Quarkonia and open heavy flavours in event generators New observables in quarkonium production workshop ECT*, Trento, 29/02 - 04/03 OUTLINE  Why event.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zi-Wei Lin (ECU) 28th WWND, Puerto Rico April 10, Update of Initial Conditions in A Multiple Phase Transport (AMPT) Model Zi-Wei Lin Department.
Advertisements

Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
Direct Photon Production in pp collisions at the LHC Théorie LHC France 06 April 2010 IPN Lyon F.M. Liu IOPP/CCNU, Wuhan, China K. Werner Subatech, Nantes,
Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July , 2003.
Recombination for JET Shower MC: Status and Discussion Rainer Fries Texas A&M University JET NLO & MC Meeting Wayne State University, August 23, 2013 On.
Tools for simulations Sarah Porteboeuf-Houssais LPC Clermont-Ferrand Physics at A Fixed Target ExpeRiment (AFTER) using the LHC beams 3-13 Febuary 2013.
Marianne BargiottiInternational Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium October 2007, DESY Hamburg MC and quarkonium physics studies for LHCb Marianne.
Charm & bottom RHIC Shingo Sakai Univ. of California, Los Angeles 1.
Peter Christiansen (Lund University) for the ALICE Collaboration.
Heavy Quark Probes of QCD Matter at RHIC Huan Zhong Huang University of California at Los Angeles ICHEP-2004 Beijing, 2004.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
References to Study the New Matter. Study QGP in different Centrality Most Central events (highest multiplicity), e.g. top 5% central, i.e. 5% of the.
Forward-Backward Correlations in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Aaron Swindell, Morehouse College REU 2006: Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University.
Julia Velkovska Selected CMS Results from pp collisions 27th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Winter Park, Colorado Feb 6-13, 2011.
Ali Hanks - APS Direct measurement of fragmentation photons in p+p collisions at √s = 200GeV with the PHENIX experiment Ali Hanks for the PHENIX.
1 Baryonic Resonance Why resonances and why  * ? How do we search for them ? What did we learn so far? What else can we do in the.
Forward-Backward Correlations in Heavy Ion Collisions Aaron Swindell, Morehouse College REU Cyclotron 2006, Texas A&M University Advisor: Dr. Che-Ming.
Jet Fragmentation Ali Hanks JClub June 21, 2006 Ali Hanks - JClub.
B-Production in PYTHIA Nick Brook University of Bristol Review of current use Review of current use Comparisons Comparisons B-asymmetries B-asymmetries.
Centrality-dependent pt spectra of Direct photons at RHIC F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner.
Honnef, Honnef, 27/06/08 1 Consequences of a  c /D enhancement effect.
Direct photon production in RHIC and LHC energies Xiao-Mei Li, Shou-Ping Li, Shou-Yang Hu, Ben-Hao Sa China Institute of Atomic Energy Dai-Mei Zhou, Zhi-Guang.
Interjet Energy Flow at ZEUS. Patrick Ryan. Univ. of Wisconsin DPF, Aug. 27, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin Aug. 27, 2004 Interjet Energy.
Event Simulation Tools in ALICE Andreas Morsch Generator Mini-Workshop CERN, Geneva June 20, 2003.
Strange and Charm Probes of Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC International Symposium on Multi-Particle Dynamics Aug 9-15, 2005 Huan Zhong Huang University.
Glauber shadowing at particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions within the framework of pQCD. Alexey Svyatkovskiy scientific advisor: M.A.Braun.
Uncertainties in jet event generators due to hadronizaton scheme, Other issues with energy loss on E-by-E hydro, and the extraction of transport coefficients.
Jets at RHIC Jiangyong Jia
Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.
Measurement of J/ψ production in p+p collisions at √s = 500 GeV at STAR experiment Rongrong Ma (BNL) Hard Probes 2015 McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
NE X US hep-ph/ Physics Reports 350 (2001) Guideline: theoretical consistency hep-ph/ Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 3506 Hajo Drescher,
U N C L A S S I F I E D 7 Feb 2005 Studies of Hadronic Jets with the Two-Particle Azimuthal Correlations Method Paul Constantin.
Jet quenching and direct photon production F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano 平野哲文 University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner University.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
