© GSMA 2014 Name: Katrin Jordan Chair GSMA Terminal Steering Group (TSG) EU Commission Workshop: Receiver performance of mobile telephones 10 th April 2014, Brussels Restricted - Confidential Information © GSM Association 2014 All GSMA meetings are conducted in full compliance with the GSMA’s anti-trust compliance policy GSMA Antenna Performance Activities

© GSMA Overview 1.About GSMA Terminal Steering Group (TSG) 2.TSG Antenna Performance Activities 3.Position on an Antenna Performance Labelling

© GSMA Introduction: GSMA Terminal Steering Group (1/2) Coordinates and drives terminal related matters in GSMA and beyond Membership – Over 65 companies – Operator, hardware and chipset vendor community worldwide Three focus areas: – Sharing of terminal related information – Alignment of terminal requirements – Alignment of field and lab test cases

© GSMA Introduction: GSMA Terminal Steering Group (2/2) Topics driven include : – Antenna Performance – NFC Requirements + Test cases – WI-FI – HD Voice Logo Terminal Requirements – Smartphone Network Efficiency – Smartphone Browser User Experience – 3GPP bearer field & lab tests – Battery Life Measurement Requirement Documents Test Cases / Certification Req. Inputs to industry Operators Vendors Industry groups + Certification

© GSMA GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Background Mobile Handset design changed significantly in recent years – Antennas which were external moved inside the terminal – Antennas evolved to be light-weight and low-volume. Concerns raised about varying antennae performances and implications on user experiences In June 2010, GSMA Board & Strategy Committee agreed to actively address the topic – Conducted a study of Antenna performance on a number of handsets – Findings Acceptable levels were provided for approximately only 50% of the bands covered. Noticeable differences between left and right hand performance in some handsets – Noted related industry activities are non-existing or insufficient 3GPP define only absolute global minimum over the air (OTA) performance req. Test methods used and Antenna Performance values requested by the various operators differ widely, leaving vendors with fragmented requirements.

© GSMA GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Background GSMA Executive Management Team tasked TSG to address the problem and enhance the Antenna Performances across devices and related user experiences.

© GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Activities Sept 2011: TSG kicked-off an operator only work item May 2013: GSMA published + shared TS.24 v1.0TS.24 v1.0 – Operator minimum Acceptance Values for Device Antenna Performance for Head and Hand Feb 2014: GSMA published + shared TS.24 v2.0TS.24 v2.0 – Operator Minimum Acceptance Values for Device Antenna Performance for Head and Hand, Browser, Free Space Q1 2014: TSG kicked off TS.24 v3.0 Draft – Operator Minimum Acceptance Values for Device Antenna Performance for Head and Hand, Browser, Free Space, LTE – Publication target: End-2014

© GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Activities (2) TS.24 Performance Requirements are based on Industry specifications from CTIA, 3GPP TS.24 Performance Requirements are validated against – Annual GSMA commissioned tests of market devices – Operator internal performance requirements and test results – TSG Vendor feedback TS.24 Performance Requirements – Can and are adopted/enforced by key operators around the world in their bilateral terminal requirements

© GSMA Antenna Performance: Labelling Scheme The originating issue and concerns about poor Antenna Performance and impact on the customer – Are understood and supported – Were also basis for GSMA work However, it should be noted, whilst it sounds so simple, the actual delivery of a labelling scheme is rather complex and carries risks 1. Realization 2. User / Market Impact 3. Resource Impact

© GSMA Antenna Performance: Labelling Scheme 1.Realization – It will be very difficult to sufficiently cater with one useful logo for all the different regional marketing & technical differences RF performance is defined per band, per scenario (head and hand, free space, browsing), per technology (2G, 3G, LTE) and against different test specs (3GPP, CTIA). RF performance is defined for receiving and sending; in case of receiving and where device carry more antennas, values can be defined with only one antenna switched on/both switched on. Different bands may have a different importance to operators in Europe Different use cases may have a different importance to operators Operators may want to accept variances in RF performances per scenario/bands/device model pending on internal priorities Difficult to keep up the logo evolution with evolving RF technology developments

© GSMA Antenna Performance: Labelling Scheme 2.User / Market Impact – Difficult to represent all applicable RF performances in one logo which makes sense to the user – Risk that a poorly delivered labelling scheme confuses users more than providing value – Risk of a strong lobby and, given the complexity, agreement on a logo could take quite some time and end up with underlying requirements which are much below those defined in GSMA and/or by indiv. operators today already. This in turn could negatively impact vendor efforts + eventually user experience. – Risk of a strict RF scheme negatively blocks innovation where new designs cannot test with existing test specs 3. Resource Impact – Resources of the key RF experts are very limited and much needed in industry work – to understand, assess and compromise on AP requirements – Risk of those handful of deep experts’ resources being diverted to follow/engage industry label activity

© GSMA Antenna Performance: Labelling Scheme Rather  Means other than a logo/label can address the problem more efficiently  GSMA members already actively aligning and engaging on global scale and across the industry  Global Certification Forum (GCF) supports reporting of Antenna Performance Requirements  Terminal vendors are taking action, also by introducing new technologies to enhance performance  Findings over the past two years are promising of increasing performance  More can be achieved, utilizing existing processes/fora to  Drive, communicate and adopt requirements  Share and make test results -based on common standards- available on wider scale

© GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Labelling Scheme Conclusion: A regulated industry wide labelling scheme could prove difficult to implement in a way that provides real value to consumers and helps drive forwards the antenna performance of devices within the industry. However we do believe an industry initiated set of performance standards, based on testing methodologies approved by GSMA and implemented as part of the GCF could be a great value. We would therefore request and encourage the EU and especially also the Scandinavian countries to work with and help promote the ongoing work of GSMA to improve Antenna performance with Device Vendors.

© GSMA Backup Supporting Document: – TS.24 v2.0 Operator Minimum Acceptance Values for Device Antenna Performance 03 Feb 2014 Contacts – Paul Gosden, GSMA TSG Director – Katrin Jordan, GSMA TSG Chair

© GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Activities - Phase 1 Sept 2011: TSG kicked-off an operator only work item – Agreed on test method: CTIA – Agreed on scope for PH1: Head and Hand – Agreed on interim values – Validated values against 2 rounds of GSMA tests + operator internal findings – Reviewed values with terminal vendors May 2013: GSMA published + shared TS.24 v1.0TS.24 v1.0 – Operator minimum Antenna Performance for Head and Hand – Values can and are adopted/enforced by operators in their bilateral terminal requirements Market Reaction found – Stronger vendor attention and increased performance

© GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Activities - Phase 2 Q1 2013: TSG kicked off Ph2 – Agreed on test method: CTIA 3.2 – Agreed on scope for PH2: Browser and Free Space – Agreed on interim values – Validated values against a round of GSMA tests + operator internal findings – Findings Significantly improved antenna performances (also due to new radio technologies) More efforts made to achieve a high TRS (supporting download) – Reviewed values with terminal vendors Feb 2014: GSMA published + shared TS.24 v2.0 Operator Minimum Acceptance Values for Device Antenna PerformanceTS.24 v2.0

© GSMA TSG Antenna Performance: Activities - Phase 3 Q1 2014: TSG kicked off Ph3 – Agreed on test method: CTIA GPP – Agreed on scope for PH3: LTE – Agreed on scenarios: Head and Hand, Browser and Free Space To come – Alignment of Draft Values (Q2 2014) – Validation through external testing + vendor review (Q3 2014) – Finalization and Publication (End-2014)