Core Curriculum Outcomes Retrofit: Backing Into Assessment Seth Matthew Fishman, Ph.D. Marylu Hill, Ph.D. Peter Spitaler, Ph.D. Villanova University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The General Education Program at Westmont
Advertisements

Agenda Why the change? What changed?
General Studies Areas Core Areas –Literacy & Critical Inquiry (L) –Mathematical Studies (MA/CS) –Humanities & Fine Arts (HU) –Social & Behavioral Sciences.
University Mission Learning-centered environment Integration of teaching research, service, and co-curricular experiences Prepare students to be responsible.
Integrative Learning and the ILP at Salve Regina University.
General Education Revision. Mission & Purpose Mission Rooted in the tradition of liberal arts education, FGCU’s General Education Program provides students.
Core Curriculum Revision Dr. Don Pratt Associate Professor Biology Chair Core Curriculum Advisory Committee.
Adjunct Training for Elementary and Middle Grades Masters Program Gardner-Webb University Graduate Program Dr. Jane King – Elementary Dr. Kelly Taylor.
Pepperdine University Portfolio Assessment Background Research Recommendations Outcomes.
Students’ Integrated & Universal Essential Education ‘ SIU e Education ’ Distribution Model for General Education Fall 2006 Marcus Agustin, Mathematics.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Integrated Core Proposal Team Members –Emmanuel Eneyo, Ind & Mnfg Engineering –Allison Funk, English Language and Literature –Jo Gibson, Office of the.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
An Interactive Teaching Circle: Measuring Learning Outcomes in a Core Curriculum Linda Anstendig Barbara Pennipede Adelia Williams Association of American.
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
More Slides. Survey Responses 152 Faculty 953 Students 59 Staff.
University Conference 2009 Overview and Brief Discussion of Survey Results Debi Cartwright David Hayes Mary Shapiro Thursday, February 19, 2009.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Beyond Basic Computer Skills: Implementing Technology Fluency Cynthia Edwards, Professor of Psychology Kristin Watkins, Computer Applications Specialist.
DIVISION OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT SCIENCES ` Charting the Integration of Ethics in the Business Curriculum David Turi Beth Castiglia Division of Business.
James Madison University General Education Program
Beginning in Fall “Given the rapid evolution of necessary knowledge and skills and the need to take into account global, national, state, and local.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Orientation Summer 2013 Academic Expectations Sarah M. Rogis Associate Director, Office of Academic and Career Services.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
INTERDISCIPLINARY ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION : THREE APPROACHES TO SUSTAINABILITY AASHE Conference Campus Initiatives to Catalyze a Just and Sustainable World.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
Goals of General Education Program Statement of Philosophy "General Education is a part of our curriculum that challenges students to develop the intellectual.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Assessment Across Two Cultures: Professional Schools and Arts & Sciences NEASC 126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 7-9, 2011 José-Marie Griffiths,
Outcomes-based Education at UC. Created, Implemented, Maintained and Assessed by Faculty (Supported by Everyone!)
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Curriculum Implementation Task Force (CITF) Status Report – April 14, 2009.
Core Curriculum Oversight Committee Committee Update University Senate Linda S. Glaze Associate Provost for Undergraduate Studies.
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
Liberal Education and America’s Promise: Changing the Conversation about Student Success and Institutional Accountability SHEEO—Denver, CO August 2009.
WELCOME TO CE 100 Preparing for a Career in Early Childhood Development –Unit 4 Class will start at the top of the hour! Please turn the volume up on your.
Integrated Learning – At the Core of the Fairfield Experience Innovative Pedagogy & Course Redesign IX June 5, 2009.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
Institutionalizing Undergraduate Research at CSUSM Academic Affairs Town Hall September 18, 2008.
General Education at Oakland University. General Education  Broad-based knowledge  Skills  Preparation for citizenship, further study, and careers.
Images from Gallery.html.
General Education Revision Proposal Faculty Meeting – Tuesday, September 1, 2015.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
SCHOOL 2.0 For the first time in history, we’re preparing kids for a future that we cannot clearly describe.
1 Spiraling Information Literacy Across Four Years Shawna (Smith) Egan Rivier University Nashua, NH Going Beyond the "One-Shot" 1.
Our Story: Our Story: The Story of One Student Affairs Division’s Quest to Improve Assessment Don Whalen, Coordinator of Assessment, Department of Residence.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study a language? Students learn the practical skills of speaking, listening comprehension, reading, and writing, while also.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study philosophy? Immanuel Kant noted that philosophy teaches us to think for ourselves. It also encourages us to put ourselves.
ARCADIA UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM Get Ready…..For the Journey of Your Life Andrea Crivelli-Kovach Associate Professor & Director Community Health.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Ethics-based Nursing Education, Research and Service: Practicing What We Preach American Public Health Association 135 th Annual Meeting Washington DC.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Silvia Reyes, Title V Director & Sarah Brennan, Faculty Activity Director Hostos Community College, The City University of New York, Bronx, NY, 10451,
Advisement and Core Curriculum Dr. Paul J. Ballard, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Student Success & Retention.
UST at a Glance Founded by Basilian Fathers in 1947 Houston’s only Catholic university Student/Faculty ratio of 9:1 Average class size: 15 Hispanic Serving.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
PDP Presentation Trinity Washington University
This webinar featured David Quigley, Provost, and Michael Lochhead, Executive Vice President. Periodically, the University embarks on a strategic.
General Education Review
The General Education Core in CLAS
The Core Curriculum and Advisement at SNC
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Dr. James W. Dottin Department Chair Business Administration
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
KS5 Religious Education AQA
Presentation transcript:

Core Curriculum Outcomes Retrofit: Backing Into Assessment Seth Matthew Fishman, Ph.D. Marylu Hill, Ph.D. Peter Spitaler, Ph.D. Villanova University

Retrofit…

Who we are Seth Matthew Fishman, Ph.D. Director of Curriculum and Academic Outcomes & Assistant Professor of Education & Counseling. Marylu Hill, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director, Augustine and Culture Seminar Program and the Graduate Liberal Studies Program. Peter Spitaler, Th.D. Department Chair & Associate Professor, Theology and Religious

Agenda  Introductions  Abridged  Overview of Foundation courses  Our two year plan; redeveloping an ePortfolio  Challenges  Q&A

Institutional Demographics 6 Colleges  College of Liberal Arts and Sciences  Villanova School of Business  College of Engineering  College of Nursing  College of Professional Studies  Villanova University School of Law Student data (Fall14)  Undergraduate full-time: 6,554  Graduate: 2,897  Law School: 720 (includes traditional and joint Ph.D., M.B.A. and Tax enrollments)  Part-time and others: 564  Total enrollment: 10,735  6 Colleges

Villanova’s Core  Core Foundational Courses (5)  Core Literature and Writing Seminar (1)  Social Sciences Courses (2)  Core History Course (1)  Mathematics or Statistics Course (1)  Natural Science Courses with lab component (2)  Foreign Language Courses (2)  Fine Arts Course (1)  Upper Level Theology Course (1)  Diversity Courses (2)

Foundation courses overview  In 2010, as part of a Core Curriculum revision in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, five courses were identified as the Foundation Courses within the College:  ACS 1000 (Ancients) and ACS 1001 (Moderns)  Theology 1000 “Faith, Reason, and Culture”  Philosophy 1000 “Knowledge, Reality, Self”  Ethics 2050 “The Good Life: Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems”

Foundation courses overview  Why were these courses considered foundation courses?  Foundations of significant books and ideas which have shaped culture  Augustinian and Catholic intellectual tradition  Grounding in essential skills: close reading, critical writing, analytical discussion  Distinctive stamp of a Villanova and Augustinian education

Foundation courses overview  Identifying these courses as Foundation courses:  Each course assigned a “foundational” question:  “Who am I?”The Augustine and Culture Seminar 1000 (Ancients) and 1001 (Moderns)  ‘What Can I Know?”Philosophy 1000  “What do I Believe?”Theology and Religious Studies 1000  “How should I Live?”Ethics 2050

Foundation courses overview  Identifying shared goals and a shared mission statement:  Interdisciplinary inquiry informed by Augustinian and Catholic intellectual traditions  Critical thinking and communication skills  Deepened understanding of self and the world  Engagement with issues of personal responsibility and social justice.”

Our 2 year plan First Step: Retrofitting Learning Goals  Knowledge: Inquiry Informed by Augustinian, Catholic Intellectual Traditions  Interdisciplinary inquiry focused on fundamental human questions of identity, knowledge, faith, and morality  Skills: Critical Thinking and Communication  Close reading of texts in diverse genres, intensive writing, and active class participation  Values: Social Justice and Personal Responsibility  Reflection on students’ own values and beliefs in conversation with the central themes and values of the Augustinian Catholic tradition

Our 2 year plan Second Step: Envisioning Assessment  Consistent assessment schedule  Dependable data pool  Direct and indirect assessment tools  Entry points and exit points  Cohesion among foundation courses

Our 2 year plan Third Step: Implementation /14Develop Common Learning Goals /15Develop Assessment Protocol Design Syllabus Frontpage Determine materials for submission to Outcomes 3.Sum 15Implement Infrastructure (BB Outcomes) 4.Fall 15Implement Foundation Essay (pre-test) [ACS] Implement “Submit best assignment” [THL, PHL] 5.Spr 16Develop assessment rubrics

Third Step: Implementation 6.Sum 16Intermediate assessment (“checking in”) 7.Fall 16Implement Foundation Essay (post-test) [ETH] Closing the loop All students submit materials to Outcomes:  ACS:Foundation Essay, What is a life well lived?  PHL: Best Assignment  THL: Best Assignment  ETH: Foundation Essay, What is a life well lived?

Third Step: Implementation 8.Summer 17Plan implemented Conduct 1 st full assessment  Select samples from data pool (Outcomes).  Data pool: All rising juniors who have taken all 5 foundation courses  Assessment teams review samples with assessment rubrics

Challenges

Q&A

Thank you! Fishman, S. M., Hill, M., & Spitaler, P. (2015, September). Core Curriculum Outcomes Retrofit: Backing Into Assessment. Session presented at the Higher Education Assessment Leaders conference, Philadelphia.