Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Digital IIR Filter
Advertisements

Signal Estimation Technology Inc. Maher S. Maklad Optimal Resolution of Noisy Seismic Data Resolve++
Contrasting Log Sine Sweep method and MLS for room acoustics measurements Angelo Farina  Industrial Engineering Dept., University of Parma, Via delle Scienze.
Well-Seismic Ties Lecture 7 Depth Time Synthetic Trace SLIDE 1
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: The Linear Prediction Model The Autocorrelation Method Levinson and Durbin.
(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Nonrecursive Digital Filters
Filtering Filtering is one of the most widely used complex signal processing operations The system implementing this operation is called a filter A filter.
WAVELET PHASE ESTIMATION WITHOUT ACCURATE TIME-DEPTH CONVERSION JIANGBO YU ADVISOR: DR. JOHN CASTAGNA AGL UPDATE MEETING MAY 2, 2012.
Attenuating the ice flexural wave on arctic seismic data David C. Henley.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
The recovery of seismic reflectivity in an attenuating medium Gary Margrave, Linping Dong, Peter Gibson, Jeff Grossman, Michael Lamoureux University of.
Establishing Well to Seismic Tie
Seismic Reflection Processing/Velocity Analysis of SAGE 2007 Data Andrew Steen Team Members; Stan, Tim, Josh, Andrew.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Wiener Deconvolution: Theoretical Basis The Wiener Deconvolution is a technique used to obtain the phase-velocity dispersion curve and the attenuation.
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman Radar Meteorology M. D. Eastin.
HEAVY-OIL SEISMIC MONITORING at PIKES PEAK, SK I.A. Watson*, L.R. Lines and K.F. Brittle November 20, 2001.
Computational Geophysics and Data Analysis
Formatting and Baseband Modulation
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 19 Digital Filtering (plus some seismology)
GG 313 Lecture 26 11/29/05 Sampling Theorem Transfer Functions.
1 Let g(t) be periodic; period = T o. Fundamental frequency = f o = 1/ T o Hz or  o = 2  / T o rad/sec. Harmonics =n f o, n =2,3 4,... Trigonometric.
Seismometry Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior Seismometer – The basic Principles u x x0x0 ugug umum xmxm x x0x0 xrxr uground displacement x r displacement.
A Short Course in Seismic Reflection Profiling
Lab 12 Atomic spectra and atomic structure
Deconvolution Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma Objectives: -Understand the difference between exponential and surface consistent gain -Identify power line.
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Authors: Sriram Ganapathy, Samuel Thomas, and Hynek Hermansky Temporal envelope compensation for robust phoneme recognition using modulation spectrum.
Arnim B. Haase and Robert R. Stewart
Chapter 6. Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems
Introduction to Deconvolution
Sources of noise in instrumental analysis
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
revision Transfer function. Frequency Response
GG313 Lecture 24 11/17/05 Power Spectrum, Phase Spectrum, and Aliasing.
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
Measurement and Instrumentation
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
(plus some seismology)
Susan L. Beck George Zandt Kevin M. Ward Jonathan R. Delph.
GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 1:
3.1 Introduction Why do we need also a frequency domain analysis (also we need time domain convolution):- 1) Sinusoidal and exponential signals occur.
Spatially Varying Frequency Compounding of Ultrasound Images
Compensating for attenuation by inverse Q filtering
Arnim B. Haase and Robert R. Stewart
POTSI Gaboring Advances
Active Source Seismology
Interpreting a 3C-3D seismic survey, Ross Lake, Saskatchewan
The FOCI™ method of depth migration
Convolution and Deconvolution
Source wavelet effects on the ISS internal multiple leading-order attenuation algorithm and its higher-order modification that accommodate issues that.
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Gary Margrave and Michael Lamoureux
Processing of the Field Data using Predictive Deconvolution
Prestack Depth Migration in a Viscoacoustic Medium
Minimum Phase Revisited
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
(plus some seismology)
Noise Reduction in Vibroseis Source
Examining the phase property of nonstationary Vibroseis wavelet
8.7 Gated Integration instrument description
8.6 Autocorrelation instrument, mathematical definition, and properties autocorrelation and Fourier transforms cosine and sine waves sum of cosines Johnson.
Uses of filters To remove unwanted components in a signal
bc POTSI Gaboring Advances
ELEN E4810: Digital Signal Processing Topic 11: Continuous Signals
Bogdan G. Nita *University of Houston M-OSRP Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems

Outline Introduction Description of Pikes Peak 141/ W5M VSP Filtering elements of the Vibroseis system Down hole wavelets before and after deconvolutions Conclusions Acknowledgements

Introduction I Effective stratigraphic seismic interpretation is aided by having a constant and known phase in the final section. Removal of the transfer function between the vibrator pilot sweep and the far-field velocity signature is needed to achieve such high quality seismic. The downgoing wavefield extracted from a Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP) represents the far-field signature at the discrete depths sampled by the geophones.

Introduction II Vibroseis deconvolution attempts to remove the transfer function knowing only the pilot sweep; the impulse responses of the geophones and the recording instruments; and usually assuming white reflectivity in the Earth. The VSP is an ideal tool to test the effectiveness of deconvolutions.

Pikes Peak VSP Experiment A 3C, five-level ASI tool was used to acquire data from 66 depths 27.0 to meters (depth increment of 7.5 meters). A Mertz HD18 Vibrator located 23 meters from the well head generated an 8 to 200 Hz linear sweep. The weighted-sum estimate of the ground force (WSEGF) was used as the phase lock signal. The WSEGF was maintained in phase with the pilot sweep as per the SEG standard.

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation If these were all minimum phase then perhaps all that would be needed would be conventional spiking deconvolution?

Convert the Klauder wavelet into its minimum phase equivalent with the Vibop operator Klauder Wavelet Minimum phase equivalent of the Klauder wavelet Vibop

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation

The recorded weighted-sum ground force estimates Phase Amplitude Wavelets 200 degrees -200 degrees 200 ms 0 Hz 200 Hz

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation

Phase (degrees)

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation

Standard Vibroseis Theory The P-wave far-field particle displacement is proportional to the applied force. Equivalently, the far-field particle velocity is the time derivative of the true ground force. In the frequency domain the derivative filter boosts the amplitude spectrum 6 dB/octave and applies a +90 degree phase shift.

Test of whether a differential filter is minimum phase Wavelet Derivative Wavelet After Wiener Deconvolution Input Wavelets Derivative Wavelet Wavelet

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation

Inverse Geophone Filter Filter Phase Amplitude

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation

Inverse Instrument Filter (phase has been removed by cross correlation) Amplitude spectrum in dBs

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation

Q from VSP Q - Spectral Ratios (blue) and Centroid Frequency (red) Q

Theoretical effect of a constant Q of 50 Wavelet at 102 meters depth Wavelet at meters depth 102 meter wavelet after applying a Q of 50 over a distance of 400 meters

Filters that Deconvolution must remove to recover the reflectivity of the Earth Klauder Wavelet Vibrator Electronic and Hydraulic Distortions Baseplate FlexingDifferential Filter Geophone Impulse Response Instrument Impulse Response Attenuation of the Earth ‘Q’ Reflectivity Scattering Attenuation

Downgoing wavelets displayed in depth versus time DepthDepth Time Downgoing Multiple

Downgoing Wavelets wavelets have been compensated for the amplitude and phase effects of the geophone 10 ms 0 Hz 200 Hz +200 degrees -200 degrees 90 degrees

Finding the best fit Constant phase Wavelet Blue is the best fit constant phase wavelet Red is the actual wavelet Green is the zero phase equivalent wavelet Correlation Coefficient versus Constant Phase

Downgoing Wavelets wavelets have been compensated for the amplitude and phase effects of the geophone 10 ms 0 Hz 200 Hz +200 degrees -200 degrees Average constant phase is 49 degrees 100%90%

Spectra for the Downgoing Wavelets before and after Deconvolutions Geophone at meters Amplitude (dB)

Wavelets after zero phase deconvolution and geophone phase removal (80 ms operator 0.1% PW) Downgoing multiple Deconvolution operator designed on wavelets averaged over 400 meters 10 ms Precursor 0 Hz200 Hz +200 degrees -200 degrees Average constant phase is 46 degrees 100%90%

Low Frequency Adjustments when computing the phase of the T5 Deconvolution Operator 48 dB/octave Applied to reduce the effect of low frequency estimation problems on the phase of the output Amplitude (dB) 22 dB

Wavelets after T5 deconvolution (4 Hz frequency smoothing 0.01% PW) with geophone phase and amplitude removal Deconvolution operator designed on wavelets averaged over 400 meters 10 ms 0 Hz 200 Hz +200 degrees -200 degrees Average constant phase is -75 degrees 100% 90%

Wavelets after T5 deconvolution (4 Hz Frequency smoothing 0.01% PW), low frequency filtering and Vibop Deconvolution operator designed on wavelets averaged over 400 meters 10 ms 0 Hz 200 Hz +200 degrees -200 degrees Average constant phase is 41 degrees 100%90%

Wavelets after T5 deconvolution (4 Hz frequency smoothing 0.01% PW) and spectral replacement Deconvolution operator designed on wavelets averaged over 400 meters 10 ms 0 Hz 200 Hz +200 degrees -200 degrees Average constant phase is 3 degrees 100%90%

Wavelets after T5 deconvolution (4 Hz frequency smoothing 0.01% PW) and low frequency filtering Deconvolution operator designed on wavelets averaged over 400 meters 10 ms 0 Hz200 Hz +200 degrees -200 degrees Average constant phase is -27 degrees 100%90%

Conclusions I T5 deconvolution gave the most consistent constant phase results. Adjusting the Klauder wavelet to minimum phase resulted in wavelets that were less constant phase or compressed (but they appeared to be close to minimum phase). Spectral replacement of the low frequencies resulted in the wavelets being less consistent than using low frequency filtering.

Conclusions II The amount of low frequency filtering changed the slope of the low frequency phase curve. Zero phase deconvolution of course did not change the phase of the original data and did not remove the down-going multiple. Removing the geophone impulse response was not desirable.

Acknowledgements Husky Energy Geo-X (Xi-Shuo Wang and Mike Perz) Schlumberger Dr. Gary Margrave Guillaume Cambois AOSTRA and the CREWES sponsors