WP1: Application Ontology Management Maria Teresa Pazienza Dept. Of Computer Science University of Rome “Tor Vergata”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

CHART or PICTURE INTEGRATING SEMANTIC WEB TO IMPROVE ONLINE Marta Gatius Meritxell González TALP Research Center (UPC) They are friendly and easy to use.
Language Technologies Reality and Promise in AKT Yorick Wilks and Fabio Ciravegna Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield.
Multilinguality & Semantic Search Eelco Mossel (University of Hamburg) Review Meeting, January 2008, Zürich.
Websydian products.
KEOD 2013 – 20 th September 2013 A Comprehensive Framework for Semantic Annotation of Web Content Manuel Fiorelli 1, Maria Teresa Pazienza 2, Armando Stellato.
© NCSR, Paris, December 5-6, 2002 WP1: Plan for the remainder (1) Ontology Ontology  Enrich the lexicons for the 1 st domain based on partners remarks.
Domain Engineering Silvio Romero de Lemos Meira
Francesca Fallucchi, Noemi Scarpato,Armando Stellato, and Fabio Massimo Zanzotto DISP, University “Tor Vergata” Rome, Italy
SRDC Ltd. 1. Problem  Solutions  Various standardization efforts ◦ Document models addressing a broad range of requirements vs Industry Specific Document.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
Intelligent Services in Selbo 2 SCORM Editor for eLearning Based on Ontologies Part of eLSE project Damyan Mitev University of Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”
The Semantic Web Week 13 Module Website: Lecture: Knowledge Acquisition / Engineering Practical: Getting to know.
Visual Web Information Extraction With Lixto Robert Baumgartner Sergio Flesca Georg Gottlob.
DCS Architecture Bob Krzaczek. Key Design Requirement Distilled from the DCS Mission statement and the results of the Conceptual Design Review (June 1999):
PLANSERVE Knowledge acquisition & Ontological engineering for AI Planning applications.
Supervised by Prof. LYU, Rung Tsong Michael Department of Computer Science & Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Prepared by: Chan Pik Wah,
UML CASE Tool. ABSTRACT Domain analysis enables identifying families of applications and capturing their terminology in order to assist and guide system.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Integrating ontological and linguistic knowledge for Conceptual Information Extraction Roberto Basili, Michele Vindigni, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto Università.
Enhance legal retrieval applications with an automatically induced knowledge base Ka Kan Lo.
OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web D. Fensel, F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider Presenter: Cristina.
DEiXTo.
Framework for Model Creation and Generation of Representations DDI Lifecycle Moving Forward.
Professional Informatics & Quality Assurance Software Lifecycle Manager „Tools that are more a help than a hindrance”
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Semantic Interoperability Jérôme Euzenat INRIA & LIG France Natasha Noy Stanford University USA.
1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.
Overview of the Database Development Process
Challenges in Information Retrieval and Language Modeling Michael Shepherd Dalhousie University Halifax, NS Canada.
Break Out Session on Infrastructure and Technology: A Report Vipul Kashyap AOS Workshop, Rome, 15 November 2001
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Second RMSIG Workshop Methodology and Process Wolfram Höpken.
Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications – NCSR “Demokritos” Bootstrapping ontology evolution with multimedia information extraction C.D. Spyropoulos,
Some Thoughts on HPC in Natural Language Engineering Steven Bird University of Melbourne & University of Pennsylvania.
Final Review 31 October WP2: Named Entity Recognition and Classification Claire Grover University of Edinburgh.
DCS Overview MCS/DCS Technical Interchange Meeting August, 2000.
University of Dublin Trinity College Localisation and Personalisation: Dynamic Retrieval & Adaptation of Multi-lingual Multimedia Content Prof Vincent.
Designing the Team-oriented Ontology Management System with Ajax Technology Ze Li, Johannes Keizer, Zhong Wang, Margherita Sini, Yelu Zheng The Institute.
CORPORUM-OntoExtract Ontology Extraction Tool Author: Robert Engels Company: CognIT a.s.
© DATAMAT S.p.A. – Giuseppe Avellino, Stefano Beco, Barbara Cantalupo, Andrea Cavallini A Semantic Workflow Authoring Tool for Programming Grids.
Aquenergy Portal Elisabetta Zuanelli, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy E-Age 2014 Muscat december.
Edinburg March 2001CROSSMARC Kick-off meetingICDC ICDC background and know-how and expectations from CROSSMARC CROSSMARC Project IST Kick-off.
ENTERFACE 08 Project 2 “multimodal high-level data integration” Mid-term presentation August 19th, 2008.
Project Overview Vangelis Karkaletsis NCSR “Demokritos” Frascati, July 17, 2002 (IST )
Ontology-Centered Personalized Presentation of Knowledge Extracted from the Web Ralitsa Angelova.
Maintaining Information Integration Ontologies Georgios Paliouras, Alexandros Valarakos, Georgios Paliouras, Vangelis Karkaletsis, Georgios Sigletos, Georgios.
FAO of the UN Library and Documentation Systems Division AOS workshop Beijing April 04 Tutorial 2: Ontology Tools Boris Lauser Food and Agriculture Organization.
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
© NCSR, Frascati, July 18-19, 2002 WP1: Plan for the remainder (1) Ontology Ontology  Use of PROTÉGÉ to generate ontology and lexicons for the 1 st domain.
CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) Tools Software that is used to support software process activities. Provides software process support by:- –
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Digital Libraries1 David Rashty. Digital Libraries2 “A library is an arsenal of liberty” Anonymous.
NCSR “Demokritos” Institute of Informatics & Telecommunications CROSSMARC CROSS-lingual Multi Agent Retail Comparison Costas Spyropoulos & Vangelis Karkaletsis.
>lingway█ >Lingway Fact Extractor (LFE)█ >Introduction >Goals Crossmarc / Lingway >Lingway adaptation of the NHLRT approach >Rule induction >(ongoing work)
August 2003 At A Glance The IRC is a platform independent, extensible, and adaptive framework that provides robust, interactive, and distributed control.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
Concepts and Realization of a Diagram Editor Generator Based on Hypergraph Transformation Author: Mark Minas Presenter: Song Gu.
And the Watson Plugin for the NeOn Toolkit. IST NeOn-project.org The Semantic Web is growing… #SW Pages.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
An Ontological Approach to Financial Analysis and Monitoring.
Henrik Eriksson Department of Computer and Information Science Linkoping University SE Linkoping, Sweden Raymond W. Fergerson Yuval Shahar Stanford.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP2: Tools Raphael Volz Universität.
Ontologies for the Semantic Web Prepared By: Tseliso Molukanele Rapelang Rabana Supervisor: Associate Professor Sonia Burman 20 July 2005.
Instance Discovery and Schema Matching With Applications to Biological Deep Web Data Integration Tantan Liu, Fan Wang, Gagan Agrawal {liut, wangfa,
WP1: Plan for the remainder (1) Ontology –Finalise ontology and lexicons for the 2 nd domain (RTV) Changes agreed in Heraklion –Improvement to existing.
© NCSR, Frascati, July 18-19, 2002 CROSSMARC big picture Domain-specific Web sites Domain-specific Spidering Domain Ontology XHTML pages WEB Focused Crawling.
NCSR “Demokritos” Institute of Informatics & Telecommunications CROSSMARC CROSS-lingual Multi Agent Retail Comparison WP3 Multilingual and Multimedia Fact.
Building Trustworthy Semantic Webs
Institute of Informatics & Telecommunications NCSR “Demokritos”
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
Presentation transcript:

WP1: Application Ontology Management Maria Teresa Pazienza Dept. Of Computer Science University of Rome “Tor Vergata”

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza The CROSSMARC application ontology: an overview CROSSMARC peculiarities Task orientend knowledge Linguistic processors NEED knowledge to reason over domains Multiple domains –Required an easy customization to new domains Multiple languages –Different character encodings (deals also with Greek charset) Changes in the role of domain knowledge during the project (increasing demands for background knowledge) T 0 : bag of language dependent terms (help in identification of entities) M-T: structured template for IE (concepts separated from lexicons) Today: integrated knowledge views (supports different sys. activities) T0T0 Mid-Term Review Today Excel Spreadsheet XML Document Protégé KB

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza Kinds of Knowledge in CROSSMARC LanguageDomain Task User Web Page Collection Language, Keywords, Terminology Named Entity Recognition and Classification Domain Concepts, Relations,Instances Fact Extraction and Normalization Structural knowledge of the Product Task Specific knowledge User Interface User Models, Preferences,Locales

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza In the first CROSSMARC domain (Laptop computers) a fragment of the knowledge required by the IE component is: PRODUCT: laptop COMPONENT: processor  the notebook processor ATTRIBUTE: type  the processor type: can be enumerated –VALUE: Intel Pentium –VALUE: AMD K6 –VALUE: Power PC –VALUE: … ATTRIBUTE: speed  the processor speed: has a numeric range –MINVALUE: 166 –MAXVALUE: 1400 –UNIT: MHz Surface realizations of such information are different strings for each language (should not be represented in the ontology) The target knowledge: an example

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza State of Art Analysis (D1.3) Goal: a widely accessed framework and tools for knowledge management Protégé 2000 (Stanford University) has been choosen Protégé 2000 features Extensible Knowledge model Customizable user interface Extensible architecture CROSSMARC KB Editor

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza The CROSSMARC KB Manager Value-added services Automatic generation of the FE XML Schema Automatic generation of semantic constraints from Ontology Support for NERC entities definition Automatic generation of Nerc.DTD Definition of IE templates from the domain ontology Export of Template definitions in XML Definition of language dependent lexicons Import/Export of Lexicons in XML Definition of user stereotypes Direct export of User Stereotypes in XML for the GUI Locale-independent storage and presentation Support for multiple languages embedded in the KB Editor UTF-8 Backend for KB storage