09/15/10Waye State University1 Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Ahmed M. Hamed Midwest Critical Mass University of Toledo, Ohio October, 2005 Wayne.
ALICE signals for MPI processes Sarah Porteboeuf-Houssais for the ALICE Collaboration 2 nd International spring school of the GDR PH-QCD Correlations between.
June 25, 2004 Jianwei Qiu, ISU 1 Introduction to Heavy Quark Production Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University CTEQ Summer School on QCD Analysis and Phenomenology.
Sarah Porteboeuf*, Klaus Werner, Tanguy Pierog Rencontres de Moriond, La Thuile, March 13th-20th 2010 Producing hard processes regarding the complete event:
In Medium Hadronization: Hadrons and Jets Rainer Fries Texas A&M University Jet Modifications in the RHIC and LHC Era Wayne State, August 20, 2014 With.
Ralf Averbeck Stony Brook University Hot Quarks 2004 Taos, New Mexico, July 19-24, 2004 for the Collaboration Open Heavy Flavor Measurements with PHENIX.
Francesco Noferini Bologna University Erice, Italy 31 st August 2006 Two-particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC.
Aachen, November 2007 Event Generators 3 Practical Topics Peter Skands CERN / Fermilab.
Study of b quark contributions to non-photonic electron yields by azimuthal angular correlations between non-photonic electrons and hadrons Shingo Sakai.
Parton energy loss Marco van Leeuwen. 2 Hard probes of QCD matter Use ‘quasi-free’ partons from hard scatterings to probe ‘quasi-thermal’ QCD matter Interactions.
OPEN HEAVY FLAVORS 1. Heavy Flavor 2 Heavy quarks produced in the early stages of the collisions (high Q2)  effective probe of the high-density medium.
Andrey Korytov, University of Florida ISMD 2003 September 5-11, 2003, Kraków Soft QCD Phenomena in High-E T Jet Events at Tevatron Andrey Korytov for CDF.
Olena Linnyk Charmonium in heavy ion collisions 16 July 2007.
The role of hadronization on jet and hadron nuclear modification factors Urs Achim Wiedemann CERN PH-TH QM15, Kobe, Japan, 28 March 2015 Based on: K.C.
Jet Hadronization in Vacuum and in the Medium Rainer Fries Texas A&M University Quark Matter 2015 Kobe, September 28, 2015 With Kyongchol Han Che Ming.
Charm elliptic flow at RHIC B. Zhang 1, L.W. Chen 2, C.M. Ko 3 1 Arkansas State University, 2 Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 3 Texas A&M University Charm.
Intermediate pT results in STAR Camelia Mironov Kent State University 2004 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop on Strangeness and Exotica at RHIC.
Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Ahmed M. Hamed Midwest Critical Mass University of Toledo, Ohio Oct. 22,
Production, energy loss and elliptic flow of heavy quarks at RHIC and LHC Jan Uphoff with O. Fochler, Z. Xu and C. Greiner Hard Probes 2010, Eilat October.
Tools08 1 st July1 PDF issues for Monte Carlo generators Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University.
Two particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC Francesco Noferini Bologna University INFN – sez. Bologna ALICE-TOF Tuesday, May 16th Villasimius (Italy) HOT.
Heavy quarks and charmonium at RHIC and LHC within a partonic transport model Jan Uphoff with O. Fochler, Z. Xu and C. Greiner XLIX International Winter.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Dynamics of Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at CBM energies Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Elena Bratkovskaya , CBM Workshop „ The Physics.
Direct photon production in p + p and Au + Au collisions at = 200GeV Xiao-Mei Li, Shou-Ping Li, Shou-Yang Hu, Ben-Hao Sa China Institute of Atomic Energy.
Review of ALICE Experiments
Is Strangeness production different in the Bulk and in Jets ?
Event generators.
Heavy-Flavour Physics in Heavy-Ion Collisions
Fragmentation and Recombination for Exotics in Heavy Ion Collisions
Edgar Dominguez Rosas Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares
Multi-Parton Interaction (MPI) measurement at LHC
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics
b-Quark Production at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Quarkonia and open heavy flavours in event generators New observables in quarkonium production workshop ECT*, Trento, 29/ /03 OUTLINE  Why event generators are needed for new observables ?  Event generators on the market (pp to AA)  Quarkonia and HF production in PYTHIA  Quarkonia and HF production in EPOS  Quarkonia and HF production vs. multiplicity  Conclusions

