The MODIS SST hypercube is a multi-dimensional look up table of SST retrieval uncertainty, bias and standard deviation, determined from comprehensive analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Processing of MODIS for Operational SST, Ocean Color, and GHRSST Bryan Franz and the NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 8th GHRSST-PP Science Team.
Advertisements

SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Sea surface temperature (SST) basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight Center,
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
Upgrades to the MODIS near-IR Water Vapor Algorithm and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithm For Collection 6 Bo-Cai Gao & Rong-Rong Li Remote Sensing Division,
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
Communicating Uncertainties for Microwave-Based ESDRs Frank J. Wentz, Carl A. Mears, and Deborah K. Smith Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA Supported.
Maintaining and Improving the AMSR-E and WindSat Ocean Products Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA AMSR TIM Agenda 4-5 September 2013.
Satellite SST Radiance Assimilation and SST Data Impacts James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA Sea Surface Temperature Science.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
Xin Kong, Lizzie Noyes, Gary Corlett, John Remedios, Simon Good and David Llewellyn-Jones Earth Observation Science, Space Research Centre, University.
1 Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Atmosphere: John Wilkin Sea Surface Temperature IMCS Building Room 214C
Cross Validation of Thermal Infrared Remotely Sensed Data In-Flight Using Automated Validation Sites © 2010 California Institute of Technology. Government.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
Improved NCEP SST Analysis
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison E. Eva Borbas, Zhenglong Li and W. Paul Menzel Cooperative.
Determining the accuracy of MODIS Sea- Surface Temperatures – an Essential Climate Variable Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Meteorology and Physical.
Introduction Land surface temperature (LST) measurement is important for understanding climate change, modeling the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles,
Ongoing calibration and extension of SST 4 and 11 μm waveband algorithms for AQUA and TERRA MODIS using the in situ buoy, radiometer matchup database Robert.
MISST FY1 team meeting April 5-6, Miami, FL NOAA: Gary Wick, Eric Bayler, Ken Casey, Andy Harris, Tim Mavor Navy: Bruce Mckenzie, Charlie Barron NASA:
Walton McBride U.S. Naval Research Lab, Stennis Space Center MS Robert Arnone University of Southern Mississippi, Stennis Space Center MS Jean-François.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
A43D-0138 Towards a New AVHRR High Cloud Climatology from PATMOS-x Andrew K Heidinger, Michael J Pavolonis, Aleksandar Jelenak* and William Straka III.
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
Application of in situ Observations to Current Satellite-Derived Sea Surface Temperature Products Gary A. Wick NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory With.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
Sea surface temperature gradient comparisons from MODIS and AVHRR sensors Ed Armstrong 1, Grant Wagner, Jorge Vazquez, Mike Chin, Gregg Foti, Ben Holt,
NASA Ocean Color Research Team Meeting, Silver Spring, Maryland 5-7 May 2014 II. Objectives Establish a high-quality long-term observational time series.
Evaluation of the Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park; 2 STAR/NESDIS/NOAA Yuling Liu 1, Yunyue.
1 RTM/NWP-BASED SST ALGORITHMS FOR VIIRS USING MODIS AS A PROXY B. Petrenko 1,2, A. Ignatov 1, Y. Kihai 1,3, J. Stroup 1,4, X. Liang 1,5 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR,
Trends & Variability of Liquid Water Clouds from Eighteen Years of Microwave Satellite Data: Initial Results 6 July 2006 Chris O’Dell & Ralf Bennartz University.
Simulator Wish-List Gary Lagerloef Aquarius Principal Investigator Cal/Val/Algorithm Workshop March GSFC.
Sea-surface Temperature from GHRSST/MODIS – recent progress in improving accuracy Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans with Kay Kilpatrick, Ajoy Kumar, Warner.
VIIRS/MODIS Science Teams Meeting May 14-16, 2008 MODIS Sea Surface Temperatures Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Meteorology & Physical Oceanography.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Transfer of AVHRR SST Pathfinder to NODC to sustain long term production, distribution and archiving Sept 8, 2010 CICS PI Robert Evans, RSMAS/U Miami ,
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
COMPARING HRPP PRODUCTS OVER LARGE SPACE AND TIME SCALES Wesley Berg Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
AVHRR Radiance Bias Correction Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate Studies University of Maryland Some concepts and some.
November 28, 2006 Derivation and Evaluation of Multi- Sensor SST Error Characteristics Gary Wick 1 and Sandra Castro 2 1 NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.
Analysis of Simultaneous Nadir Observations of MODIS from AQUA and TERRA Andrew Heidinger and many others NOAA/NESDIS Office of Research and Applications.
STATUS of MODIS AQUA and TERRA SST Transition from V5 to V6
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Dome C, MODIS/AVHRR TOA reflectance time series for (a) band 1, (b) band 2, (c)
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Three-way error analysis between AATSR, AMSR-E and in situ sea surface temperature observations
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
International GHRSST User Symposium Santa Rosa, California, USA 28-29th May 2009 MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures Peter J Minnett & Robert H. Evans With.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder Versions 5 & 6 SST field to various reference fields Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’
EARWiG: SST retrieval issues for High Latitudes Andy Harris Jonathan Mittaz NOAA-CICS University of Maryland Chris Merchant U Edinburgh.
EARWiG: SST retrieval issues for TWP Andy Harris Jonathan Mittaz Prabhat Koner NOAA-CICS University of Maryland Eileen Maturi NOAA/NESDIS, Camp Springs,
Uncertainty estimation from first principles: The future of SSES? Gary Corlett (University of Leicester) Chris Merchant (University of Edinburgh)
MODIS and VIIRS Sea-Surface Temperatures: Validation of continuity products Kay Kilpatrick and Peter J Minnett Susan Walsh, Elizabeth Williams, Goshka.
Sandra Castro and Gary Wick.  Does direct regression of satellite infrared brightness temperatures to observed in situ skin temperatures result in.
ATSR Re-analysis for Climate (ARC) Chris Merchant The University of Edinburgh.
SST from MODIS AQUA and TERRA Kay Kilpatrick, Ed Kearns, Bob Evans, and Peter Minnett Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of.
A Rising Expectation for ISCCP to produce Long-Term Climate Data Records on Satellite Cloud Climatology over 30 years prepared by Toshiyuki KURINO, JMA.
Validation of MTSAT-1R SST for the TWP+ Experiment Leon Majewski 1, Jon Mittaz 2, George Kruger 1,3, Helen Beggs 3, Andy Harris 2, Sandra Castro 4 1 Observations.
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
TOA Radiative Flux Estimation From CERES Angular Distribution Models
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
PGE06 TPW Total Precipitable Water
The SST CCI: Scientific Approaches
AHI IR Tb bias variation diurnal & at low temperature
Sea Surface Temperature, Forward Modeling,
Presentation transcript:

The MODIS SST hypercube is a multi-dimensional look up table of SST retrieval uncertainty, bias and standard deviation, determined from comprehensive analysis of the MODIS Match-up Data Base (MDB). The MDB includes contemporaneous, co-located satellite brightness temperature, in-situ buoy and radiometer SST, environmental ‘observations’ from analyzed model or satellite observed fields, satellite viewing geometry, time and location. A series of quality tests is applied to each pixel during processing of the MDB data to identify cloud and dust aerosol contaminated retrievals and assign each pixel to one of several quality levels (0-3).

After grouping MDB records by quality level the dataset is partitioned into a multi-dimensional array with the following 7 dimensions:  time by season (4)  latitude bands (5 steps in 20 degree from 60S to 60N)  surface temperature (8 increments in 5 degree steps)  satellite zenith angle (4 increments)  brightness temperature difference as a proxy for water vapor (4 intervals for 4 um and 3 intervals for mm SST)  retrieved satellite SST quality level (2 intervals ql==0 and 1)  day/night selection (2 intervals).

The bias (satellite-in situ) and standard deviation are then computed for each element. This hypercube look up table is then used during processing to predict the uncertainty bias and standard deviation of the retrieval. Requires a large MDB sufficient geographic, seasonal, and viewing geometry to capture statistical performance of both algorithm and sensor. –TERRA 7+ years 2.6 million records –AQUA 5+ years 2.4 million records –Unlike your stockbroker,the hypercube approach assumes that the past does predict future performance and that the types of errors can be classified and these characteristics remain relatively stable.

Determining partitions in a hyper cube  Requires understanding of what drives retrieval performance and a good reference fields for exploring the relationships.  The MMDB contains 130 satellite, in situ and ancillary fields that are used to explore the SSES by recursive partitioning. Understanding algorithm strengths and weaknesses  Water vapor, aerosol, clouds  Measurement understanding skin,bulk, reference  Sensor characteristics  viewing geometry,mirrors, detectors, calibrations

Through recursive partitioning the dataset is split into smaller bins along the 7 dimensions while still retaining a sufficient number of records within a bin to produce stable and meaningful statistics (>50 records/bin). Some regions of the hypercube will always remain unpopulated generally when the bin is non-physical eg. It’s never 30 60N. Bins that contain insufficient records due to a lack of in situ buoy measurements (generally at high latitudes during winter months) are filled with the global SSES average as the default.

The MODIS SSES are referenced to in situ bulk measurements but the MODIS instrument measures skin temperature. Diurnal heating effects means that the measurement of the error will behave differently at night versus day- - a natural split in the cube. Water vapor and aerosols can impact the uncertainty estimates for MODIS this is captured by proxy in the channel BT differences (dBT). The quantity and distribution of water vapor, type of aerosol change as a function of latitude and time of year. The relationship between dBT the SSES also changes as a function of scan angle and surface temperature.