GDD accumulations and probabilities were calculated from PRISM daily tmin and tmax grids at 800-m resolution, time period 1981- 2013 GDD base temperature.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Motion in One Dimension
Advertisements

Rate of change and tangent lines
Digital Image Processing
SLOSH to Evac How it is done……. Gloss over process…. LIDAR is flown to get high res elevation LIDAR is flown to get high res elevation Contractors create.
Lecture 12 Lecture 1L PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES.
North American Croplands Richard Massey & Dr. Teki Sankey.
Western Region GIS Update: National Suitability Modeling of Biofuel Feedstocks Chris Daly, Mike Halbleib David Hannaway Sun Grant Western Region GIS Center.
Air Temperature Chapter 3. Overview Daily Temperature Variations –Daytime Warming, Nighttime cooling –Cold Air near the surface The Controls of Temperature.
Maps and Globes.
Corn Growth and Development
Lecture by Austin Troy © 2005 Lecture 13: Introduction to Raster Spatial Analysis Using GIS-- Introduction to GIS Lecture Notes by Austin Troy, University.
More Raster and Surface Analysis in Spatial Analyst
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
AgWeatherNet The Multi GDD is a chart showing growing degree day (GDD) units with a variety of Base Temperatures Multi GDD Note: Be sure you have already.
Corn Growth and Development
Chapter 2 Motion in One Dimension. Quantities in Motion Any motion involves three concepts Displacement Velocity Acceleration These concepts can be used.
Developing a Cold Temperature Risk Assessment Kristen Gore, Adrienne Wootten, and Ryan Boyles Carolinas and Virginia Climate Conference October 20, 2009.
 Cool season crops  Hardiness  Growing degree day (GDD)  Metabolism  Plant heat-zone map  Plant hardiness zone map  Stratification  Thermoperiod.
Animal, Plant & Soil ScienceAnimal, Plant & Soil Science E4-6 The Influence of Temperature on Plants.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 Spatial Analyst
Arctic Temperatization Arctic Temperatization : A Preliminary Study of Future Climate Impacts on Agricultural Opportunities in the Pan-Arctic Drainage.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Constructing Climate Graphs
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Introduction to Raster Spatial Analysis Using GIS-- Introduction to GIS Raster Query Map Calculation Zonal statistics Terrain functions Viewshed.
This is Julie’s (and my) 2003 data. The location is Foster Park and the graph shows TDN and Chla concentrations as the 2003 algal bloom waxed and waned.
NE Drought Conditions CARC Update: April 2010 Mark Svoboda and Brian Fuchs National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln Al Dutcher,
Agro-Climate Tools Indiana Certified Crop Adviser Program Indianapolis, Indiana Dec. 18, 2013 Chad Hart Iowa State University
Using Degree-Day Tools To Improve Pest Management: Dont get caught off-guard ! Len Coop, IPPC, OSU Corvallis Jan 25, 2012.
Fundamentals of GIS Lecture Materials by Austin Troy except where noted © 2008 Lecture 13: Introduction to Raster Spatial Analysis Using GIS-- By.
Objectives 2.1Scatterplots  Scatterplots  Explanatory and response variables  Interpreting scatterplots  Outliers Adapted from authors’ slides © 2012.
Ed Maurer Partitioning precipitation into rain and snow for event-based hydrologic modeling in the Pacific Northwest U.S. Edwin Maurer Civil Engineering.
Crop Yield in North Dakota as a function of Precipitation Tyler McEwen GIS in Water Resources Term Project Presentation 12/7/2006.
Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL Background – Current BP & FIL grids not showing BP & FIL values in areas designated NB3 by LANDFIRE.
M2M Conference Call February 13, 2013 John surface temp estimate update Ian update on progress with distillation of garden array into pixel value Lynn.
Terrain Susceptibility Kyle Renner GIS in Water Resources 2015
AgClimate View Conference/Meeting Name Location Date Presenter University
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Elevation of given points on topographic maps Mr. DeMarco.
U2U Tools and Educational Resources U2U Training Webinar May 6, 2015 Chad Hart Iowa State University
Corn Growing Degree Day Tool (GDD DST ) Crop Management Conference Columbia, MO December 15-16, 2015 Ray Massey University of Missouri.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS
Satellite Data Tools For Wyoming Agriculture
Sorghum Opportunities
Multisource Imaging of Seasonal Dynamics in Land Surface Phenology: A Fusion Approach Using Landsat and Sentinel-2 Mark Friedl1, Eli Melaas1, Jordan Graesser1,
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Statistical surfaces: DEM’s
U2U Tools and Outreach U2U Annual Meeting Davenport, Iowa May 20, 2014
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Weather-based Decision Tools
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Climate Graphs What do they tell us?.
Climate Graphs What do they tell us?.
Raster-based spatial analyses
Making Climate Information Usable to the Ag Community
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.
Conference/Meeting Name
Kansas Corn: Seed to STEM
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Initial Research Directions for Mapping Chilling Statistics
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Temp determinations Daily mean temp Daily temp range Monthly mean temp
Conference/Meeting Name
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Presentation transcript:

