Dark Matter in SUGRA Models with Universal and Nonuniversal Gaugino Masses D. P. Roy Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education Tata Institute of Fundamental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUSY Search at Future Collider and Dark Matter Experiments D. P. Roy Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai.
Advertisements

Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.
Going after the Dark at Colliders David Berge (CERN)
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Little Higgs Model Dark Matter and Its Implications at the LHC Chuan-Ren Chen (NTNU) KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop High-1 2/9 – 2/15 In collaboration.
Little Higgs Dark Matter and Its Implications at the LHC Chuan-Ren Chen (NTNU) XS 2014, 5/6/2014 In collaboration with H-C Tsai, M-C Lee, [hep-ph]
Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D.Toback Phys.Lett.B639:46,2006, hep-ph/
Measurement of Dark Matter Content at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Collaborators: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Texas A&M University.
Precision Cosmology at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Precision Cosmology at the LHC125 th August ’ 08 Cosmo 2008, Madison, Wisconsin.
Dark Matter at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Arlington LC Workshop January 2003.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine American Linear Collider Physics Group Seminar 20 February 2003.
June 8, 2007DSU 2007, Minnesota Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Phys.
Mia Schelke, Ph.D. Student The University of Stockholm, Sweden Cosmo 03.
Significant enhancement of Bino-like dark matter annihilation cross section due to CP violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University) Collaborated with Shigeki.
EuroGDR, 13 th December 2003 Dan Tovey CERN, 18/03/2004 G. Bélanger 1 Uncertainties in the relic density calculations in mSUGRA B. Allanach, G. Bélanger,
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.
Direct and Indirect Dark Matter Detection in Models with a Well-Tempered Neutralino Eun-Kyung Park Florida State University in collaboration with H. Baer.
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario (LHS) The scenario is consistent with  particle physics experiments Particle mass b → sγ Bs →μ +
Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry in collaboration with M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) Newport Beach.
SUSY in the sky: supersymmetric dark matter David G. Cerdeño Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Based on works with S.Baek, K.Y.Choi, C.Hugonie,
Neutralino relic density in the CPVMSSM and the ILC G. Bélanger LAPTH G. B, O. Kittel, S. Kraml, H. Martyn, A. Pukhov, hep-ph/ , Phys.Rev.D Motivation.
Amitava Datta Department of Physics Jadavpur University Kolkata.
Phenomenlogical Aspects of Mirage Mediation Yeong Gyun Kim (Sejong University) Neutralino Dark Matter in Mirage Mediation (thermal relic density, direct.
Overview of Supersymmetry and Dark Matter
SUSY Studies with ATLAS Experiment 2006 Texas Section of the APS Joint Fall Meeting October 5-7, 2006 Arlington, Texas Nurcan Ozturk University of Texas.
Long-lived superpartners in the MSSM Alexey GLADYSHEV (JINR, Dubna / ITEP, Moscow) PROTVINO, December 25, 2008 PHYSICS OF FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS PHYSICS.
Latest New Phenomena Results from Alexey Popov (IHEP, Protvino) For the DO Collaboration ITEP, Moscow
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
Dave Toback Texas A&M University HCP 2004 June 17 th Run II Searches for Supersymmetry Dave Toback Texas A&M University June 17 th 2004 HCP2004.
WIN 05, Delphi, Greece, June 2005Filip Moortgat, CERN WIN 05 Inclusive signatures: discovery, fast but not unambiguous Exclusive final states & long term.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
Prospects of Charged Higgs Boson Colliders D. P. Roy Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai,
M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai (arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D77:015006, 2008 D. Demir, M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai, I.Turan ( arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D78:035013,
Dirac neutrino dark matter G. Bélanger LAPTH- Annecy based on G. B, A.Pukhov, G. Servant CERN-PH-TH/
SPS5 SUSY STUDIES AT ATLAS Iris Borjanovic Institute of Physics, Belgrade.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
Phys. Lett. B646 (2007) 34, (hep-ph/ ) Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter Masato Senami (University of Tokyo, ICRR)
Interpreting a CMS lljjP T Excess With the Golden Cascade of the MSSM October 1st, 2014 Journal Club Ben Allanach, Are R. Raklev, and Anders Kvellestad.
Xenon100 collaboration gives a stringent constraint on spin-independent elastic WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section. Ton-scale detectors for direct detection.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Phenomenlogical Aspects of Mirage Mediation Yeong Gyun Kim (Sejong U. & KAIST) Neutralino Dark Matter in Mirage Mediation (thermal relic density, direct.
Origin of large At in the MSSM with extra vector-like matters
The Case of Light Neutralino Dark Matter
Supersymmetry at LHC and beyond
Using Tau polarization for Charged Higgs boson & SUSY LHC
SUSY at LEP2 (third generation and ewinos)
Dark Matter Phenomenology of the GUT-less CMSSM
Focus-Point studies at LHC
Weak Production SUSY Search In LHC
LHC The Challenge Dmitri Kazakov JINR / ITEP
MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS
Collider Phenomenology of SUSY Cosmic Connections &
D. P. Roy Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Report on the collider session: part 1
Supersymmetric Dark Matter
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
非最小超对称唯象研究: 工作汇报 杨 金 民 中科院 理论物理所 南开大学.
Collider signatures of gravitino dark matter with a sneutrino NLSP
SUSY Searches with ZEUS
Probing bino-wino coannihilation DM at the LHC
Relic density : dependence on MSSM parameters
Dark Matter Explanation in Singlet Extension of MSSM
Institute of Theoretical Physics, CAS
& Searches for Squarks and Gluinos at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Dark Matter in SUGRA Models with Universal and Nonuniversal Gaugino Masses D. P. Roy Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai – , India

Outline Nature of LSP in SUGRA Models: Bino, Higgsino or Wino DM Constraints on Bino & Higgsino LSP in mSUGRA Model Implications for Bino LSP Signals at LHC SUGRA Models with Nonuniversal Gaugino Masses Bulk Annihilation Region of Bino LSP in 1+24, 1+75 & Models : Implication for LHC Signal Mixed Bino-Higgsino & Bino-Wino-Higgsino LSP in 1+75 and Models : Implications for DM and LHC Expts. Wino and Higgsino LSP in AMSB Model:Implications for DM

Nature of the Lightest Superparticle (LSP) in SUGRA Models: Astrophysical Constraints  Colourless & Chargeless LSP Direct DM Detection Expts  LSP not Sneutrino Diagonal elements : M 1, M 2, ±μ in the basis Nondiagonal elements < M Z Exptl Indications  M 1, M 2, μ > 2M Z in mSUGRA Exception : M ii ≈ M jj  tan 2θ ij = 2M ij / (M ii – M jj ) large “Well-tempered Neutralino Scenario”Arkani-Hamed, Delgado & Giudice

DM Relic Density Constraints on Bino & Higgsino LSP Scenarios of mSUGRA: SUSY Br in HS communicated to the OS via grav. Int.  m 0, m ½, tan β, A 0, sign (μ) at GUT scale ( A0 = 0 & +ve μ) RGE ( Weak Sc masses) || RGE: Hyperbolic Br (tan β > 5) of μ 2 : Imp Weak Sc Scalar mass M Hu (LEP)

Chattopadhyay et al m 0 ~ m 1/2  TeV (Bino LSP) m h > 115 GeV  m 1/2 > 400 GeV (M 1 >2M Z )  also large sfermion mass Bino does not carry any gauge charge  Pair annihilate via sfermion exch Large sfermion mass  too large Ωh 2 Except for the stau co-ann. region

FP  Z W A

Bino LSP Signal at LHC : Canonical Multijet + Missing-E T signal with possibly additional jets (leptons) from cascade decay (Valid through out the Bino LSP parameter space, including the Res.Ann Region) Focus Point Region: Inverted Hierarchy

Chattopadhyay et al, PLB 2000 SUSY Signal at LHC: Focus Pt. Region

Guchait & Roy, PLB ‘02 μ >0 μ<0 Co-annihilation region BR ≈ 1 BR = 1 τ is soft, but P τ ≈+1 One can use P τ to detect the Soft τ coming from

1-prong hadronic τ decay (BR≈0.5) With p T > 20 GeV cut for the τ-jet the τ misid. Probability from QCD jets goes down from 6% for R > 0.3 (p Tπ± > 6 GeV) to 0.25% for R > 0.8 (p Tπ± > 16 GeV), while retaining most Of the signal.

Soft τ signal from decay in the co-annihilation region Godbole, Guchait and Roy, PRD ‘09

N(15-25 GeV)/N(25-40 GeV) = 2.3 for Signal and 1.0 for BG. So the steep rise of the Signal at the low PT end can be used to distinguish it from the BG and also to measure the small mass difference

Nonuniversal gaugino mass models of SUGRA Chattopadhyay & Roy, Huitu et al, Anderson et al, …

Bino LSP in Non-universal Gaugino Mass Model M3 = 300, 400, 500 & 600 GeV King, Roberts & Roy, JHEP 07 Bulk annihilation region of Bino DM (yellow) allowed in Non-universal gaugino mass models

Light right sleptons Even left sleptons lighter than Wino =>Large leptonic BR of SUSY Cascade deacy via Wino

Mixed bino-higgsino LSP (DM) 1+75 Model Chattopadhyay, Das & Roy, PRD 09

Mixed bino-wino-higgsino LSP (DM)

χ χ 1. Direct Detection (CDMS, XENON,…) Ge H Spin ind. Ge Bino, Higgsino & Wino LSP Signals in Dark Matter Detection Expts 2. Indirect Detection via HE ν from χχ annihilation in the Sun (Ice Cube,Antares) χ χ p p Z Spin dep. Best for mixed DM → Not for pure bino, wino or higgsino DM

Roy, PRD ‘10 (α 75 ≡ κ) Fig 1. Prediction of the (1+75) model compared with the putative signal corridor of the two candidate events of the CDMS II expt. The blue dots denote the WMAP DM relic density compatible points. Low gluino mass (≤ 600 GeV) => Viable LHC Signal with 100 pb -1 lumi at 10 TeV.

Fig 2. Prediction (1+200) model prediction with the putative signal corridor, corresponding to the two candidate events of the CDMS II expt. Blue dots correspond to the points, compatible with the WMAP DM relic density. Inverted Hierarchy => Decay of the gluino pair via stop  3-4 top quarks in addition to the missing- E T (like the focus pt. region)  Multiple isolated leptons and b-tags + missing-E T.  Gluino mass of TeV requires LHC lumi of 100 fb -1 at 10 TeV (10fb -1 at 14TeV) (Other squark masses are in the GeV range)

Wino LSP (mAMSB model) SUSY braking in HS in communicated to the OS via the Super-Weyl Anomaly Cont. (Loop) m 3/2, m 0, tan β, sign (μ) RGE  M 1 : M 2 : |M 3 | ≈ 2.8 : 1 : 7.1 including 2-loop conts

Chattopadhyay et al,PRD 07 W W W Robust results, independent of other SUSY parameters (Valid in any SUSY model with Wino(Higgsino) LSP)

3. Detection of HE γ Rays from Galactic Centre in ACT (HESS,CANGAROO,MAGIC,VERITAS) χ χ χ+χ+ W W χ χ χ+χ+ Wπ0sγsWπ0sγs vσ ~ cm 3 /s  Cont. γ Ray Signal (But too large π 0  γ from Cosmic Rays) W W W γ γ(Z) vσ γγ ~ vσ γZ ~ cm 3 /s  Discrete γ Ray Line Signal (E γ ≈ m χ ) (Small but Clean)

Reconciling Heavy Wino DM Model with the Relic Density and PAMELA Data with Sommerfeld Enhancement: Mohanty, Rao & Roy: ArXiv: Enhanced by multiple W boson exchange ladder diagram (Sommerfeld Resonace) → Increase of DM Annihilation CS and decrease of relic density at Resonance Peak Hisano,Matsumoto.Nojiri’03 ………………. Lattanzi,Silk ‘09