Overview of the EU regulatory system and governance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6th European Patients’ Rights Day The EMA Geriatric Medicines Strategy and the empowered aging patient Francesca Cerreta EMA (European Medicines Agency)
Advertisements

Background information
Registration in Europe Current situation and future outlook Thomas K ü rner, M.D. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
Karin Nienstedt - DG SANTE / E3
Disclaimer The presentation is intended for educational purposes only and does not replace independent professional judgement. Statements of fact and opinions.
The Paediatric Regulation
EFSA’s Mission and Priorities Bernhard Berger Head of the Advisory Forum and Scientific Cooperation Unit Conference “Importance of food additives today.
CMD(h) Report Progress report Truus Janse-de Hoog HMA meeting Budapest April 2011.
Slide 1 November 2008 Name Sarah Morgan © Crown copyright 2005 Pharmacovigilance Working Party - Role and future perspective Sarah Morgan Medicines and.
SPF SANTE PUBLIQUE, SECURITE DE LA CHAINE ALIMENTAIRE ET ENVIRONNEMENT 1 NOVEMBER 2005 approaching The mutual recognition procedures as from1 November.
The Zonal Experience of the CP Industry
An agency of the European Union Budapest, 13 May 2011 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author only. They do not necessarily reflect.
EU System for Marketing Authorisation
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
Organisation of sampling programmes EU experience Jean-Marc Spieser / Marta Miquel Interregional Seminar for Quality Control Laboratories involved in WHO.
The European Railway Agency in development
Research & Innovation International Rare Disease Consortium: Data Sharing Policy 3 rd International Traumatic Brain Injury Research Meeting Catherine BERENS.
An introduction to the EU and its legislation. Member States currently 15 –Austria- Ireland –Belgium- Luxembourg –Denmark- Netherlands –Finland- Portugal.
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
1 The European Paediatric Initiative Agnès Saint Raymond, MD Scientific Advice and Orphan Drugs The European Medicines Evaluation Agency.
The Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products Regulation from the European Medicines Agency (EMEA)'s perspective Nathalie Rampal Olmedo EMEA – Directorate –
1 International API Inspection Pilot Program Olivier Gross Scientific Administrator EMEA DIA International Conference Quality of Active Pharmaceutical.
EMACOLEX, May 2011 Recent activities of the HMA/EMA Transparency Group Tina Engraff Legal Adviser, Danish Medicines Agency.
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority essential.
Benefits of a strong collaboration with patient groups at national and EU level Susanna Palkonen, Director European Federation.
Overview of ICH Procedures July 2015
An agency of the European Union Presented by: David Mackay Head of Unit, Veterinary Medicines & Product Data Management Unit Incident Management Plan Veterinary.
European Enforcement of Pharmacovigilance and Inspection Trends Is compliance possible within the EU? June 7, 2007 Dr. M.C. Koster CEO Vigilex Group.
1/7 Are Patients Today Sufficiently Informed? Right and Ethics 10 October 2007.
An agency of the European Union Presented by: Emer Cooke and Truus Janse-de Hoog Update on Transparency Progress report from HMA/EMA TF on Transparency.
Paediatric Worksharing CMDh participation Work-sharing in Art 45 and 46 procedures Experiences in Art 29 procedures Presidency meeting 29 September 2011.
JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.
The New Approach and GPSD. Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonization and standards [OJ C136 of June 1985] New Approach.
New Regulation on Plant Reproductive Material: main elements of the upcoming Commission proposal Yannis Karamitsios European Commission, DG SANCO.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
Slide 1 Recognition of Professional Qualifications in the European Single Market for Services Henri Olivier FEE Secretary General FEE (Fédération des Experts.
Ketek, FDA Hearing, Dec ÖM Ketek (telithromycin) Decisions and procedures in the European Union Örjan Mortimer, MD, Senior Expert, Delegate EMEA/CHMP-PhVWP.
Österreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit GmbHwww.ages.at ASMF-AR – database ad-hoc group on ASMF assessment Christa Wirthumer-Hoche.
The New Legislative Framework
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Marketing authorisation.
Transatlantic Administrative Simplification Workshop European Preparatory Roundtable Suzette Kox EGA Senior Director Scientific Affairs.
An agency of the European Union Agnes Saint Raymond, Human Medicines Special Areas Human Medicines Development and Evaluation Unit How effective is the.
CONFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE -MiFID- Split, June 2007 OPENING SPEECH Ante Samodol President of the Board.
Information outcomes from regulatory processes Regine Lehnert Training workshop: Regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
PharmacoVigilance: Development of PhV systems and processes.
VICH General Principles and current update of VICH Outreach Forum activity 1.
TAIEX Workshop on the Implementation of EU Pharmacovigilance Legislation - BELGRADE CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser.
China EU Pharmaceutical Forum
PharmacoVigilance: Development of PhV systems and processes VICH Workshop, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, 24 June 2015.
European Commission The New Legislative Framework Jacques McMillan Head of Unit Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry Regulatory approach for.
Compassionate use programs and the European regulatory system Filip Josephson M.D., Ph.D. Clinical Assessor.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
I farmaci innovativi in una prospettiva europea Giuseppe M.C. Rosano, MD, PhD Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University.
Slide 1 The contribution of a world-class regulatory environment to the future of the industry in Ireland Pat O’Mahony Chief Executive, Irish Medicines.
1 The EU’s efforts to provide high quality and safe Organ transplantation Anna Pavlou European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate General Public.
ICORD 2006 Kerstin Westermark Md, PhD, Assoc. prof. COMP Chairperson.
Main topics Who are we at EMA and what is our regulatory experience in Parkinson’s disease (PD) Initiatives available at EMA to stimulate and support.
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
TRANSPORT SCIENCE: INNOVATIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR)
Wilbert Bannenberg SARPAM
Sophie Skorupka M2 AREIPS 15 novembre 2016
Multinational collaboration in the Authorisation of VMPs: the EU approach VICH Outreach Forum Tokyo, Nov 2017 Noel Joseph European Commission.
African Regional Meeting on 4-5 July 2017 in Entebbe, Uganda
Helen Lee, European Commission
Maintaining joint packaging and labelling into the future
EU SUBMISSION BY Haripriya & Revathy.
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
EU Standardisation Policy
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the EU regulatory system and governance PANDRH Conference – 5 September 2013 Ottawa Presented by: Alexios Skarlatos European Medicines Agency – Head of Product Information Quality

CONTENTS Approval of medicines in the EU EU assessment collaboration: Organisational aspects EU assessment collaboration: Enablers and facilitators 2

1. Approval of medicines in EU

Marketing Authorisation (MA) A medicinal product may only be placed on the market in the EU, when a marketing authorisation has been issued by the competent authority of an EU Member State or by the European Commission (via EMA) Structure of MA Application 4

EU cooperation in MA assessment: evolution 1970s-80s: First EU initiatives to encourage communication, cooperation and recognition of assessments between Member States ‘Multi-State’ and ‘Concertation Procedures’ Final national Member State decision 1990s: Creation of the European Medicines Agency (1995) Introduction of the ‘Centralised Procedure’ (1995) and the ‘Mutual Recognition Procedure (1993; mandatory from 1998) 2000s: Revision of Pharma legislation (required after 6y experience) Adapt and prepare for enlargement of EU Introduction of the ‘Decentralised Procedure’ 5 5

Drivers of Harmonisation The global pharmaceutical market -> effective operation of the internal market Pharmaceutical industry -> facilitate the free movement of medicines Scientific culture Patient involvement Need for worksharing -> avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts Fear of the unknown - insecurity

Obstacles to harmonisation Giving up sovereignty Need for compromising Heterogeneous cultures Language issue Uneven levels of capacity/experience Uneven share of the workload

