Centrifugal Barrel Polishing at Fermilab (Tuesday, December 6th at 10:20) Tesla Technology Collaboration IHEP, Beijing December 5 th -8 th, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T. Saeki (KEK) 15 May 2014 AWLC2014 at FNAL
Advertisements

Superconducting RF Cavity/Cryomodule Development at Fermilab (Industrialization) C.M. Ginsburg (FNAL) Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation 2.
Proposed Button Design for a Series of High Power Button Tests Arash Zarrebini-Esfahani 22 nd August 2007.
R&D For Accelerating Structures H. Padamsee. TESLA Niobium, one meter length, rf = 1.3 GHz Copper, 53 cm, rf = 11.4 GHz.
PEALD/CVD for Superconducting RF cavities
ANL-FNAL Collaboration Meeting: Superconducting RF ANL: Mike Kelly, Scott Gerbick, Bill Boettinger (NE) FNAL Collaborators: Kerry Ewald, Cristian Boffo,
Latest Design of ILC ( RDR). 1.3 GHz technology developed by TESLA Collaboration, R&D from 1992 to reduce the cost per MeV by a factor of 20 from current.
Series Tests of High Gradient Single- cell Superconducting Cavity for the Establishment of KEK Recipe T. Saeki (1), F. Furuta (1), K. Saito (1), M. Ge.
Shekhar Mishra, Fermilab Mark J. Oreglia, Univ. of Chicago
Superconducting RF Materials University Collaboration STATUS Lance Cooley June 07, 2010.
Jim Kerby, Fermilab for Rongli Geng and the S0 Cavity Team 23 May 2010 Current Status of SCRF Cavity Development SCRF Cavity Technology and Industrialization.
Cavity status; recent KEK activities : Hayano (1) STF CM-1 cavities are; MHI-014: 3-rd VT:36MV/m (finished) MHI-015: 3-rd VT: > 18.4MV/m.
Status of crab crossing studies Presented by NAKANISHI Kota (KEK) 2008/1/25.
Surface Preparation of superconducting cavities and industrial Production Experience Dietrich Bloess International Workshop on Thin Films applied to superconducting.
Mechanical Issues SPL cavities/cryomodules Workshop CERN 30 Sep. 2009
Cornell SRF New Materials Program Nb 3 Sn Development Sam Posen and Matthias Liepe Cornell University TTC Meeting 6 December 2011 Beijing, China.
Superconducting rf test facility STF 1 Optical Inspection update at KEK Ken Watanabe ( KEK ) ILWS08 in Chicago 17-Nov-08.
1Claire AntoineCEA/Saclay - Fermilab (Innovative) Processing of materials SRF materials Workshop Fermilab May 23-24, 2007 Today’s process is long, complex,
Experimental Comparison at KEK of High Gradient Performance of Different Single Cell Superconducting Cavity Designs. F. Furuta, K. Saito, T. Saeki, H.
High Q R&D at JLab G. Ciovati, P. Dhakal, R. Geng, P. Kneisel, G. Myneni TTC Topical Meeting on CW SRF Cornell Univ., June 12 th -14 th, 2013.
TILC09 / SCRF Session Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion, Fermilab With slides provided by: Zack Conway, Cornell Rongli Geng, Jefferson.
CAVITY TREATMENT (BCP, HEAT TREATMENT & HPR) Sergio Calatroni with many contributions from: Rama Calaga, Leonel Ferreira, Antonio Mongelluzzo LHC CCEM,
Achievement of 41 MV/m Gradient by AES8 Rong-Li Geng Jefferson Lab ALCPG09, October 1, 2009.
R.L. Geng, 5/27-31,2013 ECFA LC2013, DESY 1 Update on Raising Q0 at Ultra-High Gradient via Large-Grain Niobium Material Rongli Geng Jefferson Lab ECFA.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
SRF Processing at ANL: Progress and Plans ANL: Mike Kelly, Scott Gerbick FNAL: Dan Olis, Allan Rowe Speaker: Mike Kelly November 17, 2008.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
F Fermilab ANL/FNAL SCPF EP/HPR Processing Status and Plan Allan Rowe TD/SRFDD.
ILC Cavity Gradient R&D Plan Proposal for Release 5 Rongli Geng for ILC Cavity Group 2jun2010 ILC SCRF WebEx Meeting 6/2/20101ILC SCRF WebEx Meeting.