GDD accumulations and probabilities were calculated from PRISM daily tmin and tmax grids at 800-m resolution, time period GDD base temperature was 50F (10C) and the maximum was 30C (86F) Twenty-five planting dates were considered, ranging from 31 March to 29 July, at an interval of five days Twenty probability-of-success categories were considered, ranging from 5 to 100%, at an interval of 5% Four fall freeze thresholds were considered: 26, 28, 30, and 32F Maps used a 32F fall freeze threshold Spring freeze threshold is assumed to be 32F Maps show the latest planting date that meets the given probability of success, at a 5-day and 5% precision Planting Date Methods

The first set of maps shows final planting dates in their native grid form, at 800-m resolution Grey areas labeled as “No date” denote areas for which there was no planting date that met the probability criteria Variations of 25 days or more can be see within individual counties Elevation differences within counties can be up to 500 ft (150 m) or more; this is enough to cause significant variations in GDDs that accumulate over the growing season At the end of this presentation, a close-up of Cloud County highlights how terrain variations can producing varying final planting dates Planting Date Maps – Native Grids Grain Sorghum

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates Kansas PRISM native 800-m grids Grain Sorghum

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates Kansas PRISM native 800-m grids Grain Sorghum

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates Kansas PRISM native 800-m grids Grain Sorghum

County-level maps were created by determining the modal (majority) planting date in each county Areas not in cultivation were excluded from the modal calculations Cultivated areas were derived from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Cropland Data Layer (CDL) The native resolution of the CDL is 30 m The CDL was resampled to 800 m resolution by denoting an 800-m pixel as cultivated if it contained one or more 30-m CDL cultivated pixels This resampling process increased the cultivated area substantially, but was necessary to maintain a reasonable number of pixels for the modal calculations in counties with little cultivated land The cultivated land designation is for all crops, and has not been refined to include only grain sorghum, for example County-Level Planting Date Maps Grain Sorghum

Kansas Cultivated Land Areas Source: NASS Cropland Data Layer, 30-m resolution

Kansas Cultivated Land Areas Source: NASS Cropland Data Layer, 30-m, post-processed to 800-m. Any 800-m pixel containing cultivated land was labeled cultivated. Used as mask in county-level calculations.

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates Kansas Modal date for county Cultivated land only Grain Sorghum

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates Kansas Modal date for county Cultivated land only Grain Sorghum

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates Kansas Modal date for county Cultivated land only Grain Sorghum

Charts showing probability of success vs. planting date for a county represent the 800-m grid cell at the center (centroid) of the county, not the entire county We do not yet have the capability to easily create this kind of graph for an entire county at a time The locations of the county centroids are shown on the following slide We switched from a smooth curve to straight connecting lines because the spline line smoother was overshooting and undershooting in areas of rapidly changing slope The Rawlins and Scott county graphs do not always show smoothly increasing probabilities as one moves later in spring; this appears to be caused by occasional relatively late freezes in these areas Probability of Success vs. Planting Date Graphs Grain Sorghum

Locations of County Centroids

This set of maps zooms in on Cloud County, showing in more detail the fine-scale variations in final planting date that can occur due to temperature variations within a county The high-resolution (30-m) CDL shows that much, but not all, of the higher terrain is uncultivated Excluding uncultivated land from the county statistics helps to lessen the influence of unrepresentative areas However, it does raise the risk of failure in areas of higher terrain that are cultivated Planting Date Maps – Cloud County

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates Cloud County, KS PRISM native 800-m grids Grain Sorghum

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates PRISM native 800-m grids Cloud County, KS Grain Sorghum

Spring Freeze: 32F GDD Base: 50F GDD Max: 86F Time Period: Probability of Success (%) Maturity GDD Fall Freeze Temperature (F) GDD-Based Final Planting Dates PRISM native 800-m grids Cloud County, KS Grain Sorghum

Cloud County Cultivated Land Areas Source: NASS Cropland Data Layer, 30-m resolution