System Interface Evaluation: Goodreads Group 3 April 17, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acknowledgements: Most of this course is based on the excellent course offered by Prof. Kellogg Booth at the British Columbia University, Vancouver, Canada.
Advertisements

THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION DESIGN
COMP106 Assignment 2 Proposal 11. The Choice of Metaphor The metaphor that I am going to chose is the library. I have decided to use this metaphor because.
Heuristics  Basis  Evaluators –Qualifications –Training  Preparation –Scenario  Results –List of problems –Severity –Group synthesis.
1 CS 430 / INFO 430 Information Retrieval Lecture 24 Usability 2.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Tues Feb 13, 2001.
APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT BY SYED ADNAN ALI.
Usability 2004 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Digital Library Resources Instructional Design (5100:631) Dr. Savery April 27, 2010.
John Kelleher (IT Sligo) Cognitive Walkthrough. 1 Background Authors – Lewis & Polson (1991) Based on theory L&P CE+ Theory of Exploratory Learning Assesses.
Translating Standards Into Curriculum: The Lead Standards Approach.
What is so good about Archie and RevMan 5
BetterWorldBooks.com Expert Review Prepared by: Andrew Dubois, Monique Horton, & Karen Purcell Prepared for: Eddie Porrello, Better World Books.
Usability Methods: Cognitive Walkthrough & Heuristic Evaluation Dr. Dania Bilal IS 588 Spring 2008 Dr. D. Bilal.
Heuristic Evaluation “Discount” Usability Testing Adapted from material by Marti Hearst, Loren Terveen.
Mantova 18/10/2002 "A Roadmap to New Product Development" Supporting Innovation Through The NPD Process and the Creation of Spin-off Companies.
Kirstin Dougan Music and Performing Arts Librarian Music and Performing Arts Library University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Music Library Association.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Bill Stone Research Administrator Missouri Department of Transportation Presented at 2014 AASHTO Research Advisory Committee Meeting, Madison WI, July.
System Design: Designing the User Interface Dr. Dania Bilal IS582 Spring 2009.
Put it to the Test: Usability Testing of Library Web Sites Nicole Campbell, Washington State University.
Searching the Catalog Finding books to read, adding reviews and tags, and using your account.
Contd. Assign responsibilities Structure team Clarify roles & authority Collect internal, information Select processes.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2012 / Semester 1 / week 5 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
©2011 1www.id-book.com The process of interaction design Chapter 9.
Objectives By the end of the class, you will be able to… Describe typical users by using “personas” Write detailed task descriptions to inform design.
SEG3120 User Interfaces Design and Implementation
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Monitoring and Evaluation Management of a Training Program.
Design 2 (Chapter 5) Conceptual Design Physical Design Evaluation
Endeca: a faceted search solution for the library catalog Kristin Antelman & Emily Lynema UNC University Library Advisory Council June 15, 2006.
Destiny library.qf.org.qa User guide on how to use the library search facility of the senior school library.
Usability Heuristics Usability Materials Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2007.
Locating Books in Your EPISD Library. ONLINE CATALOG.
Evaluating a UI Design Expert inspection methods Cognitive Walkthrough
Lecture : 5 Problem Identification And Problem solving.
Usability 1 Usability evaluation Without users - analytical techniques With users - survey and observational techniques.
System Interface Evaluation: Goodreads Group 3 April 17, 2012.
Marketing Analysis and Advertising Allison Andrews Kathy Grimenstein April 25, 2006.
Dialog Design I Basic Concepts of Dialog Design. Dialog Outline Evaluate User Problem Representations, Operations, Memory Aids Generate Dialog Diagram.
Content Presentation: Content Presentation: The content of this lesson will be projected onto a whiteboard and the students will follow along on their.
How to Use the Online Catalog (OPAC) Richard J. Daley College Library.
Administrivia  Feedback from the mid-term evaluation  Insights from project proposal.
EasyChair Project Reviewer sign up and bidding Art Hsieh Jean Huang Norik Davtian Ryan Nissenbaum.
COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH Vigneshwar Poojar. The cognitive walkthrough is a formalized way of imagining people’s thoughts and actions when they use an interface.
Design, prototyping and construction(Chapter 11).
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 587 Fall 2007.
Program Design. Simple Program Design, Fourth Edition Chapter 1 2 Objectives In this chapter you will be able to: Describe the steps in the program development.
©2007 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved. MODULE 18 Working and Writing in Teams.
1 Multimedia Development Team. 2 To discuss phases of MM production team members Multimedia I.
Measuring Electronic Resource Availability Sanjeet Mann University of Redlands SCELC Research Day March 5, 2013.
Cognitive Walkthrough Leader Responsibilities Planning the evaluation method Developing two tasks to be performed by each group member (Evaluator) Meeting.
1 © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Cisco Technical Support Seminar Using the Cisco Technical Support Website.
The Library Catalog: An Introduction Beth Whitebread Librarian ©2008.
Verification vs. Validation Verification: "Are we building the product right?" The software should conform to its specification.The software should conform.
NoveList and NoveList Plus Overview. Trainer Name Title Trainer Name Title Welcome!
NoveList Plus Overview. NoveList Plus Fiction and nonfiction for all ages and grades New! Audiobook recommendations.
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 15 Usability Evaluation
The process of interaction design Chapter
Selecting a Novel for an Independent Reading Project
Evaluation without Users, Part 2
ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOG
A training aid for teachers and students.
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION DESIGN
Title of the Presentation
Walden University Academic Residencies:
Presentation transcript:

System Interface Evaluation: Goodreads Group 3 April 17, 2012

Group 3 Members Lauren Long, Evaluator Cataloger, Transylvania Co. Library, Brevard, NC ITRL Student JULIE FORKNER, Evaluator Director, E.G. Fisher Public Library Athens, TN ITRL Student ANGELA GLOWCHESKI, Evaluator Information Specialist, Lumpkin Co. Public Library Dahlonega, GA ITRL Student SUSAN MACRELLIS, Leader Director, East Ridge City Library Chattanooga, TN ITRL Student MARILYN PONTIUS Evaluator Branch Manager, Hancock War Memorial Branch Library Washington Co, MD ITRL Student

Leader Responsibilities  Planning the evaluation method  Developing two tasks to be performed by each group member (Evaluator)  Meeting with evaluators to discuss tasks, responsibilities, when and where to perform walkthrough, use of Nielsen’s severity rating scale  Performing a walkthrough for each task and creating a task analysis to use as benchmarks for comparison to Evaluator walkthroughs. This includes: time taken to complete each task feelings/emotions experienced problems and errors found and causes for these problems and errors severity rating of each problem or error found success and failure stories as applicable

Evaluator Responsibilities  Meet with the Leader and brainstorm on broad tasks to perform in a given interface. Follow the procedures outlined by the Leader.  Perform each task individually in the given interface  Identify potential problems and errors in the given interface  Use Nielsen’s severity rating scale to rate each of the problems and errors found and describe briefly the causes of these problems and errors  Provide solutions for solving the problems and errors found based on interface design/usability theories and principles learned in class.  Document the feelings and emotions experienced during the process thinking of how target users may feel during the process  Write one success and one failure story as applicable  Meet with the Leader to discuss the findings, reach a consensus on the problems and errors found and their severity ratings, among other things  Generate a usability report as a team

Cognitive Walkthrough Overview Based on what was learned in Assignment 2:  Evaluate tasks frequently preformed by adult service librarians  Evaluate a freely available reader’s advisory interface Two Phases:  Preparatory Phase  Analysis Phase

Walkthrough Methodology  Preparatory Phase Define the interface Define the tasks Define the target users Define the correct sequence of actions to complete tasks

Favorite Genres generated from user input Keyword searching What friends are reading and what they have to say about it Free Stuff Book Clubs Preparatory Phase: Define the Interface

Task 1 Task 2  A user is looking for a book in the Goodreads website. He wants to find the name of the author of this book: Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell. Find the author’s name and write it down on the task instruction sheet.  Find how many books there are in the “Blossom Street” series written by Debbie Macomber. What is the title of the most recent book in the series? Find the title name and write it down on the task instruction sheet. Preparatory Phase: Define the Tasks

 Adult services librarian working in a public library  Has obtained a college degree, and in many cases a master’s degree  Performs tasks related to reader’s advisory  Utilizes a reader’s advisory information system Supplement personal content knowledge  Seeking information Sequential order of books Breakdown of genres and subgenres Preparatory Phase: Define the Users

 TASK 1 Preparatory Phase: Correct Sequence of Actions

 TASK 2 Preparatory Phase: Correct Sequence of Actions

Walkthrough Methodology  Analysis Phase Evaluators perform tasks and record data Collect and compare data to correct actions Construct success story with defense of credibility Construct failure story

Analysis Phase: Task Instruction Worksheet Example ActionProble m Actual or Potential ? Nielsen Severit y Cause of Problem Possible Solution Feelings/ Emotion s 1. Go to 2. Enter “Jonahan Strange and” in title search box 2.1 Error returned Unexpecte d error report: Did you mean jonah an strange and Actual1Misspelled name Improve “did you mean” function to recognize “jonahan” as Jonathan” Surprised. Confused by message, but recognized the “did you mean” probably ment a spelling error.

Task Data Consolidation and Analysis Task 1 Example: Compare Actions Correct Action Eval 1Eval 2Eval 3Eval 4 1. Go to ads.com 2. Enter “Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell” in title search box 2. Enter “Jonahan Strange and” in title search box 2. Entered “Jonathan Strange” in title search box 2. Enter “Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell” in title search box 2.1 Error returned

Analysis Phase – Consolidation Spreadsheet  Allows problems and errors to be easily identified  Create best success story with credibility data  Create worst failure story with problem areas identified

Summary  Choosing the interface Why Goodreads?  Current status  Changes we would have made  Questions/Comments for the Group

Group 3 thanks you for listening! Lauren Long JULIE FORKNER ANGELA GLOWCHESKI SUSAN MACRELLIS MARILYN PONTIUS