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza Design rationales A multi-layered knowledge architecture, structured in: Meta-conceptual layer Domain independent  reuse through domains Embodies semantics the different components of the system should commit to in their reasoning activities Conceptual layer Language independent  same for the 4 languages Contains relevant concepts of each domain Instance layer Language independent  same for the 4 languages Contains relevant individuals of each domain The lexical layer Language and domain dependent  one for each language and domain surface realizations of domain information

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza Overall Organization The four different knowledge modalities are organized under four branches of the knowledge model DOMAIN-TEMPLATE DOMAIN-ONTOLOGY DOMAIN-LEXICON USER-PROTOTYPE Each of these represents a specific knowledge aspect in the overall organization Several widget components have been developed to provide focused views and ease the management LanguageDomain Task User

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza Class Panel Instance Panel Instance editor The Ontology Editor Ontology management is allowed by a specific component Fast browsing, editing Direct editing of lexical information related to ontology nodes

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza Customization and Maintenance Different phases/roles involved 1. DE examines the current status of the specific domain to identify possible changes; 2. DE validates changes in the domain and report to the KE 3. LP provides coherent lexicalisations 4. KE prepares new models for the ontology 5. OA releases a new version of the ontology 6. LP adapts lexicalisations to the concepts specified in the (new version of) ontology

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza Customization: evaluation results Test case: the 2nd domain (Job Offers) Comparative Analysis with the 1st domain Time spent for the different activities 

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza Conclusions The CROSSMARC ontology design aims to provide a methodology for knowledge representation easily customizable over different domains. The knowledge base is designed to be flexible enough to be applied to different domains without changing the overall structure ( only modifying relevant values); The lexical component (language-dependent) has been separated from the conceptual ones The domain model is in a widely assessed framework (Prot é g é ). The CROSSMARC KB Manager modular architecture enables an homogeneous approach for managing different views of the knowledge used by different system components and allows for an efficient control of several tasks involved in building and mantaining the knowledge.

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza References Basili R., M. Vindigni, F. M. Zanzotto, Integrating Ontological and Linguistic Knowledge for Conceptual Information Extraction, in proceedings of IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003), Beijing, China, October Pazienza M. T., A. Stellato, M. Vindigni, Combining Ontological Knowledge and Wrapper Induction techniques into an e-retail System, in proceedings of ATEM2003 Workshop on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, September Hachey B., C. Grover, V. Karkaletsis, A. Valarakos, M. T. Pazienza, M. Vindigni, E. Cartier, J. Coch, Use of Ontologies for Cross-lingual Information Management in the Web, in proceedings of EUROLAN 2003 International School on The Semantic Web and Language Technology, Bucharest, Romania, August Pazienza M. T., A. Stellato, M. Vindigni, A. Valarokos, V. Karkaletsis, Ontology integration in a multilingual e-retail system, in proceedings of HCI International 2003, 10 th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Crete, Greece, June Pazienza M. T., M. Vindigni, Language-based agent communication, in proceedings of EKAW02, 13 th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, OMAS Workshop on Ontologies for Multi-Agent Systems, Siguenza, Spain, October 2002.

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza References Basili R., M. Vindigni, F. M. Zanzotto, Integrating Ontological and Linguistic Knowledge for Conceptual Information Extraction, in proceedings of IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003), Beijing, China, October Pazienza M. T., A. Stellato, M. Vindigni, Combining Ontological Knowledge and Wrapper Induction techniques into an e-retail System, in proceedings of ATEM2003 Workshop on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, September Hachey B., C. Grover, V. Karkaletsis, A. Valarakos, M. T. Pazienza, M. Vindigni, E. Cartier, J. Coch, Use of Ontologies for Cross-lingual Information Management in the Web, in proceedings of EUROLAN 2003 International School on The Semantic Web and Language Technology, Bucharest, Romania, August Pazienza M. T., A. Stellato, M. Vindigni, A. Valarokos, V. Karkaletsis, Ontology integration in a multilingual e-retail system, in proceedings of HCI International 2003, 10 th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Crete, Greece, June Pazienza M. T., M. Vindigni, Language-based agent communication, in proceedings of EKAW02, 13 th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, OMAS Workshop on Ontologies for Multi-Agent Systems, Siguenza, Spain, October 2002.

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza

WP1: Ontology Maintenance Maria Teresa Pazienza The CROSSMARC KB Manager: functionalities From Protégé 2000 Integration of the CROSSMARC Ontology in a widely assessed framework Extensible Knowledge model Customizable user interface Extensible architecture CROSSMARC value-added services Automatic generation of the FE XML Schema Automatic generation of semantic constraints from Ontology Support for NERC entities definition Automatic generation of Nerc.DTD Definition of IE templates from the domain ontology Export of Template definitions in XML Definition of language dependent lexicons Import/Export of Lexicons in XML Definition of user stereotypes Direct export of User Stereotypes in XML for the GUI Locale-independent storage and presentation Support for multiple languages embedded in the KB Editor UTF-8 Backend for KB storage