Aim To synthesize the best available evidence on shared decision-making (SDM) resulting in the development of a comprehensive model to be used as a guide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
+ The APN role of “Consultation” A Panel Presentation Serena Butler Abi Fitzgerald Renee Latoures.
Advertisements

CULTURAL COMPETENCY Technical Assistance Pre-Application Workshop.
#1 Construct your question #2 Track down the best evidence #3 Critically appraise the evidence #4 Integrate with clinical expertise and patient considerations.
Teaching/Learning Strategies to Support Evidence-Based Practice Asoc. prof. Vida Staniuliene Klaipeda State College Dean of Faculty of Health Sciences.
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing
The process of formulating responses remains
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
The nature of SDM in mental health Emma Kaminskiy PhD Student Faculty of Health and Social Care.
Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice October 2014 Dawn Stacey RN, PhD Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients Full Professor,
What Defines Community-Based Participatory Research? Eugenia Eng, DrPH Derek Griffith, PhD Scott Rhodes, PhD Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD.
Continuing Competence in Nursing
The Process of Scope and Standards Development
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS
DR EBTISSAM AL-MADI Consumer Informatics, nursing informatics, public health informatics.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Developing Research Proposal Systematic Review Mohammed TA, Omar Ph.D. PT Rehabilitation Health Science.
Integrating Patient Safety across the Curriculum to Improve Healthcare Quality: One School’s Journey Susan Grinslade, PhD, RN, PHNCS, BC Sharon Hewner,
Building Capacity for Better Care Behavioural Support Systems Across Canada Dr. J Kenneth LeClair Sarah Clark.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing Dr. Derek Richards derek.richards [at] tcd.ie.
Systematic Reviews.
From Competencies to Outcomes: Nursing Care of Older Adults Christine Mueller, PhD, RN, FGSA, FAAN Professor, University of Minnesota, School of Nursing.
Learning Outcomes of the SCPHN Programme & How they Link to Practice.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
A Nationally Endorsed Framework for Measuring and Reporting Culturally Competent Care Nicole W. McElveen, MPH Senior Project Manager,
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
2008 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Step III Overview - Jon Frantsvog Ira Schoenberger Tim Case.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Unit 1: Health IT Teams Examples and Characteristics Component 17/ Unit 11 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process
Using the first nation medicine wheel as an aid to ethical decision-making in medical care Brunton N; Kakekagumick K; Cromarty H, RN; Linkewich B, HBScN;
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
All health care professionals must understand and use the EBP approach to practice Incorporates expertise of clinician and patient’s values and preferences.
Primary studies Secondry studies. Primary studies Experimental studies Clinical trial studies Surveys studies.
Standards and Competencies for Cancer Chemotherapy Nursing Practice in Canada: CANO/ACIO AN INTRODUCTION.
Issues and challenges to scoping and focusing the question ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 8 September 2011 Janet.
` ASystematic review of the effectiveness of nurse coordinated transitioning of care on readmission rates for patients with heart failure Jason T. Slyer.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Depression Screening in Primary Care and Impact on Suicide Prevention Anne-Marie T. Mann, BSN, RN, DNP Candidate Diane Kay Boyle, PhD, RN, FAAN.
Presentation By: Leaniza F. Igot-Scheir, RN Clinical Nursing Information System First Sem Chapter 20: Practice Applications Chapter 20 by Joyce.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 40 The Nurse Leader in.
ENHANCING INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATION IN HEALTH CARE Ayman M. Hamdan-Mansour, RN, PhD School of Nursing-The University of Jordan.
21st Century Skills in the Classroom
The Benefits of and Barriers to Psychiatric Advance
Barriers to the Completion of Advance Directives An Integrative Review of the Literature Anna Malia Connor Ticknor MENP for Non-Nurse (MS), College of.
Neuman’s Systems Model
The Nurse’s Role in Overcoming Barriers to Cancer Screening of African Americans An Integrative Review of the Literature Wendy Marie Clayton and Dr. Joseph.
The importance of emotional learning within communication between the staff Project Number: RO01-KA
Effective evidence-based occupational therapy
A Systematic review of the effectiveness of structured interdisciplinary collaboration for adult home hospice/palliative care patients on patient satisfaction.
Performance Measurement and Rural Primary Care: A scoping review
Lifestyle factors in the development of diabetes among African immigrants in the UK: A systematic review Alloh T. Folashade Faculty of Health and Social.
Process Indicators for Patient Navigation
Systematic Review, Synthesis, & Clinical Practice Guidelines
Evidence-Based Practice
Research & scholarship
Implementation of a Quality Practice Model in the Emergency Department
The Efficacy of the Teach-Back Method of Education on Readmission Rates in Heart Failure Patients Catherine Lynch Abstract Teach-Back Method The teach-back.
Predictors of Success in Transition to Practice on New Graduate Registered Nurses in Critical Care: An Integrative Review of the Literature Shekinah Akut.
By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.
