Student Success in Higher Education Using Professional Learning Communities to Impact Student Learning Outcomes, Instruction, and Assessment Dorie Combs,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Advertisements

Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
When Students Can’t Read…
Kentucky Leadership Networks Why are we here? Why am I here? 1.
PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION OF THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE 1 Transforming Education in Kentucky Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner Michael.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
“Writing to Learn” Adolescent Research and Development Team.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
A Conversation Across the Disciplines to Integrate Literacy into Middle & Secondary Classrooms Drs. Pixita del Hill Prado, Ellen Friedland, & Jevon Hunter.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Overview of the Common Core ELA Learning Standards Dennis Atkinson Christine Cutler IES E2BOCES
Unbridled Learning Next Steps in the Content Leadership Networks.
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Math Practices (Part I) November 2, 2012 Maricela Rincon, Professional Development Specialist
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
EDU 385 EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN THE CLASSROOM
Adolescent Literacy Community of Practice. Today’s Plan Provide background on DWW as a resource for evidence-based practice Explain structure and features.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
KEDC MEETING OCTOBER 21, 2010 KCAS and CASL: Framework for Deconstructing Standards 1.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
A Guide for Professional Development Planning for Implementation of the CCSS November 2011 Updated February 2012
Presentation by Robert L. King, CPE President SHEEO Annual Meeting, Boulder, CO July 13, 2011.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
School of Education, CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla.
HOW TO TEACH WRITING IN A NON-ELA SETTING District Learning Day 10:20-11:30 August 5, 2015.
Differentiation PLC.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Common Core Standards English Language Arts 1. Overview of the Initiative o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12 in English Language.
1 The Common Core State Standards Implications for Teacher Preparation The Importance and Impact of Effective Practice K-16 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
1 California Teaching Performance Assessment Background.
Performance Task Overview Introduction This training module answers the following questions: –What is a performance task? –What is a Classroom Activity?
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Presentation transcript:

Student Success in Higher Education Using Professional Learning Communities to Impact Student Learning Outcomes, Instruction, and Assessment Dorie Combs, EKU Ginni Fair, EKU

Session Outcomes Participants will be able to…  Describe your school/district/institution’s efforts to meet the requirements of Senate Bill 1 (Unbridled Learning).  Evaluate the success of your alignment processes and products.  Determine “next steps” for addressing the expectations of SB1.  Discuss the P-20 relationship and how it can support students’ success at all levels.

Unbridled Learning: Expectations in SB1 New content standards will be disseminated to all stakeholders. Fewer, more rigorous, clearer standards requires strong content knowledge and ability to deconstruct standards.

Unbridled Learning: Expectations in SB1, continued All teachers, administrators, and Higher Education Teacher Prep faculty will understand and be able to communicate what a balanced assessment system is and why it is important in Kentucky. SB 1 Requires PD to move all toward “Assessment Literacy” and an understanding of ‘balanced assessment.’

Unbridled Learning: Expectations in SB1, continued An ongoing statewide system of support for the learning of all teachers and administrators will be established. CPE and EPSB will coordinate training sessions for teacher preparation programs in the use of the revised standards. CPE also is responsible for determining compliance of postsecondary institutions in training faculty and pre-service teachers.

What are YOUR Goals? Write and share your major goal(s) or task for P-20 alignment.

EKU’s CARTE goals 1.Align key courses to KY Core Academic Standards: a. General Ed b. Teacher Ed content knowledge courses c. Teacher Ed pedagogy / methods 2.Provide Professional Development for faculty and leadership a. Professional Learning Communities b. The mandates of SB 1 c. Common Core / KCAS d. Highly effective teaching and learning e. Assessment 3. Improve retention and graduation 4. College Career Readiness at all levels

What are YOUR Goals? Write and share your major accomplishment(s) or task for P-20 alignment. What are YOUR Accomplishments?

Workshops and presentations that have provided instruction to over 100 faculty & academic leadership. 5 Professional Learning Communities in English, math, science, social science and teacher education have collaborated over the past 1 ½ years. Super PLC meets every bi-monthly. Executive PLC meets bi-weekly. 39 syllabi have been aligned to KCAS for E/LA, math, and literacy in science, social science and technical areas. 25 syllabi are in process to complete by August 1. Blackboard online community for PLCs Project Evaluation CARTE Accomplishments

College and Career Readiness, READING strand anchor standards

Student Learning Outcomes:  Describe the major components of reading comprehension from an interactive and schema theoretic point of view.  Demonstrate an understanding of reading as the process of constructing meaning through the interaction of the reader’s existing knowledge, the information suggested by the written language and the context of the reading situation.  Explore the role of the content area teacher in the literate lives of their students and clarify core concepts related to literacy and learning (i.e., content literacy, disciplinary literacy, adolescent literacy, new literacies, and reading to learn).  Explain the applications of informal and formal writing (i.e., information/explanatory, augmentative, and narrative) within a content area classroom. R.1

Alignment to KCAS: Factual: “Knowledge” – Do I, as the instructor, require students to identify and explain what is expected by the standard? Interpretive: “Concepts” – Do I, as the instructor, prompt students to apply the standard effectively in the context of the course/discipline?

Alignment to KCAS Procedural: “How-to” – Do I, as the instructor, expect students to apply the standard strategically and intentionally in the context of the course/discipline without prompting? Metacognitive: “Knowing what you know and how you know it” – Do I, as the instructor, require students to articulate how the standard affects learning for themselves and others?

Curriculum Project Update: Four Instructional Targets Procedural Interpretive Factual Metacognitive Students as learners? Students as teachers?

