Developing monitoring and evaluation indicators Day 10 Session 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Participatory Research Aden Aw-Hassan Aleppo, April 28, 2005.
Advertisements

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Business Planning & Strategy. What is going on? What are we good at? What is happening around us? How will we get there? Build networks Fundraise from.
Service User Discussion
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
The Most Significant Change Technique (MSC) Dr Jessica Dart Clear Horizon.
Plan © Plan Using the Most Significant Change ( MSC) technique for actual program improvement (New way towards a downward accountability and collective.
Theory of Change, Impact Monitoring, and Most Significant Change EWB-UK Away Weekend – March 23, 2013.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
The Purpose of Action Research
Building & Leading Teams for Impact December 20, 2011.
IPDET Lunch Presentation Series Equity-focused evaluation: Opportunities and challenges Michael Bamberger June 27,
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
In the Name of Allah, the Most In the Name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful Compassionate, the Most Merciful.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Rich Picture Visit://portals.wi.wur.nl/msp//portals.wi.wur.nl/msp.
Creating Effective Facilitation Plans for Capacity Building CHA/CHIP Support Laurie Call 1.
1 A Two-Days Workshop on “COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION”
Questions from a patient or carer perspective
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
May 8, 2012 MWP-K Learning Event Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) framework for the Millennium Water Program, Kenya.
Stakeholder Analysis.
Qualitative Methods to Assess Community Issues. What are qualitative methods of assessment? Qualitative methods of assessment are those whose results.
Tools for Understanding Relationships in Resilience Interventions.
Mobilizing Assets for Community Driven Development Coady International Institute 2012 Coady International Institute 2011.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
Nick Renshaw Participation and Development II. ODA Participation Training II The participation of project beneficiaries is a key dimension to modern development.
Reflection and Learning Workshop April 2015 Imperial Botanical Garden Hotel, Entebbe.
9. EAFM START UP B Essential EAFM Date Place 9. EAFM Startup B: Engage Stakeholders Version 1.
Monitoring and Evaluation
We are all learners: changing a school culture Tanya Thompson and Keith Jackson St Andrews Middle School.
CSI PLA Workshop Feb PARTICIPATORY LEARNING AND ACTION Linda Biersteker ELRU Vivienne Bozalek Department of Social Work UWC.
Climate Generation Day 3 Practical Stakeholder and community engagement.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT DESIGN. Needs assessment WHY – Identifying specific needs – Understanding present situations – Knowing about the community/organization.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Qualitative Research Methods. What is qualitative research? Research that focuses on how individuals and groups view.
VASP Research. The Final Product A research report on the VASP to the Australian government Department of Education, Employment and Workforce Training.
Brief Introduction Dr R Vincent: 1 Most Significant Change: using stories to assess impact.
Introduction to process documentation for learning alliances and action research Based on background paper SWITCH Briefing No 6 Ton Schouten.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
SEL1 Implementing an assessment – the Process Session IV Lusaka, January M. Gonzales de Asis and F. Recanatini, WBI
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation. What do we mean by choosing questions? Evaluation questions are the questions your evaluation is meant.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
The PYP Exhibition Pilot Year Purpose The Exhibition has a number of key purposes: students can engage in an in-depth, collaborative inquiry. students.
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
Introduction to Participatory Monitoring & Evaluation (PM&E): A Practical Approach to Engaging Stakeholders and Communities in Monitoring & Evaluation.
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
Participatory Tools Used in Food Security Assessments Session 2.4 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Module 3 Engagement techniques 3b Running a SP Workshop.
Organisational perspectives from a higher education institute and challenges of assessing UN activities at the community level Dzulkifli.
Building the foundations for innovation
“Add Scientific thinking to sixth sense …. ………………… the commonsense”
Partnership Delivery Team
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
GROUP 2 - STRATEGY GOAL/IMPACT AND OUTCOME; OUTPUT OBJECTIVE 4
Complexity Matters: Aligning the Evaluation of Social and Behavior Change with the Realities of Implementation International Social and Behavior Change.
Evaluating with Students Workshop
Ghazala Mansuri and Vijayendra Rao, DECRG
Results of the Organizational Performance
What it does OS Step Leads to Focus PRE-PLANNING VISION SCOPE TARGETS
Benefits and Barriers: ICTs in M&E
Participatory Rural Appraisal.
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Presentation transcript:

Developing monitoring and evaluation indicators Day 10 Session 3

By the end of this session the CPs will: Analyze an approach of M & E and identify its usefulness and challenges

Moving to systems and processes which encourage what Chambers calls `Reversals’ Not external monitoring & evaluation but internal monitoring. `Their’ perception, ideas, views. A range of tools/processes encourage participatory analysis. Participatory monitoring & evaluation

“..Participation is essential for the development and fulfilment of the human personality..’ – Aristotle. “.. If you are trying to transform a brutalised society into one where people can live in dignity and hope, you begin with the empowering of the most powerless. You build from the bottom up..” - Adrienne Rich

It CAN ‘flick’ the system over. Take for example an evaluation process..

Participation from the beginning..

Each participatory process different. Different stakeholders involved. Different processes/tools used. Important elements are that people themselves central to their own analysis of their problems. They are involved in seeking solutions to their concerns and to monitoring and assessing the results of interventions.

Many participatory techniques used… Timelines: often used to frame a discussion about what happened when, why. Can provoke a discussion on what different stakeholders perceive as significant. Maps: often used to show location and types of changes in the area Venn diagrams: show changing relationships and power relations between groups, institutions and individuals

Many participatory techniques used…Cont.. Flow diagrams: often used to show direct and indirect impacts Photographs: to depict changes through a sequence of images Matrix scoring or ranking: to compare different groups preferences for a set of options or outcomes Oral histories and oral testimonies: to track changes over time

Many participatory techniques used…Cont.. Network diagrams: to how changes in the type and degree of contact between people and services. Participatory video or photography: used to capture on film how people see and interpret what has happened in their lives and their communities. Direct observation: Theatre or role-play: often used as a tool to facilitate different groups to tell their own stories in their own ways.

Participatory monitoring and evaluation – main benefits 1)Done well, it can really enable an empowering process. People themselves can take control of own development. 2)Facilitated well. It can open a dialogue on power and create space for honest discussion about what is happening in people’s lives. 3)Opens up the space for honest dialogue on differing perspectives of project/programme intervention – there is no one view. 4)Can lead to accountability – not just to donors – but to people in whose name you raise money. It is their lives, their ideas and their work.

Main criticisms/issues with Participatory approaches. 1)Can demand time from people who don’t have time. 2)Processes can produce challenging and unpredictable outcomes for donors. 3)Some processes get caught up in producing pictures/diagrams & forget the overall analysis.

Main criticisms/issues with Participatory approaches Cont.. 1)The processes can lead to the airing of conflicting opinions/ideas. 2)Processes are often constrained by the clash with organisational structures and cultures and unequal power relationships. 3)Much depends on the facilitation – participatory processes can be done badly and processes can be extractive.

Activity DISCUSS.. a)In what way would this approach (if used by your school) strengthen the values you aspire to in your practice? b)In what ways would this approach (if used by your school) threaten or undermine these values?

Main issues/concerns The process of feeding the information upwards, leads to over-emphasis on `out-lyres’ (the best of the good and the worst of the bad) rather on the general, average changes caused by an intervention. The process of `selecting’ stories is sometimes seen as culturally inappropriate.

Main issues/concerns Most significant change stories are a compliment to other monitoring processes, but people often overemphasise MSC and forget to carry out regular monitoring processes. Generally the processes are once again about feeding information `up’ a chain, rather than the information being owned and used by the `end users’ or `beneficiaries’ of the development process.

Final word.. The important thing about M&E is that it is used to open up honest reflection processes from which ALL stakeholders learn That development practice improves as a result of it… That you align your school M &E with the values of your school. You can’t graft on processes.

By the end of this session the CPs will: Analyze an approach of M & E and identify its usefulness and challenges