Event generators Goal (dream ?) : Strategy : Initial state Elementary interactions : soft, hard, both? Radiation Remnants Multiple interactions Underlying events Particle production (string picture) 2  Different from a calculation/computation usually inclusive and for one observable (for example p T spectrum in pp -> J/ Ψ + X)  Should give access to exclusive observables  To reproduce entirely an event : particles in final state with all properties

Generate events for corrections  Simulate events for detector/analysis purpose  Model Comparison If you look at inclusive observables, maybe there is a model on the market that will be more adapted If you start looking at exclusive staff : particle correlations, soft vs. hard,... Event generators trying to reproduce all aspects of the event could be of interest 3 Test an analysis process on MC data prior to real data Test your comprehension of your detector (MC = Event generation + Geant simulation of detector) Why to use them ? New observables in quarkonium production

 pp event generators PYTHIA HERWIG ALPGEN: hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions, to be coupled to HERWIG or PHYTIA Jimmy: multiparton Interactions in HERWIG SHERPA  Specialization, complement for pp event generators EPOS Based on pQCD approach : the hard interaction is the basis of the framework Based on Gribov-Regge approach, multiple interactions are the basis of the framework Cascade: hard processes with parton evolution (unintegrated PDFs), hadronization by PYTHIA Non-exhaustive overview of event generators automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

5  Heavier systems : from pp to AA Hydjet++ AMPT Hijing EPOS Based on PYTHIA, with emphasize on minijet, include nuclear shadowing Hydro evolution (only AA?) Hijing for initial condition, add final state scattering to generate elliptic flow Picture of elementary parton-parton interactions viewed as color flux tube extended to all system, with shadowing and hydro evolution  Specialization, complement for heavier systems JEWEL in-medium jet energy loss, jet quenching Q-PYTHIA in-medium jet energy loss, jet quenching heavy-quark propagation in a realistic fluid dynamical medium Non-exhaustive overview of event generators

6 In the following, focus on two : generalist event generators that include heavy flavour and quarkonia and extension for heavy-ion physics  PYTHIA  EPOS

7 EPOS PYTHIA model BaselineMultiple Interaction Hard process Parton-based Gribov-Regge Theory MPI Reconstructed after the hard process. Interaction ordered in hardness. In the new model : color reconnection Hard and semi-hard ladder with soft pre- evolution u, d, s, g, gamma, c Based on inclusive cross section Almost everything, if not in the code, can couple with extra code systems pp, pA, AA Hijing AMPT PYTHIA 5,3? + minijet + nuclear structure HIJING + transport model (ZPC parton cascade) pppp, pA, AA pp?, pA, AA HF Quarkonia Open charm and open beauty J/Ψ in progress Yes modeled by excitation of quark-diquark strings with gluon links + multiple low-p T exchange PYTHIA 5,3 Model ingredients

8 Collectivity Yes, string density, eg. for all systems if energy density high enough. Event by event hydro in EPOS2 No Hadroniz ation String model with area law, diquark for baryon production String model with fragmentation function, popcorn for baryon production EPOS PYTHIA model Hijing AMPT Initial and Final state radiation Iterative procedure from partons in hadrons to 2->2 process A posteriori reconstruction Available for MPI in the new model (6.4) transport model Remnant Yes Off-shell treatment Yes Connection between hard processes and MPI Total by construction : several ladders soft or hard, energy conservation and color connection With color reconnection (6,4), final state effect ? modeled by excitation of quark-diquark strings with gluon links + multiple low-p T exchange PYTHIA 5,3 Simple model for jet- quenching (jet- medium interaction in AA) Model ingredients

9 Quarkonia and HF in PYTHIA PYTHIA Physics : ref 6.4 Manual 1) The first hard interaction is the first step of event machinery : Computed in pQDC framework with factorization, possibility to select hard process : charm, bottom, jets, photon -> can tune this step 2) MPI (Multiple Parton Interaction) : other processes (soft or hard) can happen in parallel: PYTHIA model : the first hard interaction is particular, other are reconstructed afterward, ordered in hardness, in PYTHIA 6, only g,u,d,s available in other interactions. In PYTHIA 8 : second hard processes can include charm and bottom ! At this step only partons are produced