Student Learning Outcomes:  Describe the major components of reading comprehension from an interactive and schema theoretic point of view. (R.1, R.2, R.3, R.7, R.8, R.9, R.10)  Demonstrate an understanding of reading as the process of constructing meaning through the interaction of the reader’s existing knowledge, the information suggested by the written language and the context of the reading situation. (R.1, R.2, R.3, R.8, R.9, R.10)  Explore the role of the content area teacher in the literate lives of their students and clarify core concepts related to literacy and learning (i.e., content literacy, disciplinary literacy, adolescent literacy, new literacies, and reading to learn). (R.1, R.2, R.4, R.6, R.7, R.8, R.9, R.10) (R.5, R.10)  Explain the applications of informal and formal writing (i.e., information/explanatory, augmentative, and narrative) within a content area classroom. (R.4) (W.1, W.2, W.3)

Something to Ponder… “Sixty minutes of thinking of any kind is bound to lead to confusion and unhappiness.” --James Thurber

Something to Ponder… “Out of confusion comes understanding.” --Dorie Combs and others

“FIP-M” Charts: READINGR - 1R - 2R - 3R - 4R - 5R - 6R - 7R - 8R - 9R - 10 EMG 447 Using standard s as a learner F___ I 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 P1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 M__ F___ I1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 P1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 M___ F___ I1, 2, 5 P1, 2, 5 M___ F___ I 3, 4,12 P 3,4,12 M___ F___ I___ P___ M___ F___ I 3, 8 P3, 8 M___ F___ I 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13 P 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13 M___ F___ I 1, 2, 3, 8, 11, 12 P 1, 2, 3, 8, 11, 12 M___ F___ I 1, 2, 3, 8,12 P 1, 2, 3, 8,12 M___ F___ I___ P 1,2, 3, 8, 9 M___ EMG 447 Using standard s as a teacher F 5, 9, 10, 12, 14 I 5, 9, 10, 12, 14 P___ M___ F 5, 9, 10, 12, 14 I 5, 9, 10, 12, 14 P___ M___ F 5, 9, 10, 12, 14 I 5, 9, 10, 12, 14 P___ M___ F 6 I 6 P___ M___ F 3 I 3 P___ M___ F___ I___ P___ M___ F___ I___ P___ M___ F___ I___ P___ M___ F___ I___ P___ M___ F 3 I 3 P___ M___

What are YOUR Goals? Write and share ideas about evaluating your progress. How and What Would YOU Evaluate?

PLCs allow faculty time to collaborate. Faculty appreciate that their work is valued & they are compensated. Faculty are more likely to implement because they are directly involved in the alignment process. Alignment is complex! Embedded PLCs keep focus and support facilitators. Some resistance remains among faculty…cats are wandering. Need better instruction of FIP-M process for clarity / deeper understanding. Make the connections among: Outcomes - Assessment – Instruction What exactly is it we expect our students to be able to do? Need to maintain momentum and ensure fidelity Continued Professional Development for participants PD for new / adjunct faculty Science standards Evaluating CARTE’s progress

How do we make FIP-M more manageable? Analyzing Data Calibrating Student Learning Outcomes Design Assessment Create appropriate instructional activities Implement Assessment

How do we make FIP-M more manageable? Application to Classroom Consider depth of knowledge in instruction Calibrating Student Learning Outcomes Analyzing University Data Design assessment Implement assessment

How do we make Alignment more manageable: “AHA!” Moments Analyzing Data Calibrating Student Learning Outcomes Design Assessment Create appropriate instructional activities Implement Assessment We talked about university data that impact our decision-making, but that is only part of the data that should be analyzed. We made some assumptions about what faculty already understood about designing assessment. This is part of our “Phase 2” plan for our faculty. We started talking about effective instruction, using HETL as our guide. We assumed that faculty would be able to transfer their understanding about depth of knowledge from the FIP-M to instructional planning. In our “Phase 2,” we will be designing common assessments for aligned courses. This will provide the important data for classroom analysis.

Lessons Learned From FIP-M The more you know, the more you realize you don’t know. Faculty background knowledge (e.g., depth of knowledge, assessment literacy, etc.) impacted the success of the FIP-M chart (ZPD). Trying to think about the depth of instruction, when connected to depth of learning, is fruitless without attending to assessment. It is better to have FIP-Med and faltered than to have never FIP-Med at all. Faculty – on their own – are beginning to ask relevant and powerful questions about assessment and instruction.

Assessment to the front, please! Student Learner Outcomes EvaluationAssessment for learningAssessment of learning 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 Text/ Professional Reading/Class or Online Activities  Reader Response Journal/Graphic Organizers  Discussion Activities  Structured pair/group work  Modeling  Clicker Response System  Homework Completion Grade 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13 Field Work Reflections  Assignment reflections, narrative feedback  Self-assessment using patterns of reasoning symbols  Documentation log  Task Stream log submission 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Lesson Plan  Models of both strong and weak exemplar work provided for whole and small group analysis  Self-assessment using scoring guide required prior to assignment submission for grading  Grades assessed using scoring guide 13, 14, 15, 16 Writing Tasks – (Research Paper for Writing Intensive sections)  Mini-lessons arranged to scaffold content knowledge with individual feedback with each lesson  Focused revision using models of strong and weak work provided  Thesis statement submitted for descriptive feedback; multiple revisions (re-drafting) accepted  Peer-review of drafts required by multiple sources (NOEL Studio, trusted peer, and instructor) using a feedback form (min. 3 required)  Engagement in self-reflection using scoring guide prior to final submission  Grades assessed on final draft using scoring guide

Ensure fidelity to syllabi and standards. Provide ongoing professional development and continue to support collaboration Enhance instruction and assessment across the university Develop classroom assessment tools that demonstrate learning Herd the cats! CARTE’s Next Steps

What are YOUR Goals? Write and share ideas about what your district/school/institution needs to do next. What are YOUR Next Steps?

People support what they help create!

Contact us: