Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Damage Prevention Programs Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention PHMSA Update Annmarie Robertson PHMSA/Office.
Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
2010 PODS User Conference Houston, Texas October 28, 2010 PHMSA Update John A. Jacobi, P.E. CATS Manager, SW Region.
1 PHMSA Pipeline Incident and IM Data: What They Do and Do Not Tell Us Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Carol Parker.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Gas Gathering Update Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.
PHMSA Perspectives Construction Process & Standards
Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Mike Israni & John Gale Aug 5, 2009.
Montana Safe Digging Law 2014 Joint Engineers Conference Thu - Nov :00am-11:30am.
Ohio’s One-Stop Utility Resource Gas Pipeline Safety Pipelines - State and Local Issues Pete Chace GPS Program Manager (614)
AGA Perspectives on Current Pipeline Safety Regulations August 2014.
Congressional Reauthorization and PHMSA Rulemakings – Enough to avoid future tragedies? Carl Weimer, Executive Director Pipeline Safety Trust.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals –Is there a need for change? Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations Interstate Natural.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Overview of Key Rule Features
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA Update Kenneth Y. Lee Engineering & Research Division
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Program.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
SCC DA Program Stress-corrosion-cracking direct assessment (SCCDA) is a structured process that contributes to pipeline company’s efforts to improve.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 25, 2009 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) & SHRIMP.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Distribution Integrity Management John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Reauthorization September 16,
Current Inspection Process for Operators of Hazardous Liquids Pipelines Rod Seeley OPS SW Region Director May 18, 2005.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Austin Regional Manager Oversight and Safety Division Pipeline Safety September 2015.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Regulatory and Compliance Landscape Western Region Gas Conference.
Rulemakings. Change in Derating Factor for PA-11 From.32 to.40.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Fitness For Service and Management of Pre-Regulation Pipe Chad Zamarin Chief Operating Officer NiSource Midstream.
Aging Infrastructure Management and Challenges Sue Fleck Vice President Pipeline Safety Trust “Getting to Zero’ Conference 2011.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Overview of Integrity Verification Process (IVP) Workshop Held.
America’s Natural Gas Utilities’ Distribution Pipelines November 2, 2006 The Connection To the Customer.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
PIPELINE SPECIFICATIONS
Consequence Analysis: A More Comprehensive Proposed Regulatory Approach Western Regional Gas Conference Tempe, Arizona Daron Moore August 19, 2014.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOUR MAOP? REAUTHORIZATION, SAN BRUNO, AND PHMSA’S ADVISORY BULLETIN.
2015 SAFETY SEMINAR HIGHLIGHTS OF 2014 Rick Moses Chief, Bureau of Safety Florida.
Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002.
A Framework for Your Pipeline Integrity Program. 2 A Few Thoughts Before Beginning l This rule is new to the pipeline industry although many of the concepts.
Updates and Construction Issues
What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1 Mike Israni Senior Technical Advisor Manager: Standards & Committees.
How Old is too Old? Who Makes that Decision? Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
Rulemaking Process and Cost Benefit Analysis
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
OPS Observations, Expectations, and Concerns Zach Barrett (OPS) Direct Assessment Workshop November 4, 2003.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, LA November 20, 2008 Elizabeth Komiskey, P.E. PHMSA/Office of.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Regulatory Initiatives.
Distribution Integrity Management Program
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention Update and Damage Prevention Rulemaking Sam.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.
The Gas “Mega Rule” Western Regional Gas Conference Tempe AZ August 23, 2016 JOHN A. JACOBI, P.E., J.D.
Federal Regulatory Update
PHMSA Regulatory Update Tuesday, August 23, :00-9:45 AM
PIPELINE SPECIFICATIONS
Utility Technologies International
Federal Regulatory Update
Plastic Pipe Rule – Tracking and Traceability Proposed Requirements
AGA Positions on Current PHMSA Rulemakings
National Conference of Regulatory Attorneys
Federal Regulatory Update
PIPELINE SPECIFICATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager

Federal Rulemaking Process Legislation – Congress passes a law that prescribes general goals for the agency. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) – agency publishes initial analysis of legislative intent and asks for public comment (optional). Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) – agency publishes proposed rule language after review by Federal Office of Management & Budget (OMB), with a public comment period. Final Rule – published with response to issues raised by public comment, subject to judicial review

Gas Transmission and Gathering Lines NPRM released 3/15/16, 60 day comment period. –New assessment and repair criteria for transmission lines, MAOP verification, revised IM requirements, changes to corrosion control, extended regulation of Gathering lines, safety features on launchers and receivers.

Excess Flow Valves for Multi-person Dwellings NPRM from 7/15/15 –Requires EFV’s to be installed for certain structures other than single family dwellings (multi-family residences and small commercial consuming volumes < 1,000 SCFH. –PHMSA currently projects this rule to be published January 2017.

Rupture Detection and Valves Rule NPRM expected 7/27/16 –Installation of automatic shutoff valves or equivalent technology, and establish performance based metrics for rupture detection for gas and liquid Transmission lines. For HCA’s, Class 3, 4 locations.

Plastic Pipe NPRM issued 5/21/15. –Addresses composite pipe, 50 year markings, increased design factor for PE pipe (.32 to.40), authorized use of PA12 at higher pressures, tracking and traceability of lines, incorporates revised standards.

Operator Qualifications NPRM issued 7/10/15. –Operator Qualification for new construction, “two part test”, incident reporting requirement changes, cost recovery and special permit language.

Excavation Damage Prevention NPRM issued 7/23/15 –Defines criteria for determining if a State enforcement program for its excavation damage prevention laws is Effective, and allows for PHMSA enforcement if not.

Gas Transmission NPRM Reporting requirements (Part 191) –Repeals reporting requirement exemption for unregulated onshore gathering lines (including annual and incident reports) –Defines an MAOP exceedance that exceeds allowable buildup ( ) as a Safety Related Condition, subject to the reporting requirements in

Gas Transmission NPRM Gathering Line requirements –RP80 is no longer used to define Gathering lines. –Extends regulation to Type A Gathering lines in Class 1 locations, for lines that are 8” or greater. –Newly regulated class of lines must follow the same requirements as currently exists for Type B Gathering.

Gas Transmission NPRM Record Keeping Requirements –Transmission operators must retain mill records, pressure test records, welder qualification records, valve and other component records, class location records, etc. for the life of the pipeline. –New section (d) requires all Transmission operators to have a “Management of Change” program as per ASME B31S

Gas Transmission NPRM MAOP Verification –“Moderate Consequence Area” is an area in a Potential Impact Circle containing 5 or more buildings, an occupied site, or a right-of-way for a freeway, and otherwise does not meet the definition of a High Consequence Area. –“Legacy Construction Techniques” (coupled pipe, wrinkle bends, etc.) and “Legacy Pipe” (LF-ERW, etc.) are defined.

Gas Transmission NPRM MAOP Verification – requires areas with inadequately documented MAOP (2012 Annual Report) to re-establish MAOP. – requires operators to re- establish MAOP for pipelines in a HCA or MCA. Method is Spike Test for Legacy pipe, Pressure Test for Modern pipe. Other methods may be allowed such as derating, engineering critical assessment, certain in-line assessments.

Gas Transmission NPRM MAOP Verification –New “Verification of Pipeline Material”. Defines non-destructive techniques, requires material verification for pipelines that do not have “reliable, traceable, verifiable and complete” documentation when the pipeline is exposed, or for HCA and Class 3, 4 locations. –Operators have to have a “Material Documentation Plan”.

Gas Transmission NPRM MAOP Verification –New Transmission lines in Class 3 or 4 locations, or in a MCA, must be assessed within 15 years, and every 20 years thereafter. Assessment may be ILI, pressure testing, excavation and examination, guided wave ultrasonic testing, direct assessment (only if the line is not pig-able).

Gas Transmission NPRM Cathodic Protection –Transmission operators must perform an above ground indirect assessment to locate moderate to severe coating damage. –Transmission operators must conduct surveys for interference currents and remediate. –Quarterly gas monitoring required for internal corrosion. –(All operators) – interpretation that “prompt remedial action” means the next monitoring interval or 1 year, whatever is less. –Transmission operators must perform a close interval survey for low CP reads.

Gas Transmission NPRM Repair of damages and leaks –General requirements modified to require a 20% pressure reduction when a condition presents an “immediate hazard”. –Establishes immediate, 2-year, and monitored conditions for imperfections and damages outside of HCA’s.

Gas Transmission NPRM Pig Launching and Receiving –New “Launcher and Receiver Safety” section requires pig launchers and receivers o have suitable means to indicate barrel pressure and to relieve pressure in the barrel. –New incorporates standards by reference for in-line inspection. API STD “In-Line Inspection System Qualification Standard” NACE SP “In-Line Inspection of Pipelines” ANSI ILI-PQ-2005 “In-Line Inspection Personnel Qualification and Certification”.

Gas Transmission NPRM Integrity Management –Direct assessment only allowed on un-piggable lines. Adds Spike test, GWUT, excavation with direct examination as assessment methods. –Incorporates NACE SP for Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment –Incorporates NACE SP for stress corrosion cracking direct assessment. –Expands the list of immediate repair conditions and preventative and mitigative measures operators must consider. –Adds detail on risk assessment, model validation.

Gas Transmission NPRM Other changes –O&M requirements changed to specifically require procedures to operate pressure relieving devices and control operating pressure. –Continuing surveillance required after extreme weather events (hurricane, flood, earthquake) –New Appendix A summarizes record retention requirements. –New Appendix F provides guidance on the use of Guided Wave Ultrasonic Testing (GWUT) in integrity assessments. –Appendix D (cathodic protection) modernized.

Annual Report Information Annual report information can help you identify risks to your system and look for trends. Compare your system to nationwide and statewide averages

Incidents by cause - Nationwide

Serious Incidents by cause - Nationwide

Hazardous Leaks Eliminated- Nationwide

Excavation Damages per 1,000 locate tickets

Annual Report – Leak Cause information

Annual Report – Excavation Damages

Questions? Pete Chace (614)