Communicating EU Research & Innovation A guide for project participants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP7 Internal Evaluation & Quality Assurance Green Employability Project StudioCentroVeneto - Toni Brunello and Paolo Zaramella Vienna, 10th January 2012.
Advertisements

Hearing the student voice: using students to enhance professional development and inform academic practice in higher education Fiona Campbell, Napier University.
The Business Support Professional Career Pathway Leonardo Partnership Management Meeting CECA´s headquarter Seville, Spain March 2010.
- 1 - Community building and new initiatives: Laying a successful path and how to be on target experiencing from pitfalls, successes and lessons learnt.
METHODS The FETRIC project is targeted to some identified shortcomings and gaps; for example: lack of links and understanding between the research community.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Support actions.
1-1 PRESENTER The Role of the Framework 7 Advisor Your Name Your Websites Websites
Bridging the gap between school education, higher education and employers. Resources which could help with these transitions.
Gloria Peasso APRE Communication & Dissemination of project results Sunny Beach, 19-20/09/2013.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
Information and Publicity Requirements Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 24th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
Communication matters from day one Trends in HORIZON 2020
Submission Writing Fundamentals – Part Webinar Series Leonie Bryen.
Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research Where Librarians can learn and teach Open Science for European Researchers LIBER 2015 London,
ENSURING SUSTAINABILITY TEMPUS FINAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER.
THE MYSTERY OF GETTING RESEARCH INTO USE… THE ONGOING MYSTERY OF GETTING RESEARCH INTO USE.
The Higher Education Innovation Fund Vinnova and British Embassy seminar 21 March 2006.
Helping to ensure sustainability of outputs in Tempus Projects Dr Carol Marrow Emeritus Reader: University of Cumbria Associate Professor: RKC, Zurich,
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Preparing for and Disseminating Study Results. Overview This session will cover how to: Develop and implement a dissemination plan Correctly time the.
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Helpdesk A presentation by Daniela Nolte.
EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement EuCARD-2 Communication.
Communicating and disseminating EU research Charlotte Haentzel European Commission’s Representation in Sweden.
COMPONENT 2 COMMUNICATION & DISSEMINATION 5 th INNOPOLIS meeting Prague, 19/10/2011 OVERVIEW.
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES Ensuring Ownership of PARSEL by Partners.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
A New Start for EUTO Redruth, 29 September 2012 Henk Schüller.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Project Communication Kirsti Mijnhijmer & Christopher Parker 23 February 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
The Essentials of Grant Writing Mena Gainpaulsingh International Fundraising Consultancy
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
P R O F I T ( ) Policy Responses Overcoming Factors in the Intergenerational Transmission of Inequalities Priority 7, STREP CIT2-CT
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Orientation for new Lead Partners and Partners Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 12 June 2008 – Voss, Norway Kirsti.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1st EPAL of Piraeus “E-learning in school practice in modern secondary schools across Europe: Let us take up the challenge together” (Nº: PL-01-KA )
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
WP6 – Dissemination Project Name: Enhancing Students Participation in Quality Assurance in Armenian HE- ESPAQ Ref TEMPUS BE-TEMPUS-SMGR.
What is impact? What is the difference between impact and public engagement? Impact Officers, R&IS.
C4EO – Ways of Working Heather Rushton, Planning and Performance 1.
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
Creating and implementing a communication plan COMMUNICATIONS AND VISIBILITY.
Regional Hubs An exciting new development for the profession Bryony Simpson, Chair Kamini Gadhok, CEO.
Equipping the Next Generation for Active Engagement in Science EngagingScience.eu שילוב נושאים סוציו-מדעיים ואתיים בלימודי מדע ד"ר יעל שורץ, אתי דגן ואמיל.
“Preparing competitive grant proposals that match policy objectives - project proposal evaluators' viewpoint ” Despina Sanoudou, PhD FACMG Assistant Professor.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS Rachel Burn, Joint Secretariat September 29th, Akureyri, Iceland.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
Tackling biodiversity challenges through innovative e-learning
Project Overview.
Writing Competitive Research Funding Applications: Tips and Advice Early-Career Researchers Information Session Friday, 26th October, 2012 Dr Barry Dixon.
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS
“CareerGuide for Schools”
EQAVET Annual Network Meeting
ERASMUS+ Capacity-building in Higher Education
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Communication and Dissemination Obligations, Guidelines, Best Practice
Pathways to Impact Lynne McCorriston
Project Communication Niclas Forsling 21st and 22nd of September 2009 – Höfn, Iceland European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Dissemination & Exploitation Activities Demetris C. Hadjisofocli
Seminar on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
DG Justice and Consumers
Presentation transcript:

Communicating EU Research & Innovation A guide for project participants

1.Communication, why? 2.What is formally required? 3.Build your own communication strategy – a checklist 4.Good practices from projects like our 5.How can we help you? 6.Sources and resources OUTLINE

Bring our research to the attention of as many relevant people as possible. Communication about European research projects should demonstrate the ways in which research is contributing to a European ‘Innovation Union’ Should account for public spending by providing tangible proofs

What we should show how European collaboration has achieved more than would have otherwise been possible, in achieving scientific excellence, contributing to competitiveness and solving societal challenges how the outcomes are relevant to our everyday lives, by creating jobs, introducing novel technologies, or making our lives more comfortable making better use of the results: are they taken up by decision-makers to influence policy-making and by industry and the scientific community to ensure follow- up?

Enormous difference between communication strategically planned with these objectives in mind and ad hoc efforts for the sake of meeting contractual requirements

HOW we will profit? A good communication and dissemination plan will: Increase the success rate of our proposal; Attract the interest of potential partners; Draw the attention of national, regional authorities and other public and private funding sources; Encourage talented students and scientists to join your partner institutes and enterprises; Enhance our reputation and visibility at local, national and international level; Help the search for financial backers, licensees or industrial implementers to exploit your results; Generate market demand for the products or services developed

Submitting and negotiating a proposal: impact resulting from communication & dissemination activities counts for evaluation. During the project: 1.Grant Agreement, Annex II.4. Reports and deliverables and Guidance Notes on Project Reporting – Provide (a) periodic reports that include a publishable summary; (b) a website to be up to date, published on the Commission’s website. 2.Grant Agreement, Annex II.12. Information and communication – (a) Beneficiaries have to engage with the public and the media about the project and to highlight the European Union’s financial support. (b) The Commission is authorised to publish information on the project. At the end of the project: 1.Grant Agreement, Annex II.30. Dissemination - (a) Each beneficiary is to ensure that their foreground is disseminated as swiftly as possible. If it fails to do so, the Commission may disseminate that foreground. 2.Grant Agreement, Annex II.4. Reports and deliverables and Guidance Notes on Project Reporting – (a) The consortium has to provide a final publishable report including a publishable summary. It includes information on the expected final results and their wider societal implications. (b) In final report should be a plan for the use and dissemination of foreground: list of all scientific (peer reviewed) publications relating to the foreground of the project, a list of all dissemination activities (e.g. conferences, flyers, articles published in the popular press, videos), a list of the applications for patents, trademarks, registered designs, etc., a list of exploitable foreground and a report on societal implications.

What formal references do we have to make? High-resolution emblems can be found here (update: see recent ) : More informationcan be found at the following link (notably p.3): ec.europa.eu/research/pdf/eu_emblem_rules_2012.pdf The following written formulas are taken from Annex II to the Grant Agreement:

See recent for update

A - Ensure good management: 1.Have resources been allocated (time and money)? – Does proposal include a work package on communication? A dissemination & communication strategy & timeline right from the beginning? – Does the communication element of the project involve all consortium partners (staff, including researchers)? – Is there awareness that communication is a continuous process, not a one- time effort when the project ends? – ready for the unexpected? how to respond effectively to such things as publication in high-ranking journals or a sudden new event related to the project’s theme? 2. Are professional communicators involved? – Have resources been allocated to professional assistance: drafting of press releases, graphic design, website maintenance …. ? – Have you considered taking any training in the field of communication or including a communication expert in your team? 3.Is continuity ensured? – Arrangements to ensure information will not be lost once the project comes to an end? – Any feedback loops back to the European Commission to amplifying the message, i.e. by notifying an event, or before publishing a press release?

B - Define your goals and objectives: Are there any goals and objectives? – Are final and intermediate communication project goals specified? what impact, what reaction or change is expected from audience? – Receiving feedback or engaging in dialogue – Influencing the attitudes of decision-makers – Having people make a decision or take action – Ensuring that the project outcomes will be taken into production Are your goals and objectives neither too ambitious nor too weak? – Is there a deadline by which the goals should be achieved, taking into account different stages of the research and possible intermediary outcomes? – Are the objectives specific and measurable, rather than vague? Does the project envisage ways of measuring its communication efforts and impact? For example: Evidence of debates in the media Evidence of new funders for your area Evidence of transference of research into practice (patents, prototypes, licenses) Number and turnover of new products, practices or procedures developed, based on your research outcomes Number of articles in the press Number of people asking for feedback or more information Number of references in scientific publications Participation in project events and seminars Speaker evaluations from conferences presentations Survey of end-users Trends in website visits

C. Pick your audience 1. Is your audience well defined? Is each target audience a relatively homogenous group of people (not: ‘the public at large’ or ‘all stakeholders’)? Can the indicated audiences be further specified? For example: from ‘the general public’ to ‘female citizens commuting by train to work in one of the EU-10 countries’ or from ‘decision-makers’ to ‘Europarliamentarians involved in the design of the new transport policy 2013 ’. 2. Does it include all relevant target groups? Can your audience help you reach your objectives? ‾Who has an interest in your research? ‾Who can contribute to your work? ‾Who would be interested in learning about the project’s findings? ‾Who could or will be affected directly by the outcomes of the research? ‾Who are not directly involved, but could have influence elsewhere? Does the project aim to address both a direct audience and intermediaries to reach more people? What about the possibility of audiences at local, regional, national and European level? Is the audience external (not restricted to consortium partners)? For each audience, you should work on a distinct strategy using targeted messages, means and language

D. Choose your message 1. Is it news? Why do we need to know? What will change? What solutions are you offering? What makes the issue urgent? What are the consequences if no actions is taken? Have you tried to stir your audience’s imagination and emotions? How does your work relate to everyday life? Does it link to any broader societal issue? Is your project research positioned within a broader socio-economic & policy context, so that it is easier to explain the results and their relevance to policymakers and citizens? 2. Are you connecting to what your audience wants to know? See through your audience’s eyes: What do they already know about the topic? What do they think about it? Do they need information and/or persuasion? Have you tested your message? Are you considering a FAQ on potentially controversial or sensitive issues? 3. Are you connecting to your own communication objectives? Tell a story, don’t just list facts. A story is an effective way to make people remember your message. Why not tell one to disseminate your results? You have forgotten how to tell a story? Just search for ‘storytelling’ on the internet.

E. Use the right medium and means 1. Do they reach the audience? Are you working at the right level (local, regional, national)? Are you using dissemination partners and multipliers to amplify and multiply a message? 2. Do they go beyond the obvious? If input or contributions are needed, are there mechanisms in place to make communication interactive so as to obtain responses? Are you taking into account the different ways to communicate?

F. Evaluate your efforts Go back to your goals and objectives. Have they been reached? What lessons have you learned? See the attached File with examples Whether your project is organising a public event or press demonstration, or has just delivered a set of exciting results: the European Commission may be able to help you spread the word. Inform your project officer about interesting topics, news and events several freely accessible tools follow in the next pages

AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) Communicating Science: Tools for Scientists and Engineers includes learning the basics of communication, how-to tips for working with reporters, strategies for using online media effectively, and more. British Science Association ‘Collective Memory’ The Collective Memory is a database of evaluations of a diverse range of science communication initiatives. Carrada, Giovanni (2006), A Scientist’s Survival Kit; Communicating Science. EU Publications Office, Luxembourg. European Commission (2004), European Research - A guide to successful communications. EU Publications Office, Luxembourg. European Commission (2008). Scientific evidence for policymaking. Publications Office, Luxembourg. European Commission (2010). Communicating research for evidence-based policymaking. A practical guide in socio-economic sciences and humanities. Publications Office, Luxembourg. European Science Events Association (Eusea) The European association for organisations for European Science Communication Events (SCE). Story Collider (podcasts) Science is everywhere in our lives. We all have a story about science, and at The Story Collider, we want to hear those stories. UK Royal Society (2006). Communicating the results of new scientific research to the public – Science & the public interest. The ins & outs of communicating about risk & probability. Voice of Young Science (2006). Standing up for science. A guide to the media for early career scientists. Sense about Science, London.

Many web sites on skills, examples Communication Skills: Speaking and Listening Also see: Teamworking skills Interactive exercise and tips for group work exercises in assessment centres. Teamworking skills Making a presentation Persuading, influencing and negotiating skills Leadership skills including a leadership styles exercise Interview skills Telephone interviews Competency-based interviews Body language in interviews Quiz on non-verbal communication. Body language in interviews Assertiveness in interviews 150 common interview questions and how to answer them Practice interviews Online Communication Skills Training