Predictions” of the Conjecture:

Conjecture on the physical implications of the scale anomaly. Christopher T. Hill (Fermilab). hep-th/ Christopher T. HillFermilab We live in D=4! Cosmological constant is zero in classical limit QCD scale is generated in this way; Hierarchy is naturally generated Testable in the Weak Interactions! Weyl Gravity in D=4 is QCD-like: String Theory RULED OUT (classical string scale) “Predictions” of the Conjecture: Weyl Gravity: Weyl Gravity is Renormalizeable! The Planck Mass Comes From Quantum Mechanics! See: (and refs.therein) Predicts D=4!

Coming to a bookstore near you In Fall 2013