SOFE Mini-Course Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego June 5, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Advertisements

Role of Fusion Energy in the 21 st Century Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego Lehigh.
Role of Fission and Fusion Energy in a Carbon-Constrained World Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research.
Comments on Progress Toward and Opportunities for Attractive Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi FPA workshop Jan 23-25, 1999 Marina Del Rey,
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
Fusion Power Plants: Visions and Development Pathway Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 15 th ICENES May 15 – 19, 2011 San Francisco, CA You can download a.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.
Perspectives on Fusion Electric Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting December 13, 2004 Washington,
National Fusion Power Plant Studies Program Achievements and Recent Results Prepared for Bill Dove OFES Headquarters June, 1999.
Physics of fusion power
National Fusion Power Plant Studies Program Achievements and Recent Results Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego FESAC Meeting March 4-5,
Towards Attractive Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presented at Korean National Fusion Research Center Daejon,
Optimization of Stellarator Power Plant Parameters J. F. Lyon, Oak Ridge National Lab. for the ARIES Team Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Tokyo, January.
June 14-15, 2007/ARR 1 Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code Presented by A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego With contribution.
RECENT RESULTS FROM USA MAGNETIC FUSION POWER PLANTS Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America German.
Characteristics of an Economically Attractive Fusion Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Fusion: Energy Source for the Future?
Physics of fusion power
August 17, 2000 ARIES: Fusion Power Core and Power Cycle Engineering/ARR 1 ARIES: Fusion Power Core and Power Cycle Engineering The ARIES Team Presented.
Contributions of Burning Plasma Physics Experiment to Fusion Energy Goals Farrokh Najmabadi Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng. And Center for Energy Research.
The ARIES Compact Stellarator Study: Introduction & Overview Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego ARIES-CS Review Meeting October 5, 2006.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Status of Advanced Design Studies and Overview of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies & Advanced Technologies.
Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
Prospect for Attractive Fusion Power (Focus on tokamaks) Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Mini-Conference on Nuclear Renaissance 48th.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies & Related Advanced.
Environmental, Safety, and Economics Studies of Magnetic Fusion, Including Power Plant Design Studies Robert W. Conn Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
IPP Stellarator Reactor perspective T. Andreeva, C.D. Beidler, E. Harmeyer, F. Herrnegger, Yu. Igitkhanov J. Kisslinger, H. Wobig O U T L I N E Helias.
The Future Prospects of Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego MIT IAP January 10, 2006 Electronic copy:
Overview of the ARIES-CS Compact Stellarator Power Plant Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Physics Issues and Trade-offs in Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA APS April 2002 Meeting.
Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi MFE-IFE Workshop Sept 14-16, 1998 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 9 th International Symposium on Fusion.
Tony WeidbergNuclear Physics Lectures1 Applications of Nuclear Physics Fusion –(How the sun works covered in Astro lectures) –Fusion reactor Radioactive.
Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:
June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)
Power of the Sun. Conditions at the Sun’s core are extreme –temperature is 15.6 million Kelvin –pressure is 250 billion atmospheres The Sun’s energy out.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Prospects for Attractive Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego 18 th KAIF/KNS Workshop Seoul, Korea April 21, 2006 Electronic.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
The Energy Challenge – Fusion Energy Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego November 21,
Roles of Fission and Fusion Energy in a Carbon- Constrained World Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research.
Magnetic Fusion Power Plants -- Tritium Systems and Requirements Farrokh Najmabadi, Director, Center for Energy Research University of California, San.
Role of Fusion Energy in the 21st Century
Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi, Director, Center for Energy Research Prof. of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of California,
Role of Fusion Energy in the 21 st Century With Thanks to Dr. Steve Koonin, BP for energy charts Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director.
Assessment and comparison of pulsed and steady-state tokamak power plants Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 21 st International Toki Conference, 28 Novemeber-1.
Fusion: Bringing star power to earth Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego NES Grand Challenges.
Nuclear Fusion The JET project. Conditions for fusion Fusion occurs at a sufficient rate only at very high energies (temperatures) - on earth, temperatures.
Role of Fusion Energy in the 21 st Century Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego Perspective.
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Ceramic Breeder Blanket and Plan for Future Effort A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
Characteristics of Transmutation Reactor Based on LAR Tokamak Neutron Source B.G. Hong Chonbuk National University.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION ARIES Pathways Study Kick-off Meeting Ken Schultz 3 April 2007 Determining the.
Towards An Attractive Fusion Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi Forum on Next Step Device April 27, May 1, 1998 U. Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
MAIN COMPONENTS  INTODUCTION  PRINCIPLE  CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS  PROCESS  ADVANTAGES  DISADVANTAGES  CONCLUSION.
MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT FUSION Zack Draper | Physics 485 November 23, 2015.
The tritium breeding blanket in Tokamak fusion reactors T. Onjun1), S. Sangaroon2), J. Prasongkit3), A. Wisitsorasak4), R. Picha5), J. Promping5) 1) Thammasat.
EVOLUTION OF VISIONS FOR TOKAMAK FUSION POWER PLANTS
X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang, F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team
Historical Perspectives and Pathways to an Attractive Power Plant
Presentation transcript:

SOFE Mini-Course Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego June 5, 2009

Fusion is one of very few non-carbon based energy options  DT fusion has the largest cross section and lowest temperature (~100M o C). But, it is still a high-temperature plasma!  Plasma should be surrounded by a Li-containing blanket to generate T. Or, DT fusion turns its waste (neutrons) into fuel!  Through careful design, only a small fraction of neutrons are absorbed in structure and induce radioactivity.  For liquid coolant/breeders (e.g., Li, LiPb), most of fusion energy is directly deposited in the coolant simplifying energy recovery  Practically no resource limit (10 11 TWy D; 10 4 (10 8 ) TWy 6 Li)  DT fusion has the largest cross section and lowest temperature (~100M o C). But, it is still a high-temperature plasma!  Plasma should be surrounded by a Li-containing blanket to generate T. Or, DT fusion turns its waste (neutrons) into fuel!  Through careful design, only a small fraction of neutrons are absorbed in structure and induce radioactivity.  For liquid coolant/breeders (e.g., Li, LiPb), most of fusion energy is directly deposited in the coolant simplifying energy recovery  Practically no resource limit (10 11 TWy D; 10 4 (10 8 ) TWy 6 Li) D + 6 Li  2 4 He MeV (Plasma) + 17 MeV (Blanket) D + T  4 He (3.5 MeV) + n (14 MeV) n + 6 Li  4 He (2 MeV) + T (2.7 MeV) n T

Fusion Power Plants: Requirements

Fusion Energy Requirements:  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million Celsius (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower- power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million Celsius (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower- power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface

Fusion Energy Requirements:  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower- power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower- power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface

Two Approaches to Fusion Power – 1) Inertial Fusion  Inertial Fusion Energy (IFE) Fast implosion of high-density DT capsules by laser or particle beams (~30 fold radial convergence, heating to fusion temperature). A DT burn front is generated, fusing ~1/3 of fuel (to be demonstrated in National Ignition Facility in Lawrence Livermore National Lab). Several ~300 MJ explosions per second with large gain (fusion power/input power).  Inertial Fusion Energy (IFE) Fast implosion of high-density DT capsules by laser or particle beams (~30 fold radial convergence, heating to fusion temperature). A DT burn front is generated, fusing ~1/3 of fuel (to be demonstrated in National Ignition Facility in Lawrence Livermore National Lab). Several ~300 MJ explosions per second with large gain (fusion power/input power).

Two Approaches to Fusion Power – 2) Magnetic Fusion  Rest of the Talk is focused on MFE  Magnetic Fusion Energy (MFE) Particles confined within a “toroidal magnetic bottle” for 10’s km and 100’s of collisions per fusion event. Strong magnetic pressure (100’s atm) to confine a low density but high pressure (10’s atm) plasma. At sufficient plasma pressure and “confinement time”, the 4 He power deposited in the plasma sustains fusion condition.  Magnetic Fusion Energy (MFE) Particles confined within a “toroidal magnetic bottle” for 10’s km and 100’s of collisions per fusion event. Strong magnetic pressure (100’s atm) to confine a low density but high pressure (10’s atm) plasma. At sufficient plasma pressure and “confinement time”, the 4 He power deposited in the plasma sustains fusion condition.

Plasma behavior is dominated by “collective” effects  Pressure balance (equilibrium) does not guaranty stability. Example: Interchange stability  Pressure balance (equilibrium) does not guaranty stability. Example: Interchange stability  Impossible to design a “toroidal magnetic bottle” with good curvatures everywhere.  Fortunately, because of high speed of particles, an “averaged” good curvature is sufficient.  Impossible to design a “toroidal magnetic bottle” with good curvatures everywhere.  Fortunately, because of high speed of particles, an “averaged” good curvature is sufficient. Outside part of torus inside part of torus Fluid Interchange Instability

Tokamak is the most successful concept for plasma confinement R=1.7 m DIII-D, General Atomics Largest US tokamak  Many other configurations possible depending on the value and profile of “q” and how it is generated (internally or externally)

Externally ControlledSelf Organized Portfolio of MFE Configurations Example: Stellarator Confinement field generated by mainly external coils Toroidal field >> Poloidal field Large aspect ratio More stable, better confinement Example: Field-reversed Configuration Confinement field generated mainly by currents in the plasma Poloidal field >> Toroidal field Small aspect ratio Simpler geometry

T3 Tokamak achieved the first high temperature (10 M o C) plasma R=1 m 0.06 MA Plasma Current

JET is currently the largest tokamak in the world R=3 m ITER Burning plasma experiment (under construction) R=6 m

Progress in plasma confinement has been impressive 500 MW of fusion Power for 300s Construction will be started shortly in France 500 MW of fusion Power for 300s Construction will be started shortly in France Fusion triple product n (10 21 m -3 )  (s) T(keV) ITER Burning plasma experiment

Large amount of fusion power has also been produced ITER Burning plasma experiment DT Experiments DD Experiments

Fusion Energy Requirements:  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower- power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower- power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface

Plasma is heated to fusion temperatures routinely in current experiments Heating Methods (See ITER talk for state-of-the-art hardware):  Neutral Particle beams Neutral particles can cross the magnet field and enter the plasma. Neutral beam particles ionize in the plasma and deposit their energy.  Electro-magnetic waves: EM waves can transfer energy to electrons or ions through cyclotron resonance or matching of the phase velocity of the wave with particle velocity. Plasma is a dielectric media and the type of EM wave used depends on plasma parameters and B field to ensure wave propagation and efficient heating. Frequency range from 10’s of MHz (radio transmitter) to ~100 GHz (gyrotron).  Ohmic heating and plasma compression Heating Methods (See ITER talk for state-of-the-art hardware):  Neutral Particle beams Neutral particles can cross the magnet field and enter the plasma. Neutral beam particles ionize in the plasma and deposit their energy.  Electro-magnetic waves: EM waves can transfer energy to electrons or ions through cyclotron resonance or matching of the phase velocity of the wave with particle velocity. Plasma is a dielectric media and the type of EM wave used depends on plasma parameters and B field to ensure wave propagation and efficient heating. Frequency range from 10’s of MHz (radio transmitter) to ~100 GHz (gyrotron).  Ohmic heating and plasma compression

Fusion Energy Requirements:  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower-power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower-power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface

We have made tremendous progress in optimizing fusion plasmas  Substantial improvement in plasma performance though optimization of plasma shape, profiles, and feedback. Achieving plasma stability at high plasma pressure. Achieving improved plasma confinement through suppression of plasma turbulence, the “transport barrier.” Progress toward steady-state operation through minimization of power needed to maintain plasma current through profile control. Controlling the boundary layer between plasma and vessel wall to avoid localized particle and heat loads.  Substantial improvement in plasma performance though optimization of plasma shape, profiles, and feedback. Achieving plasma stability at high plasma pressure. Achieving improved plasma confinement through suppression of plasma turbulence, the “transport barrier.” Progress toward steady-state operation through minimization of power needed to maintain plasma current through profile control. Controlling the boundary layer between plasma and vessel wall to avoid localized particle and heat loads.

Fusion Energy Requirements:  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower-power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface  Confining the plasma so that alpha particles sustain fusion burn Lawson Criteria: n  E ~ s/m 3  Heating the plasma for fusion reactions to occur to 100 Million o C (routinely done in present experiments)  Optimizing plasma confinement device to minimize the cost Smaller devices Cheaper systems, e.g., lower-field magnets (MFE) or lower-power lasers (IFE)  Extracting the fusion power and breeding tritium Developing power extraction technology that can operate in fusion environment Co-existence of a hot plasma with material interface

DT Fusion requires a T breeding blanket  Requirement: Plasma should be surrounded by a blanket containing Li D + T  He + n n + 6Li  T + He  Through careful design, only a small fraction of neutrons are absorbed in structure and induce radioactivity Rad-waste depends on the choice of material: Low-activation material Rad-waste generated in DT fusion is similar to advanced fuels (D-3He) For liquid coolant/breeders (e.g., Li, LiPb), most of fusion energy (carried by neutrons) is directly deposited in the coolant simplifying energy recovery  Issue: Large flux of neutrons through the first wall and blanket: Need to develop radiation-resistant, low-activation material: Different from fission material because the high energy fusion neutron generates H and He in addition to displacement damage.  Requirement: Plasma should be surrounded by a blanket containing Li D + T  He + n n + 6Li  T + He  Through careful design, only a small fraction of neutrons are absorbed in structure and induce radioactivity Rad-waste depends on the choice of material: Low-activation material Rad-waste generated in DT fusion is similar to advanced fuels (D-3He) For liquid coolant/breeders (e.g., Li, LiPb), most of fusion energy (carried by neutrons) is directly deposited in the coolant simplifying energy recovery  Issue: Large flux of neutrons through the first wall and blanket: Need to develop radiation-resistant, low-activation material: Different from fission material because the high energy fusion neutron generates H and He in addition to displacement damage.

New structural material should be developed for fusion application  Fe-9Cr steels: builds upon 9Cr-1Mo industrial experience and materials database  (9-12 Cr ODS steels are a higher temperature future option)  V-4Cr-4Ti: Higher temperature capability, targeted for Li self-cooled blanket designs  SiC/SiC: High risk, high performance option (early in its development path)  W alloys: High performance option for PFCs (early in its development path)  Fe-9Cr steels: builds upon 9Cr-1Mo industrial experience and materials database  (9-12 Cr ODS steels are a higher temperature future option)  V-4Cr-4Ti: Higher temperature capability, targeted for Li self-cooled blanket designs  SiC/SiC: High risk, high performance option (early in its development path)  W alloys: High performance option for PFCs (early in its development path)

Managing the plasma material interface is challenging  Alpha power and alpha ash has to eventually leave the plasma Particle and energy flux on the material surrounding the plasma  Modern tokomaks use divertors: Closed flux surfaces containing hot core plasma Open flux surfaces containing cold plasma diverted away from the first wall. Particle flux on the first wall is reduced, heat flux on the first wall is mainly due to radiation (bremsstrahlung, synchrotron, etc.) Alpha ash is pumped out in the divertor region High heat and particle fluxes on the divertor plates.  Alpha power and alpha ash has to eventually leave the plasma Particle and energy flux on the material surrounding the plasma  Modern tokomaks use divertors: Closed flux surfaces containing hot core plasma Open flux surfaces containing cold plasma diverted away from the first wall. Particle flux on the first wall is reduced, heat flux on the first wall is mainly due to radiation (bremsstrahlung, synchrotron, etc.) Alpha ash is pumped out in the divertor region High heat and particle fluxes on the divertor plates. First Wall Confined plasma Separatrix Edge Plasma Divertor plates Flux surface

Fusion Power Plants: Putting the system together

Elements of the case for fusion power were developed through interaction with representatives of U.S. Electric utilities and energy industry  Have an economically competitive life-cycle cost of electricity  Gain Public acceptance by having excellent safety and environmental characteristics No disturbance of public’s day-to-day activities No local or global atmospheric impact No need for evacuation plan No high-level waste Ease of licensing  Reliable, available, and stable as an electrical power source Have operational reliability and high availability Closed, on-site fuel cycle High fuel availability Capable of partial load operation Available in a range of unit sizes Fusion physics & technology Low-activation material

Cost of power plant is correlated to Machine size and the recirculating power Increase Power Density (1/Vp) What we pay for,V FPC r  r >  r ~  r <  Improvement “saturates” at ~5 MW/m 2 peak wall loading (for a 1GWe plant). A steady-state, first stability device with Nb 3 Sn technology has a power density about 1/3 of this goal. Big Win Little Gain Decrease Recirculating Power Fraction Improvement “saturates” about Q plasma ~ 40. A steady-state, first stability device with Nb 3 Sn Tech. has a recirculating fraction about 1/2 of this goal. Mass power density= net electric output / mass of fusion core Q E = net electric output / recirculating electric power

ARIES-AT % (5.4) COE insensitive of current drive COE insensitive of power density Evolution of ARIES Tokamak Designs 1 st Stability, Nb 3 Sn Tech. ARIES-I’ Major radius (m)8.0   ) 2% (2.9) Peak field (T)16 Avg. Wall Load (MW/m 2 )1.5 Current-driver power (MW)237 Recirculating Power Fraction0.29 Thermal efficiency0.46 Cost of Electricity (c/kWh)10 Reverse Shear Option High-Field Option ARIES-I % (3.0) ARIES-RS 5.5 5% (4.8)

Continuity of ARIES Research Has Led to the Progressive Refinement of Plasma Optimization Pulsar (pulsed-tokamak): Trade-off of  with bootstrap Expensive PF system, under-performing TF ARIES-I (first-stability steady-state): Trade-off of  with bootstrap High-field magnets to compensate for low  ARIES-RS (reverse shear): Improvement in  and current-drive power Approaching COE insensitive of current drive ARIES-AT (aggressive reverse shear): Approaching COE insensitive of power density High  is used to reduce toroidal field “Conventional” Pulsed plasma: Explore burn physics (ITER) Demonstrate steady-state first- stability operation. (ITER) Explore reversed-shear plasma a) Higher Q plasmas b) At steady state Explore envelopes of steady-state reversed-shear operation

ITER and satellite tokamaks will provide the necessary data for a fusion power plant DIII-D DIII-DITER SimultaneousMax BaselineARIES-AT Major toroidal radius (m) Plasma Current (MA) Magnetic field (T) Electron temperature (keV) 7.5*16*8.9** 18** Ion Temperature (keV) 18*27*8.1** 18** Density (10 20 m -3 ) 1.0*1.7*1.0** 2.2** Confinement time (s) Normalized confinement, H  (plasma/magnetic pressure) 6.7%13%2.5% 9.2% Normalized  Fusion Power (MW) 500 1,755 Pulse length300 S.S. DIII-D DIII-DITER SimultaneousMax BaselineARIES-AT Major toroidal radius (m) Plasma Current (MA) Magnetic field (T) Electron temperature (keV) 7.5*16*8.9** 18** Ion Temperature (keV) 18*27*8.1** 18** Density (10 20 m -3 ) 1.0*1.7*1.0** 2.2** Confinement time (s) Normalized confinement, H  (plasma/magnetic pressure) 6.7%13%2.5% 9.2% Normalized  Fusion Power (MW) 500 1,755 Pulse length300 S.S. * Peak value, **Average Value

ARIES-AT is an attractive vision for fusion with a reasonable extrapolation in physics & technology Competitive cost of electricity (5c/kWh); Steady-state operation; Competitive cost of electricity (5c/kWh); Steady-state operation; Low level waste; Public & worker safety; High availability. Low level waste; Public & worker safety; High availability.

Outboard blanket & first wall ARIES-AT features a high-performance blanket  Simple, low pressure design with SiC structure and LiPb coolant and breeder.  Innovative design leads to high LiPb outlet temperature (~1,100 o C) while keeping SiC structure temperature below 1,000 o C leading to a high thermal efficiency of ~ 60%.  Simple manufacturing technique.  Very low afterheat.  Class C waste by a wide margin.  Simple, low pressure design with SiC structure and LiPb coolant and breeder.  Innovative design leads to high LiPb outlet temperature (~1,100 o C) while keeping SiC structure temperature below 1,000 o C leading to a high thermal efficiency of ~ 60%.  Simple manufacturing technique.  Very low afterheat.  Class C waste by a wide margin.

Design leads to a LiPb Outlet Temperature of 1,100 o C While Keeping SiC Temperature Below 1,000 o C Two -pass PbLi flow, first pass to cool SiC f /SiC box second pass to superheat PbLi Bottom Top PbLi Outlet Temp. = 1100 °C Max. SiC/PbLi Interf. Temp. = 994 °C Max. SiC/SiC Temp. = 996°C PbLi Inlet Temp. = 764 °C

Dual coolant with a self-cooled PbLi zone, He-cooled RAFS structure and SiC insert  Flow configuration allows for a coolant outlet temperature to be higher than maximum structure temperature

Gad-cooled W divertor designs with capability of 10-12MW/m 2 has been produced. ARIES-CS T-Tube concept

The ARIES-AT utilizes an efficient superconducting magnet design  On-axis toroidal field:6 T  Peak field at TF coil:11.4 T  TF Structure: Caps and straps support loads without inter-coil structure;  On-axis toroidal field:6 T  Peak field at TF coil:11.4 T  TF Structure: Caps and straps support loads without inter-coil structure; Superconducting Material  Either LTC superconductor (Nb 3 Sn and NbTi) or HTC  Structural Plates with grooves for winding only the conductor. Superconducting Material  Either LTC superconductor (Nb 3 Sn and NbTi) or HTC  Structural Plates with grooves for winding only the conductor.

Modular sector maintenance enables high availability  Full sectors removed horizontally on rails  Transport through maintenance corridors to hot cells  Estimated maintenance time < 4 weeks  Full sectors removed horizontally on rails  Transport through maintenance corridors to hot cells  Estimated maintenance time < 4 weeks ARIES-AT elevation view

Fusion Core Is Segmented to Minimize the Rad-Waste  Only “blanket-1” and divertors are replaced every 5 years Blanket 1 (replaceable) Blanket 2 (lifetime) Shield (lifetime)

After 100 years, only 10,000 Curies of radioactivity remain in the 585 tonne ARIES-RS fusion core. After 100 years, only 10,000 Curies of radioactivity remain in the 585 tonne ARIES-RS fusion core.  SiC composites lead to a very low activation and afterheat.  All components of ARIES-AT qualify for Class-C disposal under NRC and Fetter Limits. 90% of components qualify for Class-A waste.  SiC composites lead to a very low activation and afterheat.  All components of ARIES-AT qualify for Class-C disposal under NRC and Fetter Limits. 90% of components qualify for Class-A waste. Ferritic Steel Vanadium Radioactivity levels in fusion power plants are very low and decay rapidly after shutdown Level in Coal Ash

Waste volume is not large  1270 m 3 of Waste is generated after 40 full-power year (FPY) of operation. Coolant is reused in other power plants 29 m 3 every 4 years (component replacement), 993 m 3 at end of service  Equivalent to ~ 30 m 3 of waste per FPY Effective annual waste can be reduced by increasing plant service life.  1270 m 3 of Waste is generated after 40 full-power year (FPY) of operation. Coolant is reused in other power plants 29 m 3 every 4 years (component replacement), 993 m 3 at end of service  Equivalent to ~ 30 m 3 of waste per FPY Effective annual waste can be reduced by increasing plant service life.  90% of waste qualifies for Class A disposal

In Summary:  Over 15 MW of fusion power is generated (JET, 1997) establishing “scientific feasibility” of fusion power Although fusion power < input power.  ITER will demonstrate “technical feasibility” of fusion power by generating copious amount of fusion power (500MW for 300s) with fusion power > 10 input power.  Tremendous progress in understanding plasmas has helped optimize plasma performance considerably.  Vision of attractive fusion power plants exists.  Transformation of fusion into a power plant requires considerable R&D in material and fusion nuclear technologies  Over 15 MW of fusion power is generated (JET, 1997) establishing “scientific feasibility” of fusion power Although fusion power < input power.  ITER will demonstrate “technical feasibility” of fusion power by generating copious amount of fusion power (500MW for 300s) with fusion power > 10 input power.  Tremendous progress in understanding plasmas has helped optimize plasma performance considerably.  Vision of attractive fusion power plants exists.  Transformation of fusion into a power plant requires considerable R&D in material and fusion nuclear technologies