10 Quarkonia and HF in PYTHIA All produced partons: - hard process, - ISR/FSR (Initial/Final State Radiation), - MPI, - Remnants are connected via strings: the LUND procedure. Resonances let out of the machinery Formed strings decay into hadrons. Fragmentation via qqbar pairs, pop-corn to produce baryons. qqbar = u,d,s,c (c is suppressed but available), heavier not implemented

11 Quarkonia and HF in PYTHIA  In the 2->2 hard sub-process  Gluon splitting (g->QQ, gluon originated from ISR/FSR) 1) Open heavy-flavour p p c/b Partons, connected to strings p p Any hard 2->2 sub-process (gg->gg for example) c/b Partons, connected to strings p p Any hard 2->2 sub-process (gg->gg for example) cc cluster decay into J/Ψ Other c/b connected to strings Color reconnection make this contribution available with only one g->Qqbar : artificial enhancement of this contribution in PYTHIA6.4 ( N.B : Cluster : small peace of string : decay directly into hadrons) p p Pre-resonant state (NRQCD): decay into J/ Ψ or Upsilon PYTHIA 8 : color singlet and octet Singlet no FSR evolution, octet yes 2) Resonance production c/b

12  String fragmentation u u cc D0 An event can still produce J/ Ψ and D mesons via string fragmentation cc pair production suppressed as compared to u, d, s. Higher states not available Quarkonia and HF in PYTHIA Origin of heavy flavours in PYTHIA JHEP 1509 (2015) 148

13 Quarkonia and HF in EPOS 2011, DESY, Hamburg, Klaus WERNER, Subatech, Nantes

14 Same framework extended ppAB Quarkonia and HF in EPOS

15 Quarkonia and HF in EPOS QQ production At low p T, important contribution from gluon splitting m b =4.6 GeV m c =1.2 GeV Courtesy of B. Guiot, QGP france, 2015

16 Quarkonia and HF in EPOS J/Ψ production within the CEM model Courtesy of B. Guiot, QGP france, 2015 Work in progress A parameter for the fraction of cc that hadronize into J/Ψ

17 Phys. Lett. B 712 (2012) 3, 165–175  Comparison with PYTHIA 6.4 Tune PERUGIA 2011 Direct J/Ψ production only J/Ψ produced in initial hard interactions Trend not reproduced by PYTHIA 6.4 MPI without charm in subsequent interactions MPI ordered in hardness Phys. Lett. B 712 (2012) 3, 165–175 See D. Kikola talk Quarkonia and HF vs. charged particle multiplicity

18 JHEP 1509 (2015) 148 PYTHIA  Top left : average D-mesons from different sources  Top right : average B-mesons from different sources  Bottom left : average D-mesons, all contributions, slices in p T  Bottom right : average D-mesons, slices in p T for first hard contribution only Quarkonia and HF vs. charged particle multiplicity

19 Quarkonia and HF vs. charged particle multiplicity JHEP 09 (2015) 148  PYTHIA and EPOS wo hydro  EPOS w hydro and percolation Departure from linearity help to describe the data. Reduction of the number of charged particles -hydro evolution for EPOS arXiv: string percolation for the percolation model Linear behavior fails to reproduce the data for the highest multiplicities See D. Kikola talk

20 Quarkonia and HF vs. charged particle multiplicity Rongrong Ma, Hard probes 2015 PYTHIA Up to Event activity = 3 only All contributions for J/Ψ production Works pretty well

21 Conclusions  Event generators are of interest for new observables in quarkonium production : prospective and model comparison  Heavy-flavours and quarkonia production in PYTHIA  Heavy-flavours in EPOS, quarkonia in progress  Many event generators available, few with quarkonia and underlying events, for light and heavy systems Contribution from hard process, first and MPI, (D 38%, B 60%) and ISR/FSR radiation (D 62%, B 40%) Only event generator with hydro evolution for all systems Contribution from ladder evolution, gluon fusion in hard process, gluon splitting HF : ISR/FSR contribution scales with multiplicity HF : MPI with hard processes scale with multiplicity J/Ψ : total production reproduce STAR Data HF : MPI scale with multiplicity HF : hydro evolution helps to describe the data by reducing the number of charged particles Monte Carlo event generators can play a role in understanding HF and onia production in (dense) hadronic environment