Current Marketing Authorisation procedures in EU Approval in 1 MS => National Authorisation procedure Approval in n or all MSs => EU Authorisation procedure 3 EU procedures: Centralised Procedure (CP)  1 single EU MA Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Decentralised Procedure (DCP)  n national MAs Route? Choice? Depending on type of product and authorisation history in EU + Regulatory & marketing strategy Company preferences etc …

Eligibility to the Centralised Procedure “Mandatory Scope” Biotech products - New Active Substances for Cancer, Diabetes, AIDS, Neurodegenerative, viral and auto-immune diseases - Orphan medicinal products - Cell & gene therapy + tissue engineered products “Optional Scope” - Other new active substances - Innovative uses of ‘old’ substances - Interest of patients at EU level - Generics of centrally-authorised products

2. EU assessment collaboration: Organisational aspects 10

National Competent Authorities (NCAs) EMA and the European Regulatory Network EMEA Secretariat Working Parties Committees National Competent Authorities (NCAs)

Resources in the Centralised Procedure National Competent Authorities (NCAs) in 28 EU Member States. EMA not intended to replace NCAs, but to be a trusted partner in the EU Regulatory Network > 3500 scientific experts nominated by Member States Available for scientific work & assessments for EMA Scientific committee (CHMP) delivers a final opinion Multidisciplinary assessment teams in MS to perform assessment (as Rapporteur/Co-Rapporteur) or participate as ‘peer reviewer’ Services are provided to EMA on the basis of a cooperation agreement All agencies linked by secure IT network (EudraNet) Fees received by EMA  payment of (Co-)Rapporteur

CHMP: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use Chair and Vice Chair + 1 member + 1 alternate/MS max. 5 co-opted members accompanied by experts                                                                                                                                   Ian Hudson Vice-Chair CHMP Tomas Salmonson Chair CHMP + 5 co-opted members 13

Support for MRP & DCP: Coordination group Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures – human (CMDh) Initially, voluntary ‘Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group’ Recognised and legal mandate in EU legislation revision Representatives of all Member States Agree on common rules procedural / regulatory matters Guidance to applicants Discuss and solve scientific issues during MRP/DCP EMA: secretariat, organisation of monthly meetings at EMA

3. EU assessment collaboration: enablers & facilitators 15

Harmonised legal requirements (high level) for Marketing Authorisation Application Harmonisation of technical standards and requirements ICH guidelines, incl. eCTD CHMP scientific guidelines - applicable to CP, MRP, DCP Provision of regulatory guidance Agreement on common approaches & procedures Commission guidelines CHMP and EMA guidance documents, Q&As, SOPs  Advice to applicants  Consistent approach/interpretation between Member States 16

Common templates for assessment reports Working together in expert Working Parties or ad-hoc groups e.g. Quality Working Party GCP inspectors working group Training of assessors Common templates for assessment reports ‘Twinning’ projects, e.g. for new EU Member States Years of confidence building, working together, worksharing Oversight and management by ‘Heads of Medicines Agencies’ (HMA) Group Secure communication tools and databases 17

Member State cooperation in MRP and DCP «Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures» CMDh, since Nov 2005 Replaces the informal MRFG group Coordination and facilitation of the operation of MRP and DCP Discussions on procedural/regulatory issues, guidance docs + scientific discussions on applications where MSs disagree Ensure consistency of standards and good decision-making Avoid referrals to EMA 18

Disagreements in MRP and DCP: only on the basis of ‘potential serious risk to public health’  Commission Guideline: definition and examples  CMDh: ensure common understanding and application Harmonisation of national SmPCs of originators, in order to facilitate approval of generics accross EU Commission guidelines on MRP and DCP procedures + CMDh publication of ‘Best Practice Guides’ Procedural guidance documents Q&A Worksharing and working group initiatives, coordinated by CMDh e.g. on PSURs and Active Substance Master Files 19 19

Head of Product Information Quality + 44 207 418 8682 Thank you Alexios M. Skarlatos Head of Product Information Quality + 44 207 418 8682 alexios.skarlatos@ema.europa.eu 20