Shifting Organizational Culture
Presentation transcript:

Aim To synthesize the best available evidence on shared decision-making (SDM) resulting in the development of a comprehensive model to be used as a guide for practice, policy, research, and educational initiatives. Background References Shared decision-making is a process where there is a sharing of information between a provider and patient and where this collaborative sharing results in a shared treatment decision leading to better patient health outcomes. 1,2 The literature on SDM from academicians, providers, and researchers is expansive illustrating its complexity. These works deal with the isolated components of this complex process that are portrayed individually creating snapshots each taking place in isolation. A comprehensive understanding is needed to assist in the development of practice, policy, and research initiatives as well as curricula for professional development towards SDM and improved patient-centered health outcomes. 1. Hain DJ, Sandy D. Partners in care: Patient empowerment through shared decision-making. Nephrology Nursing Journal 2013;40(2): Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on shared decision making [Internet] [Cited July 24, 2015]. Available from: Statement.pdf 3. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;52(5): See supplemental page for additional references. Methods Results Design. An integrative review using a framework adapted from Whittemore and Knafl 3 to identify, analyze, and synthesize the best available literature. Inclusion criteria. Addressed the process of SDM between an adult patient and provider—the dyad. Exclusion criteria. Addressed intervention strategies, e.g., education intervention, testing of decision aids. Psychiatric/mental health setting. Search methods. A comprehensive search for quantitative, qualitative, and theoretical papers from 1970 through October 2014 of the following electronic database: PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PsycINFO. Quality appraisal. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were critically appraised using tools from the Joanne Briggs Institute. Data abstraction/Synthesis. Data were extracted and systematically analyzed using an inductive content analysis process to create categories and abstractions which were then grouped under higher order headings. The synthesis process involved creating categories that describes all of the aspects of the SDM process leading to a new representation of facts in the form of a model for SDM. Discussion The patient-provider relationship is a partnership where both parties are active, engaged, and collaborating. Interpersonal communication between the provider and patient takes place during the healthcare encounter. Intrapersonal communication occurs as reflection within the individual provider and patient, adding depth to the communication process. Strategic questioning and listening is used by the provider to facilitate a patient’s insight into the presiding issue and create conversations that explore options, leading towards SDM and action. Reflection also continues after the interaction as providers and patients reflect on how to act on the shared decision. Flexibility occurs as providers and patients work together, alternating who takes the lead, while seeking to find a patient’s comfort level about the assumed role in SDM. Providers will assume a diverse set of roles beyond coordinator and caregiver, such as educator and advocate. Similarly, the patient role is diverse, as patients are not only the recipients of care but partners in their care. Conclusion This integrative review presents a comprehensive and flexible model for SDM in which providers and patients work collaboratively in partnerships towards a shared decision. The model for SDM incorporates a structure and a process in which SDM takes place as a moment in time with implications for the shared decision over time. This flexible model facilitates the ability to strive for balance whether that balance is being sought for practice, policy, research, or education and has the potential to demonstrate improved patient outcomes. Evidence of improved patient outcomes will assist in the attainment of funding needed for the development and implementation of SDM initiatives as well as ensure the development of public policy that supports patient involvement in decision-making. Forty-five papers published between 1997 and 2014 were included in this review: 15 quantitative, 18 qualitative, and 12 conceptual. Data synthesis generated three themes each containing sub-themes that depict the process of SDM. Communication and relationship building o Individual characteristics (n = 17) o Relationship building-–trust and respect (n = 8) o Information exchange—communication (n = 21) o Context (n = 11) Working towards a shared decision o Assessment (n = 11) o Finding balance (n = 10) o Teaching-learning (n = 12) o The decision point (n = 4) Action o Taking action on the decision (n = 4) o Returning to the provider to re-evaluate the decision (n = 5) A model for SDM offering a representation of these themes is presented. This model provides a visual representation of the SDM process providing visual cues for practice, policy, research, and education. Shared Decision-Making for Research, Practice, and Education: Shared Decision-Making for Research, Practice, and Education: An Integrative Review Jason T. Slyer DNP, RN, FNP-BC, FNAP; Marie Truglio-Londrigan, PhD, RN, FNYAM Pace University, New York, NY Table 1. Basic search term strategies used across all databases Patient context search: Shared decision making AND Patient or patients or client or clients AND Experience or experiences or perspective or perspectives or satisfaction or preference or preferences or competent or competency or competencies or demographics or diagnosis or outcome or outcomes or literacy or culture or education Provider context search: Shared decision making AND Physician or physicians or doctor or doctors or clinician or clinician or provider or providers or nurse or nurses AND Experience or experiences or perspective or perspectives or satisfaction or preference or preferences or competent or competency or competencies or demographics or diagnosis or outcome or outcomes or literacy or culture or education Environment context search: Shared decision making ANDEnvironment or “environmental culture” or organization or “organizational culture” or policy or “health service culture” or context or commitment or consistency or continuity or time or economics or “financial resources” or resources Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the article selection process. Figure 2. A model for shared decision-making in clinical practice, research, and education.