CRAB for HL-LHC KEK activity 2010DEC Yoshiyuki MORITA.
Superconducting rf test facility LCWS 2010 in Beijing, 28 Mar 2010, Ken Watanabe Replica-method and local grinding repair K. Watanabe (KEK) LCWS 2010 in.
(1)[12~13/Dec/2009] Optical inspection (2)[14/Dec] frequency & field flatness measurement (3)[10/Mar/2010] pre-EP (5μm) (4)[11/Mar] EP1 (100μm) (5)[11/Mar]
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion 17 June 2008.
Curtis Crawford, Georg H. Hoffstaetter Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics Optimization of f 9-cell Vertical Electro Polishing.
ALCPG2011, 3/19- 23, SRF Group Institute of Heavy Ion Physics, Peking University ALCPG /3/19-23, Eugene, Oregon, USA RF superconducting Cavity.
How important is the surface finish/roughness in determining the performance of Nb cavities? Introduction Peter Kneisel Jlab.
Standard EP recipe at KEK T. Saeki KEK Hot topics session SRF – 29 July 2011, Chicago.
Hydroformed Multi-Cell Cavities. Update Waldemar Singer, DESY Peter Kneisel, JLab.
Development of Infrastructure Facilities for Superconducting RF Cavity Fabrication, Processing and 2 K Characterization at RRCAT Satish Chandra Joshi,
W. Singer. SRF2011, July 25 ‐ 29, 2011, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. XFEL Cavity Recipe for Mechanical Fabrication and Treatment Waldemar Singer/DESY.
FNAL SRF Program: 1.3 GHz Camille M. Ginsburg (FNAL) Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011.
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Camille Ginsburg (FNAL) 2 June 2009 Slides/Info from: Zack Conway (Cornell) Rongli Geng (JLab) Genfa Wu, Dmitri.
Recent FNAL/ANL Cavity Performance C.M. Ginsburg (FNAL) On behalf of the FNAL/ANL Cavity Crew TTC Meeting - Milano 28.Feb.-3.Mar
Andrew BurrillFall 2011 Project X Collaboration Meeting 650 MHz Developments at JLAB Andrew Burrill for the JLab Team.
1.3 GHz Cavity/Cryomodule Performance Camille M. Ginsburg (FNAL) FNAL-LBNL joint meeting on SRF Cavities and Cryomodules March 15, 2012.
1 Guided Cavity Repair with Laser, E ‐ Beam and Grinding Genfa Wu Recent cavity processing statistics indicate that the development of RF superconductivity.
Plasma cleaning Laser re-melting technique at FANL M. Ge, G. Wu, J. Ruan, J. Ozelis, T. Nicol, D. Sergatskov, D. Hicks, L. Cooley Fermi National Accelerator.
July 5th,2006John Mammosser, Jlab ILC – Electropolish Development (EP) Plans/Progress/Problems/Performance Jefferson Lab J. Mammosser, L. Phillips, C.
Summary of STF-EP facility at KEK.
Rongli Geng ILC Cavity Group Meeting October 25, 2011
Motivation Vertical Electro-Polishing for high gradient cavity R&D.
Pulsed Energetic Condensation of Nb Thin Film Cavities at JLab
Electropolishing of Dressed ILC 9-cell Cavity
ILC R&D Board Meeting: SRF Cavities Status and Plans
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
JLab infusion and LG flux expulsion update
for the FNAL/ANL, JLab, and Cornell cavity teams
Surface Analysis of the Quench Area Sample of Cavity Z111
High Q via N infusion R&D at Jefferson Lab
ELLIPTICAL SCRF CAVITIES
Some History of Electropolishing of Niobium 1970 – 1990
Effort Torwards Improving Large Scale Production for SC Cavities
A COMMON R&D ON THE HIGH GRADIENT Nb CAVITIES
R&D Activity for Field Emission and Vertical EP
Highlights from EU Global Design Effort
Mechanical Polishing of 1.3 GHz Niobium Cavities
TTC topical-meeting on CW SRF 2013
N-infusion, Vertical-EP, and ILC cost reduction efforts at Cornell
ON THE HIGH GRADIENT Nb CAVITIES
Presentation transcript:

Centrifugal Barrel Polishing at Fermilab (Tuesday, December 6th at 10:20) Tesla Technology Collaboration IHEP, Beijing December 5 th -8 th, 2011

Centrifugal Barrel Polishing(CBP) is an alternative processing technique that polishes the inside of superconducting rf cavities by rotating the cavities at high speeds while filled with an abrasive media. What is Centrifugal Barrel Polishing? Main Shaft up to 115 RPM Individual Barrels rotate 115 RPM in opposite direction to main shaft

Alternative to what? - Electropolishing Centrifugal Barrel Polishing Cheaper Installed Cost No toxic chemicals Removes damage from manufacturing process Gives order of magnitude better surface finish May improve quality factor, accelerating gradient, and yield Easier to industrialize

How Cavities Would be Processed with CBP Micron Electropolishing Water Rinse High Temperature Bake Light Material Removal (Alcohol Rinse) High Pressure Rinse Assembly (Low Temperature Bake) RF Test Baseline Cavity Process Path CBPChemical Rinse High Temperature Bake Light Material Removal High Pressure Rinse Assembly (Low Temperature Bake) RF Test Proposed CBP Process Path CBPChemical Rinse High Pressure Rinse Assembly (Low Temperature Bake) RF Test Proposed “Hydrogen Free” CBP Process Path 800 C for 2 hours – Hydrogen Contamination 20 Micron EP 48 Hour, 120 C For Sulfur Precipitate Removal 1200 psi, Ultrapure Water Class 10 Clean-room

Summary of Results on CBP(Not all presented) Produces homogeneous finish removing defects associated with electron beam welding process. Mirror-like finish (15 nm R AVG compared to 100nm R AVG achievable by baseline technique). Improvement of Accelerating Gradient and Quality Factor over baseline technique(EP) on “good” cavities Repair of cavities with a spot defect. Repair of cavities with gross defects. Repair of cavities with inclusions.  Implies higher yields possible with CBP as a baseline technique. Not repairable with baseline processing Weld bead of electropolished cavity(left) and CBP cavity (right)

Mirror Finish from CBP on Single Cell Cavity CAT003 - which had extremely Marginal Weld Bead Shows even extremely marginal surfaces can be recovered……Means Higher Yields! Images at same location of same cavity after different processing steps. As ReceivedAfter Baseline Process After Standard CBP After Heavy CBP Inclusion not removed by EP, completely removed by CBP

Single Cell Cavities CAT003 & CAT004 Improvement after CBP Accelerating Gradient MV/m -CAT003 Baseline processing with EP – 2K -CAT004 Extensive CBP – 2K Quality Factor CAT003 – Baseline EP, 200+ microns CBP, 15 micron EP, 3 hr 800 C bake, 15 micronEP, HPR, 120 C bake CAT microns CBP, 15 micron EP, 3 hr 800 C bake, 15 micronEP, HPR, 120 C bake

Seeing higher quality factors with CBP. TE1ACC002 – CBP/20 micron EP TE1ACC002 – CBP/20 micron EP/HF Rinse TE1RCAT003 – CBP/30 micron EP Project X ILC Quality Factor Accelerating Gradient MV/m All test Surface is smoother and more homogeneous. Final surface chemistry from EP. Do subsurface dislocations have some impact? Hydrogen depth profile changed?

800C RGA Data for Hydrogen Pressure, torr Time, min Blue Trends - Tumbled, 3hour 800 C Hold Orange Trends - Electropolished, 2hour 800 C Hold

Niobium Coupon Cavity Can do CBP, EP, and HPR Coupons removable for morphological and chemical analysis SEM, EDS, EBSD, Surface Profilometer, Laser Confocal Microscope at Fermi SIMS, TEM as needed through collaborative work

Future Work Coupon Cavity  Examine chemical and structural effects of each processing step  Fine tune CBP for time, cavity performance, & cost 9 Cell Repair  AC114 – 9 Cell Large Grain from DESY  AES  NR001/2 Set a baseline CBP process and tumble 5 virgin 9- cell fine grain 1.3 GHz cavities. Thin Film Support (Single Cell 1.3 GHz Tesla)  Supply niobium single cell  Develop CBP for copper and aluminum 650 MHz Tumbling

Proposed 650 Barrel and Frame Should work on Beta = 0.6 and 0.9

Questions?

Issue A series of six AES cavities (AES011 – AES016) were manufactured that have pitting. The pitting is throughout the entire cell and not just near the equatorial weld(seen on AES013). The pitting was made more visible after EP. This could be because EP made the pitting worse, made it more visible, or exposed more pits (Also AES013). After 1000 C bake more pitting appeared from EP. AES013 went through baseline processing and reached 17 MV/m. The pitting was seen to be worse on some half cells. The thought was that it may be a material issue. TB9AES012 was tumbled and the pitting was removed. After 30 microns EP the pitting returned. Tested to 35 MV/m. TB9AES012 also seems to have a small weld porosity issue.

Recrystallized fraction Batch 1Batch 2 Batch 3 Before bulk EP After bulk EP

TB9AES012 – Cell 1B Equator Pits Uncovered This picture is taken of the cavity as received. A single grain has been artificially colored orange to more easily identify the location. This picture is taken of the cavity after barrel polishing ( microns). These defects are not barrel polishing related. They are uncovered voids. This picture is taken of the cavity after barrel polishing and 30 microns EP. Defect remains after light EP More pits appear and general appearance of area is odd(rough). Different chemical composition here?

Pictures Away from the weld of TB9AES013 ( All previous pictures taken around weld bead and equator of TB9AES012) 1B 1T

TB9AES012 After Tumbling & 30 Micron EP General Small Pitting Everywhere