Camera Pod Mounted on Cessna 172. Using Landsat TM Imagery to Predict Wheat Yield and to Define Management Zones.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You are the owner of a acre farm, and you are growing many different crops in your farm…
Advertisements

History of Predicting Yield Potential TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Toward Near Real Time Forest Fire Monitoring in Thailand Honda Kiyoshi and Veerachai Tanpipat Space Technology Applications and Research, School of Advanced.
Results Effect of Simulated Grazing Intensity on Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Growth and Grain Yield Dillon Butchee and Jeff Edwards Department of Plant and.
A Framework for Integrating Remote Sensing, Soil Sampling, and Models for Monitoring Soil Carbon Sequestration J. W. Jones, S. Traore, J. Koo, M. Bostick,
Precision agriculture in cotton: Definition of the optimal imaging resolution required for purple nutsedge detection Tal Miller, Liraz Cohen, Eldar Peleg,
Application Of Remote Sensing & GIS for Effective Agricultural Management By Dr Jibanananda Roy Consultant, SkyMap Global.
Remote Sensing of Aphid-Induced Stress in Wheat BAE/SOIL Precision Agriculture Oklahoma State University Victor W. Slowik April 20, 2001.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture. Remote Sensing The science and art of obtaining information about an object, area, or phenomenon through the.
Evaluated Surface Drainage Problems with Data Charles Ellis Kent Shannon Ag Engineering Extension Specialists.
Use of Multispectral Imagery for Variable Rate “Application-zone” Identification in Cotton Production Tim Sharp Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10,
Relationships Between NDVI and Plant Physical Measurements Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10, 2003 Tim Sharp.
DROUGHT MONITORING THROUGH THE USE OF MODIS SATELLITE Amy Anderson, Curt Johnson, Dave Prevedel, & Russ Reading.
GreenSeekerTM Variable Rate Applicator Equipment and Applications
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
Site-Specific Management Factors influencing plant growth Water Light Temperature Soil Compaction Drainage.
Using Yield Data to Make Decisions. Reasons for Collecting Yield Data Document yields Conduct field experiments Bottom-line Considerations Variable Rate.
A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management.
Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture. Remote Sensing The science and art of obtaining information about an object, area, or phenomenon through the.
Operational Agriculture Monitoring System Using Remote Sensing Pei Zhiyuan Center for Remote Sensing Applacation, Ministry of Agriculture, China.
The role of remote sensing in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.
INDICES FOR INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY Course: Introduction to RS & DIP Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact:
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Development of a Small Remotely Piloted Vehicle for the Collection of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index Readings Dr. Randy R. Price, Goutam Nistala.
Precision Ag and Conservation Precision Ag Technologies are most often developed to increase efficiency and decrease input cost However, they provide great.
Some Examples of Research Results and Activities Related to Forest Fires in Indonesia Agus Hidayat (National Institute of Aeronautics and Space Republic.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution Data Normalization and Temporal Variability.
Variable Rate Seeding Technologies
Satellite Imagery for Agronomic Management Decisions.
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Precision Agriculture an Overview. Precision Agriculture? Human need Environment –Hypoxia –$750,000,000 (excess N flowing down the Mississippi river/yr)
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution Resolution for Sensing/Soil Sampling And Yield Measurements.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
GIS: The Systematic Approach to Precise Farm Management Robert Biffle Precision Agriculture April,
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Point on crop area estimation in G2 H. Kerdiles, O. Leo, J. Gallego,
Mapping Variations in Crop Growth Using Satellite Data
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Assessment of Current Field Plots and LiDAR ‘Virtual’ Plots as Guides to Classification Procedures for Multitemporal Analysis of Historic and Current Landsat.
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Mapping wheat growth in dryland fields in SE Wyoming using Landsat images Matthew Thoman.
Using Sensors and Lime Reference Strips to Manage Soil Acidity
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Precision Agriculture
Sensing Resolution in Corn
IKONIS Satellite Imagery of an Oklahoma Wheat Field – 4 m Resolution
Stewart Reed Oklahoma State University
Precision Agriculture an Overview
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
History of Predicting Yield Potential
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
By Blake Balzan1, with Ramesh Sivanpillai PhD2
Intro to Precision Agriculture
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Methods of Determining Canopy Closure in Winter Wheat
Remote Sensing Section 3.
Coffee Shop Talk Heath Sanders Area Agronomy Specialist
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Presentation transcript:

Camera Pod Mounted on Cessna 172

Using Landsat TM Imagery to Predict Wheat Yield and to Define Management Zones

Landsat TM Imagery How can we use Landsat TM imagery to predict wheat yield? How accurately can imagery collected in near flowering (April 1 to May 15) predict wheat yields? Can satellite wheat yield estimates be used to prescribe management zones?

Winter Wheat, Pond Creek in North Central Oklahoma April 23, 1998 Variability???

April 23,1998 TM Scene over North Central Oklahoma

Image Processing and NDVI Computation Clear-sky Thematic Mapper (TM) scenes of north- central Oklahoma, spanning the period 1991 to 1999, were obtained from Space Imaging with radiometric and geometric corrections. The TM scenes were chosen so that the satellite overpasses occurred at or near the heading stage of winter wheat in the area (mid April to early May).

Dates and TM scenes used in the study: April 4, 1991 May 9, 1992 April 25, 1993 March 27, 1994 April 2, 1996 April 20, 1997 April 23, 1998 May 12, 1999

OSU Wheat Pasture Research Unit Overlaid on top of April 23,1998 False Color TM Image (Green, Red, and NIR bands). Grain wheat Grazed out wheat N

OSU Wheat Pasture Research Unit with NDVI from April 23,1998 TM Image7

Calibration curve of wheat grain yield as a function of Landsat TM NDVI. Oklahoma State University Wheat Pasture Research Unit, Marshall, OK Calibration curve of wheat grain yield as a function of Landsat TM NDVI. Oklahoma State University Wheat Pasture Research Unit, Marshall, OK NDVI Wheat Yield (bu/ac) TM 93 (April 25) TM 97 (April 20) TM 98 (April 23) TM 99 (May 12) Predicted Yield 95% Pred. Lim.

Cherokee Pond Creek OSU WPRU Marshall Relative Locations of Test Farms and OSU Wheat Pasture Research Unit

Field-average wheat grain yield, as predicted from NDVI and measured by farmer cooperators Measured Yield (bu/ac) Predicted Yield (bu/ac) Cherokee, OK Pond Creek, OK Pond Creek-2, OK Marshall, OK

Field-average wheat yield as a function of field- average NDVI, compared with the OSU WPRU prediction equation Field-average wheat yield as a function of field- average NDVI, compared with the OSU WPRU prediction equation Field-Average NDVI Field-Average Yield (bu/ac) Cherokee, OK Pond Creek, OK Pond Creek-2, OK Marshall, OK Predicted Yield 95% Pred. Lim.

Combine Yield Monitor and Satellite Estimated Wheat Yield Maps Yield Monitor 26.4 bu/ac Satellite Estimate 28.7 bu/ac

Normalizing Satellite Estimated Yield Normalization tends to remove the effect of weather, disease and other factors on the average yield. This minimizes the effect of abnormally high or yields when yield variability is compared between years or averaged over years. Yields can be normalized by dividing by the average yield for the field.

Wheat - Landsat TM Image Taken During April to Mid-May –Red Rock, OK

Linn Aerial Image Aerial Image vs. Average Yields Terrace Effects

Red Rock, OK - 7 Year Average Estimated Yield and Coefficient of Variation PortA Misclassified KirklandB KirklandB2 NorgeC2 NorgeB Floods

Wheat - Landsat TM Image Taken During April to Mid-May, Pond Creek, Ok

Pond Creek, Oklahoma Dale Silt Loam McLain Silt Loam Owner Identified Soil

Pond Creek, OK - Normalized Estimated Yield and Temporal Coefficient of Variation for Seven Years of Data Water and Hay for Calves Field Drainage

Cherokee, Oklahoma Reinach Very Fine Sandy Loam McLain Silt Loam Dale Silt Loam - SALINE

Cherokee, Oklahoma Hayed for Demonstration Plots Drainage problem from moldboard dead furrow Salt Slick

Cherokee, OK – Two Varieties

Hitchcock, OK < – – – 1.15  1.15  Field Boundary Average Normalized Yield

Hitchcock, Ok – Yield 1992 & 1993

Hitchcock, OK & 1996

Hitchcock, OK – 1998 & 1999

Hitchcock, OK < – – – 1.15  1.15  Field Boundary Average Normalized Yield Broken out of native grass pasture in 10 ac increments in the 1970’s Farm since homesteaded Low pH in 2001

Disease Effect on Estimated Yield -Enid, OK 5% Set-Aside Ground Chisholm 2180

Carrier, OK – 1999 Yield Hail Damage

Tonkawa, OK Sprayed with Metribuzin for Cheat Not sprayed for cheat Area was intensively grazed by 105 calves. Wheat yield was about 3 times greater than estimated Saline Soil

Tonkawa, OK

What may be gained by even higher resolution sensing? 25 m Resolution (Re-sampled) Landsat TM 1m Resolution NDVI

Conclusions Satellite imagery can be used to predict yields. Normalized estimated yield can be used for management decisions: –Define average relative yield –Identify regions of high and low yield whose cause changes slowly over time Drainage Soil type Organic matter pH

Conclusions Images can be used to define management zones for the purpose of managing these variables. Imagery can complement yield monitor data or when yield data are not available can serve as a surrogate. Currently, Landsat TM images are the only source of historical data for the entire United States, and, despite the coarse resolution provides, a means to begin managing less than field size areas.

Conclusions Potentially, with sufficient data, harvester yield measurements can be used to obtain the same management